ライフサイエンスコーパス: retinoscopy

1 gh cycloplegic autorefraction or cycloplegic retinoscopy.

2 acuity (VA), cover testing, and cycloplegic retinoscopy.

3 as compared to the tone found in cycloplegic retinoscopy.

4 active status was confirmed with cycloplegic retinoscopy.

5 efracted in the laboratory by noncycloplegic retinoscopy.

6 ycloplegic autorefraction versus cycloplegic retinoscopy.

7 with repeat videorefraction and cycloplegic retinoscopy.

8 ive errors, measured by standard cycloplegic retinoscopy.

9 or was measured in 75 Labrador retrievers by retinoscopy.

10 acuity measurement and noncycloplegic static retinoscopy.

11 One-third did not feel that retinoscopy (38.7%; p = 0.21), slit lamp findings (30.3%

12 Cycloplegic retinoscopy, A-scan ultrasonography, slit lamp examinati

13 Each eye's refractive status was measured by retinoscopy along the pupillary axis and at 15 degrees i

14 Refractive errors were measured by retinoscopy along the pupillary axis and at eccentriciti

15 ns were measured along the pupillary axis by retinoscopy and A-scan ultrasonography, respectively.

16 tive development was assessed by cycloplegic retinoscopy and A-scan ultrasonography.

17 Refractive development was assessed by retinoscopy and A-scan ultrasonography.

18 luding choroidal thickness, were measured by retinoscopy and high-frequency A-scan ultrasonography, r

19 ning referral criteria underwent cycloplegic retinoscopy and ophthalmoscopy by the on-site optometris

20 and excellent agreement between cycloplegic retinoscopy and Plusoptix (0.898).

21 fraction was compared to dry and cycloplegic retinoscopy and Retinomax.

22 indicated good agreement between cycloplegic retinoscopy and Spot (0.806) and excellent agreement bet

23 ment with pinhole, underwent non-cycloplegic retinoscopy and subjective refraction.

24 The refractive error was measured by static retinoscopy and subjective refraction.

25 opment and axial dimensions were assessed by retinoscopy and ultrasonography, respectively.

26 errors were measured using refractometry and retinoscopy, and axial ocular dimensions, including chor

27 oss-sectional study design, including streak retinoscopy, anterior segment tomography, A-scan ultraso

28 refractive state of each eye measured using retinoscopy, axial dimensions determined with A-scan ult

29 ror (cycloplegic autorefraction confirmed by retinoscopy), best corrected monocular visual acuity (VA

30 Compared with cycloplegic retinoscopy, both devices underestimated hyperopia or ov

31 opic or astigmatic refractive error found on retinoscopy by an amount proportional to the magnitude o

32 Cycloplegic retinoscopy can be valuable in individual clinical cases

33 refractive error was measured by cycloplegic retinoscopy (cyclopentolate 1%).

34 oplegic refraction was measured using streak retinoscopy during an office visit.

35 tive refraction using auto-refractometer and retinoscopy, followed by subjective refraction, and bio-

36 ) but was in good agreement with cycloplegic retinoscopy for cylinder power and axis.

37 Agreement with retinoscopy for the axis of astigmatism more than 0.75 D

38 ly more myopic measurements than cycloplegic retinoscopy for the sphere and spherical equivalent (P <

39 cycloplegic autorefraction with cycloplegic retinoscopy found a mean difference in spherical equival

40 Change in SER (cycloplegic retinoscopy) from baseline to 36 months.

41 nd without hyperopia (defined as cycloplegic retinoscopy >= + 1.00D and less than + 5.00D) were measu

42 der anesthesia was within 1 D of cycloplegic retinoscopy in 25 subjects (61%) for the sphere, in all

43 retinoscopy under anesthesia and cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.

44 of autorefraction compared with cycloplegic retinoscopy in children.

45 s assessed every 2 to 3 weeks by cycloplegic retinoscopy, keratometry and corneal videotopography, an

46 minations included cycloplegic refraction by retinoscopy, keratometry measurements, and A-scan ultras

47 ent was assessed along the pupillary axis by retinoscopy, keratometry, and A-scan ultrasonography.

48 fractive errors was assessed periodically by retinoscopy, keratometry, and A-scan ultrasonography.

49 ontinuous light were assessed by cycloplegic retinoscopy, keratometry, and A-scan ultrasonography.

50 power, and axial dimensions were assessed by retinoscopy, keratometry, and ultrasonography, respectiv

51 h any targeted condition were noncycloplegic retinoscopy (NCR), Retinomax autorefractor (Right Manufa

52 Noncycloplegic retinoscopy (NCR), the Retinomax Autorefractor (Nikon, T

53 c examinations, including autorefractometry, retinoscopy, ophthalmoscopy, slit lamp, visual acuity me

54 efractive development was assessed by streak retinoscopy performed along the pupillary axis and at ec

55 Refractive development was assessed by retinoscopy performed along the pupillary axis and at ec

56 acuity (VA), cover testing, and cycloplegic retinoscopy, performed by VIP-certified optometrists and

57 al acuity (BCVA; Snellen's charts), Orbscan, retinoscopy, refraction, and slit-lamp biomicroscopy wer

58 photorefractors correlated with cycloplegic retinoscopy refractive findings for sphere and spherical

59 had an automated refraction measurement with retinoscopy refractometer and aberrometer (NIDEK OPD Sca

60 d to follow-up a month later for cycloplegic retinoscopy, repeat noncycloplegic videorefraction and o

61 n was measured using a modified Nott dynamic retinoscopy technique.

62 n outcome measure was the difference between retinoscopy under anesthesia and cycloplegic retinoscopy

63 The average difference between retinoscopy under anesthesia and cycloplegic retinoscopy

64 Retinoscopy under anesthesia was within 1 D of cyclopleg

65 ge age of 3.7 years (range, 0.8 to 11 years) retinoscopy under anesthesia yielded significantly more

66 retinoscopy under anesthesia and cycloplegic retinoscopy was -0.98 diopters (D) (95% limit of agreeme

67 Nott retinoscopy was performed on 111 subjects in binocular v

68 Modified Nott dynamic retinoscopy was used to measure lag and lead of accommod

69 All children then underwent retinoscopy with cycloplegia by an examiner who was unaw

70 uded visual acuity (VA) testing, cycloplegic retinoscopy with subjective refinement if indicated, ocu

71 Within 6 months, streak retinoscopy without cycloplegia was performed under gene