戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 thin CNS microglia without the appearance of replication competent virus.
2 rvoir of latently-infected cells that harbor replication competent virus.
3 ded clones of infected CD4+ T cells carrying replication-competent virus.
4  the probability of unintended generation of replication-competent virus.
5         These stocks were free of detectable replication-competent virus.
6 lines with regard to the possible release of replication-competent virus.
7 owth assays in humanized mice did not reveal replication-competent virus.
8 en nsp13-14 and nsp14-15 allowed recovery of replication-competent virus.
9 indicate that these generally do not reflect replication-competent virus.
10 y of latently infected rCD4 cells containing replication-competent virus.
11 uring serial passaging to generate a single, replication-competent virus.
12 izing antibody sensitivity in the context of replication-competent virus.
13 on and viral entry into target cells without replication-competent virus.
14 ble HIV DNA levels, and difficult to isolate replication-competent virus.
15 lenged intravenously with very high doses of replication-competent virus.
16  Gag-Pol to Gag ratio in cells infected with replication-competent virus.
17 omologous to MMTV and revealed features of a replication-competent virus.
18 on, we introduced the PPTSUB mutation into a replication-competent virus.
19 tical model of a tumor that is infected by a replication-competent virus.
20  due to release of an insufficient amount of replication-competent virus.
21 nes that can contribute to the production of replication-competent virus.
22  tool to enhance the antitumor activity of a replication-competent virus.
23 h a retrovirus vector preparation containing replication-competent viruses.
24  in agreement with cell culture studies with replication-competent viruses.
25 typed vesicular stomatitis virus vectors and replication-competent viruses.
26 te engagement of this response is limited to replication-competent viruses.
27 artment was analyzed with assays that detect replication-competent viruses.
28 dditional compensatory mutations to generate replication-competent viruses.
29 voir of latently infected cells that contain replication-competent virus(1-4).
30                              Most inducible, replication-competent viruses (79.8%) had env sequences
31 mes of temperature, followed by expansion of replication-competent viruses, allowed selection of a te
32 CD4(+) T cells had a median of fourfold more replication-competent virus and a median of sixfold more
33 rvoir of latently infected cells that harbor replication-competent virus and evade immunity.
34 mor cells are being selectively lysed by the replication-competent virus and the enhanced effect of e
35 mutations, of regions B and C produced a DNA replication-competent virus and typically conferred resi
36                              This inducible, replication-competent virus and virus from basal ganglia
37 s because of their ability to interfere with replication-competent viruses and induce antiviral immun
38 tive effects through their interference with replication-competent viruses and induction of antiviral
39 n of the interferon pathway does not require replication-competent virus, and envelope glycoprotein B
40 Infection required corneal scarification and replication-competent virus, and the severity of ocular
41 us, inactivated rotavirus, noninfectious but replication-competent virus, and virus-like particles, w
42 s was seen with other CCR5 antagonists, with replication-competent viruses, and did not obviously cor
43                                              Replication-competent viruses are currently being evalua
44 probability of reactivation, suggesting that replication-competent viruses are less likely to be foun
45 but reducing the generation of contaminating replication-competent virus below the limit of detection
46 ion of peripheral blood mononuclear cells by replication-competent virus but did not bind to cardioli
47 se and found that despite the elimination of replication-competent virus by day 10, we were able to r
48 ed to minimize the possibility of generating replication-competent virus by recombination or nucleoti
49  presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using RT-PCR and replication-competent virus by viral culture.
50  full-length HIV proviruses and to construct replication-competent viruses by adding a patient-specif
51 uted in various tissues including the brain; replication-competent virus can be rescued ex vivo from
52 below detectable levels for up to 30 months, replication-competent virus can routinely be recovered f
53 ighly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), replication-competent virus can still be isolated from p
54                                     However, replication-competent virus can still be recovered from
55 f the latent reservoir capable of generating replication competent virus cannot be induced in the lab
56  of E1-/E4- vectors and 293-ORF6 cell lines, replication-competent virus cannot be generated by homol
57 nical dye system in situ, we characterized a replication-competent virus capable of being tracked pre
58 at reflect the full phylogenetic spectrum of replication-competent virus circulating in donor plasma.
59 nts of cell-associated SIV DNA, SIV RNA, and replication-competent virus comparable to those in PB.
60 e-based, single-round infection assays using replication-competent virus confirmed the relative sensi
61                 Using a panel of full-length replication-competent virus constructs that reflect natu
62 y of viruses with insertions in the M gene a replication-competent virus containing a fluorescent M a
63                         Plasma virus matched replication-competent virus cultured from CD4+ T cells.
64       We found that primary infection with a replication-competent virus did not protect against acqu
65 and decreased CD4(+) T cell levels harboring replication-competent virus during ART.
66 ermine, partly because there is no efficient replication-competent virus expressing an easily traceab
67 ive coculture assay in an attempt to isolate replication-competent virus from a cohort of 10 ES.
68      This is the first report of detecting a replication-competent virus from a source animal after x
69 T-cell activation, it is possible to isolate replication-competent virus from resting CD4(+) T lympho
70 tected in primate fecal samples, recovery of replication-competent virus from such samples has not be
71                     We also let ducks select replication-competent viruses from a replication-incompe
72 anning mutagenesis was used to isolate fully replication-competent viruses harbouring a potent foreig
73                                              Replication-competent virus has not been detected in ind
74      Also, genetically engineered attenuated replication-competent viruses have been investigated in
75                                     However, replication-competent viruses have not resulted heretofo
76 gen levels were higher in specimens yielding replication competent virus in cell culture.
77 rom the risk of formation and propagation of replication competent virus in vivo.
78 n CD4(+) T cell numbers, then elimination of replication-competent virus in 58% of infected mice.
79  proviral HIV before transplantation, but no replication-competent virus in blood or intestinal tissu
80 1 remission for 30 months with no detectable replication-competent virus in blood, CSF, intestinal ti
81                             By analyzing the replication-competent virus in both cell subsets, we sho
82      Here, we demonstrate the persistence of replication-competent virus in CD4+ T cells in a cohort
83              The percentage of patients with replication-competent virus in peripheral blood mononucl
84  estimated that the half-life of the latent, replication-competent virus in resting CD4 lymphocytes w
85                 One animal inevitably lacked replication-competent virus in the blood.
86 quencies of resting CD4(+) T cells harboring replication-competent virus in the pooled head lymph nod
87 ssible, several models use primary cells and replication-competent viruses in combination with antire
88  and, as might be expected, the sequences of replication-competent viruses in the active reservoir sh
89 ts potential to serve as a lasting source of replication-competent viruses, including the infecting w
90  RNA+ reservoir, which is highly enriched in replication-competent virus, increases in women after me
91 NA) is confirmed with sensitive methods, but replication-competent virus is not detected.
92 table virus in the peripheral plasma harbors replication-competent virus is not known.
93  assay used to measure reservoirs containing replication-competent virus is the quantitative viral ou
94 tently infected cells harbouring integrated, replication-competent virus (known as the virus reservoi
95 ey finding is that the independently derived replication-competent viruses lacked the virion host shu
96                               By using these replication-competent viruses, latently infected T-cell
97 ng minigenome systems and transcription- and replication-competent virus-like particle (trVLP) system
98 es/10(6) CD4(+) T-cells) without evidence of replication-competent viruses (<0.025 IUPM), consistent
99                                 In contrast, replication-competent viruses may be used for cancer the
100 ents of both total and integrated HIV-1 DNA, replication-competent virus measurement by large cell in
101 ells in peripheral lymphoid tissues, neither replication-competent virus nor integrated SIV DNA was d
102                             Proviral DNA and replication-competent virus obtained from peripheral-blo
103 he Delta variant, the infectivity (amount of replication competent virus per viral genome copy) may b
104 voirs of infected cells capable of producing replication-competent virus persist even after years of
105  integrated latent HIV-1 genomes that encode replication-competent virus persist in resting CD4(+) T
106                     Phylogenetic analysis of replication-competent viruses persisting in resting CD4(
107 ating viral load in those infected with HIV, replication-competent virus persists.
108  The provirus displays typical features of a replication competent virus, plus the open reading frame
109 nce of transmissible retroviral elements and replication-competent viruses possessing altered tropic
110                       Cultures infected with replication-competent virus produced progressively incre
111 HIV-1 RNA and DNA in human cells, as well as replication-competent-virus-producing cells, were measur
112 s indicated by the quantity of HIV-1 DNA and replication-competent-virus-producing cells.
113 Sequencing of independent clonal isolates of replication-competent virus revealed that 57% had env se
114 to attenuate or restrict cellular tropism of replication-competent viruses, such as oncolytic adenovi
115                                              Replication-competent viruses, such as Vaccinia virus (V
116  infection of PCLs, again without generating replication-competent virus, suggesting utility for prod
117 ity was seen with i.v. administration of the replication-competent viruses than with Ad.TK and in imm
118 ears are transcriptionally silent but harbor replication-competent virus that can be induced upon TLR
119 replication incompetence, and elimination of replication-competent virus that can be produced during
120 argely transcriptionally silent, but contain replication-competent virus that drives resurgence of th
121 truction of one of these (94UG114.1) yielded replication-competent virus that grew to high titers in
122 lasts expressing the RCAS constructs release replication-competent viruses that are able to elicit th
123 uses, such as Delta-24-RGD (Delta24RGD), are replication-competent viruses that are genetically engin
124    Oncolytic viruses are genetically altered replication-competent viruses that infect, and reproduce
125 great deal of progress in the development of replication-competent viruses that kill cancer cells (on
126                                         This replication-competent virus, the glioma-adapted vesicula
127                           While not encoding replication-competent viruses, the RNA transcripts frequ
128 e proviruses are unable to encode intact and replication-competent viruses, they have long been thoug
129 s safety concerns, such as the generation of replication-competent viruses through recombination with
130         The longest interval associated with replication-competent virus thus far is 20 days from sym
131 ast some elite controllers are infected with replication-competent virus, thus they may serve as a mo
132 ONYX-015 is the first genetically engineered replication-competent virus to demonstrate selective int
133  is an emerging treatment modality that uses replication-competent viruses to destroy cancers.
134 ic for the treatment of cancer that exploits replication-competent viruses to selectively infect and
135 dvances are being made in the engineering of replication-competent viruses to treat cancer.
136 ay provide an accessible marker of inducible replication-competent virus, total numbers of infected c
137                                              Replication-competent virus vector vaccines might have a
138 ion CD4(+) T cells) in these 4 children, but replication competent virus was detected by quantitative
139                                              Replication-competent virus was detected in 4 of 11 (36.
140                                              Replication-competent virus was detected in bronchioalve
141                                              Replication-competent virus was detected in spleen cells
142                                              Replication-competent virus was identified in two (50%)
143           In all three cases, infectious and replication-competent virus was isolated and amplified i
144              The frequency of cells carrying replication-competent virus was less than 1 per 10(6) ci
145 ng titers as high as 7 x 10(3) CFU/ml, while replication-competent virus was not detectable at any ti
146                                              Replication-competent virus was recovered after activati
147                                              Replication-competent virus was recovered from all LT yo
148                                              Replication-competent virus was recovered from both TN a
149                                              Replication-competent virus was recovered from pooled re
150 circulating resting CD4(+) T cells harboring replication-competent virus was reduced to a low steady-
151 ls at 7 weeks after ART interruption, and no replication-competent virus was rescued from the tissue
152 ully treated with HAART for up to 30 months, replication-competent virus was routinely recovered from
153                                              Replication-competent virus was undetectable after treat
154 ents the first gene therapy trial in which a replication-competent virus was used to deliver a therap
155 ystem (CNS), with the potential to emerge as replication-competent virus, we tracked the longitudinal
156 ese mutations were isolated by selection for replication-competent viruses, we conclude that retrovir
157  ecotropic retroviral producer cells free of replication competent virus were generated and used to t
158 onses, and the persistence of cells carrying replication-competent virus were quantified during long-
159 ttempts to delete the G5R gene and isolate a replication-competent virus were unsuccessful, suggestin
160                                              Replication-competent viruses were evaluated by cell-coc
161                                              Replication-competent viruses were recovered from periph
162 ection but has the increased safety of a non-replication-competent virus, which makes this approach a
163 elucidate which anatomic compartments harbor replication-competent virus, which upon ART interruption
164 ssing viral genes for their replication, the replication competent viruses will replicate on approved
165 ve viruses, and (iii) genetically engineered replication competent viruses with restricted host range
166  the first example of a naturally occurring, replication-competent virus with sequences closely relat
167  suggest that approximately 30 to 40% of the replication-competent viruses with 7- to 10-kb genomes u
168 nd packaging vectors, which may give rise to replication-competent viruses with pathogenic potential.
169 rom both the cell-associated HIV RNA and the replication-competent virus within the detectable pool o
170 netic elements involved in the generation of replication-competent virus without impairing vector pro

 
Page Top