ライフサイエンスコーパス: reverse transcriptase-PCR

1 the control) and a prototype, and SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) results were compared

2 A reverse transcriptase PCR was developed to detect 50 or

3 On admission, reverse transcriptase PCR identified Ebola virus RNA at

4 was not detected by Northern blot analysis, reverse transcriptase PCR revealed that these genes are

5 Using a CUP1 reporter assay and reverse transcriptase PCR, we demonstrate that this alle

6 Northern blot and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) analyses revealed tha

7 Northern blotting and reverse transcriptase PCR demonstrated that relQ is cotr

8 stationary phase in Luria-Bertani broth and reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) with oligonucleotide

9 human umbilical vein endothelial cells, and reverse transcriptase PCR demonstrated DOCK5 siRNA reduc

10 uenza test was compared to viral culture and reverse transcriptase PCR by the use of three different

11 s and subsequent nucleic acid extraction and reverse transcriptase PCR assays.

12 Reporter fusion and reverse transcriptase PCR studies indicated that a novel

13 Immunohistochemical and reverse transcriptase PCR approaches established that US

14 ere performed using immunohistochemistry and reverse transcriptase PCR and operating characteristics

15 ne expression profiles using microarrays and reverse transcriptase PCR.

16 promoter was observed by RLM-5'RACE PCR and reverse transcriptase PCR analyses during expression.

17 acteriology, immunoassays, gel-based PCR and reverse transcriptase PCR, and quantitative real-time PC

18 ected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcriptase PCR.

19 ed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse transcriptase PCR.

20 clinical isolates were analyzed by PCR- and reverse transcriptase PCR-based analyses, respectively.

21 Gene expression studies (lacZ reporter and reverse transcriptase PCR experiments) failed to show ev

22 liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and reverse transcriptase PCR, including lysozyme, siderocal

23 Microarray analysis and reverse transcriptase-PCR was performed with mRNA isolat

24 Northern blot and reverse transcriptase-PCR studies indicated a broad low

25 spinal cord preparation, immunolabeling, and reverse transcriptase-PCR assays.

26 Microarray and reverse transcriptase-PCR analyses revealed reduced expr

27 rleukin-6 (IL-6) secretion by the MMECs, and reverse transcriptase-PCR confirmed drug-related down-re

28 were evaluated with microarray profiling and reverse transcriptase-PCR.

29 logical methods, including culture, EIA, and reverse-transcriptase PCR.

30 e-specific mutagenesis, promoter fusions and reverse-transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR).

31 y nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and reverse-transcriptase PCR for HHV-6 and HHV-7 and by qua

32 s antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, reverse transcriptase PCR, the heteroduplex mobility ass

33 rans has been investigated by Northern blot, reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), primer extension, an

34 ined using immunofluorescence, western blot, reverse-transcriptase PCR, chromatin immunoprecipitation

35 A 365-bp reverse transcriptase PCR product was generated from the

36 cimens and used as a template to amplify, by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), gonococcal genes kno

37 from mice and analyzed histologically and by reverse transcriptase PCR; leukocytes were isolated, sti

38 hybridization; HPV16 E6 mRNA was assayed by reverse transcriptase PCR.

39 f RIII/Sa mice for virus characterization by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) cloning and sequencin

40 The microarray data were confirmed by reverse transcriptase PCR analysis and promoter fusion a

41 o detect exons in several genes confirmed by reverse transcriptase PCR.

42 RL), (ii) detection of T. pallidum in CSF by reverse transcriptase PCR, or (iii) new vision loss or h

43 ng CD4+ T cells, as directly demonstrated by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR).

44 LAT expression was detectable by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) in a number of tissue

45 For bulk stools, rates of detection by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and enzyme immunoassa

46 It was determined by reverse transcriptase PCR that the expression level of a

47 TFF2 expression in tissues was determined by reverse transcriptase PCR, and the inflammatory and prol

48 35 degrees C expressed fur as determined by reverse transcriptase PCR.

49 S rRNA, sdhC, and sdhD genes was examined by reverse transcriptase PCR which showed that these three

50 he expression of these genes was followed by reverse transcriptase PCR throughout the developmental c

51 trigeminal, cervical, and lumbar ganglia by reverse transcriptase PCR.

52 patterns were confirmed for certain genes by reverse transcriptase PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorben

53 ty choline transporter (ChT), as measured by reverse transcriptase PCR.

54 subset of strains that were G nontypeable by reverse transcriptase PCR and found surprisingly that tw

55 Fra-2 cDNA generated from rat osteoblasts by reverse transcriptase PCR was 95% homologous to human Fr

56 an serum circulating mRNAs were presented by reverse transcriptase PCR.

57 20 to 40 copies/ml) but can be quantified by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) assays with single-co

58 We verified our results by reverse transcriptase PCR of several genes in both flat

59 rus (NoV), astrovirus, and rotavirus (RV) by reverse transcriptase PCR.

60 BVs in 48% (44/92) of the fecal specimens by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and amplicon sequenci

61 etection of ompP2A and ompP2B transcripts by reverse transcriptase PCR indicated that these genes wer

62 s and confirmed as a transcriptional unit by reverse transcriptase PCR analysis.

63 ng cancer cell lines for WWOX alterations by reverse transcriptase-PCR, loss of heterozygosity, and m

64 All GFP-labeled cells assayed by reverse transcriptase-PCR (n = 40) were Phox2b+, VGlut2+

65 ls were increased by oxidants as assessed by reverse transcriptase-PCR.

66 xcess production of glomerular VEGF(165)b by reverse transcriptase-PCR, immunohistochemistry, and ELI

67 PR-1, FPRL-1, and FPRL-2 in SKCO-15 cells by reverse transcriptase-PCR and identified expression of a

68 from integrated transgenes were detected by reverse transcriptase-PCR.

69 the full length (TRPM2-L) was determined by reverse transcriptase-PCR, and localization of endogenou

70 of a BKCa channel in HUVEC was documented by reverse transcriptase-PCR.

71 We evaluated by reverse transcriptase-PCR the expression of GPCR142 mRNA

72 KOV3, AD10, A2780 and CP70) was evaluated by reverse transcriptase-PCR, western blots and immunohisto

73 ecipitation of HuR-RNA complexes followed by reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis showed that HuR inter

74 assessed by gene array analysis, followed by reverse transcriptase-PCR confirmation for significant g

75 enome data bases, and a cDNA was isolated by reverse transcriptase-PCR using Arabidopsis genome seque

76 and in embryonic and adult mouse kidneys by reverse transcriptase-PCR and immunolocalization.

77 dothelial, hepatocyte, and neural markers by reverse transcriptase-PCR and immunohistochemistry.

78 g a specific primer pair to amplify Nanog by reverse transcriptase-PCR, we detected the expression of

79 showed a seed-specific expression pattern by reverse transcriptase-PCR.

80 HT29 colon cancer cells were then probed by reverse transcriptase-PCR, Western Blot analysis, and li

81 icrovessel endothelial-1 cells was tested by reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR).

82 ere confirmed in extracts of SCC-13 cells by reverse-transcriptase PCR and by western blot, and by im

83 Tissues were also tested by reverse-transcriptase PCR for the presence of parvovirus

84 g a combination of Ca2+ imaging, single-cell reverse transcriptase-PCR and immunostaining, we show th

85 Based on single-cell reverse transcriptase-PCR and real-time PCR quantificati

86 Single-cell reverse transcriptase-PCR confirmed the expression of KC

87 ells by immunohistochemistry and single-cell reverse transcriptase-PCR revealed that pyramidal cells

88 ultidisciplinary approaches from single-cell reverse transcriptase-PCR, mass spectrometry, to ex vivo

89 Transcriptional reporter constructs, reverse transcriptase PCR, and deletion analysis demonst

90 nes were further analyzed using conventional reverse transcriptase-PCR and real-time quantitative PCR

91 Restriction enzyme digestion reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis identified three cDNA

92 Differential display reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), cDNA-representationa

93 Differential display reverse transcriptase-PCR identified altered mRNA expres

94 We used a differential display reverse transcriptase-PCR screen for mRNAs isolated from

95 f the env gene, and linkage by long-distance reverse transcriptase PCR established that these predomi

96 ected in the OmcF-deficient mutant by either reverse transcriptase PCR or Northern blot analyses.

97 omas and breast cancer as measured by either reverse transcriptase PCR or nucleic acid sequence-based

98 a-Ala NMTase were used to design primers for reverse transcriptase-PCR, and several cDNA clones were

99 Furthermore, reverse transcriptase PCR and Northern blot analyses sho

100 Furthermore, reverse transcriptase PCR and real-time PCR experiments

101 Furthermore, reverse-transcriptase PCR and immunoblotting demonstrate

102 m two patient fecal samples using heminested reverse transcriptase PCR.

103 However, reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis revealed that the inc

104 ltiple assays including immunocytochemistry, reverse transcriptase PCR, microarray profiling, acetylc

105 Results from immunoprecipitation-reverse transcriptase PCR experiments suggest that VP35

106 lzheimer rRNA contains 8-hydroxyguanosine in reverse transcriptase-PCR.

107 domains of intermediate filament proteins in reverse transcriptase-PCR experiments to identify and cl

108 , all of which were validated by independent reverse-transcriptase PCR experiments, with validation r

109 esolution) time points using immune markers, reverse-transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), and gene array appro

110 Using microarrays, reverse transcriptase-PCR, and immunohistochemistry, the

111 developed and validated a one-step multiplex reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) to simultaneously det

112 atory-developed test (modified CDC 2019-nCoV reverse transcriptase PCR [RT-PCR] assay with RNA extrac

113 Nested reverse transcriptase PCR and flow cytometry were used t

114 This study demonstrates the application of reverse transcriptase PCR and RNA interference screens a

115 se operon (gpdABC), based on the findings of reverse transcriptase PCR analysis.

116 ew peptides were identified by sequencing of reverse transcriptase-PCR products obtained from oral mu

117 expertise requirements limit the utility of reverse transcriptase-PCR methods for rapid diagnostics.

118 etected by either DNA microarray analysis or reverse transcriptase PCR in MCMV-infected mouse fibrobl

119 r localization using immunohistochemistry or reverse transcriptase PCR and assessed histopathology, c

120 lation being identified by flow cytometry or reverse transcriptase-PCR for T-cell receptor usage or b

121 real-time polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR), reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) and quantitative nuc

122 post-symptom onset or post-initial positive reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) result were 92.9% (78

123 ervals on the basis of expression profiling, reverse transcriptase-PCR, haplotypes, and sequence anal

124 is observation was verified with qualitative reverse transcriptase-PCR and ELISA in human endothelial

125 Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis further ind

126 Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-QPCR) and flow cytometry a

127 Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR analyses demonstrated that exp

128 Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR analyses show that hut locus t

129 Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR analysis with RNA from Schu S4

130 Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR and immunoblot analyses reveal

131 Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR and reporter gene fusion data

132 Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR indicated that EA promoted the

133 A quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR assay (qRT-PCR) revealed GSIII

134 L-6, a microarray approach, and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (q-RT-PCR), 5 target genes (tu

135 erase chain reaction (qPCR) and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses.

136 nds (5' RACE) for HIV-1 RNA and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR).

137 Using Northern blotting and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR, we measured the kinetics of e

138 oth DNA microarray analysis and quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR.

139 w cytometry-based IFN bioassay, quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), and immunoassays.

140 ication of bacteriophage MS2 by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) could be improved fr

141 asa, DRC, were EBOV positive by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR).

142 s was independently verified by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR and in situ hybridization.

143 A validation was carried out by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR in 2 different set of samples.

144 genome and TAg transcription by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR in cultured tumor cells in vit

145 This was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR in infected and uninfected gas

146 e transcripts were evaluated by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR in PCa cell lines and circulat

147 and 30 miRNAs was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR in samples from set 1 and set

148 We have confirmed by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR that mRNAs corresponding to al

149 Here we show by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR that SANC express Ca(2+)-activ

150 in-embedded tissues of NSCLC by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR to determine its clinicopathol

151 Results from quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR analysis clearly demonstrated

152 Using an MDV genome quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) array and chromatin

153 NA and/or translational levels, quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) and polysome analyse

154 Pan-genome microarrays, quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR), and transcriptional

155 On the basis of quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) data, we propose a m

156 , we have used GeneChips and/or quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR to study UTI89 recovered from

157 of simplex and duplex real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) assays for the detec

158 Real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) analysis of virus tit

159 ital PCR (ddPCR), and real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR) from nine human cell

160 ses were evaluated by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR and immunoassays, and the quan

161 A real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR assay with single-copy sensiti

162 Real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR used to quantitate transcripti

163 ityper technology and real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR, respectively, indicates more

164 nscript profiling and follow-up quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR), reporter fusion, an

165 nts with stage I NSCLC by using quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR assay.

166 Using quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR, the expression of argC, argG,

167 the expression of 84 HSPs using quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR.

168 of individual transcripts using quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR.

169 enome microarray, combined with quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) and RNA sequencing (

170 Quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR demonstrated maximal expressio

171 Quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR indicated that CFTR message le

172 Quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR showed that S1P treatment of S

173 In this study, array and quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR techniques were used to examin

174 and flow cytometry, as well as quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis, we found that endoge

175 ssion results were validated by quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR (QRT-PCR), and results at the

176 cholic acid, were determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemis

177 Transcription analysis by quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) indicates that all fa

178 Verification by quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR confirmed significantly increa

179 The finding was confirmed by quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR, western blotting, and immunoh

180 asive bladder cancer (NMIBC) by quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR.

181 Microdissected OHC and DC quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR and immunohistology localizes

182 crosslink immunoprecipitation, quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunoblot exper

183 condition and degree of injury, quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR (qPCR) and ANOVA were used to

184 were determined using real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR.

185 vels were assayed by real-time, quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR.

186 Using quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR and immunohistochemisty, we ca

187 mRNA in urine particulates with quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR.

188 Quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis showed that

189 Quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR analysis of ISC-S and rhodanes

190 Quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR revealed nematode inducibility

191 al models using flow cytometry, quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR), and RNA-Seq for PD-

192 d gene-expression changes using quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR), immunofluorescence,

193 a finding that was confirmed by quantitative reverse-transcriptase-PCR, immunohistochemistry (IHC), a

194 an expanded redesign of the WHO-recommended reverse transcriptase PCRs (RT-PCRs).

195 The results of semiquantitative reverse transcriptase PCR analysis and in vivo transcrip

196 ype progenitor by real-time semiquantitative reverse transcriptase PCR experiments.

197 beta, and aromatase mRNA by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR.

198 RNA, which was profiled by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR.

199 cation of both DNA and mRNA targets [in situ reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR)], from frozen or para

200 Two technologies, allele-specific reverse transcriptase PCR and a Ty1HRT yeast system, cou

201 One-step reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was performed in pico

202 In this study, reverse transcriptase PCR sequencing of the RNA genome o

203 d followed intensively with a supersensitive reverse transcriptase PCR assay with a lower limit of qu

204 = 0.0001) but less sensitive than the TaqMan reverse transcriptase PCR (P = 0.0001).

205 A fluorogenic-probe hydrolysis (TaqMan)-reverse transcriptase PCR assay for classical swine feve

206 ng pathways using DNA microarray technology, reverse transcriptase-PCR, Western blot, 3-dimensional r

207 roved diagnostic sensitivity provided by the reverse transcriptase PCR assays.

208 As determined through reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR), quantitative RT-PCR,

209 in NP cells based on quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis.

210 Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) separated and measur

211 udied, as assessed by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR).

212 genotype, and the vaccine-specific real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) assay described by F

213 values noted on serial qualitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) of respiratory speci

214 Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) procedures for detec

215 design of an internally controlled real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) that detects all fou

216 cular assays, such as conventional real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR), detect total RNA in

217 retrograde dye techniques and with real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) analyses of single-ne

218 We have developed and evaluated a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) assay for the detecti

219 Detailed examination with real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) confirmed the increas

220 A real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) screening revealed th

221 escence antibody testing (DFA) and real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) using the CDC assay.

222 Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was used as the gold

223 Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was utilized as a str

224 Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RTrtPCR) offers possible grea

225 e microarray results, we performed real-time reverse transcriptase PCR analyses for a selection of th

226 DNA microarray and real-time reverse transcriptase PCR analyses indicated that severa

227 Using microarray and real-time reverse transcriptase PCR analyses, we found that SaeRS

228 Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR analysis indicated that this i

229 Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR analysis was used to validate

230 in infected mice and humans using real-time reverse transcriptase PCR and immunoblotting.

231 creened for the presence of SVA by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR and virus isolation.

232 blast (HFF) cells were examined by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR and whole-genome array.

233 ensitive and specific quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay to detect the H274Y muta

234 We used a quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay to measure the transcrip

235 Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assays indicated that slr is t

236 Immunofluorescence and real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assays showed that the levels

237 rral laboratories were screened by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assays using different primers

238 Microarray data were validated by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR for genes encoding early growt

239 rmulated as a one-tube, multiplex, real-time reverse transcriptase PCR for serotype identification.

240 We report a failure of the real-time reverse transcriptase PCR H7 subtyping protocol currentl

241 A multiplex real-time reverse transcriptase PCR has been developed for the rap

242 umigatus genome was analyzed using real-time reverse transcriptase PCR in different environmental con

243 Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR indicated an absence of transc

244 al gene expression by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR revealed that pretreatment of

245 Western blot analysis and real-time reverse transcriptase PCR revealed that the protein and

246 en assay was compared to Cepheid's real-time reverse transcriptase PCR RSV analyte-specific reagents.

247 Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR showed that the ratio of betaB

248 In this study, real-time reverse transcriptase PCR was used to determine the kine

249 cing of bisulfite-modified DNA and real-time reverse transcriptase PCR, respectively.

250 By using uidA fusions and real-time reverse transcriptase PCR, we demonstrate here that the

251 ssociated genes using quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR.

252 the fhbA gene, as demonstrated by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR.

253 were substantiated by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR.

254 XN expression was determined using real-time reverse transcriptase PCR.

255 vation was also demonstrated using real time reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis.

256 Real time reverse transcriptase-PCR and Western blot analysis reve

257 dynamic range for our quantitative real time reverse transcriptase-PCR approach, particularly for the

258 bsence of 4E-BP1, as determined by real time reverse transcriptase-PCR assays and promoter assays for

259 d a medium-throughput quantitative real time reverse transcriptase-PCR platform for the analysis of t

260 Real time reverse transcriptase-PCR used to assess the Cyp2C39 mRN

261 Quantitative real time reverse transcriptase-PCR was used to confirm the microa

262 Immunoblot assay and real time reverse transcriptase-PCR were used to determine express

263 Gel shift, real time reverse transcriptase-PCR, and Western blot analyses sho

264 Using microarray, real time reverse transcriptase-PCR, immunohistochemistry, and HSD

265 ed the upregulation of 14 genes by real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR and confirmed Act-induced prod

266 Real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR and in situ hybridization conf

267 gh glucose, which was confirmed by real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR and RNase protection analysis.

268 vels in kidney cortex, measured by real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR and Western blot analysis, res

269 r), were confirmed by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR as up-regulated in subjects wi

270 mRNA sequencing, and quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR of tissue biopsy samples.

271 unohistochemistry and quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR.

272 f-life insulin pre-mRNA species by real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR.

273 d pandemic H1N1 virus infection by real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR or viral culture; a probable c

274 rd and the retina via quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase PCR.

275 rmore, microarray and quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses revealed de

276 pregulated in HSFs by quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase-PCR and flow cytometry.

277 anscriptome analysis, quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase-PCR, and quantitative immunohistoc

278 subjected to diagnostic tests for BVDV--two reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) assays, two commercia

279 Using reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), we first uncovered t

280 Using reverse transcriptase PCR and Western blot analysis to e

281 Using reverse transcriptase PCR we found open reading frames M

282 Using reverse transcriptase PCR, we also identified a nine-gen

283 Using reverse transcriptase PCR, we showed that ORF011 and ORF

284 s measured on a population of cells by using reverse transcriptase PCR, microarrays or high-throughpu

285 mRNA levels from tissues are measured using reverse transcriptase PCR, microarray analysis or high-t

286 Using reverse transcriptase-PCR and hTERT promoter activity as

287 Using reverse transcriptase-PCR, we detected expression of ASI

288 Using reverse transcriptase-PCR, we found that artemin mRNA wa

289 Noxa induction was confirmed by using reverse transcriptase-PCR and immunoblot analyses in mul

290 and blood taken for Ebola confirmation using reverse-transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) and for haematologica

291 s were confirmed using an in-house-validated reverse transcriptase PCR ASR-based assay.

292 ncement, we assessed cytokine production via reverse transcriptase PCR and enzyme-linked immunosorben

293 mRNA expression was determined via reverse transcriptase-PCR.

294 Diagnostic viral reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) of nose and throat sw

295 cases according to the result of Ebola virus reverse-transcriptase PCR (EBOV RT-PCR) testing.

296 d Delta fosB probes was verified by in vitro reverse transcriptase-PCR amplification to a single frag

297 The assays were evaluated with reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) using 411 nasopharyng

298 and their expression was also confirmed with reverse transcriptase-PCR.

299 Ralpha, and these changes were verified with reverse transcriptase-PCR.

300 All specimens were tested for influenza with reverse-transcriptase PCR, and if the result was positiv