コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 supporters, and healthcare professionals) on self-care.
2 ement in chronic disease self-management and self-care.
3 provide users with more flexible choices in self-care.
4 ing information provided to donors regarding self-care.
5 Carers have the potential to improve patient self-care.
6 he other cognitive domains were unrelated to self-care.
7 eeds more intensive interventions to improve self-care.
8 of socio-demographic and clinical factors on self-care.
9 specific cognitive domains and heart failure self-care.
10 s to identify patients at risk of inadequate self-care.
11 100, where a score <70 indicates inadequate self-care.
12 elf-care and 85 to acupuncture plus enhanced self-care.
13 re relatively low, but few fellows engage in self-care.
14 ve functioning and patient behaviors such as self-care.
15 ion session delivered by a nurse focusing on self-care.
16 stantially grow the evidence base supporting self-care.
17 gin with a theoretically sound definition of self-care.
18 stantially grow the evidence base supporting self-care.
19 y life and maintain health is referred to as self-care.
20 y and mortality associated with improper VAD self-care.
21 nflammatory bowel disease to perform routine self-care.
22 velopment for mobility, and even more so for self-care.
23 s seem to share the same fundamental view of self-care.
24 vs. $4095), mobility ($7266 vs. $4115), and self-care ($10 935 vs. $4436) disability versus those wh
26 mited in mobility (88% versus 71%; P=0.004), self-care (40% versus 25%; P=0.019), and independent dai
27 ths postinjury was 37% for mobility, 21% for self-care, 47% for usual activities, 50% for pain/discom
28 45%; odds ratio, 3.1 [1.6-6.1]; p = 0.001), self-care (49% vs 15%; odds ratio, 5.8 [2.9-11.7]; p < 0
31 sive symptoms, and fall prevention, improved self-care ability and decreased emergency department vis
33 ed similar thoughts about social support and self-care ability by race, whereas AA patients described
35 Family carers often support or substitute self-care activities, and act as proxies for self-manage
36 ropriate measure to monitor changes in daily self-care activities; and younger age at disease onset i
39 he self-care questionnaire for assessment of self-care among patients with inflammatory bowel disease
40 ants, 105 were randomly assigned to enhanced self-care and 85 to acupuncture plus enhanced self-care.
41 for permission as key in enabling nurses to self-care and be self-compassionate, which may facilitat
43 he relationship between simple attention and self-care and between working memory and self-care (comp
46 thood, which in turn would predict favorable self-care and dental attendance behaviors; those would l
47 and caregiver contributions to heart failure self-care and identify common dyadic archetypes, respect
49 nce rates in the past month were 23%-81% for self-care and lifestyle requirements (diet, exercise, bl
52 This study explored nurses' experience of self-care and self-compassion and how this may relate to
54 of NMDAR function on PV interneurons impairs self-care and sociability while increasing N1 latency an
55 ded to reveal the modifiable determinants of self-care and the complex relationships between patients
56 can deepen our theoretical understanding of self-care and the mechanisms underlying self-care, which
57 self-care confidence consistently influenced self-care and totally mediated the relationship between
63 ssociated with more limitations in mobility, self-care, and daily activities compared with patients w
64 -care behaviors are an integral component of self-care, and may be impacted by the disease process of
66 and caregiver contributions to heart failure self-care, and to identify patient-, caregiver- and dyad
67 s through which cognitive impairment affects self-care are not currently well defined but evidence fr
68 care partner (or caregiver) contributions to self-care are recommended to reduce the impact of MCC an
70 n the influence of diabetes on heart failure self-care as well as on the influence of socio-demograph
71 ficantly lower hot flash score than enhanced self-care at the end of treatment (P < .001) and at 3- a
73 e behavior change techniques used to enhance self-care behavior; and 4) assess the dose of self-care
74 with self-care, the influence of culture on self-care behavioral choices, the difficulty performing
75 l health-related beliefs (15, 26, and 32 y), self-care behaviors (15, 28, and 32 y), oral health outc
77 contribution of comorbidity to heart failure self-care behaviors and outcomes (i.e. hospitalization,
79 ort may positively influence an individual's self-care behaviors by assisting with activities associa
80 ly-specific practices and their influence on self-care behaviors can inform development of interventi
81 had improved adherence to diabetes mellitus self-care behaviors from baseline to 6-month follow-up.
83 the relationship between social support and self-care behaviors in individuals with heart failure (H
84 rmine the effectiveness of social support on self-care behaviors in individuals with heart failure, s
86 findings suggest that greater engagement in self-care behaviors is associated with better HF outcome
88 ave a positive relationship on heart failure self-care behaviors, with an individual's family playing
102 intervention group reported improvements in self-care behaviours, including self-maintenance and sel
103 diate the relationship between cognition and self-care, but further study is needed to validate this
106 e developmental trajectories of mobility and self-care capability in a large sample of children and a
109 and self-care and between working memory and self-care (comparative fit index range: .929-.968; root
110 Specific aims were to: 1) identify what self-care concepts and behaviors are evaluated in self-c
111 f-care management (B = 6.33, p = 0.004), and self-care confidence (B = 5.15, p = 0.003) at four weeks
112 elf-care management (B = 6.97, p = 0.03) and self-care confidence (B = 6.24, p = 0.001) at 8 weeks.
113 egiver (p=0.04), family income (p=0.009) and self-care confidence (p<0.001) were determinants of self
114 p=0.01), number of medications (p=0.004) and self-care confidence (p<0.001) were significant determin
117 this study was to test the mediating role of self-care confidence between specific cognitive domains
119 f-care maintenance, self-care management and self-care confidence in patients with heart failure and
120 this study was to test the mediating role of self-care confidence in the relationship between cogniti
122 Theory and preliminary evidence suggest that self-care confidence may mediate the relationship betwee
123 f-care maintenance, self-care management and self-care confidence of heart failure patients; (3) to i
124 f-care maintenance, self-care management and self-care confidence of patients with heart failure and
125 ot mean square error of approximation=0.02): Self-care confidence totally mediated the relationship b
127 f-care maintenance, self-care management and self-care confidence were measured with the Self-Care of
134 problems in mobility, usual activities, and self-care domains were reported in 37.4%, 43.7%, and 20.
137 tion (n = 1104 patients), in which nurse-led self-care education, a structured hospital discharge sum
138 ted by factors that may hinder or facilitate self-care especially in countries that experience politi
139 n important factor influencing heart failure self-care even in patients with impaired cognition.
140 t improving self-care confidence may improve self-care, even in heart failure patients with impaired
142 dity and self-efficacy interact to influence self-care, hospitalization, and quality of life remains
143 self-care and care partner contributions to self-care in dyads using the Self-care of Chronic Illnes
145 eased confidence or self-efficacy to perform self-care in heart failure patients which, in turn, impa
151 self-care with multiple chronic conditions, self-care in persons with severe mental illness, and the
153 a gradient in the level of contributions to self-care, in addition to different approaches to workin
155 Important patient clinical determinants of self-care included cognitive status, number of medicatio
156 .5-96.7 for mobility and 91.8, 90.1-93.4 for self-care), indicating capability for most if not all it
157 if they compared a behavioral or educational self- care intervention to usual care or another self-ca
158 - care intervention to usual care or another self-care intervention and were conducted in adults.
164 c (patient and informal carer) heart failure self-care interventions seek to improve patient self-car
165 onal researchers are increasingly developing self-care interventions to improve outcomes of individua
166 esearch exists describing different types of self-care interventions, but these studies have never be
170 care concepts and behaviors are evaluated in self-care interventions; 2) classify and quantify hetero
171 wledge Survey of Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Self-Care Inventory, Patient Health Questionnaire 9, and
173 Acupuncture in association with enhanced self-care is an effective integrative intervention for m
176 sions, we identified seven major reasons why self-care is challenging, which can be grouped into the
179 The vision of this Center is a world where self-care is prioritized by individuals, families, and c
181 aborative program of research that addresses self-care knowledge gaps and improves outcomes, create a
183 ibited significantly greater improvements in self-care maintenance (B = 3.74, p = 0.01), self-care ma
184 The presence of diabetes did not influence self-care maintenance (p=0.12), self-care management (p=
185 tial scalar invariance level was reached for self-care maintenance [chi(2)(50) = 63.495, p = 0.095; R
191 ent or maintain the stability of an illness (self-care maintenance), to monitor signs and symptoms (s
192 d the relationship between self-efficacy and self-care maintenance, but not self-care management.
194 imate if the presence of diabetes influences self-care maintenance, self-care management and self-car
195 cio-demographic and clinical determinants of self-care maintenance, self-care management and self-car
197 Care of Heart Failure Index v.6.2 to measure self-care maintenance, self-care management, and self-ca
199 f the relationship between self-efficacy and self-care maintenance, tailoring interventions aimed at
200 rt-term memory, which had a direct effect on self-care maintenance, the other cognitive domains were
202 self-care maintenance (B = 3.74, p = 0.01), self-care management (B = 6.33, p = 0.004), and self-car
203 d significantly greater improvements only in self-care management (B = 6.97, p = 0.03) and self-care
204 ot influence self-care maintenance (p=0.12), self-care management (p=0.21) or self-care confidence (p
205 CFI = 0.996; TLI = 0.995; SRMR = 0.054], and self-care management [chi(2)(51) = 91.334, p = 0.001; RM
206 nical determinants of self-care maintenance, self-care management and self-care confidence in patient
207 f diabetes influences self-care maintenance, self-care management and self-care confidence of heart f
210 The basic nursing curriculum should include self-care management strategies for sleep difficulties t
211 f-care maintenance, self-care monitoring and self-care management) was measured with the Self-Care of
212 rt, medication adherence, sodium intake, and self-care management) were collected from 109 patients w
218 erm costly health crises, supporting patient self-care, maximizing effectiveness of office visits, se
219 t differences were found in any of the three self-care measures in heart failure patients with and wi
220 38; CFI = 0.981; TLI = 0.977; SRMR = 0.036], self-care monitoring [chi(2)(22) = 28.770, p = 0.095; RM
222 and care partners reported higher levels of self-care monitoring than self-care maintenance and mana
223 maintenance), to monitor signs and symptoms (self-care monitoring), and to respond to signs and sympt
224 ported greater contributions to the areas of self-care most insufficient on the part of the patients;
225 ontributions to self-care in dyads using the Self-care of Chronic Illness Inventory and the Caregiver
226 estigated the measurement equivalence of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory in individuals fr
232 ic Illness Inventory, based on the Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness, was developed for use in i
234 Self-care behaviour was measured by the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index at baseline, 4 weeks an
236 self-care confidence were measured with the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 6.2; each scale
239 health and health behaviors, (5) related to self-care or elements of self-care, and (6) related to C
240 ), anticipated difficulty with postoperative self-care (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.2), Charlson Comorbidi
242 within the domains of mobility (p < 0.001), self-care (p = 0.041), usual activities (p < 0.001) and
243 ements in health in the domains of mobility, self-care, pain, cognition, and interpersonal activities
244 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.42]), and documentation of self-care plans (48.4% for TBC vs 8.7% for TPM; OR, 5.59
245 alth conditions highly depend on one's daily self-care practice and compliance to preventive and cura
246 mong patients with diabetic neuropathy, foot self-care practice may be insufficient to prevent the oc
251 nd the country's political situation impeded self-care practices whereas family support facilitated t
255 LHF scores over time (p=0.768), the European self-care questionnaire (p=0.340) or the mean HAD anxiet
257 The aim was to develop and evaluate the self-care questionnaire for assessment of self-care amon
262 this article we address the current state of self-care research and propose an agenda for future rese
264 The mission of the Center is to lead the self-care research endeavor, improving conceptual clarit
265 l conference of the International Center for Self-Care Research held in Rome, Italy in June 2019 we i
266 l conference of the International Center for Self-Care Research held in Rome, Italy in June 2019.
267 ledge transfer and support of innovations in self-care research, and support and train others in self
273 The SBML group completed a pretest on 3 VAD self-care skills (controller, power source, and dressing
277 models focus on improving knowledge, coping, self-care, social support, and self-management strategie
279 f-care interventions seek to improve patient self-care such as adherence to medical treatment, exerci
282 ibuted to different aspects of heart failure self-care that was generally poor; these dyads were pred
283 ontributions to all aspects of heart failure self-care, the best relationship quality and lowest care
284 of stressful life events that interfere with self-care, the influence of culture on self-care behavio
286 VAD simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) self-care training curriculum with usual VAD self-care t
288 challenges with regard to the definition of self-care, use of theory, and research design, intended
289 questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L] measuring mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anx
290 scores across all 5 EQ-5D domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain, and anxiety), as well
291 sex-matched control group in the domains of self-care, usual care, and anxiety and depression, and a
294 , the relationship between self-efficacy and self-care was significantly stronger than in patients wi
295 I, the estimated mean limit for mobility and self-care were both higher than 90 (95.6, 95% CI 94.5-96
297 g of self-care and the mechanisms underlying self-care, which can contribute to the development of ef
299 ndomized controlled trial on HF education of self-care with 2 intervention groups versus control who
300 ehavioral choices, the difficulty performing self-care with multiple chronic conditions, self-care in