コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 -stage CKD (defined as long-term dialysis or renal transplantation).
2 acute kidney injury requiring dialysis; and renal transplantation).
3 ve a significant impact in diagnostics after renal transplantation.
4 ns of memory CD4 T cells in a mouse model of renal transplantation.
5 nts are the fastest-growing group in need of renal transplantation.
6 ney function, and this effect is reversed by renal transplantation.
7 the recent periods of increasing success in renal transplantation.
8 policy implications for maximizing value in renal transplantation.
9 specificity for the diagnosis of TCMVR after renal transplantation.
10 not be an absolute contraindication against renal transplantation.
11 e transplantation waiting list who underwent renal transplantation.
12 rogressed to ESRD and subsequently underwent renal transplantation.
13 most common cause of early graft loss after renal transplantation.
14 second primary cancers are infrequent after renal transplantation.
15 rs limiting long-term outcome in cardiac and renal transplantation.
16 e risk factors for primary CMV disease after renal transplantation.
17 properties of HDL remain dysfunctional after renal transplantation.
18 oncentration achievement of tacrolimus after renal transplantation.
19 ediated rejection is a major complication in renal transplantation.
20 ntal effect on early clinical outcomes after renal transplantation.
21 ts rejection with high sensitivity after non-renal transplantation.
22 ificant prognostic implications in pediatric renal transplantation.
23 tudy was to determine barriers to preemptive renal transplantation.
24 atomy can present a significant challenge to renal transplantation.
25 on, remain a major source of morbidity after renal transplantation.
26 n changes in the left ventricular mass after renal transplantation.
27 contributor to delayed graft function after renal transplantation.
28 on led to compelling success for outcomes of renal transplantation.
29 n changes in the left ventricular mass after renal transplantation.
30 ost common urological complication following renal transplantation.
31 o cases of AMR resistant to eculizumab after renal transplantation.
32 splantation and is especially feasible after renal transplantation.
33 year and after a follow-up of 3 years after renal transplantation.
34 P-2 deficiency in an isogenic mouse model of renal transplantation.
35 f anemia on patient and graft survival after renal transplantation.
36 and highly sensitized recipients undergoing renal transplantation.
37 educe IRI and improve organ preservation for renal transplantation.
38 f an intermediate period of EVNP in clinical renal transplantation.
39 on dialysis but improves significantly after renal transplantation.
40 are essential immunosuppressive drugs after renal transplantation.
41 tezomib to reduce anti-HLA antibodies before renal transplantation.
42 associated with donor-specific tolerance for renal transplantation.
43 ients who were desensitized for incompatible renal transplantation.
44 monitoring and detection of thrombosis after renal transplantation.
45 raft function (DGF) and graft survival after renal transplantation.
46 H in children with CKD on dialysis and after renal transplantation.
47 n pediatric patients undergoing living-donor renal transplantation.
48 sk stratifying patients being considered for renal transplantation.
49 outcomes following HLA antibody incompatible renal transplantation.
50 low-grade proteinuria or microalbuminuria in renal transplantation.
51 We report two cases of PLS occurring after renal transplantation.
52 true in both native kidney disease and after renal transplantation.
53 over the followup period, with 10 undergoing renal transplantation.
54 s (EVR) has demonstrated good efficacy after renal transplantation.
55 ctor for successful treatment outcomes after renal transplantation.
56 be exploited to improve clinical outcomes in renal transplantation.
57 tric patients during the first 2 years after renal transplantation.
58 trial of tolerance in HLA-identical sibling renal transplantation.
59 lation blocking agent CTLA4Ig, 7 days before renal transplantation.
60 patients who underwent primary living-donor renal transplantation.
61 graft thrombosis and early graft loss after renal transplantation.
62 ed by the immunosuppressive regimens used in renal transplantation.
63 ient has reached their final height or until renal transplantation.
64 lysis patients should not deter referral for renal transplantation.
65 erolimus-based treatment regimens in de novo renal transplantation.
66 motes graft function in an isograft model of renal transplantation.
67 -specific 3D printing into complex pediatric renal transplantation.
68 ce or prevent CNI-induced hypertension after renal transplantation.
69 s in living-related HLA-identical (LR HLAid) renal transplantation.
70 normalities that could be reversed following renal transplantation.
71 predictors of graft and patient survival in renal transplantation.
72 nt for 3 children who underwent living-donor renal transplantation.
73 planning in complex, living-donor pediatric renal transplantation.
74 s DGF and is a valid option to be applied in renal transplantation.
75 main higher with chronic dialysis than after renal transplantation.
76 ple aortic aneurysms, respectively underwent renal transplantation.
77 BKPyV-associated urothelial carcinoma after renal transplantation.
78 d risk of rejection in the early phase after renal transplantation.
79 arkers, with a specific focus on progress in renal transplantation.
80 s cancer have increasingly been accepted for renal transplantation.
81 termined as the need for chronic dialysis or renal transplantation.
82 he concept in clinical settings of islet and renal transplantation.
83 or exposure during the first 6 months after renal transplantation.
84 rfusion injury in a mouse model of congeneic renal transplantation.
85 el thrombosis is a severe complication after renal transplantation.
86 ich could eventually lead to applications in renal transplantation.
87 leting agent, is well tolerated in pediatric renal transplantation.
88 omorbidity still had a survival benefit from renal transplantation.
89 cause of renal graft loss after living-donor renal transplantation.
90 sion should be done with caution in LR HLAid renal transplantations.
91 e to support an absolute upper age limit for renal transplantation?
93 rom the ALERT trial (Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplantation), a study comparing fluvastatin wi
95 impacts racial disparities in deceased donor renal transplantation access has not been examined in th
98 ney allocation variance to allow for delayed renal transplantation after liver transplantation may pr
99 llected follow-up data of published cases of renal transplantations after hematopoietic stem cell tra
101 ne samples from 221 individuals 1 year after renal transplantation (age 52 +/- 13 years, 55% male, 93
103 asses are at an increased risk for DGF after renal transplantation, although differences in non-death
104 objective was to determine BIPA's impact on renal transplantation among elderly patients (age >/=65
106 diovascular), with 655 patients censored for renal transplantation and 1183 for loss to follow-up.
107 tients undergoing antibody-incompatible (Ai) renal transplantation and 319 antibody-compatible transp
109 -seropositive, recipient-seropositive (D+R+) renal transplantation and examined recipients' CMV antig
110 lyzed our institution's experience with HCV+ renal transplantation and factors contributing to subseq
111 luid from DCD (donation after cardiac death) renal transplantation and four isolates in the recipient
112 virus-6 (HHV-6) is known to reactivate after renal transplantation and has been associated with sever
113 hether antibodies to vimentin are made after renal transplantation and if production is associated wi
114 gh expression of WISE mRNA in a rat model of renal transplantation and in kidneys from normal rats.
116 chemia-reperfusion injury, pigs subjected to renal transplantation and liver transplantation patients
119 l was used to analyze the chance of having a renal transplantation and the effect of transplantation
120 ous ureteroplasty of ureteric stenosis after renal transplantation and to compare the outcomes to tho
121 ial cause of humoral alloimmune responses in renal transplantation, and de novo donor-specific anti-h
122 mprovement of long-term graft survival after renal transplantation, and have potentially unlimited ap
123 oprine, a drug to prevent acute rejection in renal transplantation, and kaempferol and esculetin, two
124 toxicity from clinical studies of islet and renal transplantation, and of rapamycin as an anticancer
125 sion injury (IRI) remains a major problem in renal transplantation, and the inflammatory response to
126 clinically indicated as a CNI alternative in renal transplantation, and we have endeavored to develop
128 graft outcomes in patients undergoing repeat renal transplantation are inferior compared to first-tim
130 sparities in clinical outcomes after de novo renal transplantation are well documented; whether the e
131 reatinine] x 1000, mg/mM) 1 year after first renal transplantation as predictors of transplant failur
132 etaphysis was performed within 2 weeks after renal transplantation (baseline) and 6 months later in 4
133 o determine the clinical relevance of T50 in renal transplantation, baseline serum T50 was measured i
135 tel Children's Hospital, UCLA, who underwent renal transplantation between January 2003 and October 2
136 an incident cohort of patients who underwent renal transplantation between June 2004 and September 20
139 on increases the risk of complications after renal transplantation, but the mechanisms controlling do
140 genesis of specific disease conditions after renal transplantation, but their utility as a biomarker
141 cells (MSCs) have protolerogenic effects in renal transplantation, but they induce long-term regulat
145 esistive index is routinely measured in many renal-transplantation centers for assessment of renal-al
146 n safety and efficacy of early (week 7 after renal transplantation) conversion from cyclosporine A (C
152 ort the feasibility and long-term results of renal transplantation during adulthood in patients with
158 e 90 CMV-negative patients receiving a first renal transplantation from a CMV-positive donor in this
159 xperienced allograft dysfunction following a renal transplantation from a donation after cardiac deat
160 A retrospective review of the outcome of renal transplantation from pediatric donor (<18 years) k
161 t-beating donors were allowed to perform 236 renal transplantations from September 2005 to December 2
162 s function with caliper-matched living-donor renal transplantations from the Austrian dialysis and tr
167 target of rapamycin (mTOR) in the setting of renal transplantation has previously been associated wit
168 ugh simultaneous hematopoietic stem cell and renal transplantation has shown promising results, but i
172 ely derived from the early Banff meetings on renal transplantation, have somewhat arbitrarily been ap
173 ctomy can be safely performed at the time of renal transplantation, however, carries a significantly
174 e rejection risk during the first year after renal transplantation.Impaired glucose tolerance was not
176 -107 may help to better identify TCMVR after renal transplantation in a precise and clinically applic
177 potential benefit in patients with IGT after renal transplantation in addition to lifestyle modificat
181 ibed as a marker to predict thrombosis after renal transplantation in patients with antiphospholipid
184 ribed after clinical ABO-incompatible (ABOi) renal transplantation in the 1980s and is recognized as
188 Racial disparities persist in access to renal transplantation in the United States, but the degr
189 iated with the development of diabetes after renal transplantation included older recipient age, fema
190 onor-specific antibody-secreting cells after renal transplantation indicates that B cells respond spe
191 jection may exist as early as 3 months after renal transplantation indicates that optimal management
192 emtuzumab as induction immunosuppression for renal transplantation introduces the possibility of long
194 icosteroid withdrawal/avoidance in pediatric renal transplantation is associated with a significant i
196 alence of left ventricular hypertrophy after renal transplantation is blunted by high sodium intake.
204 matching and patient risk stratification in renal transplantation is the single antigen bead (SAB) a
205 of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching in renal transplantation is well recognized, with HLA-DR co
207 % of patients in end-stage renal disease and renal transplantation, is the main independent risk fact
210 eresis-based strategies with some success in renal transplantation, kidney paired donation (KPD) is a
211 We present our experience of living-donor renal transplantation (LDRT) using pretransplant stem ce
213 ciated with severe acute rejection following renal transplantation, leading us to investigate whether
215 articularly lymphoceles, are not uncommon in renal transplantation, lymphangiectasia is a distinct co
222 nts after heart transplantation (HTx, n=57), renal transplantation (n=1), or hematopoietic stem cell
223 ia is a feature of CKD and a complication of renal transplantation, often caused by impaired producti
224 or parathyroidectomy to define the impact of renal transplantation on circulating sclerostin levels a
225 dysfunction and in particular the effects of renal transplantation on markers of endothelial function
226 aim of our study was to assess the impact of renal transplantation on the survival of patients older
227 ing of cardiac dysfunction and the effect of renal transplantation on this progression remain poorly
230 increased incidence of new-onset diabetes in renal transplantation patients over those receiving rapa
231 of the French national database for LR HLAid renal transplantations performed between 2002 and 2012.
235 India with a population of 1.2 billion has a renal transplantation rate of 3.25 per million populatio
236 vestigated the determinants of depression in renal transplantation recipients (RTRs) and the associat
243 muM] for healthy controls; P<0.001); whereas renal transplantation resulted in substantial reductions
244 During the last 20 years, waiting lists for renal transplantation (RT) have grown significantly olde
247 iogenic factors on endothelial repair during renal transplantation (RT)-related ischemia-reperfusion.
250 S during in vivo cold storage and subsequent renal transplantation (RTx) and in vitro cold hypoxic re
251 , and fertility in adult male patients after renal transplantation (RTx) during childhood or adolesce
252 mothers after liver transplantation (LTx) or renal transplantation (RTx) with the assessment of certa
253 cohort comprising all children referred for renal transplantation (RTx) workup between 2009 and 2017
257 We propose that the diagnosis of CRS after renal transplantation should be based on the following t
258 s after SLKT, our data strongly suggest that renal transplantation should be deferred in liver recipi
259 mpact significantly on CIT in deceased donor renal transplantation, some of which are modifiable; att
260 The Tricontinental Mycophenolate Mofetil Renal Transplantation Study was a double-blind randomize
262 e placebo arm of the Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplantation study, a randomized controlled tri
263 s a substudy of the Certican Nordic Trial in Renal Transplantation study, a randomized controlled tri
265 rom this trial of tolerance in HLA-identical renal transplantation suggest that predictive genomic bi
266 urgeon versus urologist; history of previous renal transplantations; technique of ureteral anastomosi
267 times higher in patients on dialysis or post-renal transplantation than in the general population.
268 will return to insulin therapy after repeat renal transplantation, the relatively high frequency of
272 donors has allowed expansion of living donor renal transplantation to account for one third of all re
274 and monitoring before and periodically after renal transplantation to prevent morbidity and mortality
276 e used data from the Assessment of Lescol in Renal Transplantation trial, which are randomly divided
278 ibe the case of a 52-year-old man awaiting a renal transplantation, undergoing elective orthopedic su
279 been some reports of acceptable outcomes of renal transplantation using kidneys from donors with DIC
283 significant mutation in INF2 In this family, renal transplantation was associated with post-transplan
284 Tacrolimus variability 6 to 12 months after renal transplantation was calculated, and outcomes were
286 outbreak of A. baumannii emerging after DCD renal transplantation was tracked to understand the tran
287 s and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy in renal transplantation, we analyzed the peripheral B- and
288 tacept in patients with recurrent FSGS after renal transplantation, we investigated B7-1 expression i
289 layed graft function (DGF) in deceased donor renal transplantation, we undertook the efficacy of miro
290 s) from six UK hospitals who were undergoing renal transplantation were recruited and randomly assign
291 ion, the risks for four cancer groups during renal transplantation were significantly increased: anog
292 bruary 2010 and January 2012, a total of 217 renal transplantations were performed from living donors
294 ty in preventing post-ischemic injury during renal transplantation, where acute kidney injury is know
296 sorders (PTLD) are a common malignancy after renal transplantation with a high incidence of PTLD desc
297 vels appear to show a biphasic pattern after renal transplantation with a rapid and profound decrease
299 on of transcriptional genomic information to renal transplantation, with specific reference to acute