ライフサイエンスコーパス: sacroiliitis

1 inic with clinical suspicion of inflammatory sacroiliitis.

2 nhanced pelvic CT were performed to rule out sacroiliitis.

3 clinical features, the hallmark of which is sacroiliitis.

4 ndylitis has been observed in the absence of sacroiliitis.

5 .001), spondylitis (7% vs 76%, P < .001) and sacroiliitis (9% vs 87%, P < .001).

6 Of 14 patients with radiographic sacroiliitis according to modified New York criteria, on

7 is the method of choice in diagnosing early sacroiliitis and detecting structural lesions, in partic

8 ents with early IBP, a combination of severe sacroiliitis and HLA-B27 positivity has a high specifici

9 the 40 patients followed up had MRI-evident sacroiliitis, and 6 (12%) had unequivocal AS according t

10 Reactive arthritis, sacroiliitis, and ankylosing spondylitis also appear to

11 back pain, radicular back pain, spondylitis, sacroiliitis, and other) and overall diagnoses were made

12 rior, based on findings of bilateral erosive sacroiliitis at pelvic radiography (Fig 1A) and bone sci

13 rior, based on findings of bilateral erosive sacroiliitis at pelvic radiography and bone scintigraphy

14 l lesions in individuals suspected of having sacroiliitis compared with routine T1-weighted MRI.

15 what proportion of patients with MRI-evident sacroiliitis develop ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the

16 RI, radiographs resulted in 40% of incorrect sacroiliitis diagnoses (both false positive and false ne

17 imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to detect sacroiliitis earlier.

18 Differences in sacroiliitis grade between right and left sacroiliac joi

19 ng no sacroiliitis on radiograms, MRI showed sacroiliitis in 34 patients (39.5%).

20 MRI allowed to diagnose sacroiliitis in 39,5 % of patients in preradiographic st

21 R imaging seemed to enhance the detection of sacroiliitis in children with spondyloarthropathies.

22 of radiography and MRI in the diagnostics of sacroiliitis in patients with a clinical diagnosis of sp

23 ndyloarthritis without definite radiographic sacroiliitis (non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis),

24 e based on the presence of advanced lesions, sacroiliitis of at least 2 grade bilaterally or 3-4 unil

25 to modified New York criteria, only 50% had sacroiliitis on MRI.

26 y, 91%]), and imaging findings consisting of sacroiliitis on plain radiography (sensitivity, 66%; spe

27 flammatory lesions in 60.4% of patients with sacroiliitis on radiograms according to modified New Yor

28 Among 86 patients displaying no sacroiliitis on radiograms, MRI showed sacroiliitis in 3

29 tibility complex (ankylosing spondylitis and sacroiliitis, P = 1.4E-15; OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.0-3.1; PSC

30 sing spondylitis [ankylosing spondylitis and sacroiliitis], primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC], per

31 es reviewed in the literature include septic sacroiliitis, prognosis of metastatic spinal tumors, and

32 nfliximab was an effective therapy for early sacroiliitis, providing a reduction in disease activity

33 [LR] 8.0, specificity 92%), while mild or no sacroiliitis, regardless of HLA-B27 status, was a predic

34 development of AS, compared with mild or no sacroiliitis, regardless of HLA-B27 status, which confer

35 The combination of severe sacroiliitis seen on MRI with HLA-B27 positivity was an

36 d specificity than radiography in diagnosing sacroiliitis (sensitivity: 71% vs. 22%, specificity: 90%

37 clinical-diagnostic approach in the case of sacroiliitis, spondylitis and arthritis.

38 random, in assessing individual features of sacroiliitis, such as sclerosis, change in the joint spa

39 .001), and radiographic damage (presence of sacroiliitis, syndesmophytes, bamboo spine, hip involvem

40 allow early inflammatory lesions indicating sacroiliitis to be diagnosed, which leads to diagnostic

41 ing, as well as radiographic changes such as sacroiliitis, vertebral squaring, corner erosions and Ro

42 Symmetric sacroiliitis was seen in 86.1% of patients.

43 three months in the absence of radiographic sacroiliitis who were classified as axSpA based on a pos