ライフサイエンスコーパス: satisfaction

1 eir self-expression also report greater Life Satisfaction.

2 ge was significantly associated with patient satisfaction.

3 spital and nursing home quality; and patient satisfaction.

4 ible while achieving high individual patient satisfaction.

5 ation, with no difference in pain or patient satisfaction.

6 satisfaction, showing limited improvement in satisfaction.

7 ces were observed in UDVA, UIVA, and patient satisfaction.

8 faction Questionnaire was used to assess job satisfaction.

9 y with simulated services and rated them for satisfaction.

10 rall treatment time, and increases patient's satisfaction.

11 life, physical function, blood pressure, and satisfaction.

12 RAI choice with receipt of RAI and decision satisfaction.

13 verse patient population in terms of patient satisfaction.

14 , control of health expenditures, and public satisfaction.

15 sician-nurse coordination and trust) and job satisfaction.

16 Care in the ICU 24 was used to assess family satisfaction.

17 d can lead to improved adherence and patient satisfaction.

18 xchanges and consequently affect group-level satisfaction.

19 d based upon recovery parameters and patient satisfaction.

20 E gown can be improved in usability and user satisfaction.

21 treatment-related complications, and patient satisfaction.

22 received monitoring practices reported high satisfaction.

23 proved access to care, outcomes, and patient satisfaction.

24 In midlife they reported low life satisfaction.

25 p issues, and overall sexual functioning and satisfaction.

26 health-related quality of life, and patient satisfaction.

27 h VAS and the Questionnaire of Oral Esthetic Satisfaction.

28 VMR offers acceptable long-term outcomes and satisfaction.

29 EQ-5D-3L measured patient-reported pain and satisfaction.

30 symptoms of depression, anxiety, and family satisfaction.

31 duration, continuity, timing, alertness, and satisfaction.

32 EHR, improve operative room metrics and user satisfaction.

33 ss complications, cost, and improved patient satisfaction.

34 bovine meat-eating qualities for consumers' satisfaction.

35 sit 2, we found high rates of motivation and satisfaction.

36 ved FCOTS, perioperative workflows, and user satisfaction.

37 that measures pain, function, cosmesis, and satisfaction.

38 raumatic stress, while supporting compassion satisfaction.

39 lf-reported pain, willingness to retreat and satisfaction.

40 VMR symptoms, long-term outcome, and overall satisfaction.

41 (d) Is there good patient satisfaction?

42 s 0.86 [0.74-0.99], N=3753, p=0.039 for life satisfaction; 0.80 [0.70-0.92], N=3831, p=0.0013 for hap

43 harm (5.80, 4.55-7.41; p<0.0001), lower life satisfaction (3.66, 2.92-4.58; p<0.0001), lower self-est

44 we observed mediation through increased life satisfaction (5.27%; P <= 0.001) and possibly positive a

45 ty of hospital facilities (55%), and patient satisfaction (54%).

46 s, process-of-care quality measures, patient satisfaction), 7 found no association between liability

47 esence of social support (89.3%), and career satisfaction (73.2%); 44.7% reported a disruptive work e

48 high score (proportion mediated 58.2%), life satisfaction (80.1%), happiness (47.7%), and anxiety (32

49 53 +/- 0.35 decimals (P = .259), and patient satisfaction 9.3 +/- 0.9 vs 9.2 +/- 1.1 (P = .644) were

50 in and of itself, a strong predictor of life satisfaction across the adolescent population.

51 CI, 1.64 to 3.82) and report lower decision satisfaction (adjusted OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.67 to 3.20).

52 We report the visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of a bifocal d

53 d light on the clinical sequelae and patient satisfaction after dental implant removal (IR).

54 yze functional results, quality of life, and satisfaction after implantation in the mid-term, and to

55 PREDIMED): low-adherent); poor sleep health (Satisfaction, Alertness, Timing, Efficiency and Duration

56 e fat-grafted cohort reported similar breast satisfaction (AMD, -0.68; 95% CI, -4.42 to 3.06; P = .72

57 chronic disease and death according to life satisfaction among a population-based cohort in Ontario,

58 stance stopping criteria, and high treatment satisfaction among participants was recorded.

59 logy, we developed questionnaires to measure satisfaction among patients and professionals.

60 s in good visual outcomes, with high patient satisfaction and a significant improvement in patient-re

61 ould assess participants' skills, attitudes, satisfaction and behaviour change; cost-effectiveness an

62 he co-primary clinical outcomes were patient satisfaction and condition-specific quality of life, mea

63 with their specific hedonic well-being, life satisfaction and eudaimonic well-being outcomes was gene

64 ), we elucidate factors associated with user satisfaction and evaluate each scenario's resource recov

65 Nurse outcomes were job satisfaction and intent-to-stay.

66 is impaired with endotherapy, but alimentary satisfaction and oncologic outcomes support esophageal p

67 residents continue to report a high rate of satisfaction and positive effects on continuity of care.

68 point, but IBR patients had stable long-term satisfaction and QOL postoperatively.

69 and physical limitations and lower treatment satisfaction and quality of life.

70 rative pain had a more significant effect on satisfaction and regret after surgery, suggesting focuse

71 no significant difference in treatment time, satisfaction and risk of failure between O and S.

72 into activity patterns associated with life satisfaction and self-reported disease.

73 Men's satisfaction and sexual function is influenced by discom

74 t has a dramatic impact on our sense of life satisfaction and well-being.

75 e.g., access to shelter), mental (e.g., life satisfaction), and social (e.g., social support) well-be

76 tion and fatigue, 2.5 to 7.5 for social role satisfaction, and 3.0 to 8.0 for anxiety.

77 physical function, symptom relief, treatment satisfaction, and adverse events.

78 tors on surgical complication rates, patient satisfaction, and anxiety.

79 included Short Form-36 Health Survey scores, satisfaction, and categorical response.

80 supplemental analgesia, patient and operator satisfaction, and complications were recorded.

81 tion, sexual satisfaction, perceived-partner satisfaction, and conflict.

82 uality and safety metrics, patient and staff satisfaction, and on new areas of focus including enhanc

83 d to assess currently reported complication, satisfaction, and other outcome rates.

84 Secondary patient outcomes included pain, satisfaction, and psychosocial indices.

85 es include efficacy of pain control, patient satisfaction, and refill requests.

86 nor did changes in symptoms, coping, patient satisfaction, and shared decision-making.

87 los and glare experienced, levels of patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence achieved also a

88 pectations of availability and impact, staff satisfaction, and understanding of operations), and 3) o

89 se effects on duty-hour violations, resident satisfaction, and well-being.

90 individual eating behaviors and nutritional satisfaction are linked to changes in blood glucose leve

91 espect, physician-nurse coordination and job satisfaction are significant factors associated with a n

92 -reported measures (e.g., loneliness or life satisfaction) are equally well explained by static and d

93 Most studies reported improved family satisfaction as the main outcome.

94 ntified MIC (0.301) reported lower treatment satisfaction at follow-up (beta = -0.17; P = 0.01).

95 needs at baseline predicted worse treatment satisfaction at follow-up (beta = -0.28; P < 0.01), but

96 ith participation, high motivation, and high satisfaction at visit 2.

97 on, and context-sensitive, mutual constraint satisfaction-based processing.

98 here are mounting concerns about nurses' job satisfaction because of its pivotal role in nurse turnov

99 It is vital to increase nurses' job satisfaction because this has the potential both to impr

100 thways have been identified with nurses' job satisfaction being mediated by various factors.

101 AQLQ-S (beta = 0.21; P < 0.01) and treatment satisfaction (beta = -0.36; P < 0.01).

102 (QoL) (beta = 0.31; P < 0.01), and treatment satisfaction (beta = -0.59; P < 0.01).

103 ric conditions can improve communication and satisfaction between physicians, patients and caregivers

104 plore the factors associated with compassion satisfaction, burnout and second traumatic stress.

105 salient variables associated with compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress fro

106 mean scores for the dimensions of compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress wer

107 ic and work-related variables and compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress.

108 tes of documented consent and patient/family satisfaction, but there has been little published litera

109 or identifying nutritional constraints whose satisfaction by plant eaters is challenging, disproporti

110 es, including quality of life, knowledge and satisfaction, caregiver burden, time tradeoffs, and out-

111 renting (including parent-child relationship satisfaction concerning love, parental authoritativeness

112 itions, falls, age, insomnia, weight change, satisfaction, confiding in someone, exercise, sports and

113 indirect relationships and predictors of job satisfaction contribute to a more comprehensive understa

114 Age, sex and treatment satisfaction did not change with severity; however, 19%

115 Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction did not show any difference between the 2 g

116 groups on self-reported levels of parenting satisfaction (difference estimate 0.21, 95% CI -0.09 to

117 ch results in excellent patient and operator satisfaction during endovascular treatment of critical l

118 of CCIS by >=5.5 points correlated best with satisfaction, expressed by 22 patients (48% in intention

119 cal distress), and wellbeing at wave 3 (life satisfaction, feeling life is worthwhile, happiness, and

120 Participants drew satisfaction from trauma team members' demeanor, experti

121 Satisfaction, functional, and quality of life outcomes i

122 e of 36 or higher, being married, higher job satisfaction, good sleep quality and regular exercise we

123 unction; and improve the patient's treatment satisfaction (Grade: strong recommendation; moderate-cer

124 While satisfaction has improved, it is too early to ascertain

125 than no treatment for cure, improvement, and satisfaction (high SoE).

126 cognition, self-rated health, fatigue, care satisfaction, home blood pressure monitoring, and falls.

127 patients at risk of anaphylaxis, increasing satisfaction, improving adherence, and reducing anxiety,

128 Sydney (AQLQ-S), and a question on treatment satisfaction in 2014 and 2017.

129 Secondly, use of medication and treatment satisfaction in AR and NAR was assessed.

130 ed a high rate of spectacle independence and satisfaction in everyday life and little to no dysphotop

131 bjective quality of vision (QoV) and patient satisfaction in eyes with very high myopia (VHM) above -

132 Patient satisfaction in the hospital and community clinics is ve

133 mplying with such wishes, can affect patient satisfaction in the last days of life.

134 Treatment satisfaction increased after participants switched to lo

135 While beneficial for consumer satisfaction, intensive meat production inflicts negativ

136 than 40 years and that brought much fun and satisfaction into my life.

137 We find that existing user satisfaction is associated with factors including cleani

138 Life satisfaction is increasingly recognized as an important

139 Median (interquartile range) satisfaction levels (1-10 [10 = highest]) were 10 (7-10)

140 s known about quality of life (QoL) and life satisfaction (LS) of treated primary congenital glaucoma

141 The primary outcome was patient satisfaction, measured by a survey administered on posto

142 nication, health-related quality-of-life and satisfaction measures and a manualised consultation-codi

143 Two-way mixed ANOVA evaluated pain and satisfaction measures between groups and over time.

144 at four factors, poor sleep quality, low job satisfaction, more work hours, and second-hand smoke exp

145 mes included surgeon and anesthesia provider satisfaction, need for supplemental anesthesia, and surg

146 p individual-difference predictors were life satisfaction, negative affect, depression, attachment av

147 heless, IR does not seem to affect patients' satisfaction nor their quality of life, though a certain

148 Key terms and phrases associated with job satisfaction, occupational stress, professional commitme

149 nants from 74 countries to examine change in satisfaction of contraceptive need from a contextual per

150 Job satisfaction of hospital nurses is closely related to wo

151 Data on the long-term outcome and satisfaction of patients undergoing LVMR are limited.

152 responses that would enable the simultaneous satisfaction of the auditory system.

153 ation in the portal region of the liver, and satisfaction of the criteria for "definite AIH" under th

154 We dwell on past actions and experience satisfaction or regret.

155 Patient-centered pain, sensitivity, and satisfaction outcomes, digital photographs and radiograp

156 e was no significant difference in patients' satisfaction (p = 0.164).

157 professional commitment, job stress, patient satisfaction, patient-nurse ratios, social capital, evid

158 ved-partner commitment, appreciation, sexual satisfaction, perceived-partner satisfaction, and confli

159 We applied the novel methods to life satisfaction, positive affect, neuroticism, and depressi

160 ter psychological well-being (including life satisfaction, positive affect, self-esteem, emotional pr

161 hylogeny reconstruction-a Boolean constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) and solve them by leveraging

162 n be understood in the context of constraint-satisfaction problems.

163 g an integer linear program, or a constraint satisfaction program, which, although guaranteeing conve

164 s at 2 years after reconstruction in patient satisfaction, quality-of-life, or complication rates.

165 never" to question 1 of the Intraocular Lens Satisfaction questionnaire (regarding frequency of spect

166 Patients completed a visual satisfaction questionnaire between 9 and 12 months after

167 satisfaction was measured via HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (HIVTSQs).

168 isfaction was measured via the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (HIVTSQs).

169 The short version of the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire was used to assess job satisf

170 Food satisfaction questionnaires indicated that both diets we

171 Mean satisfaction rate was 86.9 +/- 13.65 (VAS) and showed a

172 o medium-term PFCL tamponade achieved a high satisfaction rate.

173 Participants' behavioral responses (i.e., satisfaction ratings) were modulated systematically by t

174 systems to deliver quality care, and inflate satisfaction ratings.

175 ally significant increases in overall family satisfaction, satisfaction with decision-making, and sat

176 ts coupled with a score above 3 on a 5-point satisfaction scale.

177 l outcome were similar for both groups (mean satisfaction score 8.4 vs 8.0, p = 0.444; 86.8% vs 90.2%

178 All subjects reported a satisfaction score of >=3.5 of 5 and required no spectac

179 n, 9.5 years) completing the study, the mean satisfaction score was 5.34+/-0.63 (range, 3.75-6) in th

180 Complete spectacle independence and high satisfaction score were achieved.

181 justed odds ratio, 1.20; p = 0.234), or mean satisfaction scores (85.1 vs 89.0; unadjusted odds ratio

182 significantly associated with higher patient satisfaction scores (P < 0.01).

183 Secondary outcomes included pain and satisfaction scores over multiple time points and new pe

184 IBR patients had satisfaction scores that remained stable over the study

185 fessionals, patient-reported convenience and satisfaction scores, and rates of complications.

186 ption, incidence of hypotension, and patient satisfaction seemed to be in favor of preperitoneal woun

187 Secondary outcomes were coping, patient satisfaction, shared decision-making, patient involvemen

188 structured family rounds on family and staff satisfaction, showing limited improvement in satisfactio

189 formance, one study also reported on patient satisfaction, showing that 78% of patients preferred an

190 ormation System (PROMIS) Sexual Interest and Satisfaction single item measures in patients with prost

191 g married/member of an unmarried couple, job satisfaction, sleep hours per day and sleep quality were

192 On the other hand, satisfaction studies are becoming increasingly important

193 For the general satisfaction subscale, improvement at 24 months from bas

194 n, as well as the influencing factors of job satisfaction such as working shift and leadership, job p

195 ely to receive RAI and report lower decision satisfaction, suggesting a need for more shared decision

196 The mean PROMIS satisfaction T-score declined from baseline to 3 months

197 ex despite functional losses and can salvage satisfaction, thereby giving insight into attainable pat

198 d out questionnaire survey about effects and satisfaction to patients and their guardians.

199 The impact of job satisfaction upon sickness absence, turnover intention,

200 We sought to evaluate satisfaction using a medical device (digital technology

201 The satisfaction visual analogue scale (VAS) after using the

202 ment of the image; the mean overall level of satisfaction was 3.1.

203 ssness positively; the mean overall level of satisfaction was 4.71 on a scale from 1 to 5.

204 In this population-based cohort, poor life satisfaction was an independent risk factor for incident

205 Patient satisfaction was assessed.

206 he results suggest that greater relationship satisfaction was associated with greater emotional well-

207 lation means in 4 of 8 areas, but alimentary satisfaction was good after endotherapy.

208 Overall treatment satisfaction was high with median (IQR) score, 81.3 (75.

209 The reported degree of satisfaction was high, and the overall OHIP-14 score was

210 23 of 572) reported that a personal sense of satisfaction was likely to motivate them to communicate

211 Among professionals, the level of satisfaction was lower, especially with regards to the t

212 tion [FDA] snapshot) at Week 48; participant satisfaction was measured via HIV Treatment Satisfaction

213 tion [FDA] snapshot) at week 48; participant satisfaction was measured via the HIV Treatment Satisfac

214 Patient satisfaction was recorded and the Oral Health Impact Pro

215 Sexual life satisfaction was significantly higher (p = 0.023) and ra

216 Surgeon and anesthesia provider satisfaction was similar between the 2 groups.

217 Operator satisfaction was very good in all cases.

218 nt cessation for a long term and the patient satisfaction was very high.

219 Overall satisfaction was worse in the PMRT group [OR 0.497, P =

220 medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) signals the satisfaction we expect from imminent actions.

221 ire (FIQL)], bowel diary data, and patients' satisfaction were assessed before and after implantation

222 -month T-scores for both PROMIS interest and satisfaction were examined.

223 adverse events, quality of life, and patient satisfaction were not significantly different between th

224 Treatment times and children's satisfaction were recorded.

225 derstanding of the complex phenomenon of job satisfaction, which in turn may aid the development of e

226 e were positively associated with compassion satisfaction, while smoking was a negative factor; these

227 interventions and programs that improve life satisfaction will affect population health.

228 pared post-intervention behaviour change and satisfaction with blended and online digital education,

229 in behaviour between the groups, and higher satisfaction with blended education.

230 the lowest to highest of -2.79-2.62) and in satisfaction with breast (-2.82-2.07) compared with the

231 low rates, and cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction with breast appearance were high with eithe

232 that ABR patients had greater postoperative satisfaction with breast scores at all timepoints compar

233 iation and mental illness adversely impacted satisfaction with breast scores.

234 tics, we found no significant differences in satisfaction with breast, psychosocial well-being, physi

235 tandard deviations (SDs) were calculated for satisfaction with breast, satisfaction with outcome, psy

236 omplications, satisfaction with outcome, and satisfaction with breast.

237 autologous reconstruction group had improved satisfaction with breasts (difference, 8.0; P = .002) an

238 ) reported worse PROs in 3 BREAST-Q domains: satisfaction with breasts [-6.27 points, P = 0.008, 95%

239 Satisfaction with breasts and physical well-being of the

240 icacy in Patient-Physician Interactions, and Satisfaction With Care and Information.

241 The Family Satisfaction with Care in the ICU 24 was used to assess

242 nd satisfaction with quality of care (Family Satisfaction with Care in the ICU mean score change rang

243 Outcomes were satisfaction with care, satisfaction with decision, deci

244 nt-centered PreProCare intervention improved satisfaction with care, satisfaction with decision, redu

245 eneral function, cognition, social life, and satisfaction with care.

246 orthopaedic surgeon consultation; patients' satisfaction with care; physical activity level; and pro

247 w perceptions of their work environment, and satisfaction with career choice.

248 Lower satisfaction with continuity of care predicted poorer ph

249 ance use, COMM score, and perceptions of and satisfaction with COT monitoring were assessed among PLH

250 between higher COMM score and receipt of or satisfaction with COT monitoring.

251 reas working 12-hour shifts predicted higher satisfaction with daily tasks and periodic life activiti

252 The proportion reporting satisfaction with decision and no regret increased over

253 Outcomes were satisfaction with care, satisfaction with decision, decision regret, and treatme

254 ntervention improved satisfaction with care, satisfaction with decision, reduced regrets, and aligned

255 nt increases in overall family satisfaction, satisfaction with decision-making, and satisfaction with

256 uty-hour violations [OR 1.25 (0.95-1.61)] or satisfaction with duty hours [OR 0.80 (0.55-1.19)] compa

257 e arm (19.8%-17.0%, P = 0.06), and increased satisfaction with flexible duty-hours (91.9%-94.3%, P <

258 WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire (items related to satisfaction with general health, physical, psychologica

259 High satisfaction with healthcare is common in low- and middl

260 E improves transparency, civic activity, and satisfaction with issues that most concern the people un

261 s, and environmental aspects) and the 5-item Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in the clinic visit.

262 Satisfaction With Life Score (SWLS) was higher in OC -us

263 [SD] age, 34 [8] years), global disability, satisfaction with life, neurobehavioral symptom severity

264 .9; 95% CI 12.7, 25.1; p < 0.001) and higher satisfaction with OA care (odds ratio [OR] 12.1; 95% CI

265 Satisfaction with oral status was perceived high by most

266 There were also meaningful differences in satisfaction with outcome (from the lowest to highest of

267 % confidence interval (CI) (-10.91, -1.63)], satisfaction with outcome [-7.53 points, P = 0.002, CI (

268 rs in any complication, major complications, satisfaction with outcome, and satisfaction with breast.

269 ere calculated for satisfaction with breast, satisfaction with outcome, psychosocial well-being, phys

270 Satisfaction with physical appearance (P = 0.002), socia

271 nt-centered outcomes revealed high levels of satisfaction with Piezocision.

272 fference in refills requested, or in patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control.

273 ge at transition was associated with greater satisfaction with provider and clinic.

274 tion, satisfaction with decision-making, and satisfaction with quality of care (Family Satisfaction w

275 evaluated motivations for participation and satisfaction with retention efforts among participants w

276 It is unclear how satisfaction with RYGB surgery changes over time followi

277 Level of satisfaction with RYGB surgery significantly decreased 3

278 PROMIS Global Satisfaction With Sex Life and Interest in Sexual Activi

279 A single item from the PROMIS Global Satisfaction With Sex Life subdomain and a single item f

280 costs that were manageable and high personal satisfaction with STM work.

281 s of the 1770 who underwent RYGB had data on satisfaction with surgery (81% female; median age 47 yea

282 Product-moment correlations of satisfaction with surgery with visual symptom scales at

283 determine reflux symptoms, side-effects and satisfaction with surgery.

284 ommendations, level of discussion about CPM, satisfaction with surgical decision making, receipt of s

285 distress, and uncertainty and high levels of satisfaction with testing.

286 Patient satisfaction with the home monitoring program was high.

287 Although the results revealed overwhelming satisfaction with the IACUC administrative office and th

288 The primary endpoint was satisfaction with the medical device.

289 All fellows reported medium to high satisfaction with the overall fellowship, webinar conten

290 med to evaluate patients' and professionals' satisfaction with the use of a three-dimensional scanner

291 s who opted for ABR had significantly higher satisfaction with their breast and QOL at each assessed

292 s, regardless of transition status, reported satisfaction with their clinic and care provider, but ma

293 Satisfaction with these treatments is low, and a need ex

294 icant predictor of chronic fatigue and lower satisfaction with time for daily tasks and family/social

295 y were to investigate how shift work impacts satisfaction with time for social and home activities, b

296 al OR 1.14 [95% CI 0.88-1.48], p = 0.314) or satisfaction with treatment (nitroglycerin, 288 [75.4%],

297 The primary patient-sided outcomes were satisfaction with treatment and side-effect profile, ass

298 Intervention participants reported greater satisfaction with weight outcomes, more planning for die

299 sion models examined factors associated with satisfaction with, and retention in, adult clinical care

300 e measures of OS efficiency and OS personnel satisfaction without adversely affecting clinical outcom