ライフサイエンスコーパス: research fund

1 e, Epilepsy Society, Dr Marvin Weil Epilepsy Research Fund.

2 onal Cancer Institute, and Children's Cancer Research Fund.

3 Victorian Government Mental Illness Research Fund.

4 Research Council, and the Global Challenges Research Fund.

5 al Research Council, Australia, and Thrasher Research Fund.

6 ronment Fund, and Danish Working Environment Research Fund.

7 British Heart Foundation, and Heart Diseases Research Fund.

8 amily Research Fund, and the Matteson Family Research Fund.

9 Program, and Solon Scott III Prostate Cancer Research Fund.

10 for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cancer Research Fund.

11 tle and the University of Washington Royalty Research Fund.

12 Council and University of Washington Royalty Research Fund.

13 y difficult for young researchers to procure research funds.

14 time as they do to acquire new buildings and research funds.

15 ed with allocating health-care resources and research funds.

16 he subspecialty of basic science or clinical research funded.

17 , current position and responsibilities, and research funding.

18 ts less likely than whites to be awarded NIH research funding.

19 0 grant to a young investigator for start-up research funding.

20 tion to their work, which can lead to future research funding.

21 relation to starting salary and success with research funding.

22 ased radiology departments have little or no research funding.

23 nd the National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding.

24 f sex development (DSD) lack recognition and research funding.

25 c medicine and receive less compensation and research funding.

26 (SPI) with $750 000 or more in total annual research funding.

27 Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding.

28 National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding.

29 res may help inform and prioritize pediatric research funding.

30 ntelligence and digital health, and boosting research funding.

31 y due to low sample sizes and disparities in research funding.

32 al trial research receives considerably less research funding.

33 s and scientists from countries with limited research funding.

34 analysis examining antibacterial resistance research funding.

35 r-control planning and priorities for public research funding.

36 ed, which limits the return on investment of research funding.

37 e events that stimulated public interest and research funding.

38 medical school was ranked highly in terms of research funding.

39 on in authorship, research productivity, and research funding, 21 (33%) on discrimination in academic

40 garnered a mean of $410,755 in total annual research funding, 22.1% of all AMC research faculty were

41 Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation), the Biosta

42 ies Research Program from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation).

43 hting Astmabestrijding, St Olav's Hospital's Research Fund, Academy of Finland, European Commission,

44 esearch Council, Wellcome, Global Challenges Research Fund, Academy of Medical Sciences, and PHARMBIO

45 This study compared total NIH research funding across US dental institutions from 2005

46 HEFCE Global Challenge Research Fund Aflatoxin project.

47 e impact this has on obtaining peer reviewed research funding after residency is unknown.

48 gly be a priority for health-care providers, research funding agencies, and policy makers in years to

49 It also calls for major international research funding agencies, including the WHO and the Nat

50 gical and Scientific Development (CNPq), and Research Funding Agency of the State of Rio de Janeiro (

51 h Program, Stand Up To Cancer-Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Alliance-National Ovarian Cancer Coalition

52 e a national priority, with considerable new research funding allocated.

53 cer care systems and inform effective public research funds allocation.

54 and deaths will be important to guide future research funding allocations, health care planning, and

55 The 2007 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WC

56 hodological changes to the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WC

57 probable evidence that a priori World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WC

58 The World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Con

59 The 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research rec

60 In the recent World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research rep

61 In 2007 the World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research

62 Thrasher Research Fund and Clinical Health Research Institute at

63 The Thrasher Research Fund and the National Immunisation Schedule Eva

64 Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund and US National Institutes of Health.

65 Braun Anaesthesia Scientific Research Fund and Wu Jieping Medical Foundation, Beijing

66 oadly, and migraine in particular, have poor research funding and a limited academic base.

67 is an increasing relationship between NCCAM research funding and disease burden over the 4-year stud

68 d between the amount of radiology department research funding and institutional rankings for charity

69 p between aggregate NIH radiology department research funding and measures of inclusivity and communi

70 y distance to researchers, locally available research funding and participation in data-sharing netwo

71 Overall evidence indicates that a lack of research funding and poor reproducibility of findings we

72 ost visible to health professionals, such as research funding and public health programmes, and invol

73 ives of industry, government (including both research funding and regulatory agencies), academia, and

74 ical school by National Institutes of Health research funding and starting a clinical practice (OR, 0

75 ial mission score differ from those that use research funding and subjective assessments of school re

76 ic collaboration, optimize the use of public research funds and help achieve the required yield gains

77 undation, the Bettie Willerson Driver Cancer Research Fund, and a Cancer Center Support Grant for the

78 ibank, the Medibank Better Health Foundation Research Fund, and a National Health and Medical Researc

79 (CRUK/04/003), the June Hancock Mesothelioma Research Fund, and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation T

80 Wellcome Trust, Global Challenges Research Fund, and Health Data Research UK.

81 Psychiatry Research Trust, Maudsley Charity Research Fund, and th European Community's Seventh Frame

82 Psychiatry Research Trust, Maudsley Charity Research Fund, and th European Community's Seventh Frame

83 Meningioma Research Fund, Fleming Meningioma Research Fund, and the Gray Family Foundation.

84 Minnesota and Arizona, the Braillier Family Research Fund, and the Matteson Family Research Fund.

85 Plastic Surgeons, the Meirion Thomas Cancer Research Fund, and the National Institute for Health and

86 Foundation, Singapore National Cancer Centre Research Fund, and the US National Institutes of Health

87 etics Research Fund, Edward and Maybeth Sonn Research Fund, and US National Center for Research Resou

88 rcial determinants of health, reprioritising research funding, and advocating for greater neurologica

89 dical research, massive increases in federal research funding, and an increasingly large and speciali

90 r additional obstacles to board eligibility, research funding, and career progression.

91 ted pathways for drug and vaccine approvals, research funding, and insurance coverage for medical the

92 aim to increase the quantity of scientists, research funding, and scientific output, which is measur

93 and cancer followed substantial increases in research funding, and slowing the rising burden of respi

94 in coding, reimbursement from insurers, and research funding, and widespread education for clinician

95 More awareness, research, funding, and policies on the part of key stake

96 gion; Research Grants Council, Collaborative Research Fund; and Health Bureau, Government of the Hong

97 Trust; the University of Washington Royalty Research Fund; and the University of Washington King K H

98 Lymphoma Research Foundation, Lymphoma Research Fund (Andrew D Zelenetz), and National Institut

99 The research funding application process began in January, 2

100 rate, but parallel increases in capacity and research funding are going to be needed to translate thi

101 onal and international data on mental health research funding are minimal and not comparable.

102 neficiaries of NIH support view advocacy for research funding as "someone else's job".

103 But the threats they face-cuts to federal research funding, assaults on academic freedom, and bans

104 alter S. and Lucienne Driskill Immunotherapy Research funds; Astex Pharmaceuticals; Merck & Co.; Nati

105 al Research Council Australia, Breast Cancer Research Fund, AstraZeneca, Sanofi Aventis.

106 she Fund, and the Lyme Disease and Arthritis Research Fund at Massachusetts General Hospital.

107 Lung and Blood Institute, University Cancer Research Fund at the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Cen

108 h, US Food and Drug Administration, Thrasher Research Fund, Australian National Health and Medical Re

109 ults should be of use to decision makers and research-funding authorities charged with allocating hea

110 Western Australia Children's Research Fund, Autism Cooperative Research Centre, La Tr

111 S, but they received only 21.7% of total NIH research funding awarded to all surgeons.

112 We analyzed the focus and type of norovirus research funding awarded to institutions in the United S

113 Purpose To assess the relationship between research funding awarded to radiology departments by the

114 and Cancer Research UK data for human cancer research funding awards from public and philanthropic fu

115 Family Foundation; "Rick" Eisemann Pediatric Research Fund; Banbury Foundation; Edith Robertson Found

116 MDs to the National Institutes of Health for research funding became less successful than application

117 on of public and philanthropic global cancer research funding between 2016 and 2023, including patter

118 through funding opportunities, working with research funding bodies to set the research agenda in th

119 Regulators, research funding bodies, and public policy makers may ne

120 imilar patterns have been described in other research funding bodies, suggesting that racial disparit

121 e Foundation (Ireland), Eccles Breast Cancer Research Fund, British Journal of Anaesthesia Internatio

122 s worsened, not only by the lack of targeted research funding, but also by the lack of relevant in-co

123 conformed to the institutional standards for research funded by a commercial sponsor.

124 ighlights significant findings stemming from research funded by my American Diabetes Association Path

125 Only research funded by public funding bodies was collected a

126 these topics are reviewed in the context of research funded by the American Diabetes Association Pat

127 Here, in the context of research funded by the American Diabetes Association Pat

128 t of a series of Perspectives that report on research funded by the American Diabetes Association Pat

129 t of a series of Perspectives that report on research funded by the American Diabetes Association Pat

130 t of a series of perspectives that report on research funded by the American Diabetes Association Pat

131 t in a series of Perspectives that report on research funded by the American Diabetes Association Pat

132 This abstract presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Res

133 RI) is tasked with rooting out misconduct in research funded by the National Institutes of Health (NI

134 Biomedical research funded by The National Institutes of Health and

135 Research funded by the National Institutes of Health is

136 arch on mental health disparities, including research funded by the National Institutes of Health, is

137 Research funded by the NIH is becoming more concentrated

138 Success in research funding by clinician-scientists in ophthalmolog

139 ould work together to increase the effect of research funding by strengthening national and internati

140 Industry funding was compared with public research funding by the National Eye Institute.

141 Despite substantial increases in research funding by the pharmaceutical industry, drug di

142 the 'United to End MND' pound 50m government research funding campaign by the patients who started th

143 randomized phase 3 United Kingdom Leukaemia Research Fund Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 4 (UK LRF CCL

144 ll gaps in data and eliminate gender bias in research; fund civil-society actors and social movements

145 y Cancer Center Frankfurt, and the Frankfurt Research Funding Clinician Scientist Program.

146 likely to receive NIH investigator-initiated research funding compared with whites.

147 eases (NCID) Catalyst Grant and the National Research Fund Competitive Research Programme.

148 Kruip: Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding.

149 Research funding data from fiscal years 2015 to 2021 amo

150 Research funding data related to malaria for 1997-2013 w

151 we searched Dimensions, the world's largest research funding database, for grants relevant to neonat

152 (3) Globalization: US government research funding declined from 57% (2004) to 50% (2012)

153 tal US (public plus private) share of global research funding declining from 57% to 44%.

154 Independent Research Fund Denmark and NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical

155 undation for Strategic Research, Independent Research Fund Denmark, Forte Foundation, Swedish Cancer

156 od and Cancer Institutes and the Independent Research Fund Denmark.

157 ublicly available data about global oncology research funded directly by the US National Institutes o

158 Comparatively, total National Eye Institute research funding during the same period was $5 003 407 7

159 iaotong University, Central University Basic Research Fund, Early Career Research Start-up Plan of Xi

160 Disorders and Stroke, Keane Stroke Genetics Research Fund, Edward and Maybeth Sonn Research Fund, an

161 l Symposium of the Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund, entitled "DNA Repair and Human Cancers,"

162 Labex-IBEID, NIH-MIDAS, AXA Research fund, EU-PREDEMICS.

163 tion, and governmental (Finland) competitive research funds (EVO/VTR/TYH).

164 ffects of the economic downturn on available research funding, existing research tools and protocols

165 ifts in family structure, uncertainty around research funding, expanded job responsibilities and uphe

166 Furthermore, many sources of research funding expect researchers to acknowledge any s

167 NIH's policies, programs, and research funding fill gaps in knowledge about the health

168 g Charitable Foundation, Courtney Meningioma Research Fund, Fleming Meningioma Research Fund, and the

169 3M and the Health and Medical Research Fund, Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong.

170 (Career Development Award); The Trust Family Research Fund for Kidney Cancer; US National Institutes

171 Research Fund for the Control of Infectious Disease (090

172 al Support Program of Guangdong, Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Educati

173 , improving access to trials, and allocating research funding for equitable initiatives should be pri

174 Faculty Development Awards, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2011jdhz62)

175 ral Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities for Peking U

176 logy Major Project of China, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the She

177 mmissioned grant from the Health and Medical Research Fund from the Government of the Hong Kong Speci

178 However, research funding from all sources will need to increase

179 how the UK's leading universities deal with research funding from health harming industries and call

180 The share of all medical research funding from industry directed specifically tow

181 Research funding from public and private sources has rea

182 All authors receive research funding from the British Heart Foundation and D

183 ed States that receive the largest amount of research funding from the National Institutes of Health.

184 the 50 U.S. universities receiving the most research funding from the National Institutes of Health.

185 rs and less institutional support, including research funding from their institutions (46% compared w

186 fair and unbiased distribution of extramural research funds from the NIH.

187 ble Disease Dynamics, and Health and Medical Research Fund, Government of Hong Kong Special Administr

188 r ability to attract their first independent research funding grant.

189 cience Foundation (530/18 and IPMP 3432/19); Research Fund - Hadassah Medical Organization.

190 When adjusted for inflation, cancer research funding has actually declined 12% since 2004.

191 mental programs, recent growth in biomedical research funding has barely kept up with inflation.

192 Finally, we quantify how U.S. research funding has been distributed among these linkag

193 1) Merit Review research funding has been essential to the training, rec

194 Research funding has to be aligned with prevailing and p

195 s financial pressures and ongoing changes in research funding, has prompted many institutions to re-e

196 er, many instances of poor value from stroke research funding have resulted from the way in which str

197 ship and sustainability of the network after research funds have been expended.

198 ective centralization of care and absence of research funds have hampered our ability to improve the

199 OG Trust Fund, Hong Kong Health and Medical Research Fund, Hong Kong Matching Fund.

200 Health and Medical Research Fund, Hong Kong.

201 n=2,823) of a prestigious grant for personal research funding in a national full population of early

202 The stagnation of biomedical research funding in the US is placing great pressure on

203 urgical workforce and 25.4% of surgeons with research funding in the US, but they received only 21.7%

204 s molecular and genetic features and improve research funding in this area.

205 Anne and Jason Farber Foundation, Will Power Research Fund Inc., the Isabella Kerr Molina Foundation,

206 dre of trained investigators, and sufficient research funding, including the development of an all pa

207 identify factors associated with successful research funding, income, and career satisfaction.

208 DHT research funding increased during this period from $348

209 Biomedical research funding increased from $75.5 billion in 2003 to

210 portunities through novel business plans and research funding, increasing doctoral-level professional

211 are augmented by several factors, including research funding initiatives and the distinct demographi

212 World Cancer Research Fund International, Cancer Research UK, Tehran

213 World Cancer Research Fund International, European Commission (Marie

214 Scientific research funding is allocated largely through a system o

215 Seeking research funding is an essential part of academic life.

216 Governmental research funding is increasing (P <0.001).

217 NIH's allocation of research funding is often disproportionate to the curren

218 Since federal research funding is regionally concentrated and not geog

219 nentech (Roche), Grais-Cutler Fund, Lymphoma Research Fund, Lymphoma Research Foundation, American Ca

220 Discrepancies in research funding may contribute to stagnant survival rat

221 e the importance of the Merit Review medical research funding mechanism not just to the VA, but to th

222 Research funding mechanisms are needed to support and su

223 d (UNICEF) provided the largest value of non-research funding mentioning and exclusively benefitting

224 Institutes of Health Research, Canada Brain Research Fund, Michael Smith Health Research BC, Fonds d

225 Cancer research funding must be aligned with the global burden

226 Research funding must be increased to support these effo

227 K, UK Medical Research Council, World Cancer Research Fund, National Cancer Institute.

228 Ovarian Cancer Research Fund, National Institutes of Health, California

229 Danish Work Environment Research Fund, NordForsk.

230 rd, MSK's Ludwig Center, Weiss Family Kidney Research Fund, Novartis, The Sidney Kimmel Center for Pr

231 Global Challenge Research Fund of United Kingdom Research and Innovation

232 This was the first systematic analysis of research funding of antibacterial resistance of this sca

233 However, few studies exist examining the research funding of institutions that serve historically

234 s/Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Clinical Research-Fund of the University Hospitals Leuven, and Re

235 groups: no author with a financial interest, research funding only, employment and leadership positio

236 ulated development of numerous workshops and research funding opportunities.

237 ier were supported by CIHR Coronavirus Rapid Research Funding Opportunity OV2170359 and coordinated o

238 utes of Health Research (CIHR-COVID-19 Rapid Research Funding opportunity, VR5-172666 grant to Eduard

239 s, patients and caregivers, and U.S. federal research funding organizations.

240 The charity Children's Cancer Research Fund organized a workshop bringing together a b

241 was not associated with either the level of research funding (P=0.89) or local rates of literacy (P=

242 The mean annual research funding per person was almost four times higher

243 Of pound13 846.1 million of available research funding, pound269.2 million (1.9%) was awarded

244 ue to challenges arising from combinatorics, research funding priorities, and medical practicalities,

245 ly being used both for regulation and to set research funding priorities.

246 piled showing trends in US and international research funding, productivity, and disease burden by so

247 ection and Immunity (MI4) Emergency COVID-19 Research Funding program.

248 nal membership to establishing extraordinary research funding programs; translating evidence to pract

249 Constrained research funding prompts some to advocate training fewer

250 proposed that the amount of disease-specific research funding provided by the National Institutes of

251 is increase has been spurred on, in part, by research funding provided through private, parent advoca

252 Access to research funds, provision of incentives for acquisition

253 d between the amount of radiology department research funding received and institutional rankings for

254 n African countries were ranked by amount of research funding received.

255 In 2007 the World Cancer Research Fund Report concluded that there was limited an

256 Health and Medical Research Fund Research on COVID-19, Government of the Ho

257 Hanela Foundation, Switzerland; and General Research Fund, Research Grants Council, Hong Kong.

258 tive that would improve decisions concerning research funding, research direction, and scientific gui

259 UK Research and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund: Research for Health in Conflict-Middle Ea

260 the respect of donors for the rigors of its research funding, scientific statements, and clinical gu

261 ve received more than $1.8 billion in direct research funding since their PBF Fellowships began.

262 doubling, the rate of increase in biomedical research funding slowed from 2003 to 2007, and after adj

263 acteristics (e.g., age, institution, type of research), funding, sources of funding, and types of sup

264 upported by the Luke's Army Pediatric Cancer Research Fund St.

265 All abstracts were categorized by type of research, funding status, number of centers, sample size

266 is analysis, we explore the possibility of a research funding strategy that would offer business ince

267 Research funding systems fundamentally influence how sci

268 Eisemann Pediatric Research Fund, the Banbury Foundation, the Edith Roberts

269 Reykjavik Energy Research Fund, The Icelandic Gender Equality Fund, Europ

270 Thailand Research Fund, the Melioidosis Research Center, the Cent

271 & Development Office, the Global Challenges Research Fund, the UK Medical Research Council and Wellc

272 rnational Development, the Global Challenges Research Fund, the UK Medical Research Council, Wellcome

273 pproach to ACAD treatment requires increased research funding, the development of novel treatments, a

274 for these variations include differences in research funding, the drug approval process, the role of

275 ong advocacy model to secure growing federal research funding, the physical sciences (including mathe

276 work discusses the effects of the decline in research funding, the plight of kidney research, and the

277 er, there has been an unprecedented surge in research funding: the National Collaborative on Gun Viol

278 proaches to new data generation and required research funding to address this large public health bur

279 lly mandated set-aside programs that provide research funding to for-profit small businesses for the

280 the allocation of health care resources and research funding to this major public health problem.

281 s (BRAIN) Initiative, and the Baszucki Brain Research Fund (to LRMP).

282 l Society, Wellcome Trust, Global Challenges Research Fund (UK Research and Innovation), Africa Oxfor

283 UK Research and Innovation Global Challenges Research Fund, UKAID, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Internation

284 tical discoveries, increased competition for research funds, uncertainties on the reproducibility of

285 Fort Innovation Fund; Siteman Retina Research Fund; unrestricted grant from Research to Preve

286 h Network Foundation, Mary Hunter Meningioma Research Fund, V Foundation, and National Institutes of

287 d fueled by increased number of researchers, research funding, venture capital and the number of star

288 More DHT research funding was used for research and development p

289 In 2007, the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and the American Institute for Canc

290 evention recommendations of the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and the American Institute for Canc

291 In 2007 the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and the American Institute of Cance

292 on available meta-analyses, the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) concluded that consumption of coffe

293 International Development, Global Challenges Research Fund, Wellcome Trust.

294 Radiology departments that received more NIH research funding were less likely to serve patients from

295 (2004) and 2.9% (2005) of abstracts only had research funding, whereas 7.3% (2004) and 6.9% (2005) ha

296 Considerable increases in public and private research funding will be required to develop and utilize

297 e from saturation of conventional sources of research funding without foreseeable opportunities for i

298 More dedicated research funding would likely have a ripple effect on ot

299 croft Foundation, Wenzhou Medical University Research Fund, Zhejiang Province Health Innovation Talen

300 China, National Health Commission Scientific Research Fund-Zhejiang Provincial Major Health Science a