コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 career dissatisfaction, and job turnover in respiratory care.
2 a and may be useful in guiding perioperative respiratory care.
3 and may be useful for guiding perioperative respiratory care.
5 86 +/- 16% [L]) than did physician-directed respiratory care (64 +/- 21% [S] and 72 +/- 23% [L]) (p
7 eived data from the American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC), The National Board for Respirat
8 of Chest Physicians/American Association for Respiratory Care/American College of Critical Care Medic
10 ovides a short history of the development of respiratory care and its historical relationship with cr
11 upport the integration of LUS into pediatric respiratory care and warrant further research to validat
12 by delineating the historical development of respiratory care as a profession, the development of its
15 In this retrospective study data from the Respiratory Care Center of Chung Shan Medical University
17 .5 days COPD vs. 5 days other, p = .11), ICU respiratory care costs for patients with COPD were $2,42
18 may serve as target areas for reductions in respiratory care costs, it may also be true that these m
19 l (L) criterion for agreement, RTCS-directed respiratory care demonstrated better agreement with the
20 e mandatory overtime is a common practice in respiratory care departments, it was not overwhelming ut
22 NBRC), and the Committee on Accreditation of Respiratory Care education (CoARC) relative to their mem
23 cted a randomized controlled trial comparing respiratory care for adult non-ICU inpatients directed b
28 re maintained (n = 74), or (2) RTCS-directed respiratory care, in which the physician's respiratory c
29 to assign patients to (1) Physician-directed respiratory care, in which the prescribed physician resp
30 urgical techniques and adjunctive therapies, respiratory care, intensive care technology and monitori
32 tments was slightly lower with RTCS-directed respiratory care (mean, $235.70 versus $255.70/pt, p = 0
33 piratory Care (AARC), The National Board for Respiratory Care (NBRC), and the Committee on Accreditat
35 tory care, in which the prescribed physician respiratory care orders were maintained (n = 74), or (2)
36 d respiratory care, in which the physician's respiratory care orders were preempted by a respiratory
37 assessed as agreement between the prescribed respiratory care plan and an algorithm-based "standard c
38 respiratory care orders were preempted by a respiratory care plan generated by the RTCS (n = 71).
39 aluated by an RTCS therapist evaluator whose respiratory care plan was based on sign/symptom-based al
40 ve care unit (ICU) beds per actual number of respiratory care practitioners (RCPs) and ICU beds per p
41 pist-driven protocol (TDP) that included 117 respiratory care practitioners (RCPs) managing 1,067 pat
46 n during the control period was conducted by respiratory care practitioners using a previously publis
48 xploration of the factors that contribute to respiratory care practitioners' moral distress is needed
50 between RTCS-directed and physician-directed respiratory care regarding hospital mortality rate (5.7
51 ts; and (2) compared with physician-directed respiratory care, RTCS-directed respiratory care showed
52 l to the Society of Critical Care Medicine's Respiratory Care Section members and members of the RC_W
53 prescribed a similar number and duration of respiratory care services at a slight savings (that did
54 ory care protocols can enhance allocation of respiratory care services while conserving costs, a rand
57 ian-directed respiratory care, RTCS-directed respiratory care showed greater agreement with Clinical
58 de that (1) compared with physician-directed respiratory care, the RTCS prescribed a similar number a
59 embers, with physicians, social workers, and respiratory care therapists showing increases in signifi
60 - 9.0 versus 7.7 +/- 7.3 d), total number of respiratory care treatments delivered (30.3 +/- 30 versu
64 on-nursing, physical therapy, physician, and respiratory care-were identified to facilitate changes i