戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 al levels: progressive nonfluent aphasia and semantic dementia.
2 ormed markedly better than the patients with semantic dementia.
3  face and name knowledge in 15 patients with semantic dementia.
4 vanced interpretations of the impairments in semantic dementia.
5 ts observed during the onset and progress of semantic dementia.
6 te semantic primary progressive aphasia from semantic dementia.
7 tices and nucleus accumbens in patients with semantic dementia.
8 tic forms of primary progressive aphasia and semantic dementia.
9 pposed to the 'storage' deficits observed in semantic dementia.
10 ts of picture-naming data from patients with semantic dementia.
11  that is sensitive to semantic impairment in semantic dementia.
12 of a more severe generic semantic deficit in semantic dementia.
13 ith those areas known to be most affected in semantic dementia.
14 visual deficits as compared to patients with semantic dementia.
15 its, but sparing of phonology and fluency in semantic dementia.
16  the widely accepted diagnostic criteria for semantic dementia.
17 ad criteria, excluding only those with clear semantic dementia.
18 ), progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA) and semantic dementia.
19 t mortem cases meeting clinical criteria for semantic dementia.
20 h progressive non-fluent aphasia; eight with semantic dementia].
21  on this test of a group of 12 patients with semantic dementia (10 male, mean age: 64.4 years) correl
22 2% bvFTD/motor neuron disease cases), 2 with semantic dementia (5.9% of patients with semantic dement
23 t frontotemporal dementia (71% of cases) and semantic dementia (65% of cases) and in association with
24 ic cases) and heightened responsiveness with semantic dementia (73% of symptomatic cases) and Alzheim
25 er of central conceptual knowledge arises in semantic dementia, a degenerative condition associated w
26                   The study of patients with semantic dementia, a variant of frontotemporal lobar deg
27 tion, the topography of neuroinflammation in semantic dementia, also known as the semantic variant of
28 sotropy--from 10 patients with mild/moderate semantic dementia and 21 matched controls.
29                                              Semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease groups did not
30  expert musicians with clinical diagnoses of semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease, in comparison
31 the distribution of temporal lobe atrophy in semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease.
32 tify the global and temporal lobe atrophy in semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease.
33 l eating behavior in patients with bvFTD and semantic dementia and are likely responsible for the dif
34 heimer's disease, the focal lobar atrophies (semantic dementia and dementia of frontal type) and thre
35 t the performance of three patients-two with semantic dementia and focal temporal lobe atrophy and th
36 teria for behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD) or semantic dementia and had characteristic brain atrophy.
37 asting doubt over the conclusions drawn from semantic dementia and linked basic neuroscience studies.
38 h clinical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, semantic dementia and non-fluent primary progressive aph
39 osia is one of the clinical presentations of semantic dementia and not a separate clinical entity.
40 oral lobe epilepsy and the expectations from semantic dementia and other neuroscience findings.
41 h those observed in a group of patients with semantic dementia and predominant left-sided temporal lo
42 ic prominence, particularly for diagnosis in semantic dementia and prognosis in behavioural syndromes
43 ible for deteriorating semantic knowledge in semantic dementia and separate from 'classic' language a
44                           All patients had a semantic dementia and the clinical details of two of the
45 psychological studies of surface dyslexia in semantic dementia and the connectionist triangle model o
46 s an examination of the relationship between semantic dementia and the focal clinical syndrome of pro
47 totemporal dementia with motoneuron disease, semantic dementia and, with one exception, progressive n
48 tients (five with svPPA and two with 'right' semantic dementia) and 12 healthy controls underwent pos
49 ith semantic dementia (5.9% of patients with semantic dementia), and none with progressive nonfluent
50 tients with dementia (19 with bvFTD, 15 with semantic dementia, and 15 with Alzheimer disease) were r
51 f primary progressive aphasia, also known as semantic dementia, and Alzheimer's disease have deficits
52 d in both progressive non-fluent aphasia and semantic dementia, and deficits of semantic processing a
53 clear palsy set), anterior temporal lobes in semantic dementia, and hippocampus and posterior cingula
54 ding of the anatomical changes that occur in semantic dementia, and may further help to explain the d
55       These cases most commonly presented as semantic dementia, and they had longer disease duration
56 h the volume of right temporal structures in semantic dementia, and with subcallosal gyrus volume in
57 rment of semantic knowledge in patients with semantic dementia appears to influence performance in a
58 ant primary progressive aphasia (also called semantic dementia) are two clinical variants of frontote
59 s suggested by observations on patients with semantic dementia, as well as posterior regions describe
60  a striking literary depiction of collective semantic dementia before the syndrome was recognized in
61 hat differed between patients with bvFTD and semantic dementia but included the cingulate cortices, t
62                   In Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia, by contrast, group level and individu
63                  Insofar as the diagnosis of semantic dementia can have these two different meanings,
64 ecent findings indicate that the syndrome of semantic dementia can inform us about the organisation o
65 a visual decision task in four patients with semantic dementia compared with six age-matched normal c
66  longitudinal bundle, where abnormalities in semantic dementia did not extend caudal to the atrophic/
67  [(18)F]AV-1451, the pathological regions in semantic dementia do not normally contain significant le
68                                              Semantic dementia formed a true diagnostic category (i.e
69  [(18)F]AV-1451 binding potential, separated semantic dementia from controls with 86% sensitivity and
70      It has been reported that patients with semantic dementia function well in everyday life and som
71 ilateral anterior temporal lobe damage (e.g. semantic dementia), functional neuroimaging and repetiti
72 ative threshold, tensor abnormalities in the semantic dementia group mapped onto the tractographies f
73 temporal lobe atrophy patient group than the semantic dementia group.
74                      Patients with bvFTD and semantic dementia had a strong sucrose preference compar
75                            The patients with semantic dementia had the expected deficit in object ide
76                            While research on semantic dementia has provided evidence for a critical r
77                        Cognitive deficits in semantic dementia have been attributed to anterior tempo
78                   For example, patients with semantic dementia have prominent atrophy in anterolatera
79 performed on a wider cohort of patients with semantic dementia, in which the patients with more exten
80                                              Semantic dementia, in which there is progressive deterio
81                                INTRODUCTION: Semantic dementia, including the semantic variant of pri
82 d the hypothesis that concept degradation in semantic dementia involves a combination of these pan-mo
83                                              Semantic dementia is a focal clinical syndrome, resultin
84                 The core clinical feature of semantic dementia is a progressive yet selective degrada
85                                              Semantic dementia is a syndrome of progressive deteriora
86                        This study shows that semantic dementia is associated with anatomical damage t
87               Although it is well-known that semantic dementia is associated with temporal lobe degen
88 on between progressive nonfluent aphasia and semantic dementia is strengthening.
89                             In patients with semantic dementia, it appears that both the left tempora
90  the Alzheimer disease (mean, 710 calories), semantic dementia (mean, 573 calories), and control grou
91 f progressive nonfluent aphasia (n = 23) and semantic dementia (n = 15).
92 ral variant FTD (n = 26), language variants (semantic dementia, n = 9; and progressive nonfluent apha
93 iant FTD: n = 1337 cases, n = 2754 controls; semantic dementia: n = 308 cases, n = 616 controls; prog
94 havioral variant frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia, often respond to treatment with selec
95 dial temporal lobe lesions and patients with semantic dementia on nine tests of semantic knowledge an
96 al dementia, progressive non-fluent aphasia, semantic dementia or mixture of these syndromes for muta
97 longitudinal fasciculus were tracked in five semantic dementia patients and eight healthy controls.
98                                              Semantic dementia patients had significantly higher mean
99 ', strategies that resonate with attempts by semantic dementia patients to cope with their disease.
100                                          The semantic dementia patients were profoundly impaired on b
101 erall profile masked individual differences: semantic dementia patients with predominant left tempora
102    Three groups of 10 subjects were studied: semantic dementia patients, Alzheimer's disease patients
103 ntic variant primary progressive aphasia and semantic dementia, patients with early right anterior te
104 the tests of new learning, the patients with semantic dementia performed markedly better than the amn
105 r each FTD subtype (behavioural variant FTD, semantic dementia, progressive non-fluent aphasia, and F
106 drome that includes frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, progressive nonfluent aphasia and pro
107                                              Semantic dementia refers to the variant of frontotempora
108                              The syndrome of semantic dementia represents the "other side of the coin
109 essing in progressive non-fluent aphasia and semantic dementia, respectively.
110                          Parallel studies of semantic dementia, rTMS in normal participants, and neur
111 wo groups suffering from different diseases: semantic dementia (SD) and herpes simplex virus encephal
112 sy exists regarding the relationship between semantic dementia (SD) and progressive aphasia.
113  with frontotemporal dementia (FTD), 19 with semantic dementia (SD) and six with progressive non-flue
114 A), progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA), or semantic dementia (SD) based on language testing.
115                                              Semantic dementia (SD) is a neurodegenerative disease ch
116                                              Semantic dementia (SD) is a neurodegenerative disorder c
117 diverse cortical regions in semantic memory: semantic dementia (SD) is characterized by atrophy of th
118 ed patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or semantic dementia (SD) on a visual oddity judgment task
119 ed it to simulate and explain the effects of semantic dementia (SD) on word processing abilities.
120                                  People with semantic dementia (SD) or semantic variant primary progr
121 ral atrophy of the anterior temporal lobe in semantic dementia (SD) produces a gradual degradation of
122 herpes simplex virus encephalitis (HSVE) and semantic dementia (SD) typically affect anterior tempora
123                                              Semantic dementia (SD), one of the main clinical variant
124 ed upon neuropsychological investigations of semantic dementia (SD).
125  Solitude to that exhibited by patients with semantic dementia (SD).
126 ccur in both behavioural-variant (bvFTD) and semantic dementia (SD)/semantic-variant primary progress
127 uent aphasia (PNFA) (or a mixed aphasia) and semantic dementia (SD); and to compare the age of onset,
128 onfluent progressive aphasia (NFPA; n = 11), semantic dementia (SD; n = 10), and a third variant term
129  18 progressive nonfluent aphasia [PNFA], 16 semantic dementia [SD]), 22 progressive supranuclear pal
130                             The patient with semantic dementia showed relatively preserved recognitio
131 FA), progressive logopenic aphasia (PLA) and semantic dementia (SMD).
132       In addition, the pattern of atrophy in semantic dementia suggests that semantic memory is subse
133 rment found across different patient groups (semantic dementia, temporal lobe epilepsy, glioma and st
134      The cortical anatomy of 6 patients with semantic dementia (the temporal lobe variant of frontote
135 convincingly demonstrated that patients with semantic dementia (the temporal variant of frontotempora
136       Our results line up with evidence from semantic dementia, the convergence zone framework and me
137                   The study of patients with semantic dementia, the temporal variant of frontotempora
138                     We studied patients with semantic dementia-the paradigmatic disorder of the brain
139                                           In semantic dementia, there is profound progressive and rel
140                                           In semantic dementia, there was asymmetrical temporal lobe
141 ite epidemiological and genetic data linking semantic dementia to inflammation, the topography of neu
142 est to evaluate the ability of patients with semantic dementia to use recollection-based memory proce
143 and that semantic deficits in the context of semantic dementia underlie surface alexia.
144 e left language-related cerebral pathways in semantic dementia using diffusion tensor imaging-based t
145                                              Semantic dementia was predominantly associated with TDP-
146                                    The term "semantic dementia" was originally introduced to designat
147  To explore this phenomenon in nine cases of semantic dementia, we designed a set of semantic tests r
148 integrative memory model through the lens of semantic dementia, we propose a number of important exte
149                      Behavioral symptoms and semantic dementia were associated with a range of pathol
150 uced fractional anisotropy for patients with semantic dementia were spatially concordant with each ot
151 ogressive Aphasia (PPA) when left-sided, and semantic dementia when bilateral.
152 frontotemporal dementia alone, one had mixed semantic dementia with frontal features and three had pr
153  Social cognitive changes are also common in semantic dementia, with atrophy centred on the anterior
154 or temporal lobe structures were affected in semantic dementia, with the entorhinal cortex, amygdala,
155 ntext of their implications for the place of semantic dementia within the classification of progressi

 
Page Top