ライフサイエンスコーパス: riparian

1 ociated lentic wetlands, provided a range of riparian and aquatic habitat variability ideal for study

2 tivity at 14 survey locations, stratified in riparian and upland habitat, in mixed-conifer forest hab

3 We found differential use of riparian and upland habitats among the phonic groups, ye

4 have spread rapidly to dominate over 600,000 riparian and wetland hectares.

5 ng properties to identify forest management, riparian, and hillslope factors that influence responses

6 , sand content of soils, basin area, percent riparian area as forest, channel erosion, and relative b

7 ) derived canopy height model (CHM) within a riparian area in Southeast Iowa, United States.

8 The microbial biomass C (C(mic)) in the riparian area was 2.5 and 4 times lower than in the mead

9 gher in SCM (1.2 mg N kg(-1) hr(-1)) than in riparian areas (0.4 mg N kg(-1) hr(-1)).

10 We find that time in biodiverse riparian areas and areas of perceived aesthetic value co

11 Both species became more attracted to riparian areas as air temperature increased, with prefer

12 s by hikers and wildlife alike target shared riparian areas as hot spots for management efforts to pr

13 rential visitation and high service value of riparian areas by hikers and wildlife alike target share

14 ering practices) and forested and herbaceous riparian areas in Baltimore, MD.

15 heir ability to remove N compared to natural riparian areas is not well-known.

16 lasses and distribution of land cover in the riparian areas of streams; (2) examine the discrepancies

17 well as to sustain ecological functions that riparian areas provide.

18 changes in runoff have impaired streams and riparian areas that previously reduced watershed nitroge

19 Riparian areas, particularly those with both water and w

20 igher potential denitrification than natural riparian areas.

21 istent with preferred forage concentrated in riparian areas.

22 cross the western Oregon Cascades, including riparian areas.

23 ntify the impact on trophic structure in 240 riparian arthropod communities in tropical and temperate

24 transport among the terrestrial, floodplain, riparian, benthic and transitional ecosystems with which

25 riparian zones, which helps to explain high riparian biodiversity.

26 s and the physical characteristics of stream-riparian boundaries.

27 tural environmental conditions, we studied a riparian broadleaf angiosperm species, Populus angustifo

28 ss the environmental impact of land cover on riparian buffer areas.

29 lidar data can be used to estimate forested riparian buffer canopy height within diverse vegetation

30 in mapping can effectively estimate forested riparian buffer H and FC within a range of riparian vege

31 a method to create accurate high-resolution riparian buffer maps which can be used to improve water

32 red with field measurements from 80 forested riparian buffer plots.

33 wn as biogeochemical hotspots in landscapes, riparian buffer zones exhibit considerable potential con

34 hnique using LiDAR data to help characterize riparian buffers over large spatial extents.

35 ng rivers and streams as partially harvested riparian buffers.

36 the BRT model were associated with extensive riparian canopy, high levels of organic carbon in soils,

37 ural land use, carbonate geology, and sparse riparian canopy, which suggested that reduced nitrogen i

38 habitat analyses to investigate the diet of riparian Coleoptera in relation to inundation risk and r

39 than temperate regions, indicating tropical riparian communities are both more reliant on and impact

40 loss in emergence reduces prey subsidies to riparian communities at concentrations considered safe f

41 In addition, riparian communities obeying neutral dynamics seem to ex

42 ight the importance of aquatic resources for riparian communities, especially in the tropics, but sug

43 de in marine communities and tetrodotoxin in riparian communities.

44 spatial statistics to quantify variation of riparian condition in each measurement section.

45 Evaluation of riparian condition is essential to achieve and maintain

46 had been the main human disturbances to the riparian condition, which were increased from 1976 to 20

47 land-use patterns had an important effect on riparian condition.

48 This manuscript is aimed to evaluate riparian conditions of Songhua River, the fifth longest

49 be 35 traits that enable plants to cope with riparian conditions.

50 mmetrical subsidy flows, we found stream and riparian consumer allochthony to be equivalent.

51 rial subsidies have the potential to provide riparian consumers with benefits in terms of physiologic

52 ragmentation, highlighting the importance of riparian corridors for connectivity, and continuous tree

53 on inside plantations and maintaining nearby riparian corridors would increase the likelihood of terr

54 anagement, such as maintaining and restoring riparian corridors, benefit stream-water microbiomes in

55 een 1999 and 2010 in sun coffee plantations, riparian corridors, secondary forests, forest fragments,

56 n United States and can thrive in hyper-arid riparian corridors.

57 thod analyzes the evolutionary strategies of riparian countries and investigates evolutionary stable

58 mation on conditions in ungauged or upstream riparian countries that do not share such data with neig

59 everal parameters on the interaction between riparian countries.

60 t plant upgrades and regulation in the Rhine riparian countries.

61 The water-sharing strategy of a riparian country depends on the strategies of other coun

62 zation, bottom substrate, shallow pools, and riparian cover).

63 streams in eastern North America shows that riparian deforestation causes channel narrowing, which r

64 on macroinvertebrates was evident only when riparian degradation was also high.

65 effects often depended on local land use and riparian degradation.

66 ntain elk (Cervus elaphus) in high-elevation riparian drainages in northern Arizona, where elk impact

67 ered assessment of groundwater influences on riparian ecosystem health at the spatial and temporal sc

68 e explore linkages between components of the riparian ecosystem in Arctic Alaska since the 1960s, inc

69 Groundwater-fed riparian ecosystems and associated fluvial deposits abou

70 iversity of these foundation species affects riparian ecosystems and determines a much larger communi

71 portant implications for water availability, riparian ecosystems and environmental flows(4-10), but t

72 Riparian ecosystems are highly diverse and dynamic, but

73 Our relict riparian ecosystems from the PdT basin are indicative of

74 Riparian ecosystems fundamentally depend on groundwater,

75 onsequently, our analysis suggests that many riparian ecosystems have become reliant on anthropogenic

76 Global biodiversity in river and riparian ecosystems is generated and maintained by geogr

77 genetic diversity accumulates downstream in riparian ecosystems, but life history traits (e.g. dispe

78 In semiarid western North American riparian ecosystems, increased drought and lower streamf

79 uctures and functions of soils, streams, and riparian ecosystems, threatens drinking water supplies,

80 e been found in all terrestrial, marine, and riparian environments, including remote regions.

81 gasoline deposits may remain in the combined riparian/estuarine system for decades.

82 Riparian floodplains are important regions for biogeoche

83 The strength of this subsidy in active riparian floodplains is thought to underpin local biodiv

84 ults are consistent with the hypothesis that riparian flow-pathways and seasonality in riparian soil

85 rst evidence that PFASs can propagate to the riparian food web via aquatic emergent insects.

86 aquatic food web and bioaccumulation in the riparian food web.

87 atic insects are important food subsidies to riparian food webs but can also transfer waterborne cont

88 ortant vectors of waterborne contaminants to riparian food webs, yet pathways of Se transport and exp

89 treams, and play a vital role in aquatic and riparian food webs.

90 st evidence that algal toxins propagate into riparian food webs.

91 nt policy of the United States that endorses riparian forest buffers as best management practice and

92 nhabited a latest Quaternary mosaic savannah-riparian forest ecosystem on the Aru Islands of Eastern

93 Habitat (vernal pool, upland or riparian forest floor) and site of collection explained

94 ologic change, potentially leading to future riparian forest loss across increasingly stressed drylan

95 logical integrity than were natural factors (riparian forest, watershed soil character).

96 Working in a temperate evergreen riparian forest, we aimed to determine whether disturban

97 arying proportions of grassland, wetland and riparian forest.

98 uates the impact of distinct land use types (riparian, forest, pasture) on soil microbial biomass and

99 In riparian forests across the northern hemisphere, warming

100 , but source 4 is up to 47% in valleys where riparian forests and desert oases are found.

101 Riparian forests are structured and maintained by their

102 affected ~20% of the Basin and up to ~50% of riparian forests in some regions.

103 ation of fragmentation and drought, but even riparian forests located within 40 m of oil palm plantat

104 other ecosystems also typify woody plants in riparian forests where disturbances are often mild or ch

105 orrelations with organic soils (wetlands and riparian forests) persisted during mild drought and were

106 itical for recruitment of these foundational riparian forests, although the magnitude of future decou

107 g the degradation of bottomland hardwood and riparian forests, which provide essential habitats for n

108 rubra, which is primarily found in pristine riparian forests.

109 rity and self-maintenance of species-diverse riparian forests.

110 Salicaceae species that dominate western USA riparian forests.

111 Along with comparable riparian forms on other Pacific Islands, var. newellii a

112 lts were especially profound for the remnant riparian fringe, which suggests that this region maintai

113 e measurements of H2 O and CO2 fluxes over a riparian grassland, shrubland, and woodland.

114 Here we aim to assess and to compare two riparian gray alder forests in terms of gaseous N2O and

115 of denitrification and N2O reduction in both riparian gray alder stands.

116 isotopologue ratios of N2O dissolved in the riparian groundwater in order to support our assumption

117 of N(2) production due to denitrification in riparian groundwater over a six-month period.

118 verage (15)N site preferences of N2O (SP) in riparian groundwater ranged between 11 and 44 per thousa

119 gical processes contributing to the expanded riparian habitat and range of snowshoe hares (Lepus amer

120 an initiate meanders, increasing channel and riparian habitat diversity.

121 or dragonfly conservation should incorporate riparian habitat protection while maintaining aquatic ha

122 loads conductively through wet soil suggests riparian habitats also are critical thermal refuges for

123 tegrative waterway management accounting for riparian habitats and landscape characteristics could he

124 Riparian habitats are subjected to frequent inundation (

125 ease the processing of external subsidies in riparian habitats.

126 feed on predatory invertebrates in adjacent riparian habitats.

127 lorado, U.S.A., we find that the increase in riparian hydraulic gradients imposed by a beaver dam is

128 ite not being riparian specialists, and that riparian invaders disperse in more ways, including by wa

129 o examine possible causes of high degrees of riparian invasion.

130 Riparian land use across the region had only small effec

131 predictor of present-day diversity, whereas riparian land use and watershed land use in the 1990s we

132 ounded by dense human settlement and intense riparian land use often develop algae/cyanobacteria bloo

133 at human experts would delineate within this riparian landscape.

134 present the first global-scale assessment of riparian litter quality by determining latitudinal varia

135 formation on large-scale trait variation for riparian litter.

136 The experiment demonstrates that riparian management targeting salmonids strongly affects

137 treams) to investigate whether four types of riparian management, including those proposed to reduce

138 restrial and aquatic origins irrespective of riparian management.

139 This study contributes new insights into riparian MeHg production within rivers which can inform

140 we synthesize existing literature on stream-riparian meta-ecosystems to quantify global patterns of

141 ted river-fed artificial channels, from bare riparian mineral soil to lotic channels, under two disti

142 orth America have long been characterized as riparian-obligate species because of their dependence on

143 yet pathways of Se transport and exposure of riparian organisms are poorly characterized.

144 investigated Se concentrations in stream and riparian organisms to determine whether mining extent in

145 ble pathways for the Mekong's ecosystems and riparian people.

146 frequent disturbance, from dam building and riparian plant browsing through dam failure and abandonm

147 y similarity measured by Sorensen's index in riparian plant communities.

148 To investigate riparian plant community recovery, we quantified riparia

149 of beaver activity on channel processes and riparian plant recruitment beyond those dams and after d

150 uencing channel and floodplain evolution and riparian plant recruitment.

151 Woody riparian plants typically adapt to the local flood regim

152 NA except for three terrestrial and emergent riparian plants.

153 ctivity and mating patterns among and within riparian populations.

154 antly correlated with MeHg concentrations in riparian porewaters, suggesting riparian zones were like

155 ity to changing resource availability within riparian predator communities in both tropical and tempe

156 ubled in magnitude, benefitting a generalist riparian predator.

157 Riparian predators consumed more aquatic prey and were m

158 m insects are important prey for aquatic and riparian predators, and widespread planting of Bt crops

159 lt Trichoptera, an important food source for riparian predators, showed an increased body burden of p

160 idies provide benefits or come at a cost for riparian predators.

161 centrations, potentially due to in-stream or riparian processes.

162 in benthic snails and clams, supporting that riparian produced MeHg was assimilated into local aquati

163 summer baseflow conditions, with emphasis on riparian production of MeHg.

164 nd federal and state programs that subsidize riparian reforestation for stream restoration and water

165 er Basin, site of one of the largest aquatic/riparian restoration programs in the United States, woul

166 that some Costa Rican forest birds will use 'riparian' (river margin) corridors to get back home, but

167 s suggest that increased aridity will reduce riparian seedling growth despite elevated CO(2), and wil

168 derate positive effects of elevated CO(2) on riparian seedlings are unlikely to counteract the large

169 re, we address whether this applies to urban riparian settings, where discharging groundwater may pot

170 dients in mute swan (Cygnus olor) herbivory, riparian shading, water temperature and distance downstr

171 an shrub height are consistent with observed riparian shrub expansion in the region.

172 ring discharge and the estimated increase in riparian shrub height are consistent with observed ripar

173 ents show that snowshoe hares require a mean riparian shrub height of at least 1.24-1.36 m, a thresho

174 lations between cumulative summer warmth and riparian shrub height to reconstruct annual changes in s

175 e stimulated a 78% increase in the height of riparian shrubs.

176 A first-order linear model fit best at the riparian site, indicating consistent growth increases in

177 at the upland site and a 36% increase at the riparian site.

178 dry upland tundra site and an adjacent mesic riparian site.

179 Here, by considering seven riparian sites across four seasons, we determined the ab

180 ing upland region, groundwater access at the riparian sites increased net carbon uptake (NEP) and eva

181 at riparian flow-pathways and seasonality in riparian soil concentrations are the major controls on t

182 ansitions on Zn partitioning in contaminated riparian soil in a mountain watershed.

183 Discharge, and simulated riparian soil water concentrations profiles, represented

184 four parameters to represent seasonality in riparian soil water THg and MeHg concentrations profiles

185 ved Hg induced by flooding of a contaminated riparian soil, we performed laboratory microcosm experim

186 k where a continuum of lateral flows through riparian soils determines streamflow concentrations.

187 metal sulfide nanoparticles in contaminated riparian soils may influence the availability of Hg for

188 ve invaded riparian zones, despite not being riparian specialists, and that riparian invaders dispers

189 en-community (beta) diversity, implying that riparian species are distributed in a more localized pat

190 x spp., Ulmus pumila) western North American riparian species in a CO(2)-controlled glasshouse, using

191 Cottonwoods are foundation riparian species, and hybridization among species is kno

192 abscission and the establishment of invasive riparian species.

193 We collected adult insects and two riparian spider genera, Tetragnatha and Dolomedes, for 1

194 model that approximately 55% of MeHg in two riparian spiders is derived from riverine sources while

195 ontrast, insect-mediated transfer of PFAS to riparian spiders showed trophic enrichment of 6:2 FTS an

196 aquatic insect larvae and adults, fish, and riparian spiders) matrices were sampled upstream and dow

197 mergence of aquatic insects and predation by riparian spiders, as well as significant reductions in i

198 hese insects were effective Se biovectors to riparian spiders.

199 ence and insect-mediated contaminant flux to riparian spiders.

200 e time and oxygen and nitrogen fluxes in the riparian subsurface.

201 In a California riparian system, the most diverse natural assemblages ar

202 form hydrologic and biogeochemical cycles in riparian systems.

203 salivary cortisol, but were associated with riparian travel and aesthetic preferences, indicating an

204 he most dominant, and ecologically important riparian tree species in the western United States and c

205 white elm (Ulmus laevis Pallas), a European riparian tree species whose populations have been fragme

206 Field elm (Ulmus minor) is a riparian tree that grows in rare, small populations scat

207 ity of Salix salviifolia, an Iberian endemic riparian tree, across the species latitudinal range.

208 cottonwood, Populus angustifolia, a dominant riparian tree.

209 s, our results reveal how planting deciduous riparian trees along temperate headwaters as an adaptati

210 Quantifying the genetic diversity of riparian trees is essential to understand their chances

211 isturbance, equid wells became nurseries for riparian trees.

212 The single island-endemic form, riparian var. newellii, showed especially strong differe

213 Shading by riparian vegetation also had a greater depressing effect

214 diverse and dynamic, but effects of fire on riparian vegetation are poorly understood.

215 While riparian vegetation between the river and the main levee

216 lution, agricultural runoffs and maintaining riparian vegetation can mitigate the impacts of land use

217 set of modern meandering rivers with varying riparian vegetation densities, using satellite imagery a

218 for bankfull Shields number, which considers riparian vegetation density.

219 r and artificially enhance water supplies to riparian vegetation in the dry season, disrupt the seaso

220 Riparian vegetation is exposed to stress from inundation

221 ashington state, USA, replicated large-scale riparian vegetation manipulations implemented with the l

222 Changes in riparian vegetation or water turbidity and browning in s

223 D(50) < 2 mm, increasingly densely forested riparian vegetation reduces the bankfull Shields number,

224 rian plant community recovery, we quantified riparian vegetation responses to wildfire and forest man

225 d riparian buffer H and FC within a range of riparian vegetation types.

226 dietary impact of t-POC (from the leaves of riparian vegetation) and various phytoplankton on Daphni

227 r example, human activity can strongly alter riparian vegetation, potentially impacting both economic

228 e will modify the recruitment and quality of riparian vegetation, the timing of leaf abscission and t

229 the dynamics and patterns of biodiversity of riparian vegetation.

230 ough habitat conservation and enhancement of riparian vegetation.

231 ecause of their comparatively well-developed riparian vegetation.

232 dystrophic lake > dystrophic lake/wetland > riparian wetland.

233 These results illustrate the importance of riparian wetland/floodplain areas as sources of fluvial

234 al resources where cover is extensive (>60 m riparian width).

235 vations), and streamflow alteration data for riparian woodland communities (n = 22,153 polygons) over

236 Riparian woodland communities rely on naturally variable

237 lization), with some 30% of Sr deriving from riparian woodland habitats.

238 For example, riparian woodland is advocated widely as shade to reduce

239 We find that riparian woodlands exhibit a stress response to deeper g

240 These patterns suggest that many riparian woodlands in California are subsidized by water

241 n, seasonal wetlands, desert shrublands, and riparian woodlands, and paleoclimates ranging from semia

242 tect the phenomena that ultimately determine riparian woody vegetation-induced width variation.

243 e efficacy of an urban remnant and a cleared riparian zone for supporting a putative denitrifying mic

244 Analysis of land use patterns of riparian zone in the cold and hot spots found that land-

245 Riparian zone is crucial to the health of streams and th

246 alled three of these 4 m deep HR-MLWs in the riparian zone of a third-order river and analyzed for hy

247 show that the water level variations at the riparian zone of the Colorado River, USA, exhibit multif

248 of PFASs from the aquatic environment to the riparian zone via emergent aquatic insects.

249 Additionally, the riparian zone's microbial quotient (qMic) was 0.5 times

250 ation in the subsurface, particularly in the riparian zone, is limiting base flow nitrate concentrati

251 Soils in the riparian zone, the interface between terrestrial and aqu

252 north-facing slope, south-facing slope, and riparian zone, there were clear differences in fluoresce

253 ater use and river stage fluctuations in the riparian zone, using multifractal detrended fluctuation

254 The transfer of PFAS from the lake to the riparian zone, via deposition of emergent aquatic insect

255 ir range beyond the lake up to 40 m into the riparian zone.

256 nt but functionally similar in the reservoir riparian zone.

257 emented to identify the vulnerability of the riparian zone.

258 ns (20-38 m from stream), outside the stream riparian zone.

259 ogic extremes dominate chemical exports from riparian zones and dictate water quality in major river

260 Stress from urbanization in the riparian zones appears to be localized.

261 Globally, riparian zones are increasingly exposed to wildfire, and

262 Although riparian zones are thought to be resilient to wildfire,

263 oadcasting whitewater river noise in montane riparian zones for two summers.

264 ment sections indicated that over 60% of the riparian zones have been disturbed by human activities.

265 stover and unfertilized switchgrass grown in riparian zones in the Midwestern United States.

266 However, the ecological functioning of riparian zones is often compromised due to degraded cond

267 re by far the dominant land cover classes in riparian zones of the Lower Savannah River Basin, follow

268 ntrations in riparian porewaters, suggesting riparian zones were likely an important source of MeHg t

269 Possible applications range from riparian zones, agricultural field sites to contaminated

270 s in the regional species pools have invaded riparian zones, despite not being riparian specialists,

271 centrated in western plains and Yellow River riparian zones, versus low-quality areas in eastern/nort

272 Riparian zones, which are known biogeochemical hotspots

273 at there are many ways of sustaining life in riparian zones, which helps to explain high riparian bio

274 xposure risks for top predators that prey in riparian zones.

275 ic diversity, regardless of reforestation of riparian zones.

276 srupted by human modification of streams and riparian zones.