ライフサイエンスコーパス: rhizosphere

1 ot grazing but forming more symbioses in the rhizosphere.

2 es many Gram-negative bacteria living in the rhizosphere.

3 ligands production up to 50 muM in the wheat rhizosphere.

4 pete with other bacterial species within the rhizosphere.

5 ions both in the lab and in the tomato plant rhizosphere.

6 ascular bundle from the flowers and from the rhizosphere.

7 minocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC), in the rhizosphere.

8 phosphorus (RS-P(available)) (26-74%) in the rhizosphere.

9 of nutrients, in particular, nitrate, in the rhizosphere.

10 e chemistry and microbial composition of the rhizosphere.

11 mycorrhizal roots than further out into the rhizosphere.

12 ype determines the taxa colonizing the beech rhizosphere.

13 carbon from the below-ground tissue into the rhizosphere.

14 bioreporter showed a high signal also in the rhizosphere.

15 g the release of diffusible signals into the rhizosphere.

16 ole of different molecules secreted into the rhizosphere.

17 crusts), soil below biocrusts, and the plant rhizosphere.

18 e system being significantly enriched in the rhizosphere.

19 time exhibit phylogenetic over-dispersion in rhizosphere.

20 acterial community is formed and affected in rhizosphere.

21 ceted role of the natural product within the rhizosphere.

22 ogical crust, root-attached, and the broader rhizosphere.

23 ting a greater capacity to mobilize P in the rhizosphere.

24 tion of a beneficial rhizobacterium in their rhizosphere.

25 ferent bacterial assemblages in the root and rhizosphere.

26 industrial waste and a good colonizer of the rhizosphere.

27 mical cycles through interactions within the rhizosphere.

28 gnificantly promote mineral evolution in the rhizosphere.

29 vacuole, thereby limiting carbon loss to the rhizosphere.

30 lanacearum in microcosms and in tomato plant rhizosphere.

31 major inorganic thioarsenate detected in the rhizosphere.

32 s to physical constraints present within the rhizosphere.

33 a complex bacterial community network in the rhizosphere.

34 portion of their assimilated carbon into the rhizosphere.

35 interact with other organisms that share the rhizosphere.

36 rongly coupled with protease activity in the rhizosphere.

37 ivers of fungal community composition in the rhizosphere.

38 growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in the rhizosphere.

39 es in dictating which bacteria reside in the rhizosphere.

40 ting mechanisms of metal mobilization in the rhizosphere.

41 obacteria sense and respond to indole in the rhizosphere.

42 e same ecological niches, the soil and plant rhizosphere.

43 ts that are important for competition in the rhizosphere.

44 ing oxyhydroxides and phyllosilicates in all rhizospheres.

45 sizes within the inspected plant organs and rhizospheres.

46 nzymes in the hyphosphere (118%) than in the rhizosphere (19%).

47 eater increase of N-releasing enzymes in the rhizosphere (215% increase) than in the hyphosphere (36%

48 mensions <50 nm were 52% of those within the rhizospheres, 88.5% of those within the roots, 90% of th

49 abolomic analyses of the pea (Pisum sativum) rhizosphere, a suite of bioreporters has been developed

50 At the ecosystem scale, the rhizosphere accounted for c. 50% and 40% of the total ac

51 ynthesis, the antioxidant defence system and rhizosphere acidification were up-regulated in Si and SA

52 h decreases of pH in the range achievable by rhizosphere acidification.

53 lanted soil sampled over a 22-d time series: Rhizosphere alone, detritosphere alone, rhizosphere with

54 henotypes: A lower sulfatase activity in the rhizosphere and a loss of plant growth-promoting effect

55 communities differ to a great degree between rhizosphere and bulk soils, regardless of the tree speci

56 Pseudomonas spp. competitively colonize the rhizosphere and display plant-growth promotion and/or di

57 The maize rhizosphere and endosphere alpha-diversity was higher th

58 ybrid offspring, which we quantified in both rhizosphere and leaves of field-grown plants using 16S-v

59 elled in three ecological niches (bulk soil, rhizosphere and nodule) with a focus on the role of each

60 how that a Streptomyces isolate found in the rhizosphere and on flowers protects both the plant and p

61 s are colonized on their surfaces and in the rhizosphere and phyllosphere by a multitude of different

62 In parallel greenhouse experiments, rhizosphere and phyllosphere microbiota of con- and hete

63 Unlike microbiomes of the soil, rhizosphere and phyllosphere, wood associated communitie

64 consecutive, selection of bacteria from the rhizosphere and root compartments.

65 n their extent of domestication and assessed rhizosphere and root endosphere bacterial and fungal com

66 the genomes of 33 strains isolated from the rhizosphere and root nodules of a particular bean variet

67 The endosphere, rhizosphere and soil bacterial and archaeal communities

68 ns and species in mixed inocula in the host, rhizosphere and soil environments.

69 ed CO2 and O3 (eCO2 and eO3) the endosphere, rhizosphere and soil were sampled from soybeans under eC

70 urrent understanding of how plants shape the rhizosphere and the benefits it confers to plant fitness

71 actions of plants with microorganisms in the rhizosphere and the efficiency of nutrient acquisition.

72 bution of the TiO(2) nanoparticles among the rhizosphere and the plant organs could have impacts on t

73 crease the contact area of the root with the rhizosphere and thereby improve water and nutrient uptak

74 ities involved in C, N, and P cycling in the rhizosphere and unplanted soil.

75 tween soil compartments (proximal vs. distal rhizosphere) and between plant genetic groups (teosinte,

76 ty structure was analyzed in unplanted soil, rhizosphere, and plant roots by 454-pyrosequencing of th

77 The bacterial communities of the soil, rhizosphere, and root from amendment-treated and untreat

78 rophic Stenotrophomonas isolated from tomato rhizosphere are able to protect plants against oxalate-p

79 Plant-microbial interactions in the rhizosphere are an essential link in soil nitrogen (N) c

80 ent changes with other microorganisms in the rhizosphere as a key step for understanding nutrient flo

81 roots that had greater P availability in the rhizosphere (as a result of citrate and acid phosphatase

82 f the detectable pore space (> 5 mum) in the rhizosphere, as compared with the no-hair mutants.

83 cture of root-associated EcM fungi, soil and rhizosphere bacteria) were used to analyse relationships

84 catula and barley and show its perception by rhizosphere bacteria, containing bioluminescent and fluo

85 es to determine lineage-specific controls on rhizosphere bacteria.

86 ive mutualistic interactions may occur among rhizosphere bacteria; we identified quorum-based signall

87 r, in their natural environment, such as the rhizosphere, bacteria live in spatially structured open

88 lineage is crucial for determination of both rhizosphere bacterial communities and plant fitness.Envi

89 hanges on root traits and on the assembly of rhizosphere bacterial communities by comparing eight whe

90 However, lineage and not rhizosphere bacterial communities dictate individual pla

91 Rhizosphere bacterial communities from tall cultivars we

92 Introduced P. australis rhizosphere bacterial communities have lower abundances

93 host lineage is crucial for determination of rhizosphere bacterial communities in Phragmites australi

94 The effect of hairy root transformation on rhizosphere bacterial communities was largely similar to

95 Neither root nor rhizosphere bacterial communities were affected by the e

96 ntify bacterial taxa and evaluate changes in rhizosphere bacterial communities.

97 to evaluate the influence of plant roots on rhizosphere bacterial communities.

98 and resource acquisition drive variation in rhizosphere bacterial community composition and activity

99 Plant biomass, N accumulation, rhizosphere bacterial community composition, and rhizosp

100 ss, root tissue density, N concentration and rhizosphere bacterial community structure.

101 select specific taxa and functions in their rhizosphere based on the soil conditions and their nutri

102 Symbiotic associations in the rhizosphere between plants and microorganisms lead to ef

103 not change the microbial communities in the rhizosphere, but altered the soil communities where hybr

104 ibited lower alpha-diversity relative to the rhizosphere, but was more closely related to host growth

105 t heating reduced respiration from roots and rhizosphere by 25%.

106 t heating reduced respiration from roots and rhizosphere by ~25%.

107 As a consequence, the rhizosphere can be considered an extended root phenotype

108 and the resulting chemical landscape of the rhizosphere can strongly affect root health and developm

109 of the organic acid, citrate, into the soil rhizosphere, chelating Al(3+) ions and thereby imparting

110 as a barrier creating a zone with increased rhizosphere chemical interactions via surface-mediated p

111 that enables the collection and analysis of rhizosphere chemicals from different plant species.

112 Rhizosphere chemistry is the sum of root exudation chemi

113 hat the method is suitable for profiling the rhizosphere chemistry of Zea mays (maize) in agricultura

114 bacteria with higher organisms - leading to rhizosphere colonization and modulating the virulence of

115 upregulated over fivefold (p </= 0.05) upon rhizosphere colonization and root adhesion respectively.

116 mediated motility is an essential trait for rhizosphere colonization by pseudomonads.

117 d throughout the symbiotic interaction, from rhizosphere colonization to differentiated mycorrhizas,

118 ccession and may contribute to the shifts in rhizosphere communities and herbivore resistance we obse

119 to investigate the degree to which root and rhizosphere communities were influenced by vertical tran

120 y in the composition of bacterial and fungal rhizosphere communities, as well as leaf-associated fung

121 at act as semiochemicals and shape microbial rhizosphere communities.

122 Changes in rhizosphere community composition could be explained by

123 Temporal trends in rhizosphere community composition varied between plant s

124 eract with the soil environment to determine rhizosphere community structure and activity.

125 es are enriched in the bacteria found in the rhizosphere compared to the bulk soil.

126 ed in biocontrol, plant-growth promotion and rhizosphere competence.

127 However, rhizosphere concentrations of Fe(II) and Mn did not diff

128 essions in their growth response to physical rhizosphere constraints and competition.

129 Furthermore, the rhizosphere contained several organic molecules that wer

130 r watering, whereas it did not change in the rhizosphere, despite its much higher water retention.

131 A wide range of rhizosphere diazotrophic bacteria are able to establish

132 tribution and dynamics in the whole seagrass rhizosphere during experimental manipulation of light ex

133 Plants are master regulators of rhizosphere ecology, secreting a complex mixture of comp

134 Then, using a numerical model that combines rhizosphere effect sizes with fine root morphology and d

135 A rhizosphere effect was observed in each soil type, but a

136 nts in the growth system support a microbial rhizosphere effect.

137 gy and soil resource availability in shaping rhizosphere effects are not well understood.

138 position, the ecosystem consequences of such rhizosphere effects have rarely been quantified.

139 he field prevent the addressing of real-time rhizosphere effects that regulate nutrient cycling and S

140 udies are needed to differentiate litter and rhizosphere effects within single systems to better unde

141 anisms, paving the way for new approaches to rhizosphere engineering and crop protection.

142 dates extend systemic defense loops into the rhizosphere, enhancing or reducing recruitment of microb

143 rial survival in highly competitive soil and rhizosphere environments.

144 nopy tree species and other biota and favors rhizosphere food web.

145 gulation of bacterial gene expression in the rhizosphere for delivery of useful functions to plants.

146 undance taxa may significantly contribute to rhizosphere function.

147 r water balance, carbon storage, and related rhizosphere functions.

148 , phylogeny and functional traits in shaping rhizosphere fungal communities and tested the robustness

149 ranscribed spacer 2, we studied the root and rhizosphere fungal communities of A. alpina growing unde

150 domestication did affect the composition of rhizosphere fungal communities.

151 itrogen and specific root length, in driving rhizosphere fungal community composition, demonstrating

152 ic relatedness and plant traits all affected rhizosphere fungal community composition.

153 aggregates, while being partly sorted along rhizosphere gradients of <300 mum from Miscanthus plant

154 The rhizosphere had elevated C, N, Mn, and Fe concentrations

155 Like the gut microbiome, the rhizosphere harbors a complex microbiome, but little is

156 n those in surrounding soils, indicating the rhizosphere has a greater potential for interactions and

157 However, researching the undisturbed rhizosphere has proved very challenging.

158 n order to enhance defense responses against rhizosphere herbivores, remains poorly understood.

159 properties and microbial communities of the rhizosphere, i.e. the soil compartment under the influen

160 sitions and microredox gradients in the root rhizosphere in CWs, future research needs have also been

161 itions and micro-redox gradients in the root rhizosphere in CWs, future research needs have also been

162 on and role of C-containing compounds in the rhizosphere, in particular those involved in chemical co

163 rees excreted 50% more chloride ion into the rhizosphere, indicative of increased TCE metabolism in p

164 We used rhizosphere injection of (15) N-, (13) C- and (14) C-lab

165 )) strain Pseudomonas synxantha 2-79 than in rhizospheres inoculated with a PCA-deficient mutant.

166 gher, respectively, in dryland and irrigated rhizospheres inoculated with the PCA-producing (PCA(+))

167 plants affect soil biota through litter and rhizosphere inputs, but the direction and magnitude of t

168 The rhizosphere interaction between plant roots or pathogeni

169 ovel decontamination strategies based on the rhizosphere interactions between plants and their microb

170 ion have received little study, particularly rhizosphere interactions, in planta transformations, and

171 is presumed to play a central role in plant rhizosphere interactions.

172 In the rhizosphere, invasive plants reduced bacterial biomass b

173 d function of specialized metabolites in the rhizosphere is a key element in understanding interactio

174 L transport within the plant and towards the rhizosphere is driven by the ABCG-class protein PDR1.

175 he complex plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere is still in its infancy.

176 The rhizosphere is the zone of soil influenced by a plant ro

177 impact of PCA upon Fe and Mn cycling in the rhizosphere is unknown.

178 acteria and discusses their relevance to the rhizosphere lifestyle.

179 o the molecular characteristics of OM in the rhizosphere may in part be responsible for the enhanced

180 Mutualistic rhizosphere microbes of the S. ericoidesPR population ma

181 r and interact with a wide range of soil and rhizosphere microbes.

182 nfection and for mutualist associations with rhizosphere microbes.

183 ts to establish beneficial associations with rhizosphere microbes.

184 y in soil, which can be used as a measure of rhizosphere microbial activity, is differently affected

185 plete understanding of the basic function of rhizosphere microbial communities and how they may chang

186 in hybrid development significantly impacted rhizosphere microbial communities and network assembly.

187 ns were adapted or maladapted to their local rhizosphere microbial communities by growing seedlings s

188 Root and rhizosphere microbial communities can affect plant healt

189 With this in mind, we ask whether some rhizosphere microbial communities might be governed by '

190 sion to examine the herbivore resistance and rhizosphere microbial communities of Solidago altissima

191 round effects on root system functioning and rhizosphere microbial communities remain poorly understo

192 Rhizodeposits play a key role in shaping rhizosphere microbial communities.

193 r, it is uncertain if and how they influence rhizosphere microbial communities.

194 resses the interactions of plants with their rhizosphere microbial communities.

195 We investigated the rhizosphere microbial community composition and structur

196 s and transcriptomes change according to the rhizosphere microbial community structure.

197 ltivation identified in the nZVI-facilitated rhizosphere microbial degradation of PCP.

198 Here, we review how plants shape the rhizosphere microbiome and how domestication may have im

199 ive the composition and functionality of the rhizosphere microbiome and its interaction with the plan

200 lus tremula x Populus alba) on the bacterial rhizosphere microbiome and the endosphere microbiome, na

201 iome and how domestication may have impacted rhizosphere microbiome assembly and functions via habita

202 Our results demonstrate that rhizosphere microbiome assembly drives the SIREM process

203 Only the rhizosphere microbiome composition of the soybeans chang

204 s, rotation sequence had a greater effect on rhizosphere microbiome composition, with larger effects

205 The rhizosphere microbiome is pivotal for plant health and g

206 Rhizosphere microbiome members with growth-inhibitory si

207 Conversely, rhizosphere microbiome members with growth-promotive sid

208 ly unaddressed including whether and how the rhizosphere microbiome modulates root metabolism and exu

209 In contrast, the rhizosphere microbiome of CCR-deficient and WT poplar tr

210 ty, a previously undescribed property of the rhizosphere microbiome, appears to be a defining charact

211 the toposequence, we identified a core beech rhizosphere microbiome.

212 ving the resilience and functionality of the rhizosphere microbiome.

213 r succession, with concomitant shifts in the rhizosphere microbiome.

214 of 2,150 individual bacterial members of 80 rhizosphere microbiomes, covering all major phylogenetic

215 is variable and poorly understood in natural rhizosphere microbiomes.

216 atives on recruitment and maintenance of the rhizosphere microbiota remains to be fully elucidated.

217 e primarily water-limited, compared with the rhizosphere microbiota that were co-limited by nutrients

218 es exerted a stronger genotype effect on the rhizosphere microbiota when compared with wild barley ge

219 s suggest that phyllosphere microbiota, like rhizosphere microbiota, can potentially mediate plant sp

220 Phage treatment did not affect the existing rhizosphere microbiota.

221 Rhizosphere networks were substantially more complex tha

222 ed a comparative 16S rRNA gene survey of the rhizosphere of 4 domesticated and 20 wild barley (Hordeu

223 omonas fluorescens on C and N cycling in the rhizosphere of a common grass species under eCO(2).

224 ment of specific bacterial taxa found in the rhizosphere of a given plant species changes with differ

225 Bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere of agricultural crops can have a beneficial

226 imaging of chemical microenvironments in the rhizosphere of aquatic plants at high spatiotemporal res

227 nite, the more toxic form of arsenic, in the rhizosphere of Californian Oryza sativa L. variety M206,

228 The PGPR, isolated from the rhizosphere of chickpea, were characterized on the basis

229 (i) In the rhizosphere of E. pithyusa, Zn was found to exist in dif

230 fication of the nitrate concentration in the rhizosphere of experimental plants, a calibration curve

231 examine the different effects of litter and rhizosphere of invasive plants on soil communities and n

232 ria and Firmicutes were more abundant in the rhizosphere of newer hybrids under water stress.

233 ment to analyze bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of P. australis stands from native, introduc

234 compare mechanisms and infochemicals in the rhizosphere of plants and the eco-chemosphere of seaweed

235 acterial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of plants, a more detailed understanding of

236 racterised the fungal communities within the rhizosphere of these plants.

237 he bacterial genus Stenotrophomonas from the rhizosphere of tomato plants.

238 eduction in anoxic microsites present in the rhizosphere of unsaturated soil is a key driver for mobi

239 nt organs, as well as from the corresponding rhizosphere of wild, adult plants.

240 mposition, are significantly enhanced in the rhizospheres of diverse vegetation types.

241 The rhizosphere OM molecules generally had (1) greater overa

242 allows to observe chemical gradients in the rhizosphere on a molecular level over time.

243 Trees and their associated rhizosphere organisms play a major role in mineral weath

244 ith agriculturally and economically relevant rhizosphere organisms, paving the way for new approaches

245 ed prokaryotic and fungal communities in the rhizosphere, phyllosphere, leaf and root endosphere, as

246 To this end, they release into the rhizosphere phytotoxic substances that inhibit the germi

247 e compare the temporal changes to the intact rhizosphere pore structure during the emergence of a dev

248 This 'rhizosphere pore structure' and its impact on associated

249 with concomitant phosphate release into the rhizosphere porewater.

250 osphere bacterial community composition, and rhizosphere potential extracellular enzyme activity were

251 obal change may hinge on the balance between rhizosphere priming and SOM protection, and highlight th

252 The model accurately predicted rhizosphere processes and C-N dynamics across a gradient

253 Collectively, our results indicate that rhizosphere processes are a widespread, quantitatively i

254 in future research include the influence of rhizosphere processes on uptake, determining mechanisms

255 Microorganisms and nematodes in the rhizosphere profoundly impact plant health, and small-mo

256 t shape chemical interaction networks in the rhizosphere provides a promising ecological strategy for

257 Soil microbial H2 uptake was correlated with rhizosphere respiration rates (r = 0.8, P < 0.001), and

258 in Rsoil likely reflected increased root and rhizosphere respiration rather than increased microbial

259 Finally, we propose that "soil-rhizosphere-rhizoplane-endophytes-plant" could be consid

260 ew technique for nondestructive and repeated rhizosphere sampling.

261 These images of the poplar rhizosphere showed evidence for symbiotic sharing of nut

262 ) composition and microbial communities of a rhizosphere soil (primarily an oxidized environment) to

263 Conversely, the rhizosphere soil acid phosphatase (RS-APase) activity wa

264 as detected in pore water and postexperiment rhizosphere soil confirming ferrihydrite reduction.

265 Rhizosphere soil fractions tightly associated with roots

266 Rhizosphere soil has distinct physical and chemical prop

267 Rhizosphere soil inoculum from the S. ericoidesPR popula

268 A reduction in rhizosphere soil pH (RS-pH) was observed in the IC treat

269 nt microhabitats at the soil-root interface: rhizosphere soil, rhizoplane, and endorhizosphere.

270 m sp., was detected in the alpha-HCH-treated rhizosphere soil, supporting the potential for biotransf

271 ehensive metabolite profiling of non-sterile rhizosphere soil, which represents a technical advance t

272 ntargeted metabolic profiling of non-sterile rhizosphere soil.

273 ties were all higher in invasive than native rhizosphere soils.

274 ight into the processes affecting DOM in the rhizosphere, such as root exudation, microbial processes

275 position are more pronounced in the root and rhizosphere, suggesting an interaction between plant dev

276 xa, including methanogenic archaea, in their rhizosphere that differ from those of native plants grow

277 nt roots play a dominant role in shaping the rhizosphere, the environment in which interaction with d

278 osure to high ammonium concentrations in the rhizosphere, the high-affinity ammonium transporters (AM

279 The microbiota thriving in the rhizosphere, the thin layer of soil surrounding plant ro

280 Recent research has shown that the rhizosphere, the zone near plant roots, in wetlands is e

281 ed the main bacterial taxa of burnt holm-oak rhizosphere, then we obtained an isolate collection of t

282 nt alterations of Fe-bearing minerals in the rhizosphere to a single bacterial trait.

283 rate their below-ground tissue and immediate rhizosphere to prevent sulfide intrusion from the surrou

284 Plants engineer the rhizosphere to their advantage by secreting various nutr

285 The soil-binding factors released into rhizospheres to form rhizosheaths have not been characte

286 ntial nutrients iron and phosphorus in their rhizosphere via multiple biogeochemical pathways.

287 es mobilize phosphorus and iron within their rhizosphere via plant-induced local acidification, leadi

288 The soybean rhizosphere was enriched in Proteobacteria and Bacteroid

289 ence of thioarsenates in the oxygenated rice rhizosphere was investigated using planted rhizobox expe

290 ding 11 dominant phyla (>1%) in E. splendens rhizosphere were presented.

291 currence patterns of the inbred maize lines' rhizosphere were significantly more similar to those of

292 m functional diversity, e.g., grasslands and rhizospheres were the most diverse biomes in oxidoreduct

293 d could therefore deliver nematicides to the rhizosphere, whereas the Physalis mosaic virus remains i

294 ross habitats and preferentially enriched in rhizospheres, whereas biodegrading bacteria are rare.

295 t interior of healthy plants, as well as the rhizosphere, which consists of soil particles firmly att

296 d to achieve effective concentrations in the rhizosphere, which results in the accumulation of harmfu

297 ies: Rhizosphere alone, detritosphere alone, rhizosphere with added root detritus, and unamended soil

298 s the major thiolated arsenic species in the rhizosphere with concentrations comparable to its precur

299 n of ZnS (enriched in light isotopes) in the rhizosphere with subsequent Zn(2+) sorption on the root

300 suggest avenues to effectively engineer the rhizosphere with the aim of improving crop growth in iro