コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 in vitro to produce spermatozoa for assisted reproductive technology.
2 fication is a standard procedure in assisted reproductive technology.
3 time to pregnancy >=12 mo or use of assisted reproductive technology.
4 erage of fertility preservation and assisted reproductive technology.
5 erage of fertility preservation and assisted reproductive technology.
6 ce of anisogamy and for outcomes of assisted reproductive technology.
7 al or decrease the need for complex assisted reproductive technology.
8 y may affect the outcomes of modern assisted reproductive technology.
9 estations resulting from the use of assisted reproductive technology.
10 ns and in outcomes after the use of assisted reproductive technology.
11 c counseling of couples who opt for assisted reproductive technology.
12 ing focus on spermatozoa sorting in assisted reproductive technology.
13 ed to yield important insights into emerging reproductive technologies.
14 lity and infertility, and improving assisted reproductive technologies.
15 food production traits and support advanced reproductive technologies.
16 loped to increase the efficiency of assisted reproductive technologies.
17 raise ethical and social concerns regarding reproductive technologies.
18 ons, with potential applications in assisted reproductive technologies.
19 iations were modified by the use of assisted reproductive technologies.
20 d and could lead to improvements in assisted reproductive technologies.
21 nduction and caesarean delivery and assisted reproductive technologies.
22 idity, and stability to advance the assisted reproductive technologies.
23 hout the world are permitted to use assisted reproductive technologies.
24 during infertility treatments using assisted reproductive technologies.
25 ng multiple embryo transfers during assisted reproductive technologies (0.06), cervical cerclage (0.1
26 .001), and were more likely to use assisted reproductive technology (172 of 692 [24.9%] vs 27 of 158
29 age, BMI, gravidity, parity, use of assisted reproductive technology, adverse obstetric history, or c
30 valence of monozygotic twinning, of assisted reproductive technology among parents, and of disturbanc
32 ust 23, 2021, using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and BabyCenter, an online media
33 e whether pregnancies conceived via assisted reproductive technology and exposed to Hurricane Katrina
34 conducted a validation study of the assisted reproductive technology and infertility drug use check b
35 in 1996 and 1997 and conceived with assisted reproductive technology and used as a comparison group 3
36 mal imprinting are found in cancer, assisted reproductive technologies, and several human syndromes.
37 and work, gay and lesbian parenting, the new reproductive technologies, and the effect of parental in
38 ery, induction of pregnancy through assisted reproductive technology, and any concurrently ongoing pr
39 d childbearing, infertility, use of assisted reproductive technology, and career alterations to accom
40 f infertility but no treatment with assisted reproductive technology, and pregnancies in women with n
41 cy of more than 12 months or use of assisted reproductive technology; and miscarriage, defined as pre
42 cy of more than 12 months or use of assisted reproductive technology; and miscarriage, defined as pre
43 of this observation for the use of assisted reproductive technologies are especially relevant to con
49 is of utmost concern for improving assisted reproductive technologies (ART) because low-fitness sper
51 Embryos generated with the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) can develop overgrowth s
56 rauterine insemination and in vitro assisted reproductive technologies (ART) procedures performed fro
57 ion breeding programs often rely on assisted reproductive technologies (ART) to produce offspring due
60 infertility is often bypassed with assisted reproductive technologies (ART), some accompanied by saf
62 hod holds significant potential for assisted reproductive technologies (ART), where metabolic assessm
67 the relatively low success rates of assisted reproductive technologies (ART; ~25%), additives and adj
68 bservations suggests a link between assisted reproductive technology (ART) and epigenetic errors--tha
69 ment has important implications for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and for human embryonic st
70 entage of births are conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) and other infertility trea
71 ether pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology (ART) are at an increased risk o
72 hods of gamete manipulation used in assisted reproductive technology (ART) are rapidly proliferating
74 the past 25 years, the frequency of assisted reproductive technology (ART) births has increased rapid
76 rs (median age: 35 y) underwent 437 assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles for infertility tre
77 dogenously elevated estrogen during assisted reproductive technology (ART) exhibits little adverse ef
78 (AMA, >=35 years) women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) face reduced live birth ra
83 bout the outcomes of pregnancy with assisted reproductive technology (ART) in women with kidney trans
88 in humans and animals suggest that assisted reproductive technology (ART) might affect the epigeneti
93 igate 1) whether the association of assisted reproductive technology (ART) with preterm birth varies
94 c sperm injection (ICSI), a type of assisted reproductive technology (ART), can induce epimutations a
95 ion (ICSI), the most common type of assisted reproductive technology (ART), might damage the sperm or
97 diabetes, gestational hypertension, assisted reproductive technology (ART), rates of maternal primipa
98 obesity are also more likely to use assisted reproductive technology (ART), which frequently results
101 include ovulation stimulation, both assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) and non-ART ovulation s
104 directly from raw semen samples for assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) as an alternative to de
110 sorders in children conceived using assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), and aberrant DNA methy
111 igh-throughput, would be useful for assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), as it can allow specif
113 ormonal cycles and the way in which assisted reproductive technologies can be applied, and key differ
114 ctive technology in the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System
115 t member clinics of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Report System (S
116 m member clinics of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinical Outcomes Reporting Syst
117 ted by linkage with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology-Clinical Outcome Reporting Syste
118 state FP mandate status, number of assisted reproductive technology cycles performed, and number of
119 w oocyte yield, and 2 or more prior assisted reproductive technology cycles; reproductive outcomes fo
121 ent (ie, intrauterine insemination, assisted reproductive technology, fertility preservation procedur
122 dications and ethical acceptance of assisted reproductive technologies for adult-onset cancer predisp
123 ation of semen cryopreservation and assisted reproductive technologies for the critically endangered
124 lability of drugs for impotence and advanced reproductive technologies for the treatment of subfertil
125 data collected from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology for 33 863 recipients undergoing
126 irst, we established a tractable pipeline of reproductive technologies, from induction of ovulation,
127 on babies conceived globally, using assisted reproductive technologies, fundamental questions remain;
128 tion or later, those conceived with assisted reproductive technology had a risk of low birth weight t
130 h weight associated with the use of assisted reproductive technology has been attributed largely to t
131 ew species, beside humans, in which assisted reproductive technology has important clinical applicati
132 ve-birth rates after treatment with assisted reproductive technology have traditionally been reported
135 e linked a census of treatment with assisted reproductive technology in South Australia to a registry
137 28], and estrogen [n = 16 948]) and assisted reproductive technology (in vitro fertilization [n = 19
138 states and to understand why use of assisted reproductive technology is not a risk factor for poor bi
139 sus deceased donation, (iii) use of assisted reproductive technologies, (iv) informed consent, (v) cl
141 n infants conceived with the use of assisted reproductive technology may also have a higher risk of l
143 lity, secondary infertility despite assisted reproductive technology, negative self-image, and discom
144 nces in risk factors such as use of assisted reproductive technologies, obesity, smoking, and poor me
146 e following contexts are explored with care: reproductive technologies; organ transplantation; cosmet
147 emen parameters, DNA integrity, and assisted reproductive technology outcomes after varicocele repair
148 are associated with infertility and assisted reproductive technology outcomes is unclear; although, t
149 the safety of contraception, use of assisted reproductive technology, preservation of fertility durin
150 We analyzed data on outcomes of assisted reproductive technology procedures as reported to the Ce
151 monogenic PKD, like other forms of assisted reproductive technology, raises important ethical questi
153 om the databases of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) in the US and the Human F
154 e findings, captured by Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) national data, underscore
156 n women who received treatment with assisted reproductive technology, spontaneous pregnancies (i.e.,
157 f infertility have been overcome by assisted reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilization
158 sence of sperm fertilising ability, assisted reproductive technologies, such as in-vitro fertilisatio
159 cycles reported to the US National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System during 1996-
161 Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is a reproductive technology that selects embryos without (fa
164 rofiled 25 healthy women undergoing assisted reproductive technology to monitor transcriptional chang
165 f low birth weight after the use of assisted reproductive technology to the rate in the general popul
170 ltiple pregnancy, placenta praevia, assisted reproductive technology use, macrosomia with a birthweig
171 ancies occurred spontaneously, with assisted reproductive technologies used in the remaining cases.
174 evaluate trends in infertility and assisted reproductive technology utilization rates, including pat
180 cundity can be achieved by means of assisted reproductive technology when there are favorable patient
181 els of CCNA2 in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology who had successful pregnancies.
182 re common among children born after assisted reproductive technology with fresh embryo transfer (fres
183 500 g) among infants conceived with assisted reproductive technology with the rates in the general po
184 remains a significant challenge for assisted reproductive technology, with implantation failure occur
185 ity causes, childbearing decisions, assisted reproductive technology, workplace support, and reflecti