ライフサイエンスコーパス: regional anesthesia

1 aduating residents better in the practice of regional anesthesia.

2 e use of ultrasound to facilitate peripheral regional anesthesia.

3 have all resulted in the growing demand for regional anesthesia.

4 eem to be improved compared with general and regional anesthesia.

5 f standard harvest techniques and general or regional anesthesia.

6 (97%) were performed in awake patients using regional anesthesia.

7 nation with local anesthetics for ophthalmic regional anesthesia.

8 s of well tolerated and effective paediatric regional anesthesia.

9 nimize the risk of infection associated with regional anesthesia.

10 of infectious complications associated with regional anesthesia.

11 postoperative pain, and use of adjuncts and regional anesthesia.

12 Regional anesthesia, alone or combined with general anes

13 Pain management therapy, including regional anesthesia, along with multimodal analgesia may

14 xamining short and long-term consequences of regional anesthesia/analgesia along with identification

15 idural insertion, and replacement for failed regional anesthesia/analgesia along with preparation for

16 Of 56,729 patients, 15,904 (28%) received regional anesthesia and 40,825 (72%) received general an

17 Furthermore, regional anesthesia and adjuncts are useful in the pedia

18 lts have given new strength to arguments for regional anesthesia and analgesia and led to the increas

19 The potential benefits and risks of regional anesthesia and analgesia at home are pertinent

20 e strength of the available data, the use of regional anesthesia and analgesia does provide improveme

21 The debate continues on whether regional anesthesia and analgesia improve outcome or not

22 ations, limitations and practical aspects of regional anesthesia and analgesia in critically ill medi

23 published peer-reviewed literature involving regional anesthesia and analgesia in patients at home.

24 Regional anesthesia and analgesia in the critically ill

25 specifically designed to evaluate the use of regional anesthesia and analgesia in the intensive care

26 rally indicate that the perioperative use of regional anesthesia and analgesia may be associated with

27 been a considerable increase in interest in regional anesthesia and neural blockade.

28 Neuroscience and Pain Institute, and US Army Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management Initiative.

29 its use as described by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine guidelines.

30 ines as published by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, American Society

31 thorities, including the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, have published gu

32 ecommendations and literature on training in regional anesthesia and suggest an improved model to pre

33 as fibre-optic intubation, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and transthoracic echocardiography a

34 a dedicated team of mentors with training in regional anesthesia, and adequate clinical volume are a

35 sia performance and practical strategies for regional anesthesia application in chronic pain patients

36 e benefits and complications associated with regional anesthesia are assessed on the basis of a revie

37 Paediatric specific data for regional anesthesia are available to help guide optimal

38 articles describing the use of clonidine in regional anesthesia are discussed.

39 Infectious complications associated with regional anesthesia are exceedingly rare events.

40 umerous potential benefits and advantages of regional anesthesia are keys to its continued popularity

41 The established outcome effects of regional anesthesia are mostly due its ability to provid

42 Regional anesthesia as a sole agent for surgical anesthe

43 y ill, nerve blocks, regional analgesia, and regional anesthesia, as well as a search in the Cochrane

44 Regional anesthesia, as well as hypnotics and opioids, p

45 c or brachiocephalic AVF creation to receive regional anesthesia (brachial plexus block; 0.5% L-bupiv

46 ajority of carotid lesions are treated using regional anesthesia, but general anesthesia is currently

47 Regional anesthesia can be safely utilized in patients w

48 Despite difficulties, regional anesthesia can be used successfully in obese pa

49 Regional anesthesia can be utilized in a variety of surg

50 trospective studies indicate that the use of regional anesthesia can reduce cancer recurrence after s

51 Regional anesthesia certainly takes a leading role in th

52 York State undergoing hip repair, the use of regional anesthesia compared with general anesthesia was

53 e applications and indications for pediatric regional anesthesia continue to increase.

54 As the demand for regional anesthesia continues to increase in the years t

55 The choice of local anesthetics in regional anesthesia depends on desired onset, intensity,

56 Regional anesthesia, despite its well known clinical ben

57 Regional anesthesia during general anesthesia has become

58 The use of regional anesthesia, either alone or as an adjunct to ge

59 Many of the negative aspects of regional anesthesia evolve from the reality that current

60 ry criteria to capitalize on the benefits of regional anesthesia for ambulatory surgery.

61 ice guidelines have advocated greater use of regional anesthesia for hip fracture surgery.

62 most stimulating developments in the area of regional anesthesia for outpatients revolve around the u

63 agent for surgical anesthesia and the use of regional anesthesia for pain in nonsurgical pain patient

64 children particularly the use of intravenous regional anesthesia for sympathetic blockade for complex

65 rtain benefits from the use of clonidine for regional anesthesia, further investigations are necessar

66 Regional anesthesia has experienced a tremendous renaiss

67 Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has increased the comfort level for

68 Regional anesthesia has numerous benefits for upper extr

69 tant practical and clinical implications for regional anesthesia implementation by anesthesiologists

70 trated that, compared with local anesthesia, regional anesthesia improves primary AVF patency at 3 mo

71 es of local anesthetics in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia improves safety but should be weighe

72 Regional anesthesia improves short-term blood flow throu

73 echnology and available literature regarding regional anesthesia in infants and children undergoing h

74 The following is a review of regional anesthesia in obesity, with special considerati

75 Decisions to perform regional anesthesia in patients under anticoagulation sh

76 ent developments in the literature regarding regional anesthesia in the outpatient setting, and allow

77 dings do not support a mortality benefit for regional anesthesia in this setting.

78 paring the impact of adjuvants in ophthalmic regional anesthesia, in Embase, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Web

79 Different routes for the administration of regional anesthesia, including intravenous, intrathecal

80 Regional anesthesia is a preferable anesthetic option fo

81 Regional anesthesia is an increasing but still underutil

82 The use of regional anesthesia is becoming increasingly popular for

83 ition, the subspecialty of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia is being further pioneered via both

84 Regional anesthesia is commonly used to provide intraope

85 s requires a more conservative approach when regional anesthesia is considered.

86 Regional anesthesia is controversial in patients with pr

87 Sedation of patients either with or without regional anesthesia is discussed to ascertain sedation r

88 Regional anesthesia is preferred to endotracheal intubat

89 The debate continues as to whether regional anesthesia is safer than general anesthesia.

90 ell established that the current teaching of regional anesthesia is suboptimal.

91 Excellent pain relief with regional anesthesia is well demonstrated in children.

92 The effect of additional regional anesthesia lasted for 6 h (0.5 h SMD, -1.471, 9

93 The paediatric regional anesthesia literature lags behind literature av

94 With increases in use of regional anesthesia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity

95 Improvements in analgesic efficacy with regional anesthesia may attenuate pathophysiological sur

96 s a growing body of evidence suggesting that regional anesthesia may be superior to opioids for impro

97 a strong conclusion on whether or not using regional anesthesia might benefit the patient to decreas

98 urrent developments regarding the effects of regional anesthesia on perioperative outcome.

99 gery results from a judicious combination of regional anesthesia, opioids, and low doses of NMBAs.

100 re general (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.23-1.37) and regional anesthesia (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.43-1.63), with

101 Several databases of paediatric regional anesthesia (over 46,000 regional anesthetics) d

102 The use of regional anesthesia particularly with ultrasound guidanc

103 The specifics of regional anesthesia performance and practical strategies

104 l features and physician selection of either Regional Anesthesia (peribulbar or retrobulbar block) wi

105 Regional anesthesia plays an important role in day case

106 suggest that point-of-care ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (POCUS-GRA) may reduce delirium, but

107 In addition to quality analgesia, regional anesthesia provides a variety of benefits in th

108 Regional anesthesia provides well tolerated and effectiv

109 nts who underwent cesarean surgery, received regional anesthesia, received opioids other than fentany

110 arch from 1966 to 2006 with the search terms regional anesthesia, regional analgesia, critically ill

111 Regional anesthesia resulted in net savings of pound 195

112 The addition of clonidine to intravenous regional anesthesia resulted in prolongation of the tour

113 A structured regional anesthesia rotation, a dedicated team of mentor

114 Compared with local anesthesia, regional anesthesia significantly improved both primary

115 inical starting point for the development of regional anesthesia skills.

116 757 matched patients (5.4%) who lived near a regional anesthesia-specialized hospital died vs 629 of

117 he serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a regional anesthesia technique that provides analgesia to

118 s article reviews the recent developments in regional anesthesia techniques and the modifications nec

119 ion of their condition(s) following surgery, regional anesthesia techniques for these patients is onl

120 nvestigate the rational for incorporation of regional anesthesia techniques into a multimodal approac

121 The use of regional anesthesia techniques is increasing in populari

122 publications suggest additional ways to add regional anesthesia techniques to outpatient surgical pr

123 This review highlights regional anesthesia techniques with focus on outpatient

124 anesthesiologists experienced in ophthalmic regional anesthesia techniques, and appropriate case sel

125 TKA, 59.4%); Canadian patients received more regional anesthesia (THA, 78.7%; TKA, 81.0%).

126 of ultrasonography and its increasing use in regional anesthesia, there has been a renewed interest i

127 pain, the controversy on how and when to use regional anesthesia to avoid chronic pain persists.

128 Supplementary analyses also showed regional anesthesia to be associated with shorter length

129 Recent advances in the application of regional anesthesia to the care of patients undergoing s

130 Routine regional anesthesia use, multimodal postoperative nausea

131 In the near-far match, regional anesthesia was associated with a 0.6-day shorte

132 Historically, the practice of paediatric regional anesthesia was based largely on information fro

133 esia were included, while studies using only regional anesthesia were excluded.

134 ional textbooks related to critical care and regional anesthesia were searched for practice recommend

135 Regional anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care (RA-M

136 to report outcomes with the evolving use of regional anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care (RA-M

137 nd findings of prior research by this group, regional anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care was t

138 t recent publications compares the safety of regional anesthesia with that of general anesthesia.

139 n are a challenge for anesthesiologists when regional anesthesia would be a beneficial component of t