ライフサイエンスコーパス: refusal

1 st uptake rates (i.e. with the least vaccine refusal).

2 od of mutism, immobility, and food and fluid refusal.

3 ican-American ethnicity were associated with refusal.

4 PDAC without contraindications to surgery or refusal.

5 were lack of clinical indication and patient refusal.

6 cause of medical contraindication or patient refusal.

7 31% because of excessive toxicity or patient refusal.

8 principles of informed consent and informed refusal.

9 rove patient well-being and reduce treatment refusal.

10 ce of pretreatment attrition was participant refusal.

11 as advocated for permissibility of treatment refusal.

12 ing 67 (24.6%) whose physician cited patient refusal.

13 l delays in Pakistan were common reasons for refusal.

14 [1.27-9.32]) were associated with admission refusal.

15 number of terminations secondary to vaccine refusal.

16 and facility staff were related to admission refusal.

17 sion, unacceptable toxic effects, or patient refusal.

18 Size mismatch accounts for 30% of organ refusal.

19 y source of information regarding consent or refusal.

20 ants of health as a risk factor for death or refusal.

21 their relationships to vaccine hesitancy and refusal.

22 ith a single center sending a single patient refusal.

23 effects as reported reasons for HPV vaccine refusal.

24 ons at heightened risk of widespread vaccine refusal.

25 ogression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal.

26 eased odds (OR = 0.38, P = .0385) of surgery refusal.

27 monly cited reason for vaccine hesitancy and refusal.

28 cluded because of either medical problems or refusal.

29 d linkage system a median of 3.9 years after refusal.

30 verse effects, concomitant disease, or study refusal.

31 nication styles were associated with reduced refusals.

32 d negative communication are associated with refusals.

33 l reasons are more commonly multiple patient refusals.

34 ther than hypertension [for outright vaccine refusal]).

35 ly receiving recommended therapy by having a refusal (0% to 14%) or contraindication (1% to 30%) docu

36 itial presentation to healthcare, with fewer refusals (11.4% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 5.3%-17.5

37 ns for failure to randomize included patient refusal (12 patients), early progression or death on ind

38 m and toxicity (23 of 312; 7.4%) and patient refusal (13 of 312; 4.2%) in the CCRT arm.

39 ly (cisplatin because of toxicity or patient refusal [17%], and paclitaxel because of progression [20

40 ons for ENE were no consent (42%), physician refusal (24%), missed randomization window (15%), and cu

41 essful rhythm control (278 [34.0%]), patient refusal (272 [33.3%]), perceived low risk of stroke (206

42 providing adjuvant therapy included patient refusal (30% for chemotherapy, 22% for radiation therapy

43 uded medication not ordered (30.4%), patient refusal (30.3%), incorrect dosage/frequency (8.2%), and

44 on rate was 28% for organs without pre-clamp refusals, 35% with a single center sending a multiple pa

45 it was recommended or discussed was patient refusal (54 of 74, 73%).

46 ating included absenteeism (6.3%) and parent refusal (6.7%).

47 f papers indicating ethical acceptability of refusal (60%, P < .001), while HIV had the least (13.3%,

48 ansport, 2059 prehospital deaths, and 16 064 refusals (62 636 completed EMS to ED transports) from 33

49 asons for failed enrollment included patient refusal (88%) and failed eligibility (12%).

50 There were 33 family and resident refusals; 930 residents were enrolled.

51 48%) were not vaccinated because of traveler refusal, 966 (28%) because of provider decision, and 822

52 , and ethnicity were associated with service refusal across multiple years.

53 ur results show higher vaccine hesitancy and refusal among Arab subjects, related mainly to distrust

54 tributing to this shortage is a high rate of refusal among families who are asked for permission to r

55 essity may cause increasing rates of vaccine refusal among some parents, but clear messages from prov

56 a uniform national policy addressing vaccine refusal among transplant candidates is needed to resolve

57 aphic method to examine the reasons for such refusal among women who are homeless and psychiatrically

58 itive for heroin (with additional 9.5% urine refusal and 14.0% incarceration, for whom urinalyses wer

59 for advanced age, acquired comorbidities, or refusal and 30 (22%) with recurrence beyond MC.

60 because there is no evidence supporting the refusal and because many of these organs were transplant

61 led to predict outcomes or reduce the kidney refusal and discard rates.

62 sal codes were used to place recipients into refusal and nonrefusal groups; demographics, morbidity a

63 s for lack of random assignment were patient refusal and relapse.

64 rstanding of the association between vaccine refusal and the epidemiology of these diseases is needed

65 Refusal and toxicity were the main reasons for never sta

66 es might prevent the relatives' regret about refusal and unnecessary loss of organs.

67 In our model, outright vaccine refusal and vaccine hesitancy were both significantly as

68 ed, and data were collected on the length of refusal and whether the refusal episode was terminated v

69 those with a perceived risk for enucleation refusal and/or abandonment were given two to three cycle

70 Refusals and contraindications are common and may accoun

71 djusted with Poisson regression, and odds of refusals and deaths were adjusted by logistic regression

72 ination in all eight tasks (outright vaccine refusal) and 1382 (71.2%) did not.

73 nts did not undergo surgery (noncandidacy or refusal) and one patient had had a prior aortic valve re

74 sharing, contributing to vaccine hesitancy, refusals, and disease outbreaks.

75 substitute decision makers (SDMs), physician refusals, and protocols prohibiting coenrollment.

76 lace; families might have evidence regarding refusal; and failure to permit overrules could weaken tr

77 s ratio [aOR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.20-2.12), and refusals (aOR, 2.33; 95% CI, 2.09-2.60) but fewer comple

78 luate their decision differently: in case of refusal, approximately one third regret their decision,

79 he same time, rates of vaccine hesitancy and refusal are increasing across the country leading to dec

80 ated with nonutilization, but single patient refusals are positively correlated with utilization.

81 unization requirements (a measure of vaccine refusal) are at increased risk for measles and pertussis

82 It concludes that such refusals arise not only from a lack of insight but also

83 6%]; arm 2, 31 [68.9%]) and toxic effects or refusal (arm 1, 5 [10.9%]; arm 2, 12 [26.7%]).

84 Replies to messages identified patient refusal as the most common reason for patients not being

85 found conflicting results regarding patient refusals as a source of racial variation.

86 , affected by diarrhea, weight loss and food refusal, as expected.

87 dized = 0.033; 95% CI: 0.022, 0.064 for food refusal at age 4 and Pressure to eat at age 7, and Bstan

88 Eating large amounts of food and food refusal at age 4 influenced food parenting, such as Perc

89 sks designed to assess vaccine acceptance or refusal based on hypothetical vaccine characteristics (e

90 6.1; P = .04), and boys had a higher rate of refusal based on sensory characteristics (51.2%; 95% CI,

91 Multiple patient refusals before cross-clamp are associated with nonutili

92 experienced a greater number of organ offer refusals before final acceptance (13 versus 6; Wilcoxon

93 ffering different bathing options can reduce refusal behaviours in dementia, whereas elderspeak and n

94 Concerns focus on vaccine refusal but lack of access is the bigger problem.

95 f the 200 parents had given valid consent or refusal but the remainder had problems in one or more of

96 h a single center sending a multiple patient refusal, but only 12% with a single center sending a sin

97 All states sanction such refusal by competent patients, and most states allow sur

98 e organ procurement organization resulted in refusal by multiple centers.

99 uency of use of the four roles, and frequent refusal by physicians to provide treatment recommendatio

100 d recommends that clinicians address vaccine refusal by respectfully listening to parental concerns a

101 rge amounts of food, eating slowly, and food refusal can influence parents to adopt certain food pare

102 Vaccine refusal can lead to renewed outbreaks of previously elim

103 e negative sequelae of in-hospital treatment refusal cannot be eliminated by rapid treatment.

104 ose with use of the 799 or 898 OPO-initiated refusal codes (other, specify) with free-text responses

105 OS transplants are appropriately coded using refusal codes 861 to 863.

106 ng AOOS vs in sequence, defined by match-run refusal codes for donor lung offers.

107 Specific UNOS refusal codes were used to place recipients into refusal

108 , in 2023, all age groups had higher odds of refusal compared with the youngest age group.

109 We combined the costs of refusals, confirmatory tests, punishment of confirmed po

110 s necessitates constant reappraisal of donor refusal criteria.

111 Service refusal declined from 22% to 12% between 2019 and 2023.

112 sess sociodemographic disparities in service refusal (defined as having a medical code of social pres

113 ight-to-die cases extends ordinary treatment refusal doctrine to end-of-life decisions.

114 ere is growing evidence of vaccine delays or refusals due to a lack of trust in the importance, safet

115 ted on the length of refusal and whether the refusal episode was terminated voluntarily or involuntar

116 Refusal episodes were brief, on average 2.8 days, and al

117 ly 2021 using the UNOS Center Acceptance and Refusal Evaluation Report and performed a time study tha

118 mplete diagnostic autopsy in countries where refusal for autopsy in newborns is common for sociocultu

119 In India, the most common reasons for MITS refusal for both stillbirths and preterm neonatal deaths

120 Criteria for patient selection and refusal for liver transplantation are being established

121 rgan transplantation on the basis of vaccine refusal for non-medical reasons (i.e., philosophical or

122 Refusal for screening was higher in facility-based scree

123 ispanic, 1.3 (95% CI: 1.0, 1.7)) and vaccine refusal (for NH Black, aOR = 2.5 (95% CI: 1.8, 3.6), and

124 However, a rising rate of vaccine refusal has challenged transplant centers to address the

125 Injunctive social norms can prevent vaccine refusal, if vaccine acceptance is sufficiently high in t

126 d were reviewed by committee, which endorsed refusal in 110 of 155 cases (71%) and approval in 45 (29

127 nefits, our model predicted outright vaccine refusal in 29.4% (95% CI 28.6-30.2) of the French workin

128 PLT >=300 000 cells/uL would have led to PCR refusal in 428 of 1685 true-negative cases (25%) and 3 o

129 ents feeling "too ill" in 8 (16.7%), patient refusal in 8 (16.7%), and internet connectivity problems

130 ate in abortion and limitations on rights of refusal in cases of patient emergency and preservation o

131 us beliefs were the primary reason for organ refusal in males, while for females, it was lack of know

132 Risk factors for ICU refusal in patients considered "too ill/old" were advanc

133 Risk factors for ICU refusal in patients considered "too well" were advanced

134 ine is frequently used as a reason for organ refusal in pediatric kidney transplantation.

135 sociated with other co-morbidities (but high refusal in rural clinics).

136 en the rising rates of vaccine hesitancy and refusal in the general population, transplant recipients

137 rns about donor quality were the reasons for refusal in the majority of cases.

138 There is evidence of an increase in vaccine refusal in the United States and of geographic clusterin

139 tent, fair, and standard approach to vaccine refusal in transplantation.

140 dy districts had a history of persistent OPV refusals in previous campaigns.

141 tions identified as potential ways to reduce refusals included: music interventions, interaction and

142 In this cohort study, EMS transport refusals increased with the COVID-19 outbreak's peak and

143 tistics were used to test for differences in refusal/ineligibility by race and site at 4 screening po

144 igned to rIL-2 never initiated it because of refusal, intercurrent medical problems, or relapse, and

145 o-part model to disentangle outright vaccine refusal (irrespective of vaccine characteristics, define

146 Treatment abandonment because of enucleation refusal is a limitation of improving outcomes for childr

147 , and 14 were not treated because of patient refusal (n = 13) or death (n = 1).

148 , concern for xerostomia (n = 4), or patient refusal (n = 2).

149 , an early recurrence (n = 6), and patient's refusal (n = 2).

150 ); decreased hemoglobin level (n=2); patient refusal (n=2); and arthralgia, rash, and malaise (n=1 ea

151 us nurse navigation to testing completion or refusal ("navigated").

152 engagement of such functions when observing refusal of altruism from a genetic sister.

153 therapy for ERBB2-positive disease, patient refusal of an oncologist-recommended treatment, time fro

154 The authors examined the refusal of antipsychotic medications and associated outc

155 cohort study of patients with advanced OSCC, refusal of AT was associated with worse oncological outc

156 ogical outcomes and associated factors after refusal of AT.

157 Because of Jehovah's Witnesses' (JW) refusal of blood products, treatment challenges arise.

158 Advance directive statements included refusal of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), nutritio

159 n additional item querying respondents about refusal of care because of the physicians' personal attr

160 clusion criteria: death, severe comorbidity, refusal of care, advanced age (>/=80 years), or prior ma

161 alues, and, finally, responding to patients' refusal of care.

162 thalmos from ocular rupture and might reduce refusal of enucleation and abandonment.

163 was seen for a second opinion after parental refusal of enucleation.

164 The main outcome measure was patient refusal of fellow eye surgery for glaucoma.

165 Refusal of fellow eye surgery was not uncommonly encount

166 Voluntary refusal of food and fluids has been proposed as an alter

167 who deliberately hastened death by voluntary refusal of food and fluids.

168 thors have recommended terminal sedation and refusal of hydration and nutrition as important, morally

169 per presents terminal sedation and voluntary refusal of hydration and nutrition as potential last res

170 us ways that the terms terminal sedation and refusal of hydration and nutrition have been used in the

171 al problems, terminal sedation and voluntary refusal of hydration and nutrition substantially increas

172 the issues surrounding terminal sedation and refusal of hydration and nutrition, a complexity that ha

173 , it was effectively shut down following the refusal of journals to accept articles that had been cir

174 the criteria leading to a DKT and the common refusal of kidneys that are judged too marginal.

175 stimates of glomerulosclerosis can result in refusal of kidneys that might be suitable for transplant

176 how this practice resembles or differs from refusal of life-sustaining treatment.

177 for MITS, such as reasons for acceptance or refusal of MITS, as well as which family members were in

178 In this contribution we approach the refusal of modern industrial agriculture, as an act of r

179 ians in guiding patients who are considering refusal of or withdrawal from AT.

180 The approach does, however, justify patient refusal of oral intake in specific circumstances.

181 Eradication Initiative program is persistent refusal of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and harassment of va

182 onance imaging, a movie was shown, depicting refusal of organ donation between two sisters, with subj

183 by concerns about organ quality, leading to refusal of potential donor organ offers.

184 er Report 2004) supports precluding parental refusal of resuscitation before birth.

185 Recent advances in perioperative refusal of resuscitation center on goal-directed orders.

186 Refusal of strategies and technologies of modern objecti

187 ession before radiation therapy [RT], n = 9; refusal of surgery or RT, n = 5; extrapleural pneumonect

188 s with clinical stage II (inoperable/patient refusal of surgery) or III NSCLC (American Joint Committ

189 58,553 patients without contraindications or refusal of surgery, 63.8% underwent surgery, and the rat

190 Reasons for nonparticipation were refusal of the selected household or target person to pa

191 signals to communicate to cleaner fish their refusal of the symbiotic interaction or their desire to

192 on of this property has been hampered by the refusal of those working in classical EHL to acknowledge

193 of respondents answered correctly regarding refusal of treatment, 46% for withdrawal of treatment, 2

194 nt, pain management, difficult diagnoses and refusal of treatment, emergency situations, and end-of-l

195 lid distinction between assisted suicide and refusal of treatment.

196 In response to patient refusals of beneficial treatments, physicians report the

197 Refusals of care in dementia are common and can create d

198 ies and interventions to reduce or cope with refusals of care in dementia, and determine the evidence

199 mining non-pharmacological interventions for refusals of care in hospital settings and in community s

200 interventions can reduce, but not eliminate, refusals of care, such as playing music during care or c

201 ities and medication administration) reduced refusals of care.

202 ly, hospital closures, furloughing of staff, refusals of treatment, and attempts to profit by gouging

203 tered in the older population due to patient refusal or comorbidities, despite being clinically indic

204 cine hesitancy is widespread and may lead to refusal or delay of vaccination, eventually reducing the

205 ere is little research examining resistance, refusal or rejection of care by people living with demen

206 netheless, treatment was stopped for patient refusal or toxicity just as often while patients were re

207 g was not possible in most ER due to patient refusal or tumor specimen quality, all 12 ER tested ctDN

208 or comorbidity; race was not associated with refusals or contraindications to other treatments.

209 2020 vs 2019 responses by incidence rate and refusals or deaths by odds.

210 Most failures were due to patient refusals or ordering errors.

211 the underlying reasons behind the inability, refusal, or hesitancy to receive vaccinations.

212 of illness, lack/unavailability of siblings, refusal, or, primarily, unclear reasons (21 patients).

213 medical charts to determine whether patient refusal, outside care, or other justifiable exceptions t

214 referred patients, and predictors of service refusal over time.

215 ost-generating events were the punishment of refusals--over one third of cost a)--and testing positiv

216 Chart review of missed/refusal patients created a truly consecutive case series

217 Understanding refusal patterns can guide the development of transparen

218 enter RR was defined as the median number of refusals per listed patient.

219 es included donor characteristics, number of refusals per organ, and proportion of different refusal

220 yses, LMPT infants were at increased risk of refusal/picky eating (RR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.25) and

221 ire to assess eating behaviors in 4 domains: refusal/picky eating, oral motor problems, oral hypersen

222 may stop releasing pheromones, assume a mate refusal posture, or move less in response to males.

223 Exclusion criteria included refusal, pregnancy, prior antivertigo medication use, sy

224 had been denied entry, the median number of refusals (range) was 1.5 (1 to 30).

225 igate associations between transplant center refusal rate (RR) and outcomes after listing.

226 dred and nineteen interviews were completed (refusal rate 24%).

227 The refusal rate across the evaluation timepoints for these

228 considered the reasons for the high vaccine refusal rate along with risk factors for a given local g

229 mple of highly selected patients (with a 63% refusal rate among potentially eligible patients); these

230 Refusal rate increased with increasing patient age (18-4

231 ve in an establishment for 500 inmates where refusal rate is a) 10% or b) nil; and 35% of urine sampl

232 l patients in the intervention group, with a refusal rate of 4.1% and 82.8% retention.

233 ality and intubation rates were similar, but refusal rate was lower, reduction in respiratory rate wa

234 e tumors was confirmed, but the high patient refusal rate, lower than expected event rate, and failur

235 re excluded for a combination of either high refusal rates (n = 16), speeding (n = 2), or straight li

236 ith the highest per-population EMS transport refusal rates were characterized by higher unemployment,

237 In Wave 1, the response and refusal rates were, respectively, 0.26% and 0.19% in Ban

238 Refusal rates, kappa coefficients, and intraclass correl

239 Although high refusal rates, low OPV campaign awareness, and heterogen

240 approach all MSM in each venue and recorded refusal rates.

241 The remaining 15.5% of refusal reasons (100 of 644) were for application organi

242 ngle patient refusals, whereas organ-related refusal reasons are more commonly multiple patient refus

243 Patient-related refusal reasons are more commonly single patient refusal

244 Many refusal reasons are not plausible, because there is no e

245 usals per organ, and proportion of different refusal reasons in the whole sample and subgroups.

246 nt-disclosed reasons (35 of 644) matched the refusal reasons that the FDA had provided in the RTF let

247 hich applicants publicly disclosed the FDA's refusal reasons were also assessed.

248 Seventy-five percent of refusal reasons were donor related (e.g., "lab results",

249 Overall, 84.5% (544 of 644) of the refusal reasons were for scientific deficiencies; most r

250 ers containing a total of 644 identified FDA refusal reasons.

251 on the number of single and multiple patient refusals received by a specific time (e.g., cross-clamp)

252 status and chronic disorder, and the initial refusal receiver operating characteristics were area und

253 ength-training alternatives to AAS use, drug refusal role play, and anti-AAS media messages.

254 The initial refusal score and final triage score provide objective d

255 The initial refusal score included age, diagnosis, systolic blood pr

256 Patients with initial refusal scores >173.5 or final triage scores = 0 should

257 e adverse consequences of AAS, improved drug refusal skills, less belief in AAS-promoting media messa

258 o treatment, participation in another trial, refusal, technical issues, and death while awaiting tran

259 ckgrounds had 32% (1.26-1.39) higher odds of refusal than ethnic minority patients.

260 nts had 21% (95% CI 0.77-0.82) lower odds of refusal than males, and patients from White ethnic backg

261 tinuation because of toxicity and/or patient refusal than megestrol acetate (36% v 25%; P =.03).

262 nited States and of geographic clustering of refusals that results in outbreaks.

263 health behaviors - such as vaccination, and refusal thereof - can spread across social networks thro

264 access may be limited owing to psychiatrist refusal to accept insurance.

265 From vaccination refusal to climate change denial, antiscience views are

266 ac disease, previous H. pylori treatment, or refusal to consent.

267 e main reason for participant withdrawal was refusal to continue.

268 We developed a scoring system of mouse refusal to determine thresholds for mechanical stimulati

269 stance from the cancer center (13%), patient refusal to disclose reason (11%), and insurance denial (

270 not only explicit age discrimination (e.g., refusal to engage with older adults due to a stated disl

271 erious adverse event, a high temperature and refusal to feed after the first vaccination visit in a c

272 3), florid alcoholic hepatitis (n = 6), and refusal to give consent (n = 5).

273 e, assessment rules which positively judge a refusal to help bad people produce a poor correlation be

274 f assessment rules which positively judges a refusal to help scofflaws cannot invade a population of

275 s conditions, and tightly linked to explicit refusal to help.

276 ication compliance, withholding information, refusal to leave, comorbidities), relational (eg, lack o

277 Mental Disorders Volume 4 (DSM IV), as one's refusal to maintain a body weight that is above the calc

278 such male counterattacks are associated with refusal to mate with the aggressive females.

279 A strong correlation was found between refusal to participate in the inspection and failure rat

280 and ivacaftor arm due to withdrawal based on refusal to provide blood tests) and were not included in

281 Vaccine hesitancy, the reluctance or refusal to receive vaccination, is a growing public heal

282 essages of social and behavioural change and refusal to seek formal medical care or accept vaccines,

283 h Organization identified "the reluctance or refusal to vaccinate despite availability of vaccines" a

284 st state with optimum aggregate interlock or refusal VA content.

285 he impact of donor age and ICU stay on organ refusal varied substantially: organs were refused due to

286 ic, but the amount attributable to voluntary refusal vs effects of the pandemic and public health res

287 in Pakistan, the most common reason for MITS refusal was a potential delay in the funeral.

288 Outright vaccine refusal was also associated with a lower perceived sever

289 The phenomenon of vaccine refusal was associated with an increased risk for measle

290 Multivariable-adjusted 2020 refusal was associated with female sex.

291 Nonvaccination due to traveler refusal was most frequent in the South (1432 travelers [

292 Prior refusal was not an independent risk factor for recipient

293 o waning immunity and other factors, vaccine refusal was still associated with an increased risk for

294 en that the most common reason for tolvaptan refusal was the concern for intolerability of the aquare

295 In 1 out of 4 respondents (25%), refusal was the main reason their child was not vaccinat

296 mounts of food, eating very slowly, and food refusal) was reported by parents (measured using dichoto

297 psychological impact and the living donor KT refusal were mainly reported by 8 women.

298 Stated reasons for refusal were qualitatively quantified.

299 s (2.6%) and Black residents (4.8%), whereas refusals were higher among Black (28.7%) than White resi

300 mong whites (2.6%) and blacks (4.8%) whereas refusals were higher among black (28.7%) than white resi

301 sal reasons are more commonly single patient refusals, whereas organ-related refusal reasons are more