戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 He was intubated and went onto an artificial respirator.
2 bital were ventilated by a positive pressure respirator.
3 ll fail their fit test for a disposable FFP3 respirator.
4 y and Health Standard for CBRN air-purifying respirators.
5 he decontamination tests on two types of N95 respirators.
6 fold more a-amylase than cloth masks and N95 respirators.
7 tective equipment, including reusable facial respirators.
8 ng facepiece respirators (FFRs), such as N95 respirators.
9 eaking through gaps between the face and N95 respirators.
10 table alternatives to surgical masks and N95 respirators.
11 contact with measles patients; none wore N95 respirators.
12 based, closed-loop controlled protocols into respirators.
13 ance and fit with actual clinical use of N95 respirators.
14 orm filtration simulations of decontaminated respirators.
15 in denaturation to effectively disinfect N95 respirators.
16  but not to the same level as the fit-tested respirators (12%).
17  clusters were randomly assigned to wear N95 respirators (2512 HCP-seasons of observation) and 2058 i
18 sable medical masks (93.8%), followed by N95 respirators (26.2%), and cloth face masks (8.5%).
19 lity while wearing the half-face elastomeric respirator (32.3%; 95% CI, 23.8%-40.7%; P < .001) and th
20 core while wearing the half-face elastomeric respirator (38.4; 95% CI, 23.5-53.3; P < .001) and the P
21  degradation in filtration efficiency of N95 respirators (3M 1860 and 1804) treated in 10% hydrogen p
22 ions reported were for powered air purifying respirators (56% reporting restricted availability).
23 ) indicated a protective effect of masks and respirators against clinical respiratory illness (CRI) (
24 ified the protective effect of facemasks and respirators against respiratory infections among healthc
25 s with COVID-19, recommending the use of N95 respirators alone.
26 ous and assessed the effectiveness of an N95 respirator and surgical mask in blocking transmission.
27 pidly abated after instituting universal N95 respirators and daily testing.
28 ely fit-tested staff for high-filtration N95 respirators and established Web-based staff surveillance
29 hows that when these two kinds of organisms (respirators and fermenters) compete for a limited food s
30  inconclusive about the effectiveness of N95 respirators and medical masks in preventing health care
31 that would facilitate the safe re-use of N95 respirators and provides supporting information for depl
32  steam processing effectively sterilized N95 respirators and retained filtration performance.
33 ovid-19 pandemic confirms the superiority of respirators and supports the use of masks and respirator
34 ntly consider alternative use strategies for respirators and surgical masks during a pandemic that ma
35                   Providing these numbers of respirators and surgical masks represents a logistic cha
36 tions in the form of eyewear, gloves, masks, respirators, and gowns.
37 s; using air filtration devices and personal respirators; and aggressive management of chronic diseas
38 blished after the pandemic, the data suggest respirators are more effective than masks in healthcare,
39                                           If respirators are not available, medical or cloth masks co
40                      Face masks and personal respirators are used to curb the transmission of SARS-Co
41 sonal protective equipment, specifically N95 respirator availability, and ICU staffing.
42 ment supplies with the chief issue being N95 respirator availability.
43                              A poorly fitted respirator blocked 64.5% of total virus and 66.5% of inf
44                             A tightly sealed respirator blocked 99.8% of total virus and 99.6% of inf
45 ht personal protective equipment such as N95 respirators, but their use for higher levels of respirat
46 atient, and relatively short-term use of N95 respirators by other HCPs can lead to a substantial redu
47 isolation of HCPs; (iii) the use of masks or respirators by patients and HCPs; (iv) improved social d
48 and for N95 filtering facepiece respirators (respirators) by healthcare and emergency services person
49                                          N95 respirators can be recharged within 30 s of treatment an
50                       The decontamination of respirators can compromise the structural and functional
51   Mechanistically, cisplatin decreased spare respirator capacity of brain synaptosomes and caused abn
52       In 6 studies, ethylene oxide preserved respirator components in 16 N95 respirator types but lef
53 es), while open-room systems did not degrade respirator components.
54 irus/SARS-CoV-1 [1 study]) without degrading respirator components.
55                       Compared to masks, N95 respirators conferred superior protection against CRI (R
56 ns through the gaps between the face and N95 respirators could compromise the effectiveness of the de
57 bMed and EMBASE was completed for 5 types of respirator-decontaminating processes including UV irradi
58 ructive apnea was induced by turning off the respirator during end expiration for 2 min.
59 irators with that of N95 filtering facepiece respirators during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
60  and manufacturing, as an alternative to N95 respirators during periods of shortage.
61  support extended use and reuse of masks and respirators during short supply.
62 th care workers to use elastomeric half-mask respirators (EHMRs), widely used in construction and man
63        Both surgical masks and unvented KN95 respirators, even without fit-testing, reduce the outwar
64 onal protective equipment such as masks, N95 respirators, eye protection, and gowns when caring for p
65                      N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) are essential for the protection of h
66                          Filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) provide effective protection against
67 r hospitals to reprocess filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs), such as N95 respirators.
68 Equipment, specifically N95 filter face-mask respirators (FFRs).
69  including of N95 masks (filtering facepiece respirators; FFRs).
70                           The hospital had a respirator-fit testing program but no acid-fast bacilli
71                                            A respirator-fit testing program did not protect health ca
72 isease Control and Prevention recommends N95 respirators for all providers who see patients with poss
73  ultraviolet-C (UV-C) decontamination of N95 respirators for emergency reuse has been implemented to
74 ubstitution of filtering face piece 3 (FFP3) respirators for FRSMs.
75 e of the unprecedented shortage of Facepiece Respirators (FPRs), which act as fundamental tools to pr
76 d maximum demand (all healthcare workers use respirators from pandemic onset).
77 tion events (8.2% of HCP-seasons) in the N95 respirator group and 193 (7.2% of HCP-seasons) in the me
78  and 128 influenzalike illness events in the respirator group vs 166 in the mask group (difference, -
79 1556 acute respiratory illness events in the respirator group vs 1711 in the mask group (difference,
80 -confirmed respiratory illness events in the respirator group vs 417 in the mask group (difference, -
81 atory-detected respiratory infections in the respirator group vs 745 in the mask group (difference, -
82                                       In the respirator group, 89.4% of participants reported "always
83 effectively sterilized most pathogens on N95 respirators (&gt;103 reduction in influenza virus [4 studie
84   While limited reuse of filtering facepiece respirators has been permitted as a crisis capacity stra
85 ving the outermost garment, boot covers, and respirator hood harbored the greatest risk and failed in
86  maintained filtration performance in 10 N95 respirators; however, damage was noted in least 1 respir
87 ed respiration with an external cuirass-type respirator in cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging wa
88 and the concomitant delayed weaning from the respirator in critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) p
89 for the use of alternatives to tight-fitting respirators in areas outside of patient rooms during the
90 aboratory study of the efficacy of masks and respirators in blocking inhalation of influenza in aeros
91 ite study that compared medical masks to N95 respirators in preventing viral respiratory infections a
92 espirators and supports the use of masks and respirators in the community during periods of high epid
93 on of time by using 3 M 8211-N95 particulate respirators inoculated with SARS-CoV-2.
94                         Community use of N95 respirators is more protective than surgical masks, whic
95 ircumstances under which the use of masks or respirators is most warranted.
96 edures, but studies show intermittent use of respirators is not protective.
97 of intravenous lines, bladder catheters, and respirators is recommended.
98              In addition, the non-fit-tested respirator lowered the infection rate from 97% (for no p
99 ters) compete for a limited food source, the respirators manage best when they are grouped in cluster
100 ndards was significantly associated with N95 respirator mask availability.
101 antly associated with availability of an N95 respirator mask in the clinic (P < 0.001), emergency roo
102                          We suggest that N95 respirators may be just as important for the care of pat
103             Poor communication while wearing respirators may have fatal complications for patients, a
104                         Universal use of N95 respirators may help decrease nosocomial transmission at
105                                         FFP3 respirators may therefore provide more effective protect
106 y equivalent to or better than their non-N95 respirator medical mask counterparts.
107                                          N95 respirators might reduce SARS-CoV-1 risk versus surgical
108  meltblown nonwoven layers of a specific N95 respirator model (Venus-4400) after treatment with one a
109 of decontamination treatments for a specific respirator model.
110 ases (eg, 2009-like pandemic), the number of respirators needed would be higher because the pandemic
111  air specimens, on surface specimens, and on respirators on days 5-8 after rash onset.
112 ere matched and randomly assigned to the N95 respirator or medical mask groups.
113  of masks (OR = 0.13; 95% CI: 0.03-0.62) and respirators (OR = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.06-0.26) against sever
114 ss of immunity status, HCWs should wear N-95 respirators (or equivalent) when evaluating suspected me
115 ipants were randomized to medical masks, N95 respirators, or targeted use of N95 respirators while do
116 outermost garment, the powered air purifying respirator (PAPR) hood, and the PAPR helmet assembly; re
117 emergency services personnel would require 4 respirators per day.
118 tudies (no clinical trials), and 2 evaluated respirator performance and fit with actual clinical use
119    The results indicate that a poorly fitted respirator performs no better than a loosely fitting mas
120 sulted in a widespread acute shortage of N95 respirators, prompting the Centers for Disease Control a
121                                       An N95 respirator provided the best guard further enhanced by e
122 imated US demand for N95 filtering facepiece respirators (respirators) by healthcare and emergency se
123                                  Particulate respirators such as N95s are an essential component of p
124                                          N95 respirators' superior fit and filtration provide superio
125 gh 14 April 2020 on the effectiveness of N95 respirators, surgical masks, and cloth masks in reducing
126 ctious virus recovered from virus-inoculated respirator test coupons after UVC exposure.
127  level of detection is 67 PFU ml(-1)) on N95 respirator test coupons when irradiated for 120 s per si
128 hy volunteers with an ECG-triggered external respirator that was modified for use in the MR environme
129 y found that among participants using facial respirators that impaired communication, a novel in-ear
130 tion and vaporized hydrogen peroxide damaged respirators the least.
131 ng upon the fit between the headform and the respirator, the inward leakage for the aerosols ranged b
132      While wearing the half-face elastomeric respirator, the mean overall workload score was 67.7 (21
133      While wearing the half-face elastomeric respirator, the mean speech intelligibility was 58.5% (1
134           Conversely, after changing to FFP3 respirators, this risk was significantly reduced (52-100
135           Only 39.7% of agencies provide N95 respirators to their clinical staff; rural agencies are
136 least a 2-log reduction of MS2 and T4 on N95 respirators treated in one cycle with 7.8% hydrogen pero
137  neb-charge, 9.50 +/- 2.78% was found on the respirator tubing and tracheostomy tube and 21.9 +/- 7.1
138 rators; however, damage was noted in least 1 respirator type in 4 studies.
139 de preserved respirator components in 16 N95 respirator types but left residual carcinogenic by-produ
140 ll and are allowed to work while wearing N95 respirators under various vaccination coverage, SARS-CoV
141        When caring for measles patients, N95 respirator use by healthcare workers (HCWs) with documen
142 d use of medical masks alone or targeted N95 respirator use.
143  model to estimate demand for 3 scenarios of respirator use: base case (usage approximately follows e
144 tration efficiency and facial fit for 11 N95 respirators using preheated containers/chambers at 60 C
145 s differ in their guidance on the use of N95 respirators versus medical masks for frontline health ca
146 s the effects of wearing a cloth mask or N95 respirator vs no mask at peak exercise among healthy, ac
147  Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs medical masks as worn by participants in
148 istration of high-dose corticosteroid, and a respirator was switched over to non-invasive positive pr
149 reak in which 50% of the population deployed respirators was considered for risk assessment.
150                        Continuous use of N95 respirators was more efficacious against CRI than interm
151  and test coupons (2.5 cm(2)) of the 3 M-N95 respirator were inoculated with 10(6) plaque-forming uni
152 between anthropometric face-geometry and N95 respirators were scanned using computed tomography.
153                     Forty-three types of N95 respirators were treated with UV irradiation.
154 en 0% and 14.8% in studies where particulate respirators were used.
155 sks, N95 respirators, or targeted use of N95 respirators while doing high-risk procedures or barrier
156 layered controls and tight-fitting masks and respirators will be necessary.
157 conversion to report that they always wore a respirator with a high-efficiency particulate air filter
158  eye protection; and group 6, fit-tested N95 respirator with eye protection.
159 s the effectiveness of elastomeric half-mask respirators with that of N95 filtering facepiece respira
160 with eye protection; group 5, fit-tested N95 respirator without eye protection; and group 6, fit-test
161 ulation would become ill, 1.7 to 3.5 billion respirators would be needed in the base case scenario, 2
162 med that in the base case scenario, up to 16 respirators would be required per day per intensive care

 
Page Top