ライフサイエンスコーパス: relaxation time

1 by calculation of proton spin density and T2 relaxation time.

2 DPN, more so than proton spin density or T2 relaxation time.

3 with reduced ejection fraction and prolonged relaxation time.

4 find a significant slowing down of the alpha-relaxation time.

5 ical tissue, causing a shortening of the T2* relaxation time.

6 calculating nerve proton spin density and T2 relaxation time.

7 resulting in a measureable change in the T1-relaxation time.

8 is substantially smaller than the structural relaxation time.

9 g radiation and thereby increases the energy-relaxation time.

10 ds conventional thermalization with a finite relaxation time.

11 he two corresponds to a minimum value of the relaxation time.

12 h the corresponding variation in extensional relaxation time.

13 shear rates approaching the inverse longest relaxation time.

14 tched stability in biological media and long relaxation times.

15 ST detection, including pH, temperature, and relaxation times.

16 changes the polariton transient spectra and relaxation times.

17 ngle-fiber modulus, extensibility, or stress relaxation times.

18 fs and is asymmetric, with a tail at slower relaxation times.

19 quences sensitive to ultra-short transversal relaxation times.

20 spectra show that there is a distribution of relaxation times.

21 e synthesis of paramagnetic probes with long relaxation times.

22 technique to reliably predict intrinsic spin relaxation times.

23 rentiate signals based on chemical shift and relaxation times.

24 gnitude increase in both viscosity and alpha-relaxation times.

25 ding on spin-spin (T2) and spin-lattice (T1) relaxation times.

26 assess for changes in signal intensities and relaxation times.

27 ntate nucleus-to-pons ratios), and T1 and T2 relaxation times.

28 ause the strongly non-monotonous spectrum of relaxation times.

29 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24, with calculation of T2 relaxation times.

30 rdiac output (29% and 27%), and increases in relaxation time (10% OVX) with preserved ejection fracti

31 n (by -10-30%) and an increase in rotational relaxation times (+10-40%) compared with water dynamics

32 elevated in HIV-infected patients (native T1 relaxation times, 1128.3+/-53.4 ms versus 1086.5+/-54.5

33 as no statistical difference was found in T1 relaxation time (1183 msec +/- 256; P = .37).

34 +/- 29 vs 1044 msec +/- 14; P < .001) and T2 relaxation times (56 msec +/- 4 vs 59 msec +/- 3 vs 62 m

35 mpared with normal breast tissues, higher T2 relaxation time (68 msec +/- 13) was observed in invasiv

36 ter in fibromyalgia to be associated with T1 relaxation times, a surrogate marker of water content, b

37 tion; here, [Formula: see text] is the phase-relaxation time and [Formula: see text] is the turbulenc

38 ompanied by a rapid growth of the structural relaxation time and a concomitant decrease of configurat

39 nt spin-laser relies on a short carrier spin relaxation time and a large anisotropy of the refractive

40 oefficient (ADC) were calculated, as were T2 relaxation time and proton spin density obtained from DT

41 Gel relaxation time and the mechanical response to dynamic s

42 ezable water content, (1)H proton transverse relaxation time and water self-diffusivity determined by

43 SAs) possess small modulation depth and slow relaxation time and, therefore, are incapable of ensurin

44 results in a threefold enhancement in qubit relaxation times and a comparable reduction in coherence

45 t on T2-weighted TSE images and DW images T2 relaxation times and ADC values of the liver and FLLs we

46 gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) on T2 relaxation times and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC

47 namics remains challenging due to their long relaxation times and associated computational cost.

48 ing as an alternative due to their long spin-relaxation times and ease of processing, but, with the n

49 strong relationship between quantitative MRI relaxation times and hepatic iron content.

50 2) signals were found in terms of changes in relaxation times and relative abundance of the relaxatio

51 ost appropriate, based on their shorter T(1) relaxation times and spectral simplicity, while MnCl(2)

52 T1 and T2 relaxation times and their variation across scanners (re

53 there is little, if any, connection between relaxation times and thermal conductivity.

54 ng maximal strain, elastic modulus, and cell relaxation times and thus provide a number of markers fo

55 parameters, (1)H rotating-frame spin-lattice relaxation times and water-to-protein spin diffusion exp

56 ters E-wave deceleration time, isovolumetric relaxation time, and E'-wave velocity improved similarly

57 bility as evident from both the longer alpha-relaxation time, and higher viscosity values.

58 magnetic resonance neurography (DTI-MRN), T2 relaxation time, and proton spin density can detect and

59 (1)H spectral lineshapes, T2 relaxation times, and two-dimensional (2D) (1)H-(13)C co

60 y scale and the concomitant huge increase of relaxation time approaching the glass transition.

61 Analysed with the relaxation time approximation model using phonon dispers

62 combined with Boltzmann transport method and relaxation time approximation.

63 ombined with Boltzmann transport method with relaxation time approximation.

64 of dynamically heterogeneous regions and the relaxation time are very different in two and three dime

65 Specifically, T1rho relaxation times are inversely related to the proteoglyc

66 That is, observed relaxation times are not simply proportional to the solv

67 Separate electron and hole relaxation times are observed as a function of hot carri

68 tension, and to a lesser extent viscoelastic relaxation time, are dependent on myosin activity.

69 dramatic reductions in the MOF (1)H T(1rho) relaxation times, are observed as the PEO content increa

70 the existence of a characteristic molecular relaxation time around 0.1 ms.

71 s of the ion relaxation dynamics: the charge relaxation time as a strain-insensitive intrinsic variab

72 mm(3)) were applied to determine transverse relaxation time as affected by magnetic field heterogene

73 ated high-quality sodium films with electron relaxation times as long as 0.42 picoseconds using a the

74 Changes in the quantitative MRI relaxation times as well as severe splenomegaly were obs

75 chemical shift overlap, and short transverse relaxation times (associated with slow tumbling) render

76 observe a 6 orders of magnitude increase in relaxation time at 2 K and a consequent open magnetic hy

77 in terms of size, stability, MR profile, and relaxation times at 7 T.

78 T1 relaxation times at dGEMRIC showed strong correlation wi

79 s in high-density data storage, but magnetic relaxation times at elevated temperatures must be increa

80 Our computed electron-phonon relaxation times at the onset of the Gamma, L, and X val

81 o (9.2+/-1.8) min, thus exceeding (1) H T(1) relaxation time (at 8.45 T) by a factor of ~100.

82 for rearrangement (temperature dependence of relaxation times) becomes smaller than the activation en

83 max even after inclusion of LV stiffness and relaxation time (beta=0.80; P<0.01).

84 We show that intrinsic spin and momentum relaxation times both decrease with increasing temperatu

85 level of polarization and long spin-lattice relaxation time-both of which are necessary for future c

86 Furthermore, the results of MD based relaxation time calculations suggest that in amorphous m

87 sufficiently high surface disorder, the spin relaxation time can be extended via the Dyakonov-Perel m

88 We then show that the relaxation time can be robustly computed from structure

89 T1 relaxation times can in turn be used to calculate the co

90 ained from the correlations between the T(1) relaxation time changes at 24-48 h and the ensuing adapt

91 We found that magnetic resonance imaging T2 relaxation time changes in subjects commenced on lithium

92 find the average after-storm recovery time-a relaxation time characterizing barrier's resiliency to s

93 XPCS study on a colloidal suspension with a relaxation time comparable to the SACLA free-electron la

94 s showed a loss of iron signal and higher T2 relaxation times compared with ferumoxytol-labeled viabl

95 1-5 media showed significantly shortened T2 relaxation times compared with unlabeled control cells (

96 ncrease the apparent spin-label phase memory relaxation time, complemented by high sensitivity afford

97 Studies quantifying T2 relaxation times conducted at 1.5 T or 3.0 T using gradi

98 er density of up to 1323 W cm(-3) with a low relaxation time constant of 0.27 ms.

99 Results reveal a defect relaxation time constant of 10-0.2 ms, which decreases m

100 The relaxation time constant of the fluctuations was in the

101 ollow-up quantitative MR imaging (transverse relaxation time constant; MRI-T2 ), MR spectroscopy (fat

102 or to overt symptoms, muscle twitch rise and relaxation time constants both increased, consistent wit

103 P<0.01) and impaired relaxation (isovolumic relaxation time: control, 0.21 ms [interquartile range,

104 and diagnostic accuracy (91%) for native T1 relaxation times (cutoff, 1140 msec) were equivalent com

105 d T2 relaxation effects across this range of relaxation times did not account for the findings.

106 T1rho relaxation times did not correlate with cartilage sGAG c

107 After excitation at 800 nm, the measured relaxation time distribution of multiple complexes has a

108 r minutes, we find that complexes sample the relaxation time distribution on a timescale of seconds.

109 Instead, the microscopic relaxation times diverge so rapidly that, upon further c

110 t specific identifiers including microscopic relaxation times diverging on a Vogel-Tammann-Fulcher (V

111 thinning of the polymers with an increasing relaxation time due to the confinement of entanglements.

112 t of 81.6 ns is needed as an addition to all relaxation times due to intrachain friction sources.

113 result is due to changes of the nuclear spin relaxation times due to the electron spin spatial asymme

114 The fast relaxation time during dynamic relaxation is obtained as

115 The dynamics of T2 relaxation times during the first post-infarction week w

116 uantification of T(1) and especially of T(2) relaxation times during thermal treatment enabled their

117 ted markers of myocardial disease (T1 and T2 relaxation times, ECV, and qualitative and quantitative

118 ased liver stiffness) and cardiac (T1 and T2 relaxation times, ECV, myocardial edema, late gadolinium

119 primed in a hypoxic matrix with short stress relaxation time enhanced collagen fiber size and tumor d

120 lating configurational entropy to structural relaxation time) established in earlier numerical studie

121 ic scan protocol assessed hepatic (T1 and T2 relaxation times, extracellular volume [ECV], and MR ela

122 revealed 15-fold lower SNR and much shorter relaxation times for (35)Cl than (23)Na.

123 s and volumetric quantification of T1 and T2 relaxation times for breast tissues.

124 mputed using the WIEN2k code and the carrier relaxation times for electrons and holes are calculated

125 For healthy participants, averaged T1 and T2 relaxation times for fibroglandular tissues at 3.0 T wer

126 T2* relaxation times for normal cartilage (Beck score 1, 35.

127 rons and phonons saturates a quantum thermal relaxation time [Formula: see text].

128 T(1) relaxation time from qMRI and mean diffusivity (MD) from

129 tion, with typical reduction in PL radiative relaxation times from 270 ps to 190 ps upon increasing e

130 uences T(1) and T(m) and show unusually long relaxation times given that the ligand shell is rich in

131 Long magnetic relaxation times have been demonstrated for single lanth

132 e report a strong enhancement in the optical relaxation time in Cu by direct growth of few-layer grap

133 ults show that the history dependence of the relaxation time in glasses requires knowledge only of th

134 nanodiamond particles for calibration of T1 relaxation time in magnetic resonance imaging.

135 posite transducer severely limits the phonon relaxation time in sputter-deposited devices.

136 In humans, T2 relaxation time in the ischemic myocardium declines sign

137 T2 relaxation time in the myocardium (T2 mapping) and the e

138 rated 3D mono and biexponential spin-lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame (T(1rho)) mapping

139 is decoupled from that of the translational relaxation time in two dimensions but not in three dimen

140 rong anharmonicity, high reproducibility and relaxation times in excess of 40 mus at its flux-insensi

141 atter decreases were largely explained by T1 relaxation times in gray matter, a surrogate measure of

142 Conclusion The pooled mean of T2 relaxation times in healthy adults had marked heterogene

143 togenesis and found that reduced amygdala T2 relaxation times in high-magnetic-field MRI hours after

144 the association of global and regional brain relaxation times in patients with prior exposure to line

145 However, shorter T1 relaxation times in the globus pallidus were found in gr

146 associated with a significant increase in T2 relaxation times in the ischemic region.

147 Therefore, the electron- and hole-spin relaxation times in these systems with zero or minimal s

148 isotope effect and the unusual variation of relaxation times in water at low temperatures can be exp

149 The relaxation time increase can be explained by correlated

150 On average, relaxation times increase with stress magnitude, and eve

151 diastolic filling, decreases, and isovolumic relaxation time increases, indicating that both active a

152 Transverse relaxation times indicated a lower degree of muscle dena

153 of proton spin density and a decrease of T2 relaxation time, indicating changes in the microstructur

154 BAA receptor concentration in addition to T1 relaxation times, indicating perhaps increased neuronal

155 The slow hot carrier relaxation time is 0.5 ps.

156 teract and hinder each other: the first Zimm relaxation time is as large as the internal friction tim

157 lease in our model is that the matrix stress relaxation time is comparable to the time scale for wate

158 ly-slow thinning of neck radius (extensional relaxation time is determined from the delay constant).

159 We find that the T(1) relaxation time is significantly reduced under large ele

160 ynamic behaviour reveals that the structural relaxation time is substantially reduced in these adapti

161 is found that the proposed criterion on the relaxation times is able to explain available experiment

162 tra further suggest that the distribution of relaxation times is temperature independent at low frequ

163 Isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT), early diastolic filling (E/A), m

164 Here, we show that short stress relaxation times led to increased cell migration along a

165 leration time less than 57 ms and isovolumic relaxation time less than 40 ms respectively predicted p

166 se from observing hyperpolarized (1)H, short relaxation times limit the utility of prepolarizing this

167 ies, E:A ratio, deceleration, and isovolumic relaxation times; LV systolic function was preserved.

168 Their g anisotropy and T(1) and T(2) relaxation times make them spin labels as good as the be

169 transversal (T2) nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation time mapping.

170 Quantitative MR imaging relaxation time maps demonstrated up to a twofold variat

171 The authors reviewed T2* relaxation time maps of 28 hips from 26 consecutive pati

172 s a suppression of the Knight shift and spin relaxation time measured in nuclear magnetic resonance (

173 The relaxation times measured at variable temperature provid

174 translational diffusion and proton T1rho/T2 relaxation-time measurements for rotational diffusion, t

175 ed mitral E deceleration time, LV isovolumic relaxation time, mitral E/E', and pulmonary vein A wave

176 itative spin-lattice (T1) and spin-spin (T2) relaxation time MR imaging mapping was performed before

177 d that, as the tail length is increased, the relaxation times near the surface of the supercooled equ

178 (2)H NMR MAS spectra and T1 relaxation times obtained from the deuterated phenylalan

179 ar10 s(-1), which corresponds to the inverse relaxation time of a healthy red blood cell.

180 c environments by measuring the longitudinal relaxation time of a single-spin probe as it is systemat

181 values upon annealing, but the difference in relaxation time of density and hardness, which is usuall

182 the model of free charge carriers the phase relaxation time of fluctuating Cooper pairs is determine

183 red in stroked hemispheres; and longitudinal relaxation time of lactic acid was found to increase by

184 haracteristic times of the system, e.g., the relaxation time of local excitations.

185 Moreover, the temperature dependence of the relaxation time of orientational correlations is decoupl

186 al, benefitting from the extremely long T(2) relaxation time of quartz in (29)Si and hence dramatical

187 of density matrices to calculate spin-phonon relaxation time of solids with arbitrary spin mixing and

188 We determine an energy relaxation time of T1 approximately 100 microseconds and

189 We show that the relaxation time of the confined DNA is >10 min, which is

190 ed by the relaxation time T1 the same as the relaxation time of the human tissue T1 = 810.5 ms.

191 ggests a decoupling of the amplitude and the relaxation time of the membrane thickness fluctuations,

192 (1)H T2 relaxation time of the most abundant population (populat

193 ased on causality - on the comparison of the relaxation time of the order parameter with the "time di

194 omparing 2 independent ways of obtaining the relaxation time of the probe.

195 on multiple pulses is originated from a fast relaxation time of the saturable absorption effect.

196 The relaxation time of the solvent protons in 3 mM solutions

197 We show an increase in the transverse relaxation time of the stabilized, error-protected qubit

198 ve way is also developed to characterize the relaxation time of the viscoelastic fluid by modulating

199 different from surrounding liver parenchyma relaxation times of 840 msec +/- 113 and 28 msec +/- 3 (

200 method that exploits the differential T(2)* relaxation times of individual resonances and resolves t

201 he longitudinal (T(1)) and transverse (T(2)) relaxation times of phosphorus donors in bulk silicon wi

202 CPMG) sequence was used to measure spin-spin relaxation times of proton pools representing major yolk

203 aging is based on the dependence of the spin relaxation times of protons in water molecules in a host

204 and that the extracted temperature dependent relaxation times of the assemblies follow the Vogel-Fulc

205 The mean T2 relaxation times of the liver and focal hepatic lesions

206 The mean T2 relaxation times of the liver and focal liver lesions as

207 )H-SABRE experiments, and we record (15)N T1 relaxation times of up to 2 min.

208 ure the longitudinal relaxation time, the T1 relaxation time, of protons in a magnetic field after ex

209 tionship between postcontrast ventricular T1 relaxation time on CMR and freedom from AF after pulmona

210 A shorter postcontrast ventricular T1 relaxation time on CMR is associated with reduced freedo

211 re probed, enabling us to determine the spin relaxation time on the island.

212 r myocardial water content at 120 min and T2 relaxation times on 120 min cardiac magnetic resonance t

213 hemical shifts, linewidths, and spin-lattice relaxation times over a much wider range of temperatures

214 correlate the above g-shifts to spin-lattice relaxation times over four orders of magnitude, from 200

215 ersus controls (288 +/- 13.4), but not of T2 relaxation time (p = 0.49).

216 een different proton pools with different T1 relaxation times, particularly when the starch gelatiniz

217 ubicin-cardiotoxicity CMR parameter was T(2) relaxation-time prolongation at week 6 (2 weeks after th

218 tive LGE (r = 0.67; P < .001), myocardial T1 relaxation times (r = 0.55; P < .001), and ECV (r = 0.39

219 al shortening, ejection fraction, isovolumic relaxation time, rate of pressure development and rate o

220 time is much shorter than the self-assembly relaxation time, resulting in a non-equilibrium self-ass

221 compared with control patients, half maximal relaxation time (RT50) at 60 per minute was prolonged by

222 s substantially larger than the viscoelastic relaxation time scale of the biofilms, and this appearan

223 Vesicle relaxation time scales suggest that the vesiculation pro

224 atellar, tibial, and femoral cartilage T1rho relaxation times significantly decreased immediately aft

225 relation between regional gray matter and T1 relaxation times suggests decreased tissue water content

226 I scan that measures the proton spin-lattice relaxation time T(1).

227 The spin-lattice relaxation time T(1rho) values for (1)H, (13)C, and (207

228 rally identifiable and shortening of the MRI relaxation times T 1 and [Formula: see text].

229 E) is commonly used to speed up spin lattice relaxation time (T(1) ) for rapid data acquisition in NM

230 understanding how the electron spin-lattice relaxation time (T(1)) and phase memory time (T(m)) rela

231 bility, signal sensitivity, and spin-lattice relaxation time (T(1)) complicate in vivo translation of

232 e first measurement of electron longitudinal relaxation time (T(1e) ) during magic angle spinning (MA

233 ctroscopy was used to measure the transverse relaxation time (T(2)) and intensity of proton pools in

234 t, water status was assessed from transverse relaxation time (T(2)) weighted signals registered by Ti

235 The (1) H spin-lattice relaxation times (T(1) ) for endohedral methane are simi

236 ined phantoms that were characterized by the relaxation time T1 the same as the relaxation time of th

237 Qubit relaxation times T1 across 22 qubits are consistently ma

238 2) min(-1)] and in-cell (129)Xe spin-lattice relaxation time (T1 = 2.19 +/- 0.06 h) for 1000 Torr Xe

239 ments and quantitative imaging, including T1 relaxation time (T1) and magnetization transfer ratio (M

240 (35)Cl longitudinal relaxation time (T1) and T2* of healthy human brain and

241 Reduction of the (19)F spin-lattice relaxation time (T1) enables rapid imaging and an improv

242 e liquid state according to the spin-lattice relaxation time (T1) of the nucleus.

243 lifetime of the qubit, and the spin-lattice relaxation time (T1), the thermally defined upper limit

244 (1)H NMR relaxation times (T1 and T2) were measured at low field

245 oach to correlate spin-lattice and spin-spin relaxation times (T1-T2) including acquisition of the FI

246 meters (concentration [rho] and longitudinal relaxation time [T1]) of human cortical bone in vivo.

247 ity of lifetime of spin states (spin-lattice relaxation time, T1) and coherences (spin-spin relaxatio

248 hically inequivalent carbon and spin-lattice relaxation times, T1, yield characteristic information t

249 ect of B1(+) correction on the native tissue relaxation time (T10) of fat, parenchyma, and malignant

250 ance (MR) relaxometry demonstrating short T1 relaxation time (T1R) in the basal ganglia reflects exce

251 by microstructure, influence the transverse relaxation time (T2) in an orientation-dependent fashion

252 etic resonance imaging (MRI)-based spin-spin relaxation time (T2) mapping has been shown to be associ

253 Quantitatively, transverse relaxation time (T2) of CSS increased non-linearly with

254 Diffusion tensor imaging and transverse relaxation time (T2) relaxometry were performed at basel

255 ance imaging showed a significant transverse relaxation time (T2) shortening in the pancreata of mice

256 es (50-80 K) to increase the short spin-spin relaxation time (T2) upon which the technique relies.

257 The MRI outcomes-fat fraction, transverse relaxation time (T2), and magnetisation transfer ratio (

258 by downhill running (DR) by using transverse relaxation time (T2)-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

259 ulations were identified measuring spin-spin relaxation times (T2).

260 laxation time, T1) and coherences (spin-spin relaxation time, T2) to the immediate environment was ut

261 Regional native T1/T2 relaxation time, T2-weighted ratio, and extracellular vo

262 llenging analysis of previtreous behavior of relaxation time (tau(T)) in ultraviscous low molecular w

263 binding kinetics of these measurements, the relaxation time (tau) was obtained, where higher tau val

264 nt study shows that I1 converts to I2 with a relaxation time tau1=0.1s at 25 degrees C in 25 mM KCl.

265 n transition metal ions with long electronic relaxation times (taus) is demonstrated.

266 oup 1 medium showed significantly shorter T2 relaxation times than hMSCs labeled with group 2-5 media

267 ist, and that these generally exhibit larger relaxation times than in the unstressed case.

268 form a glass that behaves as a solid with a relaxation time that grows exponentially with decreasing

269 ostructures have longitudinal and transverse relaxation times that are on par with commonly used heav

270 d phosphonated trityl radical possesses long relaxation times that are sensitive to probe the microen

271 Rather, we predict long relaxation times that increase exponentially with system

272 ging method used to measure the longitudinal relaxation time, the T1 relaxation time, of protons in a

273 show by a Redfield theory calculation of the relaxation times, the distribution shape corresponds to

274 ensemble, we demonstrate that, regarding the relaxation times, the ensemble can be considered ergodic

275 actor was determined as the ratio of longest relaxation times, the length scaling factor was obtained

276 mula: see text] with [Formula: see text] the relaxation time, thus providing a route for spin qubits

277 ental effects on the spin-label phase memory relaxation time Tm .

278 study underlines the potential of native T1 relaxation times to complement current cardiac MR approa

279 n polarize organic radicals having long spin relaxation times to serve as spin qubits in quantum info

280 weak anti-localization effect and to a spin-relaxation time two to three orders of magnitude smaller

281 reveals that flanking sequences can lead to relaxation times up to 11-fold faster than anticipated.

282 rmal values and variability of myocardial T2 relaxation times using a systematic review and meta-anal

283 The relaxation time values and their associated relative pop

284 T1 and T2 relaxation time values of articular cartilage and menisc

285 er, for the D'yakonov-Perel' mechanism, spin relaxation time varies inversely with extrinsic scatteri

286 erred from an Arrhenius plot of the magnetic relaxation time versus the temperature.

287 In contrast, T2 relaxation time was significantly higher in controls (ti

288 The volume of lung tissue with increased relaxation times was determined by using a threshold-bas

289 iopolymer such as the ionic conductivity and relaxation time were determined by means of electrical i

290 e mono- and bi-exponential short and long T2 relaxation times were 24.7 ms, 4.2 ms (fraction 15%) and

291 On day 7 CMR, T2 relaxation times were as high as those observed at reper

292 tial and bi-exponential short and long T1rho relaxation times were estimated to be 26.9 ms, 4.6 ms (f

293 The T2 relaxation times were measured using the 16-echo Carr-Pu

294 The mean log T2 relaxation times were reduced by 62% and 43%, respective

295 Percent decreases in T1rho relaxation times were significantly larger following 10

296 Native T1 relaxation times were significantly longer in patients w

297 ecedentedly observed field dependence of the relaxation time, which was modeled with three contributi

298 greatly facilitated the interpretation of T1 relaxation times, which have been interpreted rather nar

299 l T1 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) proton relaxation times, which is proportional to amount of car

300 t proton spatial distributions and different relaxation times, which may also provide information abo