コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 and the evolutionary consequences of partial reproductive isolation.
2 y adaptation has been accompanied by partial reproductive isolation.
3 e the mechanisms and strength of postzygotic reproductive isolation.
4 e hybrid incompatibilities and contribute to reproductive isolation.
5 ntributing to the maintenance of postzygotic reproductive isolation.
6 n of new species with intrinsic post-zygotic reproductive isolation.
7 dies should employ models that do not assume reproductive isolation.
8 acle in understanding the molecular basis of reproductive isolation.
9 nct ecological niches, leading ultimately to reproductive isolation.
10 ), rather than by the rate of acquisition of reproductive isolation.
11 horter timescale than does the completion of reproductive isolation.
12 ignal-receiver coevolution, mate choice, and reproductive isolation.
13 l, as chromosomal rearrangements can lead to reproductive isolation.
14 s that divergence in mimicry plays a role in reproductive isolation.
15 peciation than organisms that slowly acquire reproductive isolation.
16 luence the rate at which populations acquire reproductive isolation.
17 on gene discovered in vertebrates conferring reproductive isolation.
18 may prevent interbreeding in nature, causing reproductive isolation.
19 romosomes playing a disproportionate role in reproductive isolation.
20 isms of CSP and degree of cross asymmetry in reproductive isolation.
21 on that this divergence could be involved in reproductive isolation.
22 genomics for studying the molecular basis of reproductive isolation.
23 of divergent ecotypes during early stages of reproductive isolation.
24 A evolution is involved in the generation of reproductive isolation.
25 erable geographic, ecological, and intrinsic reproductive isolation.
26 ollinator specificity, potentially mediating reproductive isolation.
27 s, and consequently impacts the evolution of reproductive isolation.
28 s and species that exhibit varying levels of reproductive isolation.
29 divergent selection causes the evolution of reproductive isolation.
30 ent environments, phenotypic differences and reproductive isolation.
31 gene flow between populations, facilitating reproductive isolation.
32 ciation to rare stochastic events that cause reproductive isolation.
33 te recognition proteins (GRPs) can result in reproductive isolation.
34 in these proteins may have consequences for reproductive isolation.
35 fect of local conditions on the evolution of reproductive isolation.
36 ompatibilities can play an important role in reproductive isolation.
37 tory behaviour vs. other divergent traits to reproductive isolation.
38 X effect" as a general feature of postmating reproductive isolation.
39 ths; these genomic regions may contribute to reproductive isolation.
40 velop genetic differences that might lead to reproductive isolation.
41 tify genomic regions that may be involved in reproductive isolation.
42 mate species that have not achieved complete reproductive isolation.
43 with an ecological polymorphism and partial reproductive isolation.
44 n play an important role in the evolution of reproductive isolation.
45 and of zygote formation--potentially lead to reproductive isolation.
46 d statistically isolate its association with reproductive isolation.
47 s of ecological divergence and components of reproductive isolation.
48 s may contribute to the rapid development of reproductive isolation.
49 during evolution, a potential mechanism for reproductive isolation.
50 t this region contains genes responsible for reproductive isolation.
51 xual conflict, as well as mating systems and reproductive isolation.
52 r pollen from other species and thus promote reproductive isolation.
53 , potentially driving acoustic diversity and reproductive isolation.
54 on post-pollination interactions to maintain reproductive isolation.
55 host shifts and the resulting potential for reproductive isolation.
56 oupling behavioral and ecological aspects of reproductive isolation.
57 erence association that leads to behavioural reproductive isolation.
58 tand divergence and the processes underlying reproductive isolation.
59 avors conspecific fertilization and promotes reproductive isolation.
60 ay provide a hitherto unrecognized driver of reproductive isolation.
61 ectly documented example, from its origin to reproductive isolation.
62 to accumulation of rapid, strong interploid reproductive isolation.
63 rearrangements are strongly associated with reproductive isolation.
64 efore be an important evolutionary driver of reproductive isolation.
65 lead to interpopulation divergence, causing reproductive isolation.
66 of contemporary migration, suggesting strong reproductive isolation.
67 s incompatibilities, which may contribute to reproductive isolation.
68 importance of flower orientation in imposing reproductive isolation.
69 communication that reinforces interspecific reproductive isolation.
70 predictions about regulatory divergence and reproductive isolation.
71 abitat, dietary preferences and post-zygotic reproductive isolation.
72 tic barriers are the largest contributors to reproductive isolation.
73 model system for studies of the evolution of reproductive isolation.
74 hods to investigate the timing and extent of reproductive isolation.
75 mpacting population structure(6) and causing reproductive isolation(7), but its molecular mechanism h
78 ng phenotypic divergence and nearly complete reproductive isolation across the northern contact zone.
80 ggest long-distance migration contributes to reproductive isolation among closely related forms and t
81 atibilities" could potentially contribute to reproductive isolation among geographically dispersed ye
84 istatic loci has been shown to contribute to reproductive isolation among various animal and plant sp
85 entify potential candidates for the study of reproductive isolation and adaptation in the Louisiana I
86 o be linked to diversification by increasing reproductive isolation and allowing access to novel ecol
87 n during glacial periods would have promoted reproductive isolation and consequently speciation in fo
90 songbirds to ask whether the development of reproductive isolation and ecological competition, both
93 contribute significantly to the evolution of reproductive isolation and highlights the conditional ma
95 nal variants involved in local adaptation or reproductive isolation and may therefore play an importa
96 mportant role of host plant use in promoting reproductive isolation and morphological variation among
97 i such as budding yeasts can rapidly develop reproductive isolation and novel phenotypes through hybr
98 nding of genome-wide effects of accumulating reproductive isolation and of genomic properties that in
99 erspecific heterozygosity suggest incomplete reproductive isolation and ongoing gene flow between spe
100 ytonuclear incompatibility's contribution to reproductive isolation and potentially slowing speciatio
101 ch first-generation hybrids instantly attain reproductive isolation and procreate as clonal all-femal
103 can identify genomic regions contributing to reproductive isolation and reveal genetic mechanisms of
104 Broad molecular genetic assessments affirm reproductive isolation and separation in nature, the hal
105 ting that they have not yet developed strong reproductive isolation and should be treated as conspeci
107 s of the large effect of the X chromosome in reproductive isolation and speciation have long been deb
108 at astonishing rates and lie at the heart of reproductive isolation and speciation in diverse taxa.
115 e assumptions of traditional models, such as reproductive isolation and strong domestication bottlene
116 proteins, dMBD-R2 and dMBD2/3, contribute to reproductive isolation and survival behavioral strategie
117 studying the genetics of pollinator-mediated reproductive isolation and the molecular basis of morpho
118 and lethality, are widely observed causes of reproductive isolation and thus contribute to speciation
119 ibutes to the development and maintenance of reproductive isolation and to species differences in eco
120 fe cycle, and host specificity) must lead to reproductive isolation and ultimately affect speciation
121 contact area of the two taxa indicate strong reproductive isolation and, thus, two species following
122 upport a role for competition in maintaining reproductive isolation, and highlight the need to identi
123 he entire animal, can provide mechanisms for reproductive isolation, and may have facilitated evoluti
124 of chromosomal rearrangements drive complete reproductive isolation, and promote equids as a fundamen
125 he presence of Wolbachia itself may engender reproductive isolation, and promote speciation of their
126 divergence among populations should promote reproductive isolation, and recent empirical studies pro
127 es of the mechanisms involved in adaptation, reproductive isolation, and speciation, including mappin
129 rate species sympatry, sister relationships, reproductive isolation, and that an earlier allopatric p
131 rchitecture of both phenotypic variation and reproductive isolation are important problems in evoluti
132 esses in evolution, the underlying causes of reproductive isolation are only partially understood in
133 ybrid speciation is rare in vertebrates, and reproductive isolation arising from hybridization is inf
134 ation occurs when local adaptation generates reproductive isolation as a by-product of natural select
135 ciation by host shifting would require local reproductive isolation as a prerequisite to divergent se
136 rid sterility, although it may contribute to reproductive isolation at other stages of the yeast life
137 ophila mating and attraction behavior; while reproductive isolation barriers between species are crea
138 y compared with other outcrosses, supporting reproductive isolation being polymorphic within the spec
140 ce and its causes or on the genetic basis of reproductive isolation between already divergent species
142 pothesis that chemical signals could mediate reproductive isolation between C. marthae and C. subcris
143 ng systems of a wide range of organisms, and reproductive isolation between closely related species i
144 that a young neo-X chromosome contributes to reproductive isolation between closely related species.
146 ally leading to postmating-prezygotic (PMPZ) reproductive isolation between diverging populations.
148 ce in flowering time is a key contributor to reproductive isolation between incipient species, as it
149 ce in flowering time is a key contributor to reproductive isolation between incipient species, as it
150 tial pollinator visitation, and thus promote reproductive isolation between M. lewisii and M. cardina
151 racterize an early stage of speciation where reproductive isolation between mimetic morphs is incompl
152 erful system to reconstruct the evolution of reproductive isolation between multiple subspecies pairs
153 ene double-bond positions is responsible for reproductive isolation between O. exaltata and closely r
154 used to predict the mechanisms and extent of reproductive isolation between populations and species.
157 , range fragmentation and the development of reproductive isolation between spatially separated popul
158 By studying the genetic causes of partial reproductive isolation between specialized ecological ra
159 ass of small regulatory RNAs, play a role in reproductive isolation between species by contributing t
160 ate genes between lineages acts to reinforce reproductive isolation between species in the Paramecium
162 tship and mating songs are often involved in reproductive isolation between species of Diptera, such
163 ost exclusively on retrospective analyses of reproductive isolation between species or subspecies and
166 led by phylogenetic analyses and testing for reproductive isolation between sympatric populations def
167 f homoploid hybrid speciation suggested that reproductive isolation between the hybrid species and pr
168 apping of male-specific traits important for reproductive isolation between the Japanese species pair
169 ering phenologies that result in substantial reproductive isolation between the naturally hybridizing
170 trait loci (QTL) contributing to prezygotic reproductive isolation between the sibling species Droso
172 developed analytical tools we show that (1) reproductive isolation between these species is much str
173 ds of pairs of genomic regions contribute to reproductive isolation between these species, despite th
174 id seed development is the primary source of reproductive isolation between these sympatric taxa.
175 er color differences causes the evolution of reproductive isolation between two plant species of the
176 humans, involve few individuals and rely on reproductive isolation between wild and domestic forms.
177 rizes the results of many experiments on the reproductive isolation between yeast species of the Sacc
178 These data are not compatible with complete reproductive isolation but are consistent with different
179 are analogous to those underlying intrinsic reproductive isolation but depend on the ecological cont
180 ome plays a central role in the evolution of reproductive isolation, but few studies have examined th
181 ur gradually, without complete and immediate reproductive isolation, but the full extent of gene flow
182 election can drive the repeated evolution of reproductive isolation, but the genomic basis of paralle
183 (CSP) is a taxonomically widespread form of reproductive isolation, but the selective causes and div
185 inforcement, the strengthening of prezygotic reproductive isolation by natural selection in response
187 elated species pairs that exhibit incomplete reproductive isolation can provide insights into the mec
189 d genetic, which are usually associated with reproductive isolation, can generate natural hybrids.
191 swallow (Hirundo rustica) subspecies, strong reproductive isolation coincided with a migratory divide
192 ence of multiple rates in the acquisition of reproductive isolation complicates placement of differen
193 ate it, thereby raising the question whether reproductive isolation could be viewed as a long-overloo
195 t under ecologically based selection causing reproductive isolation, directly implicating a process o
196 aits and mate preferences, which facilitates reproductive isolation driven entirely by sexual selecti
197 Reinforcement, the process of increased reproductive isolation due to selection against hybrids,
198 progenitors to better understand the role of reproductive isolation during the domestication process.
199 atural selection plays a role in reinforcing reproductive isolation during the earliest stages of spe
200 ful system for understanding the genetics of reproductive isolation early in the speciation process.
201 ew World, leading some populations to evolve reproductive isolation, especially between cosmopolitan
203 ion might drive the evolution of postzygotic reproductive isolation even when allopatric populations
204 k in concert to achieve local adaptation and reproductive isolation, even in the presence of substant
207 te its promise to elucidate the evolution of reproductive isolation, experimental speciation has been
208 thus represents a robust mechanism of rapid reproductive isolation for small populations and large s
210 ancing our understanding of the evolution of reproductive isolation from the individual gene to a who
211 ifferent environments is a common element of reproductive isolation, genomic conflicts also play a ro
212 ides an example of a system in which partial reproductive isolation has evolved between populations a
214 Much evidence has shown that postzygotic reproductive isolation (hybrid inviability or sterility)
215 lutionary processes of speciation, including reproductive isolation, hybridization, and adaptation.
217 ides strong evidence for a large X-effect on reproductive isolation in a vertebrate system, but also
220 e faster-X (if any) to the large-X effect on reproductive isolation in Drosophila is not due to a gen
222 provide a more complete characterization of reproductive isolation in house mice, we conducted an F(
223 ies suggest that reinforcement has generated reproductive isolation in many taxa (reviewed in [2-4]),
225 nt comparisons to studies of the genetics of reproductive isolation in more standard model systems.
226 4 y (approximately 60 generations) leads to reproductive isolation in natural populations of feather
227 osition and male response directly reinforce reproductive isolation in nature, because even slight va
228 pecific song patterns seems to contribute to reproductive isolation in New World sand fly species, su
231 xpression, quantitative traits and intrinsic reproductive isolation in the yeast Schizosaccharomyces
233 wired neural mechanisms enforcing behavioral reproductive isolation include the interpretation of the
237 axa reflect female responses, then premating reproductive isolation is also evolving more slowly in A
240 erstanding evidence for the genetic basis of reproductive isolation is imperative for supporting stud
244 it indicates that the raw material to drive reproductive isolation is segregating contemporaneously
245 ed flycatcher (Tyrannus savana) resulting in reproductive isolation likely driven by changes in breed
246 ggest that factors associated with intrinsic reproductive isolation may have less to do with the trem
248 owever, recent work suggests that interploid reproductive isolation may not be complete, especially a
249 aromyces species, the circumstances in which reproductive isolation mechanisms are effective and inef
251 males could reinforce fitness and pre-mating reproductive isolation mechanisms that underlie incipien
253 number of DMIs required to produce complete reproductive isolation (more asymmetry occurs when fewer
256 on entails substantial and rapid postzygotic reproductive isolation of nascent species that are initi
262 udy, we reveal by integrated approaches that reproductive isolation originates in one homoploid hybri
263 nes that have the potential to contribute to reproductive isolation: potential speciation genes.
264 the rate at which individual lineages evolve reproductive isolation predicts their macroevolutionary
266 chanistic link between natural selection and reproductive isolation remains poorly understood, especi
267 al impacts on plant fitness, crop yield, and reproductive isolation, research into the genetic archit
268 zhansky-Muller model posits that postzygotic reproductive isolation results from the evolution of inc
270 Experimental studies of the evolution of reproductive isolation (RI) in real time are a powerful
272 hat quickly evolve prezygotic or postzygotic reproductive isolation should have faster rates of speci
274 tages-with populations evolving only partial reproductive isolation-studies describing selective mech
275 hism is stable and does not lead to complete reproductive isolation, suggesting that empirical cases
276 nservative approach, avoiding those types of reproductive isolation that are poorly known for these t
277 Here, we examine a computational model of reproductive isolation that explicitly incorporates a ma
278 ller model posits that intrinsic postzygotic reproductive isolation--the sterility or lethality of sp
279 because it offers a potential mechanism for reproductive isolation through differential adaptation t
281 can play a decisive role in the evolution of reproductive isolation through the process of reinforcem
283 which is longer than it generally takes for reproductive isolation to be completed; also, elevationa
284 cting on a single phenotypic trait can cause reproductive isolation to emerge from a single natural p
285 e divergence of sexual signals can influence reproductive isolation, understanding how colonization e
287 ried among replicates, some lineages evolved reproductive isolation via genetic incompatibilities.
289 erm lineages due to their ability to promote reproductive isolation via pollinator specialization.
290 Ecological speciation is the promotion of reproductive isolation via the divergent adaptation of p
291 postcopulatory sexual selection can generate reproductive isolation, we expressed GFP or RFP in sperm
292 ed that cytoform B is in the early stages of reproductive isolation whereas lineage sorting is incomp
293 rriers play a major role in the evolution of reproductive isolation, which is a prerequisite for spec
296 pothesis that inquiline parasites can evolve reproductive isolation while living sympatrically with t
297 reinforcement could promote the evolution of reproductive isolation within only five generations.
298 ize differential rates of the development of reproductive isolation within the genus and estimate tha
299 enetic ancestry, suggesting weak behavioural reproductive isolation within this hybrid population.