ライフサイエンスコーパス: rhizobia

1 on of these free fatty acids were unknown in rhizobia.

2 vo nodule organogenesis and accommodation of rhizobia.

3 ctions between the plant and nitrogen-fixing rhizobia.

4 wild-type roots 24 h after inoculation with rhizobia.

5 lowed auxin transport control in response to rhizobia.

6 ignals present in the surface or secreted by rhizobia.

7 on-related gene expression in the absence of rhizobia.

8 o the translational machinery in response to rhizobia.

9 25 (symrk knockout mutant) in the absence of rhizobia.

10 of association with polysomes in response to rhizobia.

11 as largely driven by changes in diversity of rhizobia.

12 elop from the pocket and become colonized by rhizobia.

13 with nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria known as rhizobia.

14 les in association with nitrogen-fixing soil rhizobia.

15 their cognate avirulence genes derived from rhizobia.

16 led nodules and their infection by symbiotic rhizobia.

17 nts form symbioses with soil bacteria called rhizobia.

18 uptake from AM fungi and fixed nitrogen from rhizobia.

19 zation during initial root hair responses to rhizobia.

20 nduce nodule organogenesis in the absence of rhizobia.

21 ies of C. crescentus and the nitrogen-fixing rhizobia.

22 main route for delivering iron to symbiotic rhizobia.

23 ngi and nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria called rhizobia.

24 ble mechanism for sanctions against cheating rhizobia.

25 is with bacteria collectively referred to as rhizobia.

26 reversible binding were the FixL proteins of Rhizobia.

27 tch in the FixL/FixJ two-component system of Rhizobia.

28 formation and to form nodules on exposure to rhizobia.

29 dopseudomonas palustris and FixK proteins of rhizobia.

30 I)-siderophore receptor from nitrogen-fixing rhizobia.

31 ity and thus promote infection of legumes by rhizobia.

32 to establish symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing rhizobia.

33 h and development, as well as symbiosis with rhizobia.

34 heir intimate symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing rhizobia.

35 symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria known as rhizobia.

36 legumes and soil bacteria collectively named rhizobia.

37 - indicating that selection favours cheating rhizobia.

38 rlying early infection of the legume host by rhizobia.

39 development and infection by nitrogen-fixing rhizobia.

40 e beneficial interaction with soil bacteria, rhizobia.

41 nly when coinoculated with the corresponding rhizobia.

42 fense and enable symbiotic associations with rhizobia.

43 ndent on Nod factor production by compatible rhizobia.

44 oordinated, program that allows infection by rhizobia.

45 production and carbon regulatory network of rhizobia.

46 with nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria known as rhizobia.

47 nitrogen-fixing bacteria collectively called rhizobia.

48 mologous operons recently characterized from rhizobia.

49 s, uninfected root segments, and free-living rhizobia.

50 riation in the symbiosis between legumes and rhizobia.

51 s formed by the legume in its symbiosis with rhizobia.

52 mivora and colonization defects by symbiotic rhizobia.

53 host and harbor thousands of nitrogen-fixing rhizobia.

54 rogen-fixing root nodule symbioses with soil rhizobia.

55 on these legumes perform in association with rhizobia.

56 effect on the binding of purified lectin to rhizobia, a result that will facilitate forthcoming expe

57 ned to explore how nitrogen-fixing bacteria (rhizobia) adapt to legumes.

58 whereas, across 14 experiments that compete rhizobia against soil populations or each other, the poo

59 and the root symbioses with nitrogen-fixing rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhiza were similar to the w

60 Y) are essential for infection of legumes by rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF).

61 Rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi produce signal

62 thogens, while infection and colonization by rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi was maintained

63 Lipochitin Nod signals are produced by rhizobia and are required for the establishment of a nit

64 The growth and persistence of rhizobia and bradyrhizobia in soils are negatively impac

65 of the Fix network is conserved between the rhizobia and C. crescentus, a free-living aerobe that ca

66 ection threads that were sometimes devoid of rhizobia and formed small nodules with greatly reduced n

67 The nitrogen-fixing symbiosis between rhizobia and legume plants is a model of coevolved nutri

68 impact and the selective interaction between rhizobia and legumes culminating in development of funct

69 Signaling between rhizobia and legumes initiates development of a unique p

70 tiation of the symbiotic interaction between rhizobia and legumes.

71 deficiencies and symbiotic interactions with rhizobia and mycorrhiza were investigated.

72 icroorganisms like nitrogen-fixing symbiotic rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi produce chitin-based sign

73 stablishment of symbiotic relationships with rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi.

74 Successful root infection by rhizobia and nodule organogenesis require the activation

75 rol of iron-dependent gene expression in the rhizobia and other taxa of the Alphaproteobacteria is fu

76 he result of the interaction of legumes with rhizobia and requires the mitotic activation and differe

77 strategies, such as persister formation for rhizobia and reversal of spore germination by mycorrhiza

78 P-binding cassette transporters from several rhizobia and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, bu

79 ed N tissue concentrations in the absence of rhizobia and that this controls lateral root density in

80 Coinoculation of roots with rhizobia and the flavonoids naringenin, isoliquiritigeni

81 ims to summarize the metabolic plasticity of rhizobia and the importance of amino acid cycling.

82 FadLSm homologs from related symbiotic alpha-rhizobia and the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefacien

83 in the first 72 h of the interaction between rhizobia and their host plants, nodule primordium induct

84 enes function in symbiotic processes in both Rhizobia and their host plants.

85 ion in infection threads are normal, whereas rhizobia and their symbiotic plant cells become necrotic

86 evolve de novo, and published data on legume-rhizobia and yucca-moth mutualisms are consistent with P

87 netic variation and adaptive trajectories of rhizobia - and, potentially, other facultative symbionts

88 g a GFP-tagged Lupac 08 mutant together with rhizobia, and by using immunogold labeling.

89 biotic bacteria, collectively referred to as rhizobia, and the initiation of cell divisions in the ro

90 mbiotic status with rhizobia, specificity on rhizobia, and the number of introduced ranges.

91 hat mediates O2-dependent differentiation in rhizobia, and therefore hemB expression is under develop

92 In particular, rhizobia appear to advocate for their access to the host

93 hizobium fitness imply that most ineffective rhizobia are 'defective' rather than 'defectors'; this e

94 Rhizobia are accommodated as endosymbionts within latera

95 During nodulation, rhizobia are entrapped within curled root hairs to form

96 Within the nodules, rhizobia are found as bacteroids, which perform the nitr

97 st genes on rhizobial fitness (i.e. how many rhizobia are released from host nodules) and strain-spec

98 lant cells become necrotic immediately after rhizobia are released from infection threads into symbio

99 Rhizobia are soil bacteria known for fixing nitrogen ins

100 Rhizobia are soil bacteria that form important symbiotic

101 ides further evidence that the K antigens of rhizobia are strain-specific antigens which are produced

102 s toward the developing nodule primordia and rhizobia are taken up into the nodule cells, where they

103 Root nodule bacteria (RNB) or "rhizobia" are a type of plant growth promoting bacteria,

104 , closely related bacterial species, such as rhizobia, are able to transfer DNA to host plant cells w

105 mechanisms by which the host recognizes the rhizobia as pathogens and how, subsequently, these pathw

106 resses, and symbiotic nitrogen fixation with rhizobia, as well as molecular breeding.

107 Symbiosis between legumes (e.g. soybean) and rhizobia bacteria (e.g. Bradyrhizobium japonicum) result

108 es metabolite exchange between endosymbiotic rhizobia bacteria and the legume host.

109 otype of inhibited or delayed recruitment of rhizobia bacteria to host plant roots, fewer root nodule

110 nitrogen via symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing rhizobia bacteria, in rotation with nonleguminous crops.

111 action between the plant and nitrogen-fixing rhizobia bacteria.

112 Rhizobia belong to hundreds of species restricted to a d

113 However, it is not known how rhizobia benefit from nodulation of legume hosts because

114 ducer-independent and because all nodulating rhizobia, both alpha- and beta-proteobacteria have commo

115 were not impaired in epidermal responses to rhizobia but had significantly reduced nodule primordium

116 selection consistently favoured cheating by rhizobia, but did not favour legumes that provided less

117 ing symbiosis initiation between legumes and rhizobia, but it has not been established whether these

118 vates nodule organogenesis in the absence of rhizobia, but its ectodomain is required for proper symb

119 ormation in legumes in response to symbiotic rhizobia, but the molecular mechanism(s) of ethylene act

120 ating) decreased the reproductive success of rhizobia by about 50%.

121 le symbiosis, intracellular accommodation of rhizobia by legumes is a prerequisite for nitrogen fixat

122 It is now generally accepted that rhizobia can actively suppress host immune responses dur

123 Some species of rhizobia can colonize cereals but do not fix nitrogen on

124 Because free-living rhizobia can reproduce, and may benefit from the increas

125 gen, but these data support predictions that rhizobia can subvert plant defenses and evolve to exploi

126 We found that in the cre1 mutant, symbiotic rhizobia cannot locally alter acro- and basipetal auxin

127 Nitrogen-fixing rhizobia colonize legume roots via plant-made intracellu

128 hat legumes exercise partner choice, but the rhizobia compared were not otherwise isogenic.

129 A number of rhizobia contain functionally conserved, sequentially ac

130 asma membrane iron transporters move it into rhizobia-containing cells, where iron is used as the cof

131 nsing FixLJ-K system, initially described in rhizobia, controls microaerobic respiration, photophosph

132 etween leguminous plants and nitrogen-fixing rhizobia culminate in the formation of specialized organ

133 mes and nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria called rhizobia culminates in the development of root nodules,

134 symbiosis between leguminous plants and soil rhizobia culminates in the formation of nitrogen-fixing

135 almost all with PPK1 as well); these include rhizobia, cyanobacteria, Streptomyces, and several patho

136 d can either block or promote symbiosis with rhizobia depending on their molecular composition.

137 and had larger populations of colony-forming rhizobia despite their smaller size.

138 e hosts and the cocktail of T3Es secreted by rhizobia determine the symbiotic outcome.

139 AMF and rhizobia differentially increased phosphorus (P) and nit

140 nverted repeat-lacking clade (IRLC) legumes, rhizobia differentiate into nitrogen-fixing bacteroids.

141 In legume nodules, rhizobia differentiate into nitrogen-fixing forms called

142 of rhizobia in two different hosts where the rhizobia differentiate into swollen nonreproductive bact

143 Symbiotic rhizobia differentiate physiologically and morphological

144 Rhizobia directly regulate the expression of genes requi

145 Legume nodulation by nitrogen-fixing rhizobia displays strict host specificity, primarily det

146 We concluded that rhizobia do not influence the effect of a native parasit

147 Rhizobia (e.g. Rhizobium, Sinorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium,

148 cialized systems in which the differentiated rhizobia effectively become ammonia factories.

149 Rhizobia elicit de novo formation of a novel root organ

150 progress made in decoding host control over rhizobia, empirically examining both molecular and cellu

151 Rather than sense iron directly, the rhizobia employ the iron response regulator (Irr) to mon

152 The nodC genes from rhizobia encode an N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase (chi

153 Each species of rhizobia establishes a symbiosis with a limited set of l

154 ly deposited rhizobia into plant host cells; rhizobia failed to differentiate further in these cases.

155 esponse to symbiotic signals produced by the rhizobia, few sites of in vivo phosphorylation have prev

156 zed organs called root nodules, in which the rhizobia fix atmospheric nitrogen and transfer it to the

157 es in the development of root nodules, where rhizobia fix atmospheric nitrogen and transfer it to the

158 legumes also develop a nodule symbiosis with rhizobia for nitrogen acquisition.

159 ling pathway that is used by AM fungi and by rhizobia for their symbiotic associations with legumes.

160 surface and extracellular polysaccharides of rhizobia function in the infection process that leads to

161 Once rhizobia gain intracellular access to their host, legume

162 that symbiotic bacteria, collectively called rhizobia, gain access to the interior of roots and root

163 erial nitrogen stress metabolism so that the rhizobia generate "excess" ammonia and release this ammo

164 Legumes and soil bacteria called rhizobia have coevolved a facultative nitrogen-fixing sy

165 hree strains of Bradyrhizobium (slow-growing rhizobia) have been established.

166 e species (including Escherichia coli and 12 rhizobia) help identify the barriers that must be overco

167 symbiotic relationships with soil bacteria (rhizobia), housed in nodules on roots.

168 pressed nodD genes from different species of rhizobia in a strain of S. meliloti lacking endogenous N

169 Symbiotic nitrogen fixation by rhizobia in legume root nodules is a key source of nitro

170 Symbiotic rhizobia in legumes account for a large portion of nitro

171 Optimization of nitrogen fixation by rhizobia in legumes is a key area of research for sustai

172 cellular host cell colonization by symbiotic rhizobia in Medicago truncatula requires repolarization

173 NCR-induced differentiation and survival of rhizobia in nodule cells.

174 ose, yet the importance of its metabolism by rhizobia in planta is not yet known.

175 ulation, and expression accompanied invading rhizobia in the nodule infection zone and into the dista

176 ant to exclude non-desirable nitrogen-fixing rhizobia in the root and pathogenic microbes in the shoo

177 Here, we compare symbiotic efficiency of rhizobia in two different hosts where the rhizobia diffe

178 pment is mostly controlled by the plant, the rhizobia induce nodule formation, invade, and perform N(

179 Host compatible rhizobia induce the formation of legume root nodules, sy

180 tion in TR25/SYMRK-kd was 6-fold higher than rhizobia-induced nodulation in TR25/SYMRK roots.

181 sons with primitive actinorhizal nodules and rhizobia-induced nodules on the nonlegume Parasponia and

182 Rhizobia infect the roots of leguminous plants and estab

183 er responsible for apoplastic iron uptake by rhizobia-infected cells in zone II.

184 size and endoreduplication were detected in rhizobia-infected rrb3 mutant roots, expression of the M

185 egulator of NF-dependent host specificity in rhizobia infection.

186 In amsh1 mutants, rhizobia initially became entrapped in infection threads

187 nally upregulated during root symbiosis, and rhizobia inoculated roots ectopically expressing SINA4 s

188 ssed depending on whether plants are mock or rhizobia inoculated.

189 solation and use of the nuclei from mock and rhizobia-inoculated roots for the single nuclei RNA-seq

190 tions between plants and nitrogen (N)-fixing rhizobia intensify with decreasing N supply and come at

191 to-root transport of G3P during incompatible rhizobia interaction.

192 e genetic elements that convert nonsymbiotic rhizobia into nitrogen-fixing symbionts of leguminous pl

193 ferated abnormally and very rarely deposited rhizobia into plant host cells; rhizobia failed to diffe

194 Primary infection of legumes by rhizobia involves the controlled localized enzymatic bre

195 itrogen-fixing symbiosis between legumes and rhizobia is highly relevant to human society and global

196 Inoculation with compatible rhizobia is often needed for optimal N(2) -fixation, but

197 in a legume when interacting with compatible rhizobia is regulated by the plant.

198 endosymbiosis with nitrogen-fixing bacteria (rhizobia) is a key adaptation for supplying the plant wi

199 are similar in size and shape to free-living rhizobia, is reversible.

200 Rhizobia isolated from the nodules were genetically char

201 osion in the number of genera and species of rhizobia known to nodulate legumes.

202 ion between legumes and soil bacteria called rhizobia leads to the formation of a new root-derived or

203 During their symbiotic interaction with rhizobia, legume plants develop symbiosis-specific organ

204 rbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis but also for rhizobia-legume and actinorhizal symbioses.

205 AM symbiosis and has been recruited for the rhizobia-legume association.

206 aximising the nitrogen fixation occurring in rhizobia-legume associations represents an opportunity t

207 Symbiotic rhizobia-legume interactions are energy-demanding proces

208 Many bacterial genes involved in the rhizobia-legume symbiosis are known, and there is much i

209 Arbuscular mycorrhiza and the rhizobia-legume symbiosis are two major root endosymbios

210 d intracellular colonization of symbionts in rhizobia-legume symbiosis.

211 In rhizobia-leguminous plant symbioses, the current model o

212 oot-associated bacteria that, in addition to rhizobia, likely contribute to plant growth and ecologic

213 all, our results suggest that symbiosis with rhizobia limits range expansion when legumes are polyplo

214 he novel iron sensing mechanism found in the rhizobia may be an evolutionary adaptation to the cellul

215 We suggest that rhizobia may modulate the plant's susceptibility to infe

216 e unique outer membrane lipid composition of rhizobia may underpin their resilience in the face of in

217 Following inoculation with rhizobia, mtlax2 roots developed fewer nodules, had decr

218 ical and agricultural importance, the legume-rhizobia nitrogen-fixing symbiosis is a powerful model f

219 ce of micro-RNAs as regulators of the legume-rhizobia nitrogen-fixing symbiosis is emerging.

220 ical ('unfair') bargaining power in a legume-rhizobia nitrogen-fixing symbiosis using measurements of

221 nthesis genes can be elevated in response to rhizobia/Nod LCOs, suggests that Nod LCOs may induce SL

222 ent during invasion of the nascent nodule by rhizobia, normal lateral root elongation, and normal reg

223 mes, root entry of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing rhizobia occurs via host-constructed tubular tip-growing

224 ction, and demonstrates that the dynamics of rhizobia on host species can feed back on plant populati

225 urther facet of the effect of symbiosis with rhizobia on the ecologically important trait of the plan

226 c nitrogen by hosting symbiotic diazotrophic rhizobia or Frankia bacteria in root organs known as nod

227 ccumulation at root hair tips in response to rhizobia or NFs.

228 y to induce root hair curling in response to rhizobia or Nod lipochitooligosaccharides (LCOs) and SL-

229 ch are also impaired in the accommodation of rhizobia, our data indicate that ARPC1 and, by inference

230 Even so, symbiotic rhizobia play an active role in promoting their goal of

231 gs show that, in response to a plant signal, rhizobia play an active role in the control of infection

232 and nodule organogenesis was unaffected but rhizobia remain restricted to the epidermis in infection

233 tect the delicate root cap and signal motile rhizobia required for symbiotic nitrogen fixation.

234 Legumes obtain nitrogen from air through rhizobia residing in root nodules.

235 ns between legumes and compatible strains of rhizobia result in root nodule formation.

236 y the infection of legume hosts by bacteria (rhizobia), resulting in formation of root nodules.

237 trogen-fixing bacteria collectively known as rhizobia results in the formation of a unique plant root

238 biotic interaction between legume plants and rhizobia results in the formation of root nodules, in wh

239 Legume-rhizobia root-nodule symbioses involve the recognition o

240 ersonii, a nonlegume that can associate with rhizobia, showed Nod factor-induced calcium oscillations

241 the cross-talk between the broad host range rhizobia Sinorhizobium fredii HH103 T3E Nodulation Outer

242 Symbiosis between rhizobia soil bacteria and legume plants results in the

243 nt the infection site on leguminous roots by rhizobia, soil bacteria that establish a nitrogen-fixing

244 nsport of FAs, membrane lipids, and 2-MAG in rhizobia-soybean symbioses via the RAML-WRI-FatM-GPAT-ST

245 iosynthesis are essential for nodulation and rhizobia-soybean symbioses.

246 es to estimate ploidy, symbiotic status with rhizobia, specificity on rhizobia, and the number of int

247 In legume-rhizobia symbioses, the bacteria in infected cells are e

248 st of this ammonium is contributed by legume-rhizobia symbioses, which are initiated by the infection

249 plays a role in osmoregulation during legume/rhizobia symbioses.

250 and cellular mechanisms and their effects on rhizobia symbiosis and its benefits.

251 As the legume-rhizobia symbiosis is established, the plant recognizes

252 nt of nitrogen-fixing root nodules in legume-rhizobia symbiosis requires an intricate communication b

253 y role of the miR172 node in the common bean-rhizobia symbiosis.

254 for establishing the nitrogen-fixing legume-rhizobia symbiosis.

255 cluding the genetics and evolution of legume-rhizobia symbiosis.

256 critical in the establishment of the legume/rhizobia symbiosis.

257 cognition and signaling events during legume-rhizobia symbiosis.

258 Legume rhizobia symbiotic nitrogen (N2) fixation plays a critic

259 In the presence of rhizobia, SYMRK-kd could rescue the epidermal infection

260 n-fixing Gram-negative proteobacteria called rhizobia that are able to interact with most leguminous

261 nodules, host plant cells are infected with rhizobia that are encapsulated by a plant-derived membra

262 or the maintenance of symbiotic variation in rhizobia that associate with a native legume: partner mi

263 Rhizobia that colonized developing npd1 nodules did not

264 Legumes tend to be nodulated by competitive rhizobia that do not maximize nitrogen (N(2)) fixation,

265 Among the rhizobia that establish nitrogen-fixing nodules on the r

266 Here we show that soybeans penalize rhizobia that fail to fix N(2) inside their root nodules

267 Legumes have mechanisms to defend against rhizobia that fail to fix sufficient nitrogen, but these

268 binds to the Nod factor signals produced by rhizobia that nodulate this plant.

269 rally important, including bacteria known as rhizobia that participate in growth-promoting symbioses

270 nsistent with competitive interference among rhizobia that reduced both nodulation and plant growth.

271 n (N2) through a symbiotic relationship with rhizobia that reside within root nodules.

272 symbiotic relationships with nitrogen-fixing rhizobia that trigger root nodule organogenesis for bact

273 ost infection, legumes nonetheless encounter rhizobia that vary in their nitrogen fixation.

274 lishing an intimate relationship with either rhizobia, the symbionts of legumes or Frankia in the cas

275 In the symbiosis between legumes and rhizobia, the symbiosome encases the intracellular bacte

276 etection of flavonoids in the rhizosphere by rhizobia to activate their production of Nod factor coun

277 In addition, the ability of rhizobia to alter auxin transport depended on N and C tr

278 inoglycan interferes with the ability of the rhizobia to colonize curled root hairs.

279 ing legumes such as soybean and the bacteria rhizobia to develop a mutually beneficial relationship.

280 ved symbiosome membrane (SM), which encloses rhizobia to form a symbiosome.

281 Legumes permit rhizobia to invade these root tissues while exerting con

282 nstrating that this activity is required for rhizobia to penetrate the cell wall and initiate formati

283 nitiated by the binding and stabilization of rhizobia to plant root hairs, mediated in part by a rece

284 ression of the infection canal that conducts rhizobia to the nodule primordium requires a functional

285 ds to symbiotically associated bacteria; the rhizobia use these compounds to reduce (fix) atmospheric

286 Species from the three other major genera of rhizobia were found to have homologous terpene synthase

287 Some rhizobia were released into plant cells much later than

288 mote the secretion of Nod factors (NFs) from rhizobia, which are recognised by cognate host receptors

289 s receive their nitrogen via nitrogen-fixing rhizobia, which exist in a symbiotic relationship with t

290 ampened in plants nodulated by Fix(-) mutant rhizobia, which in most respects metabolically resemble

291 eorganize the MT cytoskeleton in response to rhizobia, which might rely on an interaction between DRE

292 ligosaccharidic signal molecules produced by rhizobia, which play a key role in the rhizobium-legume

293 osymbiotic associations with nitrogen-fixing rhizobia, which they host inside root nodules.

294 feature of legumes in their association with rhizobia, while Cercis, a non-nodulating legume, does no

295 s the coordination of epidermal infection by rhizobia with cell divisions in the underlying cortex.

296 he roles of Lbs and Glbs in the symbiosis of rhizobia with crop legumes and the model legumes for ind

297 icago is nodulated by at least two groups of rhizobia with divergent chromosomes that have been class

298 Interactions of rhizobia with legumes establish the chronic intracellula

299 emarkable frequency of nodule coinfection by rhizobia, with mixed occupancy identified in ~20% of nod

300 different guilds (e.g. mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia) yields strongly positive relationships, consis