ライフサイエンスコーパス: scapula

1 t, homology, and evolution of the vertebrate scapula.

2 rxB genes in formation of the fish and mouse scapula.

3 cervical thoracic transition, including the scapula.

4 e the mammary fat pads or remotely above the scapula 9 days later.

5 acic fractures (ribs, sternum, clavicle, and scapula), 93% for the detection of posterior rib fractur

6 the less prominent proximal girdle elements (scapula and clavicle) that brace the limb to the main tr

7 e, fibula, tibia, femur, ribs, petrous part, scapula and head mesenchyme.

8 We quantified 15 landmarks on each scapula and performed geometric morphometric analyses.

9 rticular, expression of Alx1, an effector of scapula blade patterning, is absent in all compound muta

10 To develop the method, 47 full scapula coverage CTs with matching clinical MRIs were us

11 ant mice, we examined the genetic control of scapula development by Pbx genes and their functional re

12 oreover, the expression of genes crucial for scapula development is altered in these mutants, indicat

13 wo time points (6 and 12 months) in an ovine scapula drillhole model using micro-CT, histology and hi

14 e developed markedly craniofacial dysplasia, scapula dysplasia, long bone length shortage and body we

15 limb morphogenesis have limited influence on scapula formation.

16 genes act upstream of essential pathways for scapula formation.

17 ous radial forearm free flaps (OCRFFFs), and scapula free flaps (SFFs) have been limited by insuffici

18 itic and lateral plate mesoderm to the avian scapula from quail-chick chimeras.

19 l hyperplasia, whereas Sprengel deformity of scapula, fusion of spine, rib abnormities, pectus excava

20 ent studies in amniotes demonstrate that the scapula has a mixed mesodermal origin.

21 First, the majority of the avian scapula is lateral plate derived and the somitic contrib

22 cted muscle characteristics as a function of scapula location and could eventually be used in conjunc

23 lative contribution, and FI as a function of scapula location were quantified.

24 matic arch (one), rib (one), clavicle (one), scapula (one), ulna (one), talus (one), and calcaneous (

25 ess, 6.7% display minor signs such as winged scapula or hyperCKemia, without functional motor impairm

26 er by the pelvis or sacroiliac joints (38%), scapula or shoulder, and ribs.

27 Techniques of scapula replacement have advanced and provide better upp

28 rovide better upper extremity function after scapula resection than resection alone.

29 Such soft tissue findings of snapping scapula syndrome need to be kept in mind while evaluatin

30 a case of a 10-year-old boy who had snapping scapula syndrome of the right scapula that was associate

31 Snapping scapula syndrome, also known as scapulothoracic crepitus

32 MRI in snapping scapula syndrome, which is a clinical diagnosis, exquisi

33 fferent distribution of somitic cells in the scapula than previously reported.

34 o had snapping scapula syndrome of the right scapula that was associated with edema of the serratus a

35 Because of the anterior tilt of the scapula, the midpoint was near the anterior glenoid notc

36 the iliac crest with internal oblique or the scapula tip with latissimus dorsi can more reliably supp

37 ead lodged between the rib cage and the left scapula was the probable cause of the iceman's death.

38 Three hundred ninety-four cadaveric scapulas were reviewed.