ライフサイエンスコーパス: resistive index

1 iabetes, low chronic vascular score, and low resistive index.

2 tility index (VPI), the venous equivalent of resistive index.

3 ion between Young's modulus, eGFR, and renal resistive index.

4 biopsy results, was associated with a higher resistive index (0.87 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.78 +/- 0.14 [P=0.05

5 Hepatic arterial resistive index also increases after a meal, but interob

6 iation for a single measurement was 0.08 for resistive index and 39 msec for systolic acceleration ti

7 Renal Doppler was used to measure resistive index and esophageal Doppler to monitor aortic

8 ng-II, TLR4 deficient mice had reduced renal resistive index and increased renal cortical blood flow

9 Children with SCA also had lower resistive index and pulsatility index values compared wi

10 functional impairments that include elevated resistive index and reduced blood flow in the renal cort

11 characteristic curve less than 0.6 for both resistive index and semiquantitative evaluation of renal

12 The Doppler-based resistive index and semiquantitative evaluation of renal

13 The diagnostic performance of resistive index and semiquantitative evaluation of renal

14 The influence of operator experience on resistive index and semiquantitative evaluation of renal

15 study aimed at evaluating the performance of resistive index and semiquantitative evaluation of renal

16 n, nine sonographers measured hepatic artery resistive index and systolic acceleration time in five h

17 to evaluate diagnostic performance of renal resistive index and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinas

18 study should be ultrasound, using change in resistive index and transvaginal ultrasound.

19 aorta ultrasound revealed a reduction in the resistive index and wall-to-lumen ratio.

20 Increase in the mean resistive index at 15 minutes was 12% in the proper hepa

21 renal-allograft recipients, we measured the resistive index at baseline, at the time of protocol-spe

22 ortal venous blood flow and hepatic arterial resistive index before and 30 minutes after a liquid mea

23 raphic examinations were performed to obtain resistive indexes before and during fontanelle compressi

24 The difference in resistive index between the two groups was not significa

25 (P < .001)--and to increase hepatic arterial resistive index by 0.089 (P < .001)--a change in sonogra

26 of intramural arterial signal recorded, and resistive index calculated.

27 Graft flow volume and resistive index change did not correlate with stenosis.

28 Stroke volume showed no correlations with resistive index changes after fluid challenge in the ove

29 Stroke volume did not correlate with resistive index changes after fluid challenge in the sub

30 terial pressure and bilateral peak velocity, resistive index, coronal vascular cross-sectional area,

31 Although the arterial resistive index did not differentiate between rejection

32 correlation was found between the change in resistive index during compression and elevated intracra

33 id removal and correlated with the change in resistive index during compression of the anterior fonta

34 Surrogate markers (eg, resistive index) fail to quantify actual volumetric flow

35 The mean resistive indexes for the right epididymal head, body, a

36 A resistive index greater than 0.8 was associated with a h

37 A renal resistive index greater than or equal to 0.685 predictin

38 Renal resistive index had a good performance for predicting th

39 OLT recipients developed DAA (defined by HA resistive index [HARI] <0.5) and received oral SVDs.

40 ke growth factor-binding protein 7 and renal resistive index in predicting reversibility of acute kid

41 There was also a significant resistive index increase from 0.69 +/- 0.12 to 0.79 +/-

42 m 209.2 to 331.9 mL/min and hepatic arterial resistive index increased from 0.70 to 0.77 and from 0.6

43 entage of nocturnal fall in SBP and elevated resistive index independently correlated with GFR.

44 ction, high chronic vascular score, and high resistive index irrespective of allograft fibrosis.

45 The intrarenal resistive index is routinely measured in many renal-tran

46 A resistive index less than 0.60 indicated inflammation.

47 Resistive index measurement before and after fluid chall

48 A total of 1124 renal-allograft resistive-index measurements were included in the analys

49 tor experience showed no association between resistive index (odds ratio, 0.02 per international unit

50 differ significantly between patients with a resistive index of at least 0.80 and those with a resist

51 Allograft recipients with a resistive index of at least 0.80 had higher mortality th

52 Several new imaging indices like resistive index of capsular artery, presumed circle area

53 An intrarenal arterial resistive index of less than 0.6 was associated with hig

54 tive index of at least 0.80 and those with a resistive index of less than 0.80 at 3, 12, and 24 month

55 0.80 had higher mortality than those with a resistive index of less than 0.80 at 3, 12, and 24 month

56 intranodular vascularity, pulsatility index, resistive index, or peak-systolic velocity, was associat

57 Statistically significant elevation of the resistive index (P < .01) of the hepatic arteries was ob

58 tration rate (P < 0.001), and improved renal resistive index (P < 0.001) and kidney microcirculation.

59 n (P = 0.007) and low middle cerebral artery resistive index (P = 0.04) were associated with RV dysfu

60 ge was the strongest determinant of a higher resistive index (P<0.001).

61 Doppler abnormalities-including elevation in resistive index-preceded biopsy-confirmed T-cell-mediate

62 -allograft status, although the value of the resistive index remains unclear.

63 elocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), resistive index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI) of ophth

64 rmonic imaging was performed, and interlobar resistive index (RI) and renal blood flow were determine

65 city (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), or resistive index (RI) at 24 hours.

66 Resistive Index (RI) of hepatic artery showed moderate d

67 e-corrected peak systolic velocity (PSV) and resistive index (RI) values were compared between patien

68 averaged maximum mean velocity (V(mean)) and resistive index (RI) were calculated in the middle cereb

69 xpanded criteria donor (ECD) definition, and resistive index (RI) were developed for pretransplant ev

70 ity, portal vein flow volume, hepatic artery resistive index (RI), hepatic artery pulsatility index (

71 city (EDV), peak systolic velocity (PSV) and resistive index (RI).

72 ere renal length, relative echogenicity, and resistive index (RI).

73 rmance of the standard IHA and MHA criteria (resistive index [RI] < 0.5 and classic parvus tardus wav

74 The resistive index, routinely measured at predefined time p

75 For resistive index, the estimated variance components were

76 growth factor-binding protein 7 and of renal resistive index to predict persistent acute kidney injur

77 ced by fluid challenge do not translate into resistive index variations in patients without acute kid

78 ver operating characteristic curve for renal resistive index was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98).

79 Mean resistive index was greater for lymphatic malformation t

80 Renal resistive index was higher in persistent acute kidney in

81 Renal resistive index was measured within 12 hours after admis

82 t protocol-specified biopsy time points, the resistive index was not associated with renal-allograft

83 Maximum change in resistive index was significantly higher (P < .001) in i

84 Mean resistive index was significantly lower in neonates with

85 Renal resistive index was unchanged after fluid challenge in b

86 cal epinephrine; however, Pourcelot's ratio (resistive index) was not significantly different compare

87 healthy subjects, the pulsatility index and resistive index were estimated from mean frequency shift

88 Pulsatility index and resistive index were mapped with color Doppler ultrasoun

89 Portal blood flow and renal and splenic resistive indexes were calculated through echographic me

90 Vessel density, peak flow velocities, and resistive indexes were compared.

91 Resistive indexes were determined for the hepatic arteri

92 eration time, waveform morphology grade, and resistive index) were compared before and after interven

93 Baseline resistive index without fontanelle compression was not c