ライフサイエンスコーパス: relative odds

1 ngle haplotypes and disease was expressed as relative odds.

2 p than in the discretionary sunscreen group (relative odds, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.98]).

3 al class and other established risk factors (relative odds 1.3 [95% Cl 1.0-1.7], p < 0.05 and 1.3 [1.

4 = .009), significantly higher job retention (relative odds, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.3; P

5 The association with hypertension (relative odds = 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.1-4.6) pe

6 scores of > or = 10 in Hawaii versus Japan (relative odds = 3.2, 95% confidence interval: 2.1, 4.9).

7 th self-reported coronary heart disease: the relative odds (95% CI) of heart failure, stroke, and cor

8 The multivariable-adjusted relative odds (95% CI) of prevalent CVD for the second,

9 nate living related organs cadaveric organs [relative odds (95% CI): 0.3 (0.1-0.8), 0.4(0.2-0.8), 0.1

10 willingness to donate living related organs [relative odds (95% CI): 1.7 (1.0-3.0)].

11 illingness to donate living related organs [[relative odds [95% confidence intervals (CI)]: 0.4 (0.2-

12 troke was an end point; the relative risk or relative odds and their variance (or data to calculate t

13 bled, those with mental illness had adjusted relative odds (aOR) of 3.0(95% confidence interval (CI)

14 dary outcomes were the associations shown as relative odds between maternal HCV infection and materna

15 djustment might not be essential because the relative odds between sites persisted.

16 ed with whites; and during 1998 to 2000, the relative odds continued to increase for African American

17 We found the largest relative odds estimates on the days with the highest ter

18 g subjects with CF, so did the corresponding relative odds for carriers (P < 0.001).

19 a victim of past-year violence (with similar relative odds for domestic and non-domestic violence).

20 or group current smoking prevalence in 2000 (relative odds for highest relative to the lowest quartil

21 status improved, lifestyle was less healthy (relative odds for the highest socioeconomic status group

22 status was related to a healthier lifestyle (relative odds for the highest socioeconomic status group

23 (-8)); mutations were shared by all affected relatives (odds in favor of linkage = 4,096:1).

24 serotypes 1, 2, and 3, respectively, but the relative odds increased to 0.62 (95% CI, 0.44-0.88), 0.4

25 After adjustment for age, the relative odds (odds ratios) of an abnormal urologic meas

26 ores were assigned based on the magnitude of relative odds of 1-year mortality.

27 In SIBS-I, the KL-VS allele conferred a relative odds of 1.90 (95% confidence interval 1.21-2.98

28 hose without a history of NC to estimate the relative odds of 30-day postoperative overall, systemic,

29 who were also matched with controls; as the relative odds of a given condition increased among subje

30 Over time, the relative odds of acute care diagnosis increased by 3.2%

31 er 4 seasons from 2013-2014, we compared the relative odds of an influenza B infection among IIV4 ver

32 to assess outcome variation and reflect the relative odds of an outcome for 2 patients with identica

33 mate associations of 1-year BC exposure with relative odds of being a low scorer (</= 25) on the Mini

34 ariate logistic regression, we estimated the relative odds of being a victim of past-year violence (p

35 Consistent with clinical expectations, the relative odds of BMT vary significantly by type of leuke

36 the "first trimester only" group had higher relative odds of bronchiolitis diagnosis (adjusted odds

37 After risk factor adjustment, the relative odds of CAC scores of > or = 10 in Hawaii versu

38 The relative odds of consuming foods from all 5 food groups

39 ent characteristics and injury severity, the relative odds of death was 0.02 (95% confidence interval

40 sive symptoms at baseline and calculated the relative odds of developing depressive symptoms over 3.1

41 The relative odds of early pregnancy losses associated with

42 Compared with group 1, group 2 had adjusted relative odds of early pregnancy losses of 1.23 (95% con

43 nt smokers in their forties had the greatest relative odds of erectile dysfunction, 2.74 (95% confide

44 The relative odds of excreting challenge poliovirus among ch

45 In these 2 states, the relative odds of excretion of serotype 1 was 0.32 (95% C

46 In adjusted models, the relative odds of experiencing a closure declined by 37%

47 dels, including both exposures, compared the relative odds of exposure among decedents who died by fi

48 r IL-1RN allele 2, in the English group, the relative odds of FA were increased in homozygous subject

49 rvival models were specified to estimate the relative odds of first onset of depressive disorders (ma

50 ny chronic condition had 29% higher adjusted relative odds of having 1 or more chronic conditions the

51 izophrenia had the following higher adjusted relative odds of having PSIs compared with those for pat

52 n this retrospective case-control study, the relative odds of having PTLD according to sZEBRA plasma

53 The relative odds of impairment for obese individuals versus

54 ittle effect in multivariate analysis on the relative odds of in-hospital death at each site.

55 The relative odds of incident diabetes in a comparison of me

56 The relative odds of long-term non-adherence in the standard

57 The relative odds of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (>

58 Adjusted relative odds of maternal asthma with viral cause were c

59 ight and length were associated with greater relative odds of membership in the least-growth restrict

60 AC were associated with significantly higher relative odds of mortality on extreme heat days (relativ

61 itrate, and/or organics), we observed larger relative odds of myocardial infarction associated with i

62 PC risk prediction model that integrates (1) relative odds of OPC for HPV16-E6 serostatus and cigaret

63 e approach was not associated with increased relative odds of OSI (odds ratio = 0.99; confidence inte

64 The higher relative odds of prevalent hypertension were most eviden

65 We assessed protection via the relative odds of previous detection of homologous strain

66 The relative odds of prior CHD were higher among persons wit

67 The overall age-adjusted relative odds of prostate cancer associated with the num

68 During 1992 to 1994, the adjusted relative odds of receipt of an atypical antipsychotic pr

69 significantly lower QIDS self-report scores (relative odds of recovery, 1.4; 95% confidence interval,

70 The adjusted relative odds of responding to the high-dose regimen com

71 ng equation models were used to estimate the relative odds of stillbirth associated with interquartil

72 The relative odds of stillbirth were significantly increased

73 on during pregnancy appeared to increase the relative odds of stillbirth, further studies are needed

74 l variables were available, the age-adjusted relative odds of survival from OOHCA among Blacks were 0

75 The relative odds of these conditions decrease with age amon

76 The relative odds of these symptoms increased with exposure

77 se-crossover methods to evaluate whether the relative odds of transmural MI associated with increased

78 mber of risk alleles carried and determining relative odds of type 2 diabetes and by calculating the

79 Adjusted relative odds of undergoing an indicated procedure for A

80 We carried out a meta-analysis of the relative odds on the basis of a fixed-effects model usin

81 hypertension in no more than 1 first-degree relative (odds ratio [OR], 10.9; P < 0.001) and preopera

82 ent protective effect of the proline allele (relative odds ratio = 0.78, 95% credible interval: 0.70,

83 babilities of inpatient admissions (adjusted relative odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.95), and

84 stunting (DD = -6.2 percentage points [pp], relative odds ratio [ROR]: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.51-1.06, p =

85 The risks for first-degree relatives (odds ratio [OR], 18.69; 95% CI, 14.53-24.05)

86 e significantly increased among first-degree relatives (odds ratio [OR], 7.19; 95% CI, 5.65-9.14), pa

87 in meetings of transplant coordinators with relatives (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.37-2.14; p < 0.00

88 om the probands and first- and second-degree relatives (odds ratio; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]):

89 -degree relationship to the nearest affected relative (odds ratios: 24.2 and 18.8, respectively).

90 Relative odds ratios comparing subgroup effects were cal

91 The relative odds ratios of having stress-induced myocardial

92 epeats (< 22) that were younger [< 60 years; relative odds (RO), 1.47; 95% CI, 0.96-2.25], had an aff

93 ant HBV products confirmed that HLA-DRB1*07 (relative odds [RO] = 5.18, P <.0001) and human immunodef

94 with recurrent Chlamydia infection (adjusted relative odds [RO], >2.0; P<.01, for both variants).

95 to 2 common haplotypes, DRB1*1302-DQB1*0604 (relative odds [RO], 0.28; P=.003) and DRB1*1503-DQB1*060

96 chlamydial infection (49% vs. 34%; adjusted relative odds [RO], 1.8; P=.005), as was HLA class I hap

97 ompared with whites, while for Hispanics the relative odds was equivalent (adjusted OR, 1.05; 95% CI,

98 a new method to estimate relative risk from relative odds, we estimate that the relative risks for F

99 Relative odds were raised even across different chronic