コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 This study was approved by the local research ethics committee.
2 sent and the study was approved by the local research ethics committee.
3 case-control study was approved by the local research ethics committee.
4 with due ethical approval of the Nottingham Research Ethics Committee.
5 view Board, and the Australian Defense Human Research Ethics Committee.
6 The study protocol was approved by the local research ethics committee.
7 care, and should be overseen by a functional research ethics committee.
8 ospective analysis was approved by the local research ethics committee.
9 l was granted by the University of Sheffield Research Ethics Committee.
10 earch Authority approval from London - Brent Research Ethics Committee.
11 that research projects have been examined by research ethics committees.
12 national bodies tasked with the oversight of research ethics committees.
15 Mbarara University of Science and Technology Research Ethics Committee (14/03-19), and Uganda Nationa
18 parental consent and raising awareness among research ethics committees about AYA-independent consent
19 al ethical approval was granted by the local research ethics committee; all participants gave written
22 hods This study was approved by the national research ethics committee and was performed with informe
24 cs approval was granted by Ulster University Research Ethics Committee and written informed consent (
26 Methods The study was approved by the local research ethics committee, and all participants gave wri
27 The study was approved by the Social Care Research Ethics Committee, and all participants provided
28 The study was approved by the Royal Free Research Ethics Committee, and all subjects gave full wr
30 ials and Methods The study was approved by a research ethics committee, and participants gave written
32 amples, obtained under protocols approved by research ethics committees, and found no expression of X
33 guidance document to provide research teams, research ethics committees, and other stakeholders with
34 stakeholders, such as researchers, funders, research ethics committees, and regulators play crucial
40 study, performed between 2006 and 2016 with research ethics committee approval and written informed
41 The protocol had the appropriate national research ethics committee approval for the countries whe
47 )He and (129)Xe were performed with National Research Ethics Committee approval, with informed consen
49 only 9% accessed the detail presented on the Research Ethics Committee approved participant informati
55 proval was granted by the Faculty of Science Research Ethics Committee at the University of Bristol.
56 based on archived protocols approved by six research ethics committees between 13 January 2000 and 2
57 iew board exemption was granted by the local research ethics committee for this retrospective study.
58 K National Health Service Central Office for Research Ethics Committee guidelines; informed patient c
59 y was approved by the South Central-Oxford C Research Ethics Committee in England (Ref: 13/SC/0149) a
61 andomized clinical trials (RCTs) approved by research ethics committees in Switzerland, the UK, Canad
62 cluded 326 RCT protocols approved in 2012 by research ethics committees in Switzerland, the United Ki
63 ess to 347 RCT protocols approved in 2016 by research ethics committees in the UK, Switzerland, Germa
64 lfilled before it would be appropriate for a research ethics committee/institutional review board to
66 tors, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries,
67 tors, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries,
68 tors, trial participants, patients, funders, research ethics committees, journals, trial registries,
69 esearchers, community organizers, advocates, research ethics committee members, parents of AYAs, and
70 y was approved by the UK Ministry of Defence research ethics committee (MODREC 165/Gen/10 and 692/MoD
73 l participants, patients, sponsors, funders, research ethics committees or institutional review board
74 rsement by funders, regulators, legislators, research ethics committees, patient organisations, and j
75 was granted by the University College London research ethics committee (Project ID: 14895/005) and al
78 England (Ref: 13/SC/0149) and the Scotland A Research Ethics Committee (Ref 20/SS/0028), and is regis
80 within 7 domains: justifying the CRT design, research ethics committee review, identifying research p
81 as approved by the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee, the Stanford University Panel
85 The study was approved by the University's research ethics committee, which conforms to the declara
86 al was obtained by the Southern Health Human Research Ethics Committee, which waived the requirement
87 at a time, if clinically appropriate, (5) a Research Ethics Committee with specific transplantation
88 Social Sciences, Education and Social Work's Research Ethics Committee, with pupil opt-in and parenta