ライフサイエンスコーパス: sensory feedback

1 bling intracortically controlled closed-loop sensory feedback.

2 nt the ongoing motor program or song-related sensory feedback.

3 nematics and body trajectories requires fast sensory feedback.

4 reotypical, but dynamically adapted based on sensory feedback.

5 correspondence between motor exploration and sensory feedback.

6 rvation can provide somatotopically relevant sensory feedback.

7 mpares expected with actual postarticulatory sensory feedback.

8 bsence of primary motor cortical activity or sensory feedback.

9 ng edge cells and thus the locomotor-related sensory feedback.

10 hythmogenesis, descending motor control, and sensory feedback.

11 to perform a grasp retrieval task requiring sensory feedback.

12 requires a complex neural network coupled to sensory feedback.

13 ectively damaging a muscle without affecting sensory feedback.

14 hange, increasing the gains for the expected sensory feedback.

15 enerate behaviour and adapt it to changes in sensory feedback.

16 t also the gains associated with reaction to sensory feedback.

17 are difficult to control and do not provide sensory feedback.

18 eural systems capable of anticipating actual sensory feedback.

19 with multiple forms of natural or surrogate sensory feedback.

20 nerve interfaces for prosthesis control and sensory feedback.

21 ern generating circuits can be overridden by sensory feedback.

22 nerate motor commands without the benefit of sensory feedback.

23 provides a potential pathway for meaningful sensory feedback.

24 entrally or whether it arises as a result of sensory feedback.

25 suffer from poor controllability and lack of sensory feedback.

26 desired movement trajectories while ignoring sensory feedback.

27 r task and manipulate the uncertainty of the sensory feedback.

28 ribution and the level of uncertainty in the sensory feedback.

29 n of velocities-the prior-with evidence from sensory feedback.

30 d loop component, which is more dependent on sensory feedback.

31 grams operating independently from immediate sensory feedback.

32 involve integration of intention, action and sensory feedback.

33 scles during cough, independent of laryngeal sensory feedback.

34 ry consequences of motor commands and actual sensory feedback.

35 s of the body, world and mind in response to sensory feedback.

36 oceptive) or bimodal (visual-proprioceptive) sensory feedback.

37 of the effector's state, motor commands, and sensory feedback.

38 w deficits in associating motor commands and sensory feedback.

39 ity is partly due to control loops driven by sensory feedback.

40 in real time to trigger neurostimulation or sensory feedback.

41 occurring after the motor command but before sensory feedback.

42 s-discrepancies between predicted and actual sensory feedback.

43 n (MLP) network for fusing multi-dimensional sensory feedback.

44 tasks that demand rapid responses to ongoing sensory feedback.

45 modified after brief exposure to unexpected sensory feedback.

46 ng their target innervated muscle fibers and sensory feedback.

47 its that drive rhythmic motor output without sensory feedback.

48 about the presence or role of other forms of sensory feedback.

49 absence of brain inputs and movement-related sensory feedback.

50 ts in which we controlled the reliability of sensory feedback.

51 es high levels of motor control and auditory sensory feedback.

52 del that optimally integrates noisy, delayed sensory feedback about both motion and position to estim

53 on by integrating sensorimotor memories with sensory feedback about digit positions.

54 Thus, how sensory feedback affects both task-relevant and task-irr

55 ntal coordination can in fact be achieved by sensory feedback alone, without the intersegmental inter

56 lso consistent with a dynamic interaction of sensory feedback and central programming, presumably ada

57 Our data show that both sensory feedback and central systems of the spinal cord

58 to snakes and birds, combine neural control, sensory feedback and compliant mechanics to effectively

59 Mechanoreceptor networks that provide sensory feedback and enable the dexterity of the human g

60 on requires understanding the integration of sensory feedback and executive commands.

61 e rapid mechanical preflexes with multimodal sensory feedback and feedforward commands.

62 For optimal sensorimotor control, sensory feedback and feedforward estimation of a movemen

63 like a feedback controller where continuous sensory feedback and interactions with other brain areas

64 The precision of skilled movement depends on sensory feedback and its refinement by local inhibitory

65 Artificial skin that simultaneously mimics sensory feedback and mechanical properties of natural sk

66 emely fast decision processes in response to sensory feedback and modulation through attention in a n

67 otor patterns in the presence and absence of sensory feedback and related these motor program compone

68 t uses efferent copy of commands to the arm, sensory feedback, and an internal model of the dynamics

69 rain integrates feedforward control signals, sensory feedback, and predictions based on internal mode

70 tegration between feedforward estimation and sensory feedback, and therefore the putative motor and s

71 the integration of articulatory planning and sensory feedback, and via connections with primary motor

72 This provides insight into flies' multimodal sensory feedback architecture and constitutes a previous

73 tested whether motor planning and well-timed sensory feedback are sufficient for adaptation.

74 ions with the mother and littermates and (2) sensory feedback arising from spontaneous infant movemen

75 n other modalities (e.g., retinal waves),(2) sensory feedback arising from twitches is well suited to

76 ct the consequences of motor commands before sensory feedback arrives.

77 Identification of a defect in sensory feedback as a potential initiating event in ALS

78 e fictive locomotion-that is, without phasic sensory feedback as monitored by five muscle nerves in e

79 Rather, they favour sensory feedback as the source of the sense of movement.

80 fic modifications in the processing of local sensory feedback as well as modification of the activity

81 hich was recursively updated in light of new sensory feedback, as identified by a Bayesian learning m

82 re captured by modelling the consequences of sensory feedback at high gain.

83 adapt whenever its predictions fail to match sensory feedback at the end of the movement.

84 n the interaction of Hebbian learning rules, sensory feedback, attractor dynamics, and neuromodulatio

85 ythmic input from higher brain structures or sensory feedback because they contain an intrinsic sourc

86 on intact motor circuits revealed defects in sensory feedback before evidence of motor neuron degener

87 ught that the brain does not simply react to sensory feedback, but rather uses an internal model of t

88 ting oscillations to the environment through sensory feedback, but without guidance from the brain.

89 nd advanced algorithms, and the provision of sensory feedback by means of electrodes implanted in per

90 n primates have shown that motor control and sensory feedback can be achieved by connecting sensors i

91 Intrinsic delays in sensory feedback can be detrimental for motor control.

92 nisms supporting initial motor output before sensory feedback can be processed are disrupted in ASD.

93 oprioceptor neurons, and for deciphering how sensory feedback can function within a defined neural ci

94 Time-delayed sensory feedback can then be used to correct for the une

95 rve cords, refuting earlier conclusions that sensory feedback cannot coordinate swimming activity.

96 hort period of rapid finger-tapping (without sensory feedback) caused subjects to underestimate the n

97 In this work, we show that sensory feedback causes an unbiased learner to produce R

98 Sensory feedback, central pattern generators, and supras

99 rate rhythmic motor output in the absence of sensory feedback, commonly called central pattern genera

100 ides a mechanism for temporal integration of sensory feedback consistent with PI control.

101 uggesting that O-mannosylation regulates the sensory feedback controlling muscle contractions.

102 igured to exert control over the cursor in a sensory-feedback-dependent manner.

103 (3) Removal of sensory feedback did not affect step coordination or tim

104 Loss of sensory feedback does not disrupt periodicity but slow d

105 However, the quality of the sensory feedback during a movement can depend substantia

106 ircuits may participate in the evaluation of sensory feedback during calibration of motor performance

107 In contrast, sensory feedback during locust flight or to multiple cor

108 ns with CP do not adequately process ongoing sensory feedback during motor actions, which accentuates

109 ry information at night and by evaluation of sensory feedback during the day interact to produce the

110 ation of their recent practice, provided the sensory feedback during the latter signaled a pitch mism

111 with a strengthening of the motor effects of sensory feedback during tonic contraction and with reduc

112 To distinguish these hypotheses, we examined sensory feedback effects during targeted wiping organize

113 These observations suggest the sensory feedback elicited by neural stimulation can sign

114 (i.e., adaptation of movements to perturbed sensory feedback) emphasize the role of automatic, impli

115 However, because sensory feedback entrains the stepping rhythm, it is dif

116 d many models of learning assume that larger sensory feedback errors drive larger motor changes.

117 Without sensory feedback, flies cannot fly.

118 put control signal that is adjusted based on sensory feedback) flight control.

119 g so, the nervous system strongly suppresses sensory feedback for extended periods of time in compari

120 f achieving intrinsic rhythmicity and fusing sensory feedback for generating smooth, versatile, and r

121 esistant neurological disorders to providing sensory feedback for neural prostheses.

122 mportant implications in providing realistic sensory feedback for prosthetic-hand users.

123 ssed by swimming leeches may be regulated by sensory feedback from both ventral and dorsal longitudin

124 tactile sensations and can be used to convey sensory feedback from brain-controlled bionic hands.

125 this coordination, one must characterize how sensory feedback from each limb affects walking behavior

126 ot, providing it with dynamic coloration and sensory feedback from external and internal stimuli.

127 pares timing on the order of microseconds of sensory feedback from from its high-frequency (approxima

128 rated to switch reflex responses to urethral sensory feedback from maintaining continence to producin

129 tion of coordinated body movements relies on sensory feedback from mechanosensitive proprioceptors.

130 Animals depend on sensory feedback from mechanosensory afferents for the d

131 These results confirm the importance of sensory feedback from movements in driving activity in s

132 organ-derived signals.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Sensory feedback from muscle spindle (MS) and Golgi tend

133 Group Ia/II sensory feedback from muscle spindles has a predominant

134 alled proprioceptors, that provide essential sensory feedback from muscles and joints to spinal cord

135 Precise motor control relies on continuous sensory feedback from muscles, a process in which gamma

136 somatosensory neocortex occur in response to sensory feedback from myoclonic twitching, we hypothesiz

137 of reinnervated chest skin may allow useful sensory feedback from prosthetic devices and provides in

138 persistent debate concerns the importance of sensory feedback from self-generated movements.

139 Sensory feedback from sleep-related myoclonic twitches i

140 exemplified by the sensorimotor system where sensory feedback from sleep-specific movements activates

141 of normal motor cortex maps in M1 depends on sensory feedback from somatosensory maps.

142 Sensory feedback from stretch receptors, neurons that de

143 underlying neural circuits as a function of sensory feedback from surface contact.

144 ducing a method for providing the brain with sensory feedback from the actuators, and designing and b

145 sults demonstrate the complementary roles of sensory feedback from the bladder and urethra in regulat

146 We used a novel preparation to manipulate sensory feedback from the bladder and urethra independen

147 instance, feedback-based control, which uses sensory feedback from the body to correct for errors in

148 Previous studies showed that sensory feedback from the body wall is important and som

149 eral M1 in Kallmann's subjects may be due to sensory feedback from the involuntarily mirroring hand.

150 If this capacity relied solely on sensory feedback from the limb, we would always be a ste

151 with a shared spinal locomotor network, with sensory feedback from the limbs controlling the directio

152 degeneration might interact with the loss of sensory feedback from the limbs due to peripheral neurop

153 g and locomotion and their interactions with sensory feedback from the limbs remain largely intact af

154 ts that interact with supraspinal drives and sensory feedback from the limbs.

155 persisted in the proximal stumps deprived of sensory feedback from the periphery.

156 intent of the user to activate movement and sensory feedback from the prosthesis.

157 usands of skeletal muscle twitches each day; sensory feedback from the resulting limb movements is a

158 udy shows that their preservation depends on sensory feedback from the spinal cord to the brain: if f

159 nds of limb twitches are produced daily, and sensory feedback from these movements is a substantial d

160 motor activity of the animal and the ensuing sensory feedback from this activity could directly influ

161 , which is a prerequisite to the notion that sensory feedback from twitches not only activates sensor

162 oduce twitching as well as those that convey sensory feedback from twitching limbs to the spinal cord

163 ms that produce twitching, and the role that sensory feedback from twitching plays in sensorimotor sy

164 Multimodal sensory feedback from upper-limb prostheses can increase

165 t 55% of barrel activity was attributable to sensory feedback from whisker movements.

166 patterns reflected an optimal reweighting of sensory feedback gains to minimize postural instability.

167 bility and clinical relevance of intraneural sensory feedback have not yet been clearly demonstrated.

168 which learn their vocal motor behavior using sensory feedback, have specialized a portion of their co

169 additional influences present in vivo (e.g., sensory feedback, hormonal modulation) could alter the m

170 coherence between decoded motor commands and sensory feedback in a tetraplegic individual using a bra

171 lds, with applications to the restoration of sensory feedback in brain-computer interfaces and the co

172 ion regimes, and the role of supraspinal and sensory feedback in different locomotor behaviors, inclu

173 In this paper, we evaluate the role of sensory feedback in intersegmental coordination using bo

174 nervous system processes multiple sources of sensory feedback in such short time intervals, given tha

175 The role of sensory feedback in the activation and organization of s

176 s into the interplay of central networks and sensory feedback in this model organism.

177 Previous approaches to reestablish sensory feedback include tactile, electrical, and periph

178 moved through a virtual environment without sensory feedback, indicating that theta oscillations hav

179 expectation based on object size and actual sensory feedback influences heaviness perception.

180 In turn, this sensory feedback influences subsequent behaviour, raisin

181 How exactly sensory feedback influences the activity of the CPGs to

182 The central nervous system uses sensory feedback information during movement to detect a

183 results from an effective interplay between sensory feedbacks integration and muscle modulation and

184 he underlying mechanism that transforms this sensory feedback into a dynamic body percept remains poo

185 They also successfully integrated the sensory feedback into their motor control strategies whi

186 Lack of sensory feedback is a major obstacle in the rapid absorp

187 Sensory feedback is a ubiquitous feature of guidance sys

188 etween a motor command and the corresponding sensory feedback is context-dependent, the response must

189 Sensory feedback is crucial for learning and performing

190 Adaptation to delays between actions and sensory feedback is important for efficiently interactin

191 Both the degree to which sensory feedback is integrated into an ongoing movement

192 comparison between the predicted and actual sensory feedback is made, and information about unpredic

193 ntegrator hypothesis, except that additional sensory feedback is needed, from proprioceptors in the n

194 The first problem is that sensory feedback is noisy and delayed, which can make mo

195 lay an important role in extinction, corneal sensory feedback is not necessary.

196 Sensory feedback is not required for the CPGs to generat

197 w each of these topics and suggest that when sensory feedback is reliable, it is used to adapt the mo

198 When sensory feedback is unreliable, subjects adapt the stiff

199 eep) of rehearsed motor output and predicted sensory feedback is used to adaptively shape motor outpu

200 Sensory feedback is, however, required to modify or coor

201 n error arising from the absence of expected sensory feedback, is that the magnitude of the error is

202 ic signals to fine-tune cardiac control, and sensory feedback loops regulate autonomic transmission i

203 parately through processes involving ongoing sensory feedback loops.

204 nly gated in conditions where proprioceptive sensory feedback matched the motor-based expectation.

205 Sensory feedback may also increase task-irrelevant varia

206 of urinary retention and incontinence where sensory feedback may engage these reflexes inappropriate

207 telligently to their surroundings, compliant sensory feedback mechanisms are needed.

208 We speculate that sensory feedback might adapt recruitment of muscle syner

209 ossibilities include prosthetic control with sensory feedback, monitors, and stimulation signals rela

210 metric is sensitive to the contributions of sensory feedback, motor control, and task performance st

211 This sensory feedback needs to be selectively modulated in a

212 t is neither directly available from passive sensory feedback nor compatible with outgoing motor comm

213 the role of the cerebellum in predicting the sensory feedback of our movements and in attenuating the

214 proprioceptive sensation from the action and sensory feedback of the action (inter-sensory component)

215 ration of sympathetic responses and afferent sensory feedback of visceral state via the spinal cord.

216 ile locomotion requires animals to integrate sensory feedback, often from multiple sources.

217 tive in further characterizing the impact of sensory feedback on motor control in healthy and sensory

218 ol is studied in populations, the effects of sensory feedback on variability must also be understood

219 scillating state-machine regime and requires sensory feedback or external inputs for phase transition

220 commands, known as corollary discharge (CD), sensory feedback, or some combination of both.

221 ures of the proprioceptive and exteroceptive sensory feedback pathways animals rely on for controllin

222 central motor command by opening or closing sensory feedback pathways.

223 Despite the key role urethral sensory feedback plays in regulation of the lower urinar

224 In contrast, hearing sensory feedback produced by the bird's partner decrease

225 dual differences in motor neuronal activity, sensory feedback provides each subject access to a commo

226 of the impaired movement in conjunction with sensory feedback provision are suggested as promising re

227 High levels of skeletal muscle sensory feedback related to peripheral fatigue developme

228 ctrical stimulation of peripheral nerves for sensory feedback restoration can greatly benefit from co

229 High levels of muscle sensory feedback restrict motor unit activation and limi

230 evidence that primary motor cortex processes sensory feedback, sensorimotor conflicts and subjective

231 challenges to breathing, such as changes in sensory feedback, sighing, and gasping.

232 ach can be used to provide a rich artificial sensory feedback signal, suggesting a new strategy for r

233 Sensory feedback signals recorded from peripheral nerves

234 expenditure are privy to continuous visceral sensory feedback signals that presumably modulate appeti

235 Network activities and sensory feedback signals to the network exhibited rotati

236 ained by a postural system that is driven by sensory feedback signals.

237 based on the integration of feedforward and sensory feedback signals.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The defe

238 ant's ability to combine and engage with the sensory feedback significantly differed between the two

239 Furthermore, the systematic removal of three sensory feedback streams (auditory, proprioceptive, and

240 In this study, we test an artificial sensory feedback system providing joint speed informatio

241 mb, we would always be a step behind because sensory feedback takes time: for the execution of rapid

242 Animals use a form of sensory feedback termed proprioception to monitor their

243 and highlight some of the key principles of sensory feedback that are shared across the animal kingd

244 the neural state of S1, preparing it for the sensory feedback that arises during action.

245 ith other receptors, they provide continuous sensory feedback that informs the execution of fine manu

246 Our movements result in predictable sensory feedback that is often multimodal.

247 Movement and posture depend on sensory feedback that is regulated by specialized GABAer

248 act motor circuit and identified a defect in sensory feedback that likely accounts for the altered mo

249 first stage of vibrissa scanning control via sensory feedback that provides reflexive protraction in

250 ation is not tied to the exact nature of the sensory feedback that results from movement.

251 ivity of the newborn hippocampus arises from sensory feedback that sequentially activates the neocort

252 nexpected, adjustment of lick position or to sensory feedback that varied with task condition.

253 s because of the complex flight dynamics and sensory feedback that would be required to perform such

254 Is sensory feedback the mechanism for reducing individualit

255 ing motor commands and associated vestibular sensory feedback, the direction of vestibular-evoked ank

256 w that by incorporating such state-dependent sensory feedback, the optimal solution incorporates acti

257 Although known to rely on proprioceptive sensory feedback, the underlying mechanism that transfor

258 vasive technologies for conveying artificial sensory feedback through bionic hands, and evaluate the

259 Sensory feedback through spinal circuitries is integrate

260 he subject's goal, potentially strengthening sensory feedback to allow more fluent control.

261 hese movements are completed too quickly for sensory feedback to be useful.

262 mixed cation (PIEZO and TRP) channels encode sensory feedback to central control circuits.

263 otein O-mannosylation is required for normal sensory feedback to control coordinated muscle contracti

264 The brain uses sensory feedback to correct behavioral errors.

265 ircuitries effectively integrating immediate sensory feedback to efferent pathways controlling muscle

266 Animals rely on sensory feedback to generate accurate, reliable movement

267 Neural circuits coordinate with muscles and sensory feedback to generate motor behaviors appropriate

268 ain's ability to use pre-motor variation and sensory feedback to guide behavior toward a specific tar

269 ontrols, suggesting an increased reliance on sensory feedback to guide speech articulation in this po

270 During skill learning, the brain relies on sensory feedback to improve motor performance.

271 depends upon stabilization reflexes that use sensory feedback to maintain trajectories and orientatio

272 target that is updated in real-time based on sensory feedback to maintain upright balance, while the

273 y cutaneous stimulation actually facilitates sensory feedback to motor neurons in rodents and humans.

274 el of identified motor neurons, we show that sensory feedback to motor program components highly corr

275 output, then, would it be possible to match sensory feedback to movements based on temporal coherenc

276 o establish the contribution of hip-mediated sensory feedback to spinal interneuronal circuits during

277 rd-sized robot with an active tail that used sensory feedback to stabilize pitch as it drove off a ra

278 when a new behavior changes the spinal cord, sensory feedback to the brain guides further change that

279 erators." The contribution of proprioceptive sensory feedback to the coordination of locomotor activi

280 gesting that the twitches themselves provide sensory feedback to the infant hippocampus, as occurs in

281 on, and peristaltic contraction by providing sensory feedback to the locomotor CPG circuit in larvae.

282 the chordotonal organs (chos), in providing sensory feedback to the locomotor CPG circuit with dias

283 to skin, to provide a pathway for cutaneous sensory feedback to the missing hand.

284 ing the RORbeta orphan nuclear receptor gate sensory feedback to the spinal motor system during walki

285 er limb prostheses is limited by the lack of sensory feedback to the user.

286 etween discrete positions and do not provide sensory feedback to the user.

287 dly depressing reflex that provides positive sensory feedback to the vibrissa musculature during simu

288 ee behavior and experimental manipulation of sensory feedback, to study learning of active sensing st

289 rrors and when the direction of movement and sensory feedback trajectories were decoupled.

290 sential component of the selective tuning of sensory feedback used to ensure well-coordinated and ski

291 ajority, with abnormal postural control when sensory feedback was limited (SOTABN).

292 a water maze in which the only task-relevant sensory feedback was provided by intracortical microstim

293 e take into account such state-dependency in sensory feedback we asked people to make movements in wh

294 we show that a simple form of proprioceptive sensory feedback, wherein local muscle activation is fun

295 In slower forms of locomotion, however, sensory feedback, which originates from sensory organs t

296 rs in the digits of a prosthesis to generate sensory feedback, which was then used by the subjects wh

297 tor aspects of postural control, with normal sensory feedback, while the SOT equilibrium scores measu

298 Although integration of sensory feedback with internal motor programs is importa

299 ough Av may function to integrate multimodal sensory feedback with vocal-learning circuitry and coord

300 e manipulation of neural circuits processing sensory feedback within the mammalian CNS.