1                           Projections to the sartorius and femorotibialis muscles did not differ sign

2      28-37 by injecting DiI and DiA into the sartorius and femorotibialis muscles or into the spinal

3 he majority of motoneurons projecting to the sartorius and femorotibialis were in a normal position w

4 toneurons innervating two thigh muscles, the sartorius and femorotibialis, were mapped via retrograde

5 artorius muscle and orthologous GRMD cranial sartorius (CS) are relatively spared/hypertrophied.

6 dominant impairment of paravertebral, vasti, sartorius, gracilis, peroneal and medial gastrocnemius m

7                                              Sartorius junctions in living animals were stained with

8              The Duchenne muscular dystrophy sartorius muscle and orthologous GRMD cranial sartorius

9 dles of one to three chemically skinned frog sartorius muscle fibres (time resolution 250 microsecond

10 tically shocked and control fibres from frog sartorius muscle.

11 osin- and actin-based X-ray reflections from sartorius muscles of Rana esculenta we find a combined f

12                     To test this hypothesis, sartorius muscles were double labeled with a fluorescent

13 ordings were made from isolated frog sciatic-sartorius nerve-muscle preparations, and the effects of

14 ry outcomes (lesions, pain, and the modified Sartorius score for disease severity) at week 12 in PION

15 ein Lmo4, expressed in most adductor but few sartorius sensory neurons.

16 Using whole intact muscle preparations (frog sartorius) we have been able to record the detailed beha