ライフサイエンスコーパス: reference value

1 g" elements; that is, elements closer to the reference value).

2 , respectively (5-6 times the upper limit of reference values).

3 itivity and decreased BRS (all P<0.01 versus reference values).

4 l/L of circulating folate in contrast to the reference value.

5 ice of the alternative foods was kept at the reference value.

6 tended to overestimate FZA compared with the reference value.

7 phosphatase levels greater than twofold the reference value.

8 e imply increased risk, when compared with a reference value.

9 nd the 90(th) percentiles was defined as the reference value.

10 analytes demonstrated bias of <50% from the reference value.

11 er the average was greater or smaller than a reference value.

12 results were in excellent agreement with the reference values.

13 QLQ C30 scores are overall comparable to the reference values.

14 H may be taller than age- and gender-matched reference values.

15 e obtained data were in close agreement with reference values.

16 of tumor delineation methods with different reference values.

17 pid) was comparable with U.S. adult national reference values.

18 stimates were missing and were replaced with reference values.

19 Questionnaire C30 including deviations from reference values.

20 An Institute of Medicine report provided reference values.

21 ion to determining the corresponding analyte reference values.

22 ot require laboratory prepared or determined reference values.

23 um scored as normal or abnormal according to reference values.

24 astolic volumes were increased compared with reference values.

25 which obviates the need for race-specific RV reference values.

26 r (2) use the actual values and overlook the reference values.

27 een generic formulations after adjusting for reference values.

28 c review into development of future nutrient reference values.

29 oductively used to inform the development of reference values.

30 ies have no accepted standard methodology or reference values.

31 any dual-head gamma-camera and to establish reference values.

32 In total 381 tests were selected for correct reference values.

33 e Dietary Reference Intakes, which include 4 reference values.

34 tamine concentrations down 26% compared with reference values.

35 erature than in bulk water, ~250 K below the reference values.

36 ed to the EAR cut-point method, using EFSA's reference values.

37 stently within +/-1.5% relative to the known reference values.

38 the amino acid sequence are not appropriate reference values.

39 24 hours of admission and were compared with reference values.

40 Healthy non-brain-dead rats served as reference values.

41 LT cutoffs for screening were based on local reference values.

42 CLSM to be between 0.46% to 3.8% of the SEM reference values.

43 se of chronic disease endpoints to establish reference values.

44 vailability are required for setting dietary reference values.

45 e liquid chromatography provided independent reference values.

46 alues (international normalized ratio, 1.19; reference value, 0.80-1.25; activated partial thrombopla

47 nd had similar mean values (52% vs. 51%) and reference values (29% vs. 30%).

48 t the NIR-CGM sensor data reflects the blood reference values adequately, if a proper calibration and

49 zole E-test MICs had better concordance with reference values after 48 h (95.2%) than after 24 h (90%

50 The findings of this study provide reference values against which arterial switch operation

51 The reference values allow us to determine if the size of th

52 The large range of normal pediatric reference values allows diagnosis of DD in only a small

53 re under development for establishing normal reference values analogous to the Task Force data for ca

54 above site (vendor/field strength specific) reference values and a z-score was calculated for each p

55 atically deriving and updating micronutrient reference values and dietary recommendations.

56 w into the IOM process for updating nutrient reference values and highlighted major challenges encoun

57 Reference values and lower limits of normal were derived

58 al settings has been hampered by the limited reference values and the lack of uniformity in software,

59 nd these showed good correlation between the reference values and those calculated using the PLS mode

60 In order to establish reference values and to evaluate lung growth, we obtaine

61 to define normal cardiac magnetic resonance reference values and to identify the main determinants o

62 quality assessment, we propose new pediatric reference values and Z score equations for most left ven

63 The PAAT normal reference values and z scores we provide here will be us

64 Current reference values and Z scores, allowing adjustment for g

65 n excellent agreement with the corresponding reference values and/or results obtained using double-fo

66 ith respect to the age- and ancestry-matched reference value) and with an increased risk of allergic

67 The program options are mapped into the FBB reference values, and all the aligners can be compared r

68 I and (2)I values within +/-20 index unit of reference values, and by MS spectrum matching above a ma

69 ntrations for most micronutrients were below reference values, and nearly all declined between 2 and

70 e calculated to assess correlations with the reference values, and paired t tests were performed to c

71 Intakes in group 1 were similar to reference values, and the patients adhered to the prescr

72 We conclude that if age-specific reference values are applied, CSF glucose and lactate le

73 ent and impaired outcome when currently used reference values are applied.

74 Previously published reference values are inaccurate and induce clinically si

75 Although nutrient reference values are intended for use in the general pop

76 ions are still in the normal range, reliable reference values are needed.

77 New empirical reference values are provided for use in pediatric hydro

78 ching historical batch processing data where references values are not known for new samples (unlabel

79 e challenge the previous annual soil erosion reference values as our estimate, of 35.9 Pg yr(-1) of s

80 However, their normal reference values, as measured by cardiac magnetic resona

81 ve elevation within 7 days post-PCI from the reference value ascertained within 30 days before PCI.

82 nd the proportion who established a baseline reference value at home.

83 ials, and the results were in agreement with reference values at 95% confidence level (paired t-test)

84 based ovary-intact rats provided age-matched reference values at baseline (n = 8) and landing (n = 10

85 sion was compared with the penumbra and core reference values at magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to d

86 ations allows better prediction of blood gas reference values at sea level and at altitudes as high a

87 acy (relative difference with respect to the reference value below 1%).

88 not meaningfully increased from the -0.2-SD reference value between z scores of -0.97 and +0.33 SDs

89 ing the proposed method, agreements with the reference values between 97 and 104% for Br and I were o

90 useful, not only in helping to set nutrient reference values, but also for increasing the transparen

91 GF was elevated in both groups compared with reference values, but it was higher in CF: 403 +/- 280 v

92 ysiologic requirements for iron into Dietary Reference Values, but the absorption from single meals c

93 foods, and a Daily Value (called a Nutrient Reference Value by Codex) of 150 mug for iodine.

94 M8574 (L-Glutamic Acid USGS41) differed from reference values by 0.06-0.20%.

95 These United States cancer reference values can help facilitate interpretation of t

96 e phosphatase level of less than twofold the reference value characterizes corticosteroid-responsive

97 The lower reference value combined with increased repurposing of p

98 atory rate estimates from the camera and the reference values (computed from the Electrocardiogram an

99 FA and MD quantifications by comparison with reference values derived from images with NSA = 15.

100 from 18 types of chocolate and corresponding reference values determined using DPPH, ORAC, Folin-Cioc

101 and WDXRF calibration models were built with references values determined by inductively coupled plas

102 isfactory and in accordance with the Dietary Reference Values (DRVs).

103 ess than 80 mm Hg or lower than 40% from the reference value during and for 4 hours following surgery

104 Compared with age- and gender-matched reference values, early adolescent patients were taller

105 These reference values encompass a wide age range for three ra

106 the DNA reference material with a certified reference value expressed in amount of DNA molecules per

107 rements were standardized as percentage of a reference value, expressed as bone material strength ind

108 should be able to establish a home baseline reference value for future monitoring.

109 and SRM1950, for which literature data and a reference value for SEPP1 have been reported, were analy

110 rature (7-DAM) of 13 degrees C was used as a reference value for the biological limit governing suita

111 the optimal timing as well as the threshold reference value for the urine albumin creatinine ratio i

112 The variation from the reference value for the whole air standards was determin

113 vitamin D metabolites and has certified and reference values for 25(OH)D(2), 25(OH)D(3), and 3-epi-2

114 loped a radionuclide methodology and derived reference values for a comprehensive gastrointestinal tr

115 had the lowest percentages of agreement with reference values for A. nidulans (60 to 80%).

116 We derive here normative reference values for AEX, based on age, gender, race, he

117 burden of respiratory disease, no spirometry reference values for African children are available.

118 This benchmark analysis sets key reference values for ALPPS, indicating similar outcome a

119 were validated and then selected to provide reference values for an international comparison of the

120 s the first large study that provides normal reference values for cardiac structure.

121 Spirometric reference values for Caucasians, African-Americans, and

122 noids were elevated above most nonintervened reference values for children.

123 values, making them more robust when used as reference values for ecological risk assessment.

124 rement of endotoxins, and there is a lack of reference values for endotoxin concentrations to aid in

125 The reported relationships can be used as reference values for evaluating clinical programs or for

126 ous infusion of vehicle) were used to obtain reference values for histological and immunohistochemica

127 ovide an initial assessment of healthy donor reference values for induced cytokines and chemokines an

128 These findings can contribute to establish reference values for interocular symmetry in paediatric

129 ntakes was assessed according to the Dietary Reference Values for iodine of the European Food Safety

130 This study provides reference values for LA 3DE volumes and function from a

131 Our study sought to (1) identify reference values for left atrial (LA) volumes and phasic

132 We sought to establish reference values for left ventricular ejection fraction

133 Dietary reference values for micronutrients vary considerably am

134 and 27 mm in women as sex-specific normative reference values for mPA and 0.9 for ratio PA.

135 ge- and sex-specific distribution and normal reference values for mPA and ratio PA by CT in an asympt

136 ific cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) reference values for normative left ventricular (LV) ana

137 ts (e.g. REEs) were analysed in order to get reference values for nutritional preparation.

138 ur study were to estimate pesticide exposure reference values for NYC and identify demographic and be

139 Accepted reference values for OCTA-derived microvascular paramete

140 Reference values for optimal surgical outcomes in well-d

141 study aims to provide representative, normal reference values for PAAT in children of all ages.

142 Reference values for patients age 65 to 84 years reporte

143 Reference values for percentage body fat (%BF) were obta

144 be verified in this specific group, and the reference values for peripheral nerve strain in sportspe

145 objective of this study was to define normal reference values for RA area by echocardiography in a la

146 No reference values for relevant outcome parameters are ava

147 nter study was designed to (1) establish the reference values for RV volumes and EF using transthorac

148 this study was designed to establish (1) the reference values for RVLS by 2-dimensional speckle-track

149 est study providing sex- and method-specific reference values for RVLS.

150 ts of this study support the use of GLI-2012 reference values for schoolchildren in sub-Saharan Afric

151 Reference values for serum periostin levels in adults wi

152 Reference values for some nutrients in broad bean powder

153 rsons need to be identified, and the sets of reference values for specific peripheral nerves need to

154 of antiinflammatory medications, and lack of reference values for spirometric measures of lung functi

155 hether the Global Lung Initiative (GLI-2012) reference values for spirometry are appropriate for chil

156 RATIONALE: Accurate reference values for spirometry are important because th

157 e have also provided age- and sex-stratified reference values for strain and SR based on a large-scal

158 The reference values for TBW, ECW, and ICW were defined by u

159 icit when preterm infants were compared with reference values for term infants.

160 t into walking balance control and important reference values for the emergence of balance impairment

161 This SRM has certified and reference values for the following 25-hydroxyvitamin D [

162 or EBC collection, are required to establish reference values for the interpretation of EBC markers i

163 Cross-sectional reference values for the VI and TOD increased with matur

164 here are no published age- and sex-dependent reference values for these relationships that were appro

165 We conclude that our study provides reference values for this age group and demonstrates tha

166 sal Southeast-Asian women was lower than the reference values for White women.

167 91 +/- 0.089) all compared well with the FZA reference value from the compartmental model (0.30 +/- 0

168 degrees (C3) and 133 degrees (C2), taking a reference value from vibrational studies of 175 degrees

169 CVID patients was studied using age-matched reference values from 334 healthy donors to better defin

170 dingly, we established age- and sex-specific reference values from a general population sample.

171 ults with four complementary approaches: (i) reference values from a young control group aged between

172 nding energies are corrected toward accurate reference values from higher-level calculations.

173 their severity (multiplication of the median reference values from patients and physicians).

174 , SiO2, MgO, Mn, and Al2O3 are compared with reference values from the steel works laboratory for sol

175 ughts, feelings/attitudes, competencies, and reference values (goals and standards).

176 ior/posterior GM method and have established reference values (>or=33%).

177 A radionuclide methodology and reference values have been developed for a single gastro

178 ck of standardized definitions and validated reference values have hampered clinical use.

179 Nutrient reference values have significant public health and poli

180 d DLP in 2013 were at or close to identified reference values; however, additional optimization is re

181 The aim of this study was to determine the reference values (i.e. cut-off values) for absolute sign

182 tolic blood pressure (SBP) within 10% of the reference value (ie, patient's resting SBP) or standard

183 sis provides new recommendations for dietary reference values, ie, an EAR (median) and RDA (97.5th pe

184 tion-time curve from 0 h to 24 h) in between reference values in adults dosed once and twice daily, w

185 e, minerals), their contribution for Dietary Reference Values in Italian population, and the antioxid

186 After generating reference values in normal controls, QGE(LMNA) was perfo

187 the pretrained CNN strongly correlated with reference values in per-patient (T2: R = 0.88, 95% confi

188 (leucine, valine and isoleucine) were below reference values in plasma and in CSF.

189 Purpose To estimate cancer population-based reference values in the United States for eight PROMIS (

190 pplying a correction factor of 0.88 to white reference values is considered reasonable when testing A

191 l updating methods without secondary analyte reference values (labels).

192 tolerable Upper Level (UL) -and not a single reference value like the previous RDAs, they could be us

193 Reference values (lower limits of normality) were as fol

194 the elevation of plasma gastrin (1031 pg/ml; reference value <108) and chromogranin A (337 U/L; refer

195 nce value <108) and chromogranin A (337 U/L; reference value <36).

196 Results Several reference values (means) for patients with cancer were w

197 However, published reference values mostly refer to historical cohorts usin

198 of patients compared to age- and sex-matched reference values; nerve fiber density and branching were

199 e ORs of not meeting the Australian Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) were calculated by logistic regr

200 ximum deviation of the average response from reference values obtained by a glass electrode was 0.2pH

201 whose automated EF values were compared with reference values obtained by averaging measurements by 3

202 WDXRF data presented a good correlation with reference values obtained by ICP OES.

203 d pCT-IDIF differed by less than 6% from the reference values obtained from the AIF.

204 ied values for the CRM TORT-2 as well as the reference values obtained with ICP-OES for the brass sam

205 ses RRs increased for temperatures above the reference value of 10 degrees C.

206 percent of the samples exceeded the guidance reference value of 4mg/kg of morphine set by BfR in Germ

207 h an energy resolution down to 133 eV at the reference value of 5.9 keV.

208 The results also show that higher reference value of mechanical stimulus resulted in lower

209 ed amongst the participant laboratories with reference values of 11.2 +/- 0.3 Bq kg(-1) (2.2 +/- 0.1

210 Reference values of analyte concentrations by high perfo

211 The normal reference values of atrial dimensions, volumes, and empt

212 The reference values of Cole et al equivalent to a BMI of 25

213 The reference values of Cole et al gave lower estimates than

214 ork provide a basis for the establishment of reference values of element mass fractions in CRM SWCNT-

215 tro and incubated for 5-30 minutes to obtain reference values of gammaH2AX focus yield.

216 dified partial least squares regression with reference values of HPLC.

217 We examined the reference values of left atrium and left ventricle (LV)

218 ive bone marrow mass under the assumption of reference values of marrow volume fraction and bone marr

219 Reference values of motion and thickening for 20 myocard

220 The reference values of Must et al gave much higher prevalen

221 Importantly, the study provides reference values of normal LA volume index.

222 pose of this study was to establish standard reference values of normal LVMT with cardiac magnetic re

223 We assessed retrospectively the reference values of pelvic dimensions by 3D CT performed

224 The MLR values of predicted versus reference values of protein and uric acid content were f

225 chemistry methods were used for quantifying reference values of protein, oil, and 18 amino acids.

226 between 94 and 97%, and agreements with the reference values of RM were better than 94%.

227 cale the resulting TMS absorbed fractions by reference values of site-specific marrow cellularity.

228 The findings of this study present the reference values of the main planes of the true pelvis b

229 We conclude that reference values of total body composition for young fem

230 We conclude that reference values of total body composition for young hea

231 ed to assess agreement between automated and reference values on per-patient, per-slice, and per-segm

232 into account when developing ethnic-specific reference values or designing studies to optimize lung h

233 se this approach is independent of the group reference values or the underlying clinical context, it

234 ere defined as >15% difference compared with reference values or their unavailability for any technic

235 excursions at least 20% above the individual reference value (p = 0.038) and a longer duration of tim

236 olume-based measurements, when compared with reference values provided by an expert panel.

237 BIS values were highly correlated with the reference values (r(2) = 0.94-0.97, P < 0.0001), but dif

238 rates than there was between the 2D and the reference values (r=.94, y=1.0x-0.16, difference=0.02 L/

239 tion =2.9%) and excellent agreement with the reference values: r=0.95, bias=1.0%, limits of agreement

240 mean diameter and curvature correlated with reference values (r2 = .99), and mean fractional errors

241 From year 2 on, mean deviations from reference values ranged between 12 and 29 points, with 1

242 of > 2 seconds above the upper limit of the reference value received an intramuscular injection of v

243 ficance beyond volume measures; however, the reference values remain largely unknown.

244 g the lowest available human health toxicity reference values (RfDs) and no additional exposure, esti

245 l toxicity values-specifically, chronic oral reference values (RfVs) for noncancer effects, and oral

246 m two orthogonal planes correlated well with reference values (RSV: r = 0.99, mean difference = 0.02

247 Reference values (RVs) are recommended by the American A

248 ror of 0.4+/-0.1 degrees C compared with the reference value set in a thermostatic bath.

249 replicates and the low variation compared to reference values show that this system can accurately de

250 The ICRP reference values showed a deviation comparable to the ef

251 provide a resource for establishing CTDIvol reference values specific to performing CT in PET/CT who

252 With these mortality rates as reference values the analysis revealed that a non-neglig

253 is that because the DRIs are comprised of 4 reference values -the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR

254 e risk factors, with elective surgery as the reference value, the 3 groups had significantly distinct

255 e mean National Centre for Health Statistics reference values, the presence of bilateral pitting oede

256 the importance of defining reliable nutrient reference values, there is a need for an explicit, objec

257 Control and Prevention lowered the blood Pb reference value to 5 mug/dL.

258 ld be directly compared to a known certified reference value to permit a quantitative statement of ac

259 methods were then used for the assignment of reference values to a mushroom powder Certified Referenc

260 e studies are required to provide diagnostic reference values to allow discrimination of normal from

261 ftware tools, rigorous protocols, and define reference values to assess QC metrics for the most commo

262 lipidomics community is in need of benchmark reference values to assess the validity of various lipid

263 of reference materials and the provision of reference values to clinical measurements and clinical t

264 xperimental (and random phase approximation) reference values to those of a family of nonempirical se

265 ry technicians; testing posture; appropriate reference values to use for Asians in North America; and

266 Consequently, predicting risk from toxicity reference values traditionally generated with monotonic

267 is study provides gender-specific normal CMR reference values, uniquely derived from a population-bas

268 s, potentially due to a lack of standardized reference values upon which hydraulic strategies can be

269 btained using ASV are in good agreement with reference values using cold vapor atomic absorption for

270 ethod to support the development of nutrient reference values using vitamin A as an example.

271 form of KRAS, and the alpha-actin gene (as a reference value) using quantitative, allele-specific, re

272 An individual systolic blood pressure (SBP) reference value was defined as the median of the first f

273 nd the bias between experimental results and reference values was better than 0.0033 and 0.0007 per t

274 n the investigational reading conditions and reference values was good with fluconazole and voriconaz

275 y intake was estimated and a comparison with reference values was indicated.

276 Results Consensus on reference values was initially weak for 232 of 302 featu

277 among the teams on the validity of tentative reference values was measured through the frequency of t

278 Using ASE 2015 defined reference values, we categorized 7%, 21%, 57%, and 17% o

279 above the control of the upper limit of the reference value were given three successive dosages of r

280 Reference values were determined for esophageal transit

281 Reference values were determined on the basis of a 95% c

282 Reference values were estimated using quantile regressio

283 Cross-sectional reference values were generated for fat mass (FM), fat-f

284 The %GE reference values were greater for the anterior/posterior

285 Reference values were highest (ie, showed greatest sympt

286 In Bland-Altman analysis, the automatic and reference values were in good agreement in per-patient (

287 Alkaline phosphatase control reference values were not significantly different from t

288 Reference values were obtained from 1230 persons from th

289 Normal reference values were obtained using 131 healthy control

290 Cancer reference values were poorer among those with advanced d

291 Reference values were provided by two devices in regular

292 etric MICs, as well their compatibility with reference values, were excellent with the four triazoles

293 ach grade of complication, defined as median reference values, were obtained from 472 participants, w

294 erved between (TW)CCS(N(2)) measurements and reference values when the cross-laboratory database was

295 95% of MR-based GFRs were within 30% of the reference values, whereas only 40% and 60% of Cockcroft-

296 least volumetric difference from MR imaging reference values with delay times greater than 3 seconds

297 We compared these reference values with previously developed equations for

298 All but one standard agreed with the reference value within the stated uncertainty.

299 eviews into the process of updating nutrient reference values would provide a comprehensive and disti

300 Adopting our proposed FLC reference values would reduce MGUS overdiagnosis among B