ライフサイエンスコーパス: self-efficacy

1 scale, with higher scores indicating better self-efficacy).

2 of Fatigue and indicators of neuroticism and self efficacy.

3 cing fatigue severity and increasing fatigue self-efficacy.

4 patient satisfaction, disease knowledge, and self-efficacy.

5 ficantly lower glaucoma medication adherence self-efficacy.

6 icantly higher glaucoma medication adherence self-efficacy.

7 nder on starting salaries is associated with self-efficacy.

8 decisional conflict, and greater decisional self-efficacy.

9 nal status, reducing symptoms, and enhancing self-efficacy.

10 erapist visits, and nights in hospital), and self-efficacy.

11 apy and who had higher levels of situational self-efficacy.

12 mproved in 4 of 6 health status measures and self-efficacy.

13 No effects were found for arthritis self-efficacy.

14 ity of life, health behaviors, and arthritis self-efficacy.

15 uit attempts, readiness to quit smoking, and self-efficacy.

16 king rate, high nicotine dependence, and low self-efficacy.

17 ees differed from low attendees on goals and self-efficacy.

18 tion to maximize positive qualities, such as self-efficacy.

19 sful experiences, as well as lower levels of self-efficacy.

20 al support, depression, stress, anxiety, and self-efficacy.

21 of the COVID-19 pandemic, stress/anxiety and self-efficacy.

22 te the intervention effects on patients' SSE self-efficacy.

23 ape individuals' self-beliefs in the form of self-efficacy.

24 nfluence of the intervention's effect on SSE self-efficacy.

25 ed the intervention effects on patients' SSE self-efficacy.

26 The main outcome was patient SSE self-efficacy.

27 chological status (0.15), coping (0.46), and self efficacy (0.35).

28 l relationships (2.07 [1.35-3.18]; p=0.001), self-efficacy (1.49 [1.05-2.11]; p=0.03), and frequent e

29 ealth promotion, 2) counseling that promoted self-efficacy, 3) pragmatic and practical self-care reco

30 o 6-month followup in pain (6.0 versus 3.4); self efficacy (5.5 versus 8.4), self-care behavior (1.7

31 st be made, (4) demonstrates decision-making self-efficacy; (5) exemplifies an emotional capacity to

32 IQR] change: DHFKS, 1.45 [0.84-2.04] points; self-efficacy, 8.06 [4.42-11.71] points).

33 althy new norms; (7) increase resilience and self-efficacy; (8) use clear and positive language; (9)

34 r mistrust (64 v 53; P = .001), and had less self-efficacy (92 v 97; P < .05); physician communicatio

35 ositive and negative affect, self-esteem and self-efficacy, a sense of meaning and purpose in life, a

36 ; 95% CI, -0.226 to -0.055), higher maternal self-efficacy (adjusted indirect effect, 1.855; 95% CI,

37 Controlling for neuroticism and self efficacy, affective disorder history continued to p

38 Significant improvements in self efficacy and in arthritis symptoms were maintained

39 Mediation analyses revealed that self efficacy and pain served as partial mediators of th

40 self-reported glaucoma medication adherence self-efficacy and (b) examine the relationship between p

41 ediable causes, including lack of education, self-efficacy and access to quality, experienced healthc

42 Both empowerment narratives improved self-efficacy and anticipated social mobility, but only

43 tered care model enhanced family caregivers' self-efficacy and competence but did not improve the phy

44 ucation without partners showed increases in self-efficacy and decreased fatigue.

45 n, mean cigarettes smoked, stages of change, self-efficacy and depression score.

46 the core of the model is the prediction that self-efficacy and desire to quit an addictive habit are

47 Patients with high self-efficacy and exercise levels had lower migraine-rel

48 ing overweight and negatively loaded by pain self-efficacy and exercise levels.

49 impacted patient exhibited highest levels of self-efficacy and exercise.

50 multiple barriers to adherence, with lack of self-efficacy and forgetfulness being the most common fa

51 ency and rights in order to build collective self-efficacy and have women invested in implementing th

52 dity a moderator of the relationship between self-efficacy and heart failure self-care behaviors?

53 cision aid (I-DECIDE) would increase women's self-efficacy and improve depressive symptoms compared w

54 strategies found most effective in promoting self-efficacy and improving clinical outcomes.

55 ant other led in our program to decreases in self-efficacy and increased fatigue, whereas patients pa

56 hysical function, social function, symptoms, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life on a 0-

57 igh attendees had higher task and scheduling self-efficacy and lower goal difficulty than did low att

58 on behavioral change theories that emphasize self-efficacy and motivational enhancement may provide a

59 theory-based intervention to improve patient self-efficacy and partner support to manage SLE.

60 financial concern was associated with lower self-efficacy and preparation for decision making, as we

61 Controlling for baseline self-efficacy and readiness to change, the intervention

62 morbidity moderated the relationship between self-efficacy and self-care maintenance, but not self-ca

63 ens the strength of the relationship between self-efficacy and self-care maintenance, tailoring inter

64 h less comorbidity, the relationship between self-efficacy and self-care was significantly stronger t

65 Evidence is presented suggesting that self-efficacy and social support are strong underlying c

66 comes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): self-efficacy and social support.

67 The intervention is based on the child's self-efficacy and stage of readiness to change intake of

68 change - was developed using information on self-efficacy and stage of readiness to change, and the

69 d problems and glaucoma medication adherence self-efficacy and work with patients to find ways to red

70 ), self-efficacy (Multiple Sclerosis-Fatigue Self-Efficacy) and disease-specific quality of life (Mul

71 tive (e.g., HbA1c levels), subjective (e.g., self-efficacy), and health behaviors (e.g., medication a

72 ng and strength exercise, aerobic exercise), self efficacy, and health care utilization (physician vi

73 ficulty and specificity, task and scheduling self-efficacy, and 8-week aquatic exercise attendance.

74 ticipant demographic information, technology self-efficacy, and adverse events.

75 usting for pain intensity or self-efficacy), self-efficacy, and aerobic exercise.

76 n on physical activity knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and behavior.

77 d health, health-related quality of life and self-efficacy, and competence of the family caregivers.

78 to improved anxiety and depression symptoms, self-efficacy, and coping among PMBT caregivers.

79 ntamination, increased eye drop instillation self-efficacy, and demonstrated an insignificant increas

80 ng for age, education, race, marital status, self-efficacy, and dental knowledge, multiple linear reg

81 OHL, sociodemographics, dental utilization, self-efficacy, and dental knowledge.

82 Social and cultural factors influence self-efficacy, and focusing on operative volume and auto

83 cantly greater parenting knowledge parenting self-efficacy, and home safety attitudes and fewer exter

84 with parallel improvements in diet quality, self-efficacy, and knowledge of healthy living.

85 ntly higher scores for couple communication, self-efficacy, and mental health status, and lower fatig

86 enable to change include illness perception, self-efficacy, and perceived social support.

87 psychosocial factors-including coping, mood, self-efficacy, and perceived support-influence the quali

88 fects of immunosuppressive treatment, coping self-efficacy, and physical and mental HRQoL at 3 months

89 rogram for Seniors questionnaire), arthritis self-efficacy, and physical function were assessed at ba

90 gnificant improvement in provider knowledge, self-efficacy, and professional satisfaction through par

91 used on safety planning, violence awareness, self-efficacy, and referral to social supports.

92 tions on participants' anxiety, uncertainty, self-efficacy, and satisfaction were assessed by using m

93 and general numeracy skills, lower perceived self-efficacy, and selected self-management behaviors.

94 gth, the psychosocial factors mental health, self-efficacy, and social support, and the activity leve

95 and obtain feedback about IRD understanding, self-efficacy, and willingness.

96 y of 5 standardized questionnaires including self-efficacy, anxiety and depression, personality, spir

97 95% CI, 1.95, 4.29, P = .001), and genetics self-efficacy (aOR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.54, 3.67, P = .001)

98 Because couple communication and self-efficacy appear to be modifiable risk factors, they

99 ps and patient glaucoma medication adherence self-efficacy are associated positively with adherence.

100 rophizing associated with increased pain and self-efficacy associated with lower pain reports.

101 Mean self-efficacy at 6 months and 12 months was lower for pa

102 ces favour the intervention group on fatigue self-efficacy at follow-up 1 (mean difference (MD) 9, 95

103 cial comparisons (B = 0.45; P < .001), lower self-efficacy (B = -0.11; P = .02), increased disease cy

104 Research on career adaptability, self-efficacy beliefs, and work volition is reviewed in

105 ce beta = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.45-0.76, P <0.01; self-efficacy beta = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.10-0.51, P <0.01;

106 behavior (beta, 2.48; 95% CI, 0.63-4.33) and self-efficacy (beta, 4.42; 95% CI, 2.25-6.59); these ass

107 rental confidence relating to better general self-efficacy, better quality of life and better mental

108 nths, there was no statistical difference in self-efficacy between the telecare group and the control

109 nscheduled physician visits and increases in self-efficacy, but definitive conclusions could not be r

110 s, lowering patients' anxiety and increasing self-efficacy, but there is insufficient evidence to rea

111 ht loss results in improved mobility-related self efficacy; changes in these task-specific control be

112 a significantly predicted negative change in self-efficacy compared to the group that delayed.

113 Care staff rated their self-efficacy (confidence in their own ability) on a sca

114 like literacy but with numbers) and numeric self-efficacy (confidence that provides engagement and p

115 A central concept in self-management is self-efficacy--confidence to carry out a behavior necess

116 ult health care: skills transfer, increasing self-efficacy, coordination, knowledge transfer, linking

117 trol group for self-esteem, quality of life, self-efficacy, coping strategies, mood and asthma sympto

118 all, pain, and functional status), arthritis self-efficacy, coping, and pain catastrophizing.

119 received an intervention designed to enhance self-efficacy, couples communication about lupus, social

120 ved at follow-up while control arm patients' self-efficacy declined.

121 reduces pain and improves physical function, self-efficacy, depression, and health-related quality of

122 There was a trend toward women with greater self-efficacy desiring more active decisional roles (P =

123 workers (FSWs; n = 1,083) when they had high self-efficacy, did not engage in drunken sex, and were a

124 ad statistically significant improvements in self-efficacy, disability, pain, and general health.

125 competencies (objective numeracy or numeric self-efficacy) does not guarantee superior outcomes.

126 of abuse reported significantly less condom self-efficacy (emotional ability to use condoms), less k

127 behaviors; 5 assessed attitudes, intention, self-efficacy, empathy; and 4 assessed knowledge.

128 urden-associated symptoms (eg, mood, coping, self-efficacy) even when caregiver burden itself was min

129 ntive strategies that increase the patient's self-efficacy (evidence-based confidence in his/her abil

130 dual characteristics, including motivations, self-efficacy, exercise history, skills, and other healt

131 neficial health behaviors and increase their self-efficacy expectations, participation of a significa

132 and mortality, self-concept perceptions, and self-efficacy expectations.

133 ine whether that relationship is mediated by self-efficacy expectations.

134 ctors associated with professional practice, self-efficacy, facilitators, and barriers to ECHO.

135 Self-efficacy, fear avoidance beliefs, and the Short For

136 skills were associated with worse perceived self-efficacy, fewer self-management behaviors, and poss

137 stair-climb time and 6-minute walk distance, self efficacy for completing each mobility task, and sel

138 , chair stands), and 1 psychosocial outcome (self-efficacy for arthritis management) at 8 weeks.

139 (chair stands), and 1 psychosocial outcome (self-efficacy for arthritis management) in the AT analys

140 s, they may expect improvements in symptoms, self-efficacy for arthritis management, and upper and lo

141 ve effects on reducing depression, improving self-efficacy for dealing with problem behaviors and red

142 ficant small to medium effect on caregiver's self-efficacy for dealing with problem behaviours at Z =

143 ients' attitudes as well as their knowledge, self-efficacy for decision making, receptivity to receiv

144 osocial factors, and clinical factors, lower self-efficacy for disease management (P < or = 0.0001),

145 Lower self-efficacy for disease management was associated with

146 c factors, access to health care, nutrition, self-efficacy for disease management, health locus of co

147 ally modifiable psychosocial factors such as self-efficacy for disease management.

148 T-led classes were seen on 2 of 5 mediators, self-efficacy for exercise and barriers adherence effica

149 al activity, self-efficacy for function, and self-efficacy for exercise, for which there was no evide

150 ms at 6 months, but declined in function and self-efficacy for exercise.

151 utilization, but did not increase caregiver self-efficacy for finding resources.

152 e intervention except for physical activity, self-efficacy for function, and self-efficacy for exerci

153 ersonal goal, conflict with other goals, and self-efficacy for goal attainment.

154 Self-efficacy for healthy eating (standard beta [std. be

155 (pain, fatigue) and 1 psychosocial outcome (self-efficacy for managing arthritis) in the ITT analyse

156 es revealed a 3-factor structure relating to self-efficacy for managing symptoms, emotional consequen

157 05 to 0.67, p = .02), however, the effect on self-efficacy for obtaining respite was not significant

158 ed small, significant increases in arthritis self-efficacy for pain (P = 0.002), cognitive symptom ma

159 pain (i.e. pain catastrophizing, acceptance, self-efficacy for pain) also have been found to relate t

160 an inverted U-shape function of the smoker's self-efficacy for quitting.

161 = 108) when they were bisexuals and had high self-efficacy, for Johns (Johns; n = 118) when they had

162 Low self-efficacy, forgetfulness, and difficulty with drop a

163 increase was found in eye drop instillation self-efficacy from an average score of 2.6 (standard dev

164 her measures of pulmonary function, dyspnea, self-efficacy, generic and disease-specific quality of l

165 Higher levels of self-efficacy (>5) were associated with: staff over 50 y

166 A high MSPSS (family and friends) score and self-efficacy had positive impacts on QoL in both urban

167 ups, HHAs with the lowest baseline DHFKS and self-efficacy had the greatest increases at 90 days (med

168 Self-efficacy has been shown to be a causal mechanism in

169 Interpersonal relationships and self-efficacy have each been independently studied in th

170 graphic data and measures of social support, self-efficacy, health literacy, and health activation.

171 essments included health behavior, arthritis self-efficacy, health status, and social interactions.

172 Self-efficacy, healthy living knowledge, and dietary int

173 (steps per day), cardiorespiratory fitness, self-efficacy, healthy living knowledge, and self-report

174 rval [CI], 1.03-1.12) and greater functional self-efficacy (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08), a measure o

175 Participant self-efficacy improved for both interventions versus usu

176 of athletic abilities and strength-training self-efficacy, improved nutrition and exercise behaviors

177 sion and anxiety but good social support and self-efficacy in communicating with their physician.

178 n physical activity knowledge, attitudes, or self-efficacy in either men or women.

179 of the 8-item communication subscale of the Self-efficacy in End-of-Life Care survey.

180 Communication support program recipients' self-efficacy in knowing what questions to ask their doc

181 47; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.72) and reported lower self-efficacy in medical decisions (mean score, 74.71; P

182 ty, and patient activation in clinical care (self-efficacy in medical decisions and perceived control

183 as a useful vehicle to develop the patients' self-efficacy in pain management in the longer term.

184 s that patients experience to increase their self-efficacy in using glaucoma medications.

185 first scale to measure parental confidence (self-efficacy) in managing food allergy in their child.

186 Yet the manner in which comorbidity and self-efficacy interact to influence self-care, hospitali

187 n in small gambles, as well as the strongest self-efficacy, internal locus of control, and need for a

188 Self-efficacy is enhanced when patients succeed in solvi

189 Self-efficacy is important in the self-care maintenance

190 Firstly, to describe and compare the self-efficacy level of long-term care staff regarding en

191 Enhanced self-efficacy may partially explain why longer-term bene

192 , noting good acceptability, high decisional self-efficacy (mean score 85.9/100) and low decisional c

193 ed health status, health behavior, arthritis self-efficacy, medical care utilization, and demographic

194 examined were changes in diabetes distress, self-efficacy, medication adherence, and hemoglobin A1c

195 r difficulty and less vividness in recalling self-efficacy memories during moments of increased stres

196 pulmonary disease, depressive symptoms, low self-efficacy, mobility disability, and low energy were

197 protected women's belonging in engineering, self-efficacy, motivation, retention in engineering majo

198 ue severity (Fatigue Assessment Instrument), self-efficacy (Multiple Sclerosis-Fatigue Self-Efficacy)

199 dictors of group status were self-reports of self-efficacy, negative affect, recent stressful events,

200 n diabetes distress, diabetes self-care, and self-efficacy; no differences in body mass index or depr

201 elines for palliative care could improve the self-efficacy of care staff.

202 surements were diabetes knowledge, perceived self-efficacy of diabetes self-management, and self-mana

203 understanding of models and evidence and the self-efficacy of teachers.

204 Hope impacts self-efficacy of women with suspected breast cancer and

205 However, factors predicting self-efficacy of women with suspected breast cancer who

206 vealed both direct and indirect effects (via self efficacy) of history of affective disorder on the e

207 mary care providers to develop knowledge and self-efficacy on a variety of diseases.

208 health (OR 0.62/5 points, 95% CI 0.44-0.87), self-efficacy (OR 0.79/5 points, 95% CI 0.67-0.93), and

209 9; 95% CI, 1.25 to 28.50; P = .025), banking self-efficacy (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.45; P = .012)

210 with higher odds of nonadherence: decreased self-efficacy (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 2.2-9.7; P </= 0.0001),

211 from other patient populations suggests that self-efficacy, or task-specific confidence, mediates the

212 st clinic visit contributed to the change in self-efficacy over time (beta=0.391, p<0.001).

213 ced greater improvements in mobility-related self efficacy (P = 0.0035), stair climb (P = 0.0249) and

214 associated with care quality (P < .001) and self-efficacy (P < .001).

215 fter reassurance; P = .001) while increasing self-efficacy (P = .004 and P < .001, respectively) and

216 weeks, patients using eRAPID reported better self-efficacy (P = .007) and better health on EQ5D-VAS (

217 ificantly higher at 6 months, and scores for self-efficacy (P = 0.004) and global mental health statu

218 aire subscale scores (P<0.001) except on the Self-Efficacy (P=0.18) and Symptom Stability (P=0.91).

219 egration and support subscale), pain-related self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire), pain i

220 Anxiety, depression, pain-related self-efficacy, pain acceptance, and social integration w

221 there was no effect on anxiety, pain-related self-efficacy, pain acceptance, pain intensity, or the c

222 ence in care received, mental health status, self-efficacy, patient attitude/perception of ability to

223 (1) its component constructs (for example, 'self-efficacy', 'perceived threat' or 'subjective norm')

224 consider a wide range of predictors, such as self-efficacy, personality, and behavior problems, to as

225 ychological domains, including intelligence, self-efficacy, personality, well-being, and behavior pro

226 higher levels of fatigue in RA patients, and self efficacy plays a mediating role in this relationshi

227 ale (MPAS), and perceived maternal parenting self-efficacy (PMP-SE).

228 tween concerns and self-reported measures of self-efficacy, preparation for decision making, distress

229 Associations between caregiver self-efficacy, preparedness for caregiving, and caregive

230 that certain influences on behavior, such as self-efficacy, problem-solving skills, and social suppor

231 th-related skills, enhancing self-esteem and self-efficacy, promoting social support, and ultimately

232 subscale), pain-related self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire), pain intensity (CPG pain i

233 ttitudes) and secondary outcomes (knowledge, self-efficacy, receptivity, and willingness) were assess

234 peak up is pervasive among nurses, as is low self-efficacy related to safety voice.

235 truction of the 11-item Children's Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (CASE) was based on an existing body

236 essed using the validated Eye Drop Technique Self-Efficacy Scale (EDTSES) survey at baseline and 1 mo

237 population sample in addition to the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), the Food Allergy Quality of

238 s and care assistants (n = 1680) completed a self-efficacy scale and were included in the analyses.

239 The Food Allergy Self-Efficacy Scale for Parents (FASE-P) was developed t

240 subscales, self-efficacy using the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale physical function subscale, and soci

241 months (primary end point) and Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale score, quality of life, and adverse

242 core of P-CASES (Parental Childhood Asthma's Self-efficacy Scale).

243 sments, timed chair stand, depression index, self-efficacy scale, and quality of life.

244 ecklist (perceived side effects), the coping self-efficacy scale, and the SF-36.

245 is Health Belief Scale, and the Osteoporosis Self-Efficacy Scale.

246 Improvements were found for self-efficacy, school absenteeism and quality of life.

247 community and increases in their scientific self-efficacy, scientific identity, and science values,

248 Thde proportion of staff with a mean self-efficacy score >5 was highest in the Netherlands (7

249 e (-6.70 [95% CI -11.63, -1.77; P = 0.009]), self-efficacy score (0.71 [95% CI 0.03, 1.39; P = 0.04])

250 Primary outcomes were mean general self-efficacy score (immediately after website completio

251 2 months, and the yoga group had higher pain self-efficacy scores at 3 and 6 months but not at 12 mon

252 After 12 months, self-efficacy scores for coping with other symptoms were

253 purposively sampled to reflect age, sex, and self-efficacy scores from the intervention arm of a rand

254 analog, Short Form 36 health status survey, self-efficacy scoring, and a fear avoidance questionnair

255 nuated after adjusting for pain intensity or self-efficacy), self-efficacy, and aerobic exercise.

256 ied Health Assessment Questionnaire [mHAQ]), self efficacy, self-care behavior, and arthritis knowled

257 ferentiated a strategic mindset from general self-efficacy, self-control, grit, and growth mindsets a

258 associated with PrEP uptake included higher self-efficacy, sexually transmitted infection (STI), and

259 associated with PrEP uptake included higher self-efficacy, sexually transmitted infection, and condo

260 ults demonstrate the importance of assessing self-efficacy, social influences, and bottom-line belief

261 t quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life.

262 Structural equation modeling revealed that self-efficacy, social support, and family hardiness had

263 ad significant improvements (P <or= 0.05) in self-efficacy, stretching and strengthening exercises, a

264 Crisis Resource Management checklist, and a self-efficacy survey instrument.

265 nge scores for knowledge, health belief, and self-efficacy than the control group.

266 insurance, poor social-support network, low self-efficacy (the patient's confidence in being able to

267 heories focused on expectancies for success (self-efficacy theory and control theory), theories focus

268 ty improvement intervention that is based on self-efficacy theory applied to changing clinician behav

269 emotional functioning (P < 0.01), increased self efficacy to manage ALBP (P = 0.03), and less fear o

270 rm improvements in emotional functioning and self efficacy to manage symptoms among patients with ALB

271 or understanding of (23% vs 83%, P < 0.001), self-efficacy to decide about (38% vs 70%, P < 0.001), a

272 , tailoring interventions aimed at improving self-efficacy to different levels of comorbidity may be

273 oural approaches and was designed to promote self-efficacy to manage chronic pain.

274 y is associated with decreased confidence or self-efficacy to perform self-care in heart failure pati

275 ociated factors for self-management support: self-efficacy to perform self-management support and soc

276 edicted by four person-related factors, i.e. self-efficacy to perform self-management support, genera

277 ted improvements in family connectedness and self-efficacy to refuse unwanted sex, and reductions in

278 c among those with lower growth mindsets and self-efficacy toward their general health or blood gluco

279 Care staff with greater self-efficacy towards end-of-life communication are prob

280 Self-efficacy towards end-of-life communication was most

281 staff and facilities which are associated to self-efficacy towards end-of-life communication.

282 ons, however, there is a lack of research on self-efficacy towards end-of-life discussions among long

283 chievable outcomes are growth in clinician's self-efficacy, uptake of new communication strategies an

284 s, and general glaucoma medication adherence self-efficacy using a previously validated 10-item scale

285 th and role-functioning emotional subscales, self-efficacy using the Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale ph

286 mproving health status, health behavior, and self-efficacy variables for up to 9 months.

287 ension self-care behavior was 50 (45-56) and self-efficacy was 64 (57-72).

288 Participants' self-efficacy was assessed using the validated Eye Drop

289 Higher glaucoma medication adherence self-efficacy was associated positively with better adhe

290 ortance of exercise-related goal setting and self-efficacy was demonstrated.

291 In all countries, low self-efficacy was found relatively often for discussion

292 pport was higher (4.4 versus 4.1; P = 0.03), self-efficacy was higher (7.2 versus 6.2; P = 0.02), cou

293 fficacy was related to egg and milk allergy; self-efficacy was not related to severity of allergy.

294 Poorer self-efficacy was related to egg and milk allergy; self-

295 hereas higher body mass index and functional self-efficacy were associated with recovery.

296 ratings of nicotine dependence, craving, and self-efficacy were collected.

297 Goal difficulty, specificity, and task self-efficacy were independent predictors of attendance

298 findings indicate the greatest increases in self-efficacy were observed for those with below-average

299 Optimistic perception of illness and greater self-efficacy were potentially modifiable factors associ

300 Notably, increased belonging and self-efficacy were significantly associated with more re

301 ing cessation, readiness to quit smoking and self-efficacy, were also assessed.