戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ecify distinct neuronal lineages within each rhombomere.
2 -like facial branchiomotoneurons within this rhombomere.
3 sed but not when midbrain contacts any other rhombomere.
4 cific genes were characteristic of different rhombomeres.
5 quire higher levels of RA than more anterior rhombomeres.
6 ior axis into a series of seven segments, or rhombomeres.
7 d neuroanatomically distinct segments called rhombomeres.
8  of well-defined neuroepithelial segments or rhombomeres.
9 sensory relay interneurons within individual rhombomeres.
10 dal hindbrain domain (r4-r7) into individual rhombomeres.
11 rt to confer the unique identity to multiple rhombomeres.
12  it promotes the specification of individual rhombomeres.
13  in hindbrain size and the loss of posterior rhombomeres.
14 regating populations of cells from different rhombomeres.
15 g that DBHR is regulated autonomously within rhombomeres.
16 ndbrain into lineage-restricted units called rhombomeres.
17 gulate the aberrant size of the misspecified rhombomeres.
18 xiting streams adjacent to the even-numbered rhombomeres.
19 divided into a series of compartments called rhombomeres.
20 ebrate embryonic hindbrain is segmented into rhombomeres.
21 ells emerged along the dorsal midline of all rhombomeres.
22 finity independently within their respective rhombomeres.
23 sharpen transition regions between different rhombomeres.
24 t to Gbx2 null mutants, mice lacking Gbx2 in rhombomere 1 (r1) after E9 (Gbx2-CKO) are viable and dev
25 V) patterning of the mesencephalon (mes) and rhombomere 1 (r1) is instrumental for the development of
26 ng the midbrain, and induces a cerebellum in rhombomere 1 (r1) is not clear.
27 res derived from the mesencephalon (mes) and rhombomere 1 (r1) modulate distinct motor and sensory mo
28 the induction of rostral 5-HT neurons within rhombomere 1 (r1), which project to the forebrain, but n
29 part of the anterior-most hindbrain segment, rhombomere 1 (r1), which undergoes a distinctive morphog
30 e presumptive mesencephalon into an extended rhombomere 1 (r1).
31 2 converts the rostral-caudal axis of dorsal rhombomere 1 into the medial-lateral axis of the wing-li
32 ecific grafting strategy we demonstrate that rhombomere 1 is able to express Hox genes but that both
33             The unique developmental fate of rhombomere 1 is reflected by it being the only hindbrain
34                                           In rhombomere 1 of the chick, early born cells give rise to
35 e demonstrate that secreted signals from the rhombomere 1 roof plate are both necessary and sufficien
36 mic organiser is generated when midbrain and rhombomere 1 tissue are juxtaposed but not when midbrain
37 use midbrain (mesencephalon) and cerebellum (rhombomere 1) by misexpressing sprouty2 (Spry2) from an
38 phalon (mes) and rostral metencephalon (met; rhombomere 1), respectively.
39                                           In rhombomere 1, Atoh1-positive cells give rise to both cer
40  we mapped the chick PrV nucleus position to rhombomere 1, confirming previous studies and in contras
41 nterior segment of the vertebrate hindbrain, rhombomere 1, gives rise to the entire cerebellum.
42 Early born cells, which migrate into ventral rhombomere 1, have a single long leading process that tu
43     By fate mapping the dorsoventral axis of rhombomere 1, we demonstrate that granule cell precursor
44 lip gives rise to multiple cell types within rhombomere 1.
45  of serotonergic precursors in the embryonic rhombomere 1.
46 also immediately posterior to it in anterior rhombomere 1.
47 hin the hindbrain in a manner appropriate to rhombomere 1.
48 ebellum at E6 maps to the caudal boundary of rhombomere 1.
49 t the isthmic tissue is largely derived from rhombomere 1.
50  the IP develops strictly within isthmus and rhombomere 1.
51 between vermis and roof plate development in rhombomere 1.
52  results in an exclusion of those cells from rhombomeres 1 and 2, and in a simultaneous clustering al
53          Strong FRMD7 expression was seen in rhombomeres 1 to 4, which give rise to the cerebellum an
54 ring gastrulation, and becomes restricted to rhombomeres 1-3 (r1-3) by embryonic day 8.5 (E8.5).
55 n of ectopic somatic motoneurones in ventral rhombomeres 1-4, and was accompanied by the repression o
56 ebellum (diencephalic prosomere 1 through to rhombomere 11) play central roles in the processing of s
57  role in regulating the regional identity of rhombomere 2 (r2) and is the only Hox gene expressed in
58     Serotonergic neurons derived from former rhombomere 2 drive 90% of all hindbrain events at E11.5.
59 ether to induce ectopic hoxb1a expression in rhombomere 2 of the hindbrain.
60  contrast to mouse PrV, which mainly maps to rhombomere 2-3.
61  lamprey that drives segmental expression in rhombomeres 2 and 4.
62                               Development of rhombomeres 2 through 5 was investigated in wholemount p
63                  When present, boundaries of rhombomeres 2 through 5 were distinct.
64 ifferential growth sculpts the morphology of rhombomeres 2 through 5.
65 ot nearly as clear as were the boundaries of rhombomeres 2 through 5.
66 l funiculus, while the other originated from rhombomeres 2-5 and extended in the lateral funiculus.
67 treams of cranial NCCs migrating adjacent to rhombomeres 2-7 and that Fbln1-deficient embryos display
68  by a dramatic cell-fate misspecification in rhombomeres 2-7, which results in the production of supe
69 e absence of cell mixing between neighboring rhombomeres [2, 3].
70      Neural crest cell-free zones lateral to rhombomere 3 (r3) and r5 resulted from neural crest cell
71 plays a permissive, not instructive, role in rhombomere 3 development.
72 ion of Lim1 lack head structures anterior to rhombomere 3 in the hindbrain.
73 at by removing Otx2 function, development of rhombomere 3 is rescued in Gbx2(-/-) embryos, showing th
74 uncovered new domains of Hoxa1 expression in rhombomere 3, the otic epithelium, and cardiac precursor
75 n tissue microdissected from the prospective rhombomere 3-5 region of Hoxa1 null and wild type embryo
76 loss of premigratory neural crest cells from rhombomeres 3 and 5 (r3, r5) through programmed cell dea
77 pressed in the premigratory neural crest, in rhombomeres 3 and 5, and in the neural crest-derived mes
78 Nnat expression is first detected at E8.5 in rhombomeres 3 and 5, and subsequently, expression is wid
79 ain patterning for the normal development of rhombomeres 3 and 5.
80 ically rotated the rostrocaudal positions of rhombomeres 3/4.
81                                 We show that rhombomere 4 (r4) functions as an early-differentiating
82 The activity of the paired Mauthner cells in rhombomere 4 (r4) has been shown to be critical for gene
83 o investigate chick NCC behaviors within the rhombomere 4 (r4) migratory stream by combining photoact
84 e invasion of cranial NCCs, specifically the rhombomere 4 (r4) migratory stream into branchial arch 2
85 usly to regulate FBM neuron migration out of rhombomere 4 (r4), but the cell-type within which it act
86         Hoxb1, which is expressed throughout rhombomere 4 (r4), has been shown to be required for the
87 striction of Hoxb1 expression to presumptive rhombomere 4 (r4).
88 red for segment boundary formation caudal to rhombomere 4 (r4).
89 progenitor cells along the entire DV axis of rhombomere 4 (r4).
90 equired for proper segmental organization of rhombomere 4 and the posterior hindbrain.
91 epiboly and are induced in the primordium of rhombomere 4 by 80% epibloy.
92 f the earliest hindbrain signaling-center in rhombomere 4 by regulating expression of fgf3.
93 rain boundary and in the hindbrain caudal to rhombomere 4 during segmentation.
94 y facial motor neurons do not migrate out of rhombomere 4 into more posterior segments.
95 ced the formation of somatic motoneurones in rhombomere 4 only, and Hox genes normally expressed more
96 domain of fgf3 expression expands to include rhombomere 4 through rhombomere X (an aberrant segment t
97 rons from their point of origin in hindbrain rhombomere 4 towards the posterior.
98 ene expression at all axial levels except in rhombomere 4 was also reduced, suggesting an interferenc
99 of the sixth somite acquires the identity of rhombomere 4 when retinoic acid signalling is blocked.
100 lospinal neurons and posterior expansions of rhombomere 4, as well as defects in branchiomotor neuron
101 rons of IF5 arise from rhombomeres caudal to rhombomere 4, most likely from rhombomeres 6-8.
102 t background we demonstrate that presumptive rhombomere 4, the major site of origin of the second pha
103 n fates, including differentiation of excess rhombomere 4-specific Mauthner neurons.
104 d influence the fate of cells originating in rhombomere 4.
105 to directly regulate ppp1r14al expression in rhombomere 4.
106           Examples include: the loss of both rhombomeres 4 and 5, the selective loss of the 2(nd) bra
107 haryngeal (nIX) motor neurons are induced in rhombomeres 4 and 6, respectively, and migrate tangentia
108 osis in areas populated by NCCs derived from rhombomeres 4, 6 and 7.
109                                   Removal of rhombomere 5 affects cochlear duct growth, while rhombom
110 d that activity in a small hindbrain area in rhombomere 5 was necessary for saccades to occur.
111                                 We show that rhombomere 5 wnt8b expression is absent in both RA-signa
112                        EphA4 is expressed in rhombomere 5, which contains progenitors for both NM and
113  and NL are found in distinct regions within rhombomere 5, with NM precursors in medial regions and N
114 g-depleted embryos, suggesting a signal from rhombomere 5-6 may also be required for otic fate mainte
115 nuclear factor 1 (vhnf1) in specification of rhombomeres 5 and 6 (r5+r6).
116 is specifically and transiently expressed in rhombomeres 5 and 6 (r5/r6), and Egr4 knockdown causes a
117                                     Rotating rhombomeres 5 and 6 along the anteroposterior axis also
118 (val), which blocks early differentiation of rhombomeres 5 and 6 in the hindbrain, does not delay oti
119 uct formation indicating that signaling from rhombomeres 5 and 6 is important for cochlear duct patte
120                               Signaling from rhombomeres 5 and 6 of the hindbrain is thought to be im
121 urgically generated chicken embryos in which rhombomeres 5 and 6 were similarly shifted relative to t
122 X (an aberrant segment that forms in lieu of rhombomeres 5 and 6).
123 ical model, oculomotor circuits in hindbrain rhombomeres 5-6 develop and function independently of ho
124 de that the high expression of hox3 genes in rhombomeres 5-6 serves to prevent aberrant neuronal iden
125  convergence to their final position next to rhombomeres 5-6.
126 which have disruptions in the development of rhombomeres 5-7 and in the third arch neural crest, and
127  population of central vestibular neurons in rhombomeres 5-7 of larval zebrafish.
128  are confined to the caudal hindbrain within rhombomeres 5-8.
129 n being detected in the premigratory NCCs in rhombomere 6 (r6), migrating NCCs, ventricular cardiomyo
130 bomere 5 affects cochlear duct growth, while rhombomere 6 removal affects cochlear growth and morphog
131 g cranial nerves IX and X, which derive from rhombomeres 6 and 7.
132 n patterns were identified; one derived from rhombomeres 6-7 that elongated in the dorsal funiculus,
133 l crest (arising from the level of hindbrain rhombomeres 6-8) contributes to the septation of the car
134 res caudal to rhombomere 4, most likely from rhombomeres 6-8.
135 of lateral-directed NC cells, led by NC from rhombomere 7 (r7), move as a distinct subpopulation.
136        The interrhombomeric boundary between rhombomere 7 and rhombomere 8 and between the most cauda
137 reticulospinal dINs in the caudal hindbrain (rhombomeres 7-8) fire significantly earlier on each swim
138 hombomeric boundary between rhombomere 7 and rhombomere 8 and between the most caudal rhombomere and
139 ong the anterior-posterior axis of hindbrain rhombomere 8 determines expression of hox5 genes, which
140 are together required for the development of rhombomeres adjacent to r4, particularly r5 and r6.
141 In contrast, removal of individual hindbrain rhombomeres adjacent to the developing ear preferentiall
142 st the hypothesis that a caudal shift of the rhombomeres affects inner ear development, we surgically
143     Following heterotopic transplantation of rhombomeres along the rostrocaudal axis at various devel
144 wn that cells at the boundaries of zebrafish rhombomeres also differ from non-boundary cells in their
145  a mismatch in Hox coding between a specific rhombomere and its corresponding branchial arch.
146 and rhombomere 8 and between the most caudal rhombomere and the spinal cord was not nearly as clear a
147 construction demonstrates cell shapes within rhombomeres and at rhombomere boundaries are abnormal in
148 allow Hoxa2 to be regulated independently in rhombomeres and cranial neural crest cells.
149 omere boundaries, subsequent openings within rhombomeres and eventual coalescence of openings into th
150 y and anteroposterior character of hindbrain rhombomeres and neural crest-derived structures.
151 ntagonist, is expressed in the even-numbered rhombomeres and that over-expression of cSfrp2 inhibits
152 nds, ephrins, are expressed in complementary rhombomeres and, by analogy with their roles in axon pat
153 xing of neural crest cells between adjoining rhombomeres, and the diversity in cell migration behavio
154 ures that define boundaries between adjacent rhombomeres are as yet unclear.
155   However, later antagonist treatments after rhombomeres are established still disrupt branchiomotor
156 erentiated neurons reside, and that specific rhombomeres are invariably vascularized first.
157 mbomere boundaries form sequentially until 8 rhombomeres are present at stage 8.
158                                              Rhombomeres are segmental units of the developing verteb
159                                        While rhombomeres are visible in all vertebrate embryos, gener
160 xing of neural crest cells between adjoining rhombomeres as cells emerged from the dorsal midline; th
161                       From stage 11 onwards, rhombomere borders fade.
162      Increasing noise disrupts sharpening of rhombomere boundaries and proper patterning of the hindb
163 trates cell shapes within rhombomeres and at rhombomere boundaries are abnormal in mypt1 mutants.
164 ith antisense morpholinos (MO) and find that rhombomere boundaries are disrupted in EphA4MO embryos,
165  effectors that bring about the formation of rhombomere boundaries are only just being characterized.
166  Transplantation studies have suggested that rhombomere boundaries form by the local sorting out of c
167                                              Rhombomere boundaries form sequentially until 8 rhombome
168                      Specification of future rhombomere boundaries has a retinoic acid dependency bet
169 enesis becomes confined to zones adjacent to rhombomere boundaries in the zebrafish hindbrain.
170 onist shows that successively more posterior rhombomere boundaries require progressively higher conce
171 cond and unique role in the morphogenesis of rhombomere boundaries, indicating that it controls multi
172 with initial separation along the midline at rhombomere boundaries, subsequent openings within rhombo
173 orting and plasticity -- to the formation of rhombomere boundaries.
174 um, and myosin II and actin concentration at rhombomere boundaries.
175 or cell segregation, and for the most caudal rhombomere boundary (r6/r7).
176 ecific gene expression, as well as defective rhombomere boundary formation in this region.
177 e ephrins, are candidates for functioning in rhombomere boundary formation.
178 nts in the early hindbrain, are required for rhombomere boundary formation.
179 ntin remains localized in radial glia at the rhombomere boundary regions, whereas expression of glial
180  radial glial cell processes that occupy the rhombomere boundary regions.
181                 Finally, we show that dorsal rhombomere boundary signaling centers depend on Zic1 and
182  of Hoxb1 expression at the presumptive r3/4 rhombomere boundary.
183                         Although a model for rhombomere-boundary formation based on repulsive Eph-eph
184 ere to drive the cell sorting that underlies rhombomere-boundary formation.
185 operties of odd- and even-numbered segments (rhombomeres), but an adhesion molecule with alternating
186  is an early embryonic signal that specifies rhombomeres, but its roles in neuronal differentiation w
187 ges shows that the neurons of IF5 arise from rhombomeres caudal to rhombomere 4, most likely from rho
188 buted these defects to a caudal shift of the rhombomeres caused by the shortened body axis and the ki
189 ducibly penetrate into the hindbrain via the rhombomere centers, where differentiated neurons reside,
190 r become confined to the ventricular zone at rhombomere centers, whereas the protein is exclusively e
191  Furthermore, the persistence of some normal rhombomere characteristics in Hox mutant embryos suggest
192         Despite their ectopic position, both rhombomeres continued to express DBHR at the level appro
193 d proposed that preferential adhesion within rhombomeres contributes to boundary formation.
194 irst rhombomere was not seen and the isthmic rhombomere could not be identified.
195 and developing vasculature (Cyp26B1) and the rhombomeres (Cyp26C1).
196                            In the hindbrain, rhombomeres demarcate nonoverlapping regions of the CNS
197  which is organized in a metameric series of rhombomere-derived (rd) territories, follows a rhombomer
198 lel with the EphA4-dependent adhesion within rhombomeres described here to drive the cell sorting tha
199 ighly conserved process but the mechanism of rhombomere determination is not well understood.
200                                              Rhombomere development in Alligator shares several featu
201                                              Rhombomere development was investigated in a reptile, Al
202 ur data demonstrate that, in contrast to the rhombomeres, differential adhesion does not seem to oper
203 ndbrain opening remains normal, mypt1 mutant rhombomeres do not undergo normal morphological progress
204 radial glia but subsequently define distinct rhombomere domains: vimentin remains localized in radial
205 rtebrate hindbrain leads to the formation of rhombomeres, each with a distinct anteroposterior identi
206                                              Rhombomere formation and the development of other hindbr
207 in the caudal hindbrain and are required for rhombomere formation.
208 in hindbrain development is specification of rhombomere identities and that the aberrant development
209 e' is required for the development of unique rhombomere identities, including specification of neuron
210 Thus, in addition to its role in determining rhombomere identities, RA plays a more direct role in th
211 tially initiate progressively more posterior rhombomere identities.
212 inding transcription complexes which specify rhombomere identities.
213 stablishing the segmental plan and assigning rhombomere identity are now known.
214 lations may result, in part, from defects in rhombomere identity.
215 ons cannot be explained solely by changes in rhombomere identity.
216          In val(-) mutants, rX, a region one rhombomere in length and of mixed identity, lies between
217 m contains contributions of cells from three rhombomeres in a pattern very similar to that observed i
218  hox function disrupts development of caudal rhombomeres in model organisms and causes brainstem defe
219 that ensure distinction between the multiple rhombomeres in the developing hindbrain.
220 equired for anterior-posterior patterning of rhombomeres in the hindbrain, there are unique requireme
221 that EphA4 promotes cell adhesion within the rhombomeres in which it is expressed.
222 ocus on the formation of hindbrain segments (rhombomeres) in the developing zebrafish as an example,
223 se affects patterning of hindbrain segments (rhombomeres) in the zebrafish embryo.
224 other Hox proteins expressed at more rostral rhombomere interfaces can also regulate Eph/ephrins, ind
225 egated streams adjacent to the even-numbered rhombomeres into the branchial arches, and each stream c
226 and regionally specific structures from each rhombomere is achieved with the almost complete absence
227                         The identity of each rhombomere is specified by the expression of conserved t
228 egmentation of the vertebrate hindbrain into rhombomeres is a key step in the development of a comple
229 on of the vertebrate hindbrain into multiple rhombomeres is essential for proper formation of the cer
230 egmentation of the vertebrate hindbrain into rhombomeres is essential for the anterior-posterior patt
231 egmentation of the vertebrate hindbrain into rhombomeres is highly conserved, but how early hindbrain
232 ansient, genetically-defined segments called rhombomeres is required for normal respiratory developme
233                            Hence, vertebrate rhombomeres may derive from a cryptically segmented brai
234 hat extent neural crest cells from adjoining rhombomeres mix along migration routes and within the br
235 that in the zebrafish hindbrain, cell shape, rhombomere morphogenesis and, unexpectedly, brain ventri
236             Brain ventricle lumen expansion, rhombomere morphology and cell shape are rescued by inhi
237    NM and NL thus have partially overlapping rhombomeres of origin.
238 c movements of precursor cells establish the rhombomeres of the hindbrain, the external germinal laye
239 eloping vertebrates occurs between adjacent -rhombomeres of the hindbrain.
240  of the neural tube, including even-numbered rhombomeres of the hindbrain.
241 ttern that corresponds with the segments, or rhombomeres, of the developing hindbrain and have identi
242 well-known EphA4-dependent repulsion between rhombomeres operates in parallel with the EphA4-dependen
243 ffinity within rhombomeres serve to maintain rhombomere organization during the potentially disruptiv
244                                    Hindbrain rhombomere patterning and the initial generation of post
245 pletely or partially fused from the level of rhombomere (r) 2 towards the posterior.
246 n the hindbrain, both genes are expressed in rhombomere (r) 2, but only Hoxa2(b) is expressed in r3,
247  in the cytoplasm leads to extensive loss of rhombomere (r) 3- and r4-specific gene expression, as we
248 loss of hindbrain segmentation caudal to the rhombomere (r) 3/4 border in a subset of embryos.
249  rostral expression limit at the presumptive rhombomere (r) 3/r4 boundary during gastrula stages, and
250 chiomotor (FBM) neurones are born in ventral rhombomere (r) 4 and migrate through r5 to dorsal r6 whe
251  FBM neurons failed to migrate caudally from rhombomere (r) 4 into r6.
252 angential migration from their birthplace in rhombomere (r) 4 to their final destination in r6/r7.
253 anistic basis for the regulation of Hoxa2 in rhombomere (r) 4.
254 evelopment, conferring identity to hindbrain rhombomere (r) 4.
255 nds from the posterior spinal cord up to the rhombomere (r) 4/5 boundary and both genes are upregulat
256 red cell autonomously for the development of rhombomere (r) 5 and r6 and for activation of Hox group
257 s revealed some of their roles in specifying rhombomere (r) identity.
258 tory streams that emerge from the hindbrain, rhombomere (r) segments r1-r7, and the signals that coor
259 e neural tube that had never expressed Hoxb [rhombomeres (r) 1 and 2], strongly expressed Hoxb1 but n
260                    In Gbx2 null homozygotes, rhombomeres (r) 1-3 fail to develop and the isthmic expr
261 w that distinct combinations of Hox genes in rhombomeres (r) 4 and 5 of the hindbrain are required fo
262 are expressed at high relative levels in the rhombomeres (r) 5 and 6, and 5, respectively.
263  neuronal populations derived from hindbrain rhombomeres (r) 5 to 8, suggesting a late role of the ge
264 lacode that invaginates lateral to hindbrain rhombomeres (r) 5-6 to form the otic vesicle.
265 owed that neural crest cells emerge from all rhombomeres (r) and sort into distinct exiting streams a
266 tinoic acid, and specification of individual rhombomeres (r) follows a strict rostrocaudal sequence a
267 rate hindbrain is segmented into an array of rhombomeres (r), but it remains to be fully understood h
268 at interfaces between neural segments called rhombomeres (r).
269 vided into serially homologous segments, the rhombomeres (r).
270 ain is transiently segmented into 7 distinct rhombomeres (r).
271 he hindbrain into the mesenchyme adjacent to rhombomeres (r)1 plus r2, r4 and r6 in three segregated
272 o three streams, with mesenchyme adjacent to rhombomeres (r)3 and r5 maintained NCC-free.
273                                     In these rhombomeres, r2 through r5, rostrocaudal caudal expansio
274 , a key segmentation factor expressed in odd rhombomeres (r3 and r5), can largely override Hox protei
275 (RENs) that arises in the fourth segment, or rhombomere (r4), of the hindbrain and a group of caudal
276 ommon olig2(+) neuroepithelial precursors in rhombomeres r5 and r6, but that all other motor neurons
277                 We found that NM arises from rhombomeres r5, r6, and r7, and NL arises mostly from r5
278 ion of these factors and that more posterior rhombomeres require higher levels of RA than more anteri
279 g, we show that progressively more posterior rhombomeres require increasingly higher levels of RA sig
280                                              Rhombomere-restricted misexpression of a single gene, Ho
281 sulted in the homeotic transformation of the rhombomere, revealed by reorganization of motor axon pro
282 ion originate from the same caudal hindbrain rhombomere (rh) 8-spinal compartment.
283 strate that not all aspects of an individual rhombomere's identity are regulated coordinately.
284 cdx4 overexpression in the hindbrain impairs rhombomere segmentation and patterning and induces the e
285 h Eph and Efn-dependent cell affinity within rhombomeres serve to maintain rhombomere organization du
286             All chicken embryos with shifted rhombomeres showed defects in cochlear duct formation in
287 strate a crucial role for FGF-mediated inter-rhombomere signaling in promoting early hindbrain patter
288  and their ligands, the ephrins, function in rhombomere-specific cell sorting and initiation of a str
289 ombomere-derived (rd) territories, follows a rhombomere-specific pattern, with extensive production o
290                 We show that early zebrafish rhombomere-specification genes, including vhnf1 in r5-r6
291 ically and molecularly distinct segments, or rhombomeres, that correspond to Hox expression domains.
292                                      In this rhombomere, the labeling becomes striped during the time
293 ntervein divisions of the wing and mammalian rhombomeres, the Nub and Tsh domains share some of the a
294        Whereas the hindbrain subdivides into rhombomeres, the spinal cord remains unsegmented.
295 l stages, we have found that the capacity of rhombomeres to generate somatic motoneurones is labile a
296 a suggest that an early event in determining rhombomere topology is the specification of both morphol
297 ct border between the midbrain and the first rhombomere was not seen and the isthmic rhombomere could
298 ization of neural crest cells from adjoining rhombomeres within a single branchial arch support the n
299  through two phases, the misspecification of rhombomeres within the hindbrain, followed subsequently
300 sion expands to include rhombomere 4 through rhombomere X (an aberrant segment that forms in lieu of

 
Page Top