ライフサイエンスコーパス: right bundle branch

1 uding absence or severe abnormalities of the right bundle branch.

2 ) coronary artery most commonly perfuses the right bundle branch and left anterior fascicle, but not

3 Key predictors included preexisting right bundle branch block (adjusted odds ratio, 5.45 [95

4 th left posterior fascicular block, 193 with right bundle branch block (BBB), 76 with left BBB, and 1

5 ffect was neutral, regardless of morphology, right bundle branch block (HR=1.01, P=0.975), and intrav

6 Preoperative right bundle branch block (odds ratio [OR], 3.6; 95% con

7 5% CI: 1.01 to 1.20; p = 0.02), and previous right bundle branch block (OR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.00 to 4.1

8 owever, SA was found to increase the risk of right bundle branch block (RBBB) (pooled odds ratio [OR]

9 s supraventricular tachycardia with aberrant right bundle branch block (RBBB) and left anterior hemib

10 study investigates the prognostic impact of right bundle branch block (RBBB) and left bundle branch

11 The incidence and prognosis of right bundle branch block (RBBB) following transcatheter

12 nch block (LBBB) was present in 65 patients, right bundle branch block (RBBB) in 48 patients, and non

13 raventricular conduction delay (NICD) versus right bundle branch block (RBBB) in patients eligible fo

14 his study sought to test the hypothesis that right bundle branch block (RBBB) patients have larger sc

15 ped left bundle branch block, 1.1% developed right bundle branch block (RBBB), and 0.6% had complete

16 (4) 47 normal subjects; (5) 18 patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB).

17 ts were more likely to have hypertension and right bundle branch block (RBBB).

18 anterior hemiblock (RR: 1.62; p < 0.01), or right bundle branch block (RR: 2.89; p < 0.01) at baseli

19 avity with Lugol's solution induced complete right bundle branch block and converted the bidirectiona

20 and electrophysiological factors, a baseline right bundle branch block and electrophysiology study-de

21 Right bundle branch block and right ventricular (RV) dys

22 fascicular ventricular tachycardia, and the right bundle branch block and ST segment elevation syndr

23 eath in association with typical or atypical right bundle branch block and ST-segment elevations (Bru

24 rapy was applied in the presence of complete right bundle branch block by atrial-synchronized RV free

25 e structural heart disease associated with a right bundle branch block conduction pattern and ST-segm

26 One patient developed complete right bundle branch block during radiofrequency catheter

27 eriaortic VTs could be divided into left and right bundle branch block forms with mapping showing rig

28 tration resulted in ST-segment elevation and right bundle branch block in all patients in group A and

29 We hypothesized that right bundle branch block is associated with specific RV

30 n be challenging because they present with a right bundle branch block morphology by electrocardiogra

31 d ventricular arrhythmias with a predominant right bundle branch block morphology, 13 of 27 (48%) sho

32 and cytoskeleton genes presented SMVTs with right bundle branch block morphology, which origin was i

33 lex ventricular arrhythmias with polymorphic/right bundle branch block morphology, without significan

34 nch block, non-left bundle branch block, and right bundle branch block morphology.

35 h block pattern compared with 7 (27%) with a right bundle branch block pattern.

36 acing after the procedure, three of whom had right bundle branch block preoperatively.

37 tion (P<0.001) along with elimination of the right bundle branch block QRS morphology, increase in RV

38 be divided into left bundle branch block and right bundle branch block types associated with differen

39 oped in 46% of septal myectomy patients, and right bundle branch block was evident in 58% of alcohol

40 nt depression occurred in 1 patient, and the right bundle branch block was induced in 2 others (perma

41 R 4.03, 95% CI 1.59-10.23, P = .003) and the right bundle branch block with a higher risk of CAVB (HR

42 axis and V3 transition (63%), followed by a right bundle branch block with inferior axis and no tran

43 heart (ii) heart with a conduction disorder (right bundle branch block) (iii) focal activation initia

44 s with QRSd >120 ms in 57 (39%) patients (27 right bundle branch block, 18 left bundle branch block,

45 aventricular conduction delay, or incomplete right bundle branch block, a much higher proportion than

46 heart rate, and with prevalent hypertension, right bundle branch block, and cardiovascular disease.

47 erior leads, left axis deviation, incomplete right bundle branch block, and frequent premature ventri

48 ural disease), normal QT intervals, apparent right bundle branch block, and sudden cardiac death, par

49 t versus persistent ST-segment elevation and right bundle branch block, as well as the effectiveness

50 to atrio-ventricular conduction block (AVB), right bundle branch block, bradycardia, and the Brugada

51 on-left bundle branch block (LBBB; including right bundle branch block, intraventricular conduction d

52 n patients with congenital heart disease and right bundle branch block, RV cardiac resynchronization

53 n described in patients with the syndrome of right bundle branch block, ST-segment elevation in leads

54 Electrocardiography showed sinus rhythm, right bundle branch block, T-wave inversion in V6, and e

55 bundle branch block is far more common than right bundle branch block.

56 alcohol septal ablation, 21 (36%) developed right bundle branch block.

57 further in the presence of complete left or right bundle branch block.

58 branch block/superior axis, case 2 showed a right bundle branch block/inferior axis, case 3 showed a

59 ped in the 9 patients; 9 of the 11 VTs had a right bundle branch block/left-axis morphology that mimi

60 c involvement, and electrical abnormalities (right bundle branch block/low voltages) was developed to

61 d to supraventricular complexes with left or right bundle-branch block (L/RBBB) was investigated in a

62 lymorphic ventricular arrhythmias (n=6), and right bundle-branch block (n=5).

63 elay/block may be made when catheter-induced right bundle-branch block (RBBB) develops in patients wi

64 (LV) mapping, including all 4 patients with right bundle-branch block (RBBB) VT.

65 Right bundle-branch block (RBBB) was present in 11 patie

66 RV problems may include right bundle-branch block (RBBB), volume loading, and ch

67 rigin of ventricular tachycardia (VT) with a right bundle-branch block (RBBB)-type pattern and an R-S

68 ents, with few patients in subgroups such as right bundle-branch block (RBBB).

69 diagnostic ECG markers in the presence of a right bundle-branch block (RBBB).

70 nd 40 nontetralogy control subjects (20 with right bundle-branch block [group 4] and 20 with normal E

71 Right bundle-branch block and precordial injury pattern

72 ventricular fibrillation characterized by a right bundle-branch block and ST elevation in the right

73 into two groups: group 1 (n=16) patients had right bundle-branch block and ST-segment elevation in V1

74 acemaker implantation after TAVR, with prior right bundle-branch block and transcatheter valve type a

75 ophysiological substrate and 6 patients with right bundle-branch block for comparison.

76 Unlike BrS, right bundle-branch block had delayed activation in the

77 a prolonged P-R interval, but not incomplete right bundle-branch block or early repolarization patter

78 ved in patients with a non-LBBB QRS pattern (right bundle-branch block or intraventricular conduction

79 ventricular fibrillation characterized by a right bundle-branch block pattern and ST elevation (STE)

80 or intraventricular conduction delay but not right bundle-branch block provided prognostic informatio

81 ction was relatively well preserved, and the right bundle-branch block type of BBR was frequently ind

82 Patients with either right bundle-branch block type or polymorphic complex ve

83 erted T waves on inferior leads, and all had right bundle-branch block ventricular arrhythmias.

84 Incident right bundle-branch block was examined as a negative con

85 Right bundle-branch block was found in 13% (n = 89) of t

86 Right bundle-branch block was not associated with arrhyt

87 ciation between randomization assignment and right bundle-branch block was observed (HR, 0.95; 95% CI

88 Complete or incomplete right bundle-branch block was observed in 39.2% of the p

89 We identified 12 affected individuals (right bundle-branch block, > or =1-mm STE) with an autos

90 eexisting ECG abnormalities were as follows: right bundle-branch block, 65.2%; left bundle-branch blo

91 t bundle-branch block (LBBB), 228 (13%) with right bundle-branch block, and 308 (17%) with nonspecifi

92 k pattern and 16 controls (narrow QRS, n=11; right bundle-branch block, n=5).

93 Right bundle-branch block- or multiple-morphology EIVA i

94 imaging could differentiate between BrS and right bundle-branch block.

95 and is frequently accompanied by an apparent right bundle-branch block.

96 rkinje fiber network formation, resulting in right bundle-branch block.

97 ts with NSVT or VT, the dominant morphology (right-bundle branch block with superior axis) was 100% p

98 e of the right bundle branch correlated with right-bundle-branch block by ECG.

99 ients with and without coronary angiography, right bundle branch blocks (BBBs), prolonged intrinsicoi

100 y efficacious as BiV CRT in hearts with pure right bundle branch conduction delay.

101 Absence of the right bundle branch correlated with right-bundle-branch

102 rmed adjacent to the His bundle and proximal right bundle branch (HB-RB), initially at high output to

103 mal left ventricular function, and VT with a right bundle-branch morphology was inducible in 4 patien

104 the activation sequence of the His bundle or right bundle branch (RB) for diagnoses of various suprav

105 r epicardium and the proximal segment of the right bundle branch (RBB) were obtained using a high-spe

106 e His bundle, and then divided into left and right bundle branches that terminated in the Purkinje fi