ライフサイエンスコーパス: rectus abdominis

1 .92 +/- 0.07, gluteus medius: 0.90 +/- 0.08, rectus abdominis: 0.85 +/- 0.08, lateral abdominals: 0.8

2 d 700-fold in glucosamine-infused animals in rectus abdominis (590+/-80 vs. 1.2+/-0.1 micromol/kg wet

3 Rectus abdominis activity remained high after exercise c

4 as evoked in four of seven subjects, whereas rectus abdominis activity was observed in six of the sev

5 ensitivity and specificity of MR imaging for rectus abdominis and adductor tendon injury were determi

6 bone marrow edema, secondary cleft sign, and rectus abdominis and adductor tendon injury.

7 time of multiorgan procurement, a section of rectus abdominis and external oblique muscle and fascia

8 At the GlcN6P concentrations measured in rectus abdominis and heart in vivo, glycogen synthase wa

9 ntrations of UDP-GlcNAc 4.4- and 4.6-fold in rectus abdominis and heart, respectively.

10 As compared with controls, rectus abdominis and vastus lateralis muscle of critical

11 us lumborum, erector spinae, gluteus medius, rectus abdominis, and lateral abdominals.

12 For example, rectus abdominis has been reported to play less of a rol

13 lude that NMJs remain structurally intact in rectus abdominis in both cancer and cachexia, suggesting

14 Patients with injury involving the rectus abdominis insertion were most likely to go on to

15 the pectoralis major, serratus anterior, and rectus abdominis insertion.

16 n patients with athletic pubalgia, including rectus abdominis insertional injury, thigh adductor inju

17 Injections of PRV into rectus abdominis labeled large presumed motoneurons in t

18 udy, the inputs to transversus abdominis and rectus abdominis motoneurons were determined and compare

19 infected by transynaptic passage of PRV from rectus abdominis motoneurons.

20 in glycogen synthase fractional activity in rectus abdominis muscle (69+/-3 vs. 83+/-1%, P<0.01) and

21 Rectus abdominis muscle biopsies were obtained at the ti

22 s to categorise the anatomical variations of rectus abdominis muscle diastasis (diastasis recti) by u

23 he pros and cons of an autologous transverse rectus abdominis muscle flap reconstruction with an impl

24 ion of human muscle precursor cells from the rectus abdominis muscle into nude mice (n = 18).

25 Notably, we found that, in the Rectus Abdominis muscle of cancer patients, the expressi

26 The GlcN6P concentrations in the heart and rectus abdominis muscle reach levels sufficient to cause

27 The harvest of the 6(th) or 7(th) rib and rectus abdominis muscle renders an acceptable donor site

28 e both at the level of the whole body and in rectus abdominis muscle, and it blunted the insulin-indu

29 urized thin film oxygen sensor placed in the rectus abdominis muscle, and lung injury was evaluated b

30 oblique muscle and fascia to approximate the rectus abdominis muscles in the midline.

31 e epipubic bone, through the pyramidalis and rectus abdominis muscles on one side of the abdomen, and

32 hic (EMG) activities of external oblique and rectus abdominis muscles were recorded during incrementa

33 muscle progenitor cells (hMPCs) derived from rectus abdominis muscles were subcutaneously injected in

34 ratory efforts) for the external oblique and rectus abdominis muscles, respectively.

35 Women with transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps had significantl

36 (VEGF) administration in the rat transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap could improve

37 The flaps included a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous component and a 6(th) or 7

38 In the experimental group, rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap was transferred acros

39 wall reconstruction using bilateral sliding rectus abdominis myofascial advancement flaps.

40 ological analyses were undertaken on NMJs of rectus abdominis obtained from patients undergoing upper

41 llowing injection of pseudorabies virus into rectus abdominis or transversus abdominis were located i

42 ies virus (PRV) into either the diaphragm or rectus abdominis (RA) of the ferret demonstrated that mo

43 en trunk muscle size and functional ability (rectus abdominis: six-minute walk performance, chair sta

44 r composite trunk strength (beta = 0.34) and rectus abdominis size (beta = 0.33) were associated with

45 ecificity, respectively, of 68% and 100% for rectus abdominis tendon injury and 86% and 89% for adduc

46 osteitis pubis, adductor compartment injury, rectus abdominis tendon injury, and injury or disease re

47 olling the activity of one abdominal muscle, rectus abdominis, was mapped using the transneuronal tra