コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 bular carcinoma, 1 invasive papilloma, and 4 sentinel lymph nodes).
2 ected by immunohistochemical analysis of the sentinel lymph node.
3 tastatic disease correctly identified in the sentinel lymph node.
4 ve nodes, 36 of whom had at least one mapped sentinel lymph node.
5 ients had successful mapping of at least one sentinel lymph node.
6 hese, 72 (79%) had metastases in the hottest sentinel lymph node.
7 malignancy, and it is useful in identifying sentinel lymph nodes.
8 Ninety-one patients (19%) had positive sentinel lymph nodes.
9 ts and 19 of 91 patients (21%) with positive sentinel lymph nodes.
10 (IQR 4.1-8.0) for the patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes.
11 Micrometastasis was detected in 1 of 5 sentinel lymph nodes.
12 atic system to these intramammary in-transit sentinel lymph nodes.
13 iposomes specific for lymph vessels from the sentinel lymph nodes.
14 gene expression in metastatic lesions within sentinel lymph nodes.
15 nificance of colon cancer micrometastasis in sentinel lymph nodes.
16 decreased VEGF-A would limit angiogenesis in sentinel lymph nodes.
17 he promotion of cancer metastasis beyond the sentinel lymph nodes.
18 rs that mediate their efficient transport to sentinel lymph nodes.
19 a was established, TIDC did not migrate into sentinel lymph nodes.
20 chnique's potential beyond merely localizing sentinel lymph nodes.
21 lap in tumor-involved relative to tumor-free sentinel lymph nodes.
23 B7-H3 expression was highly correlated to sentinel lymph node and overall number of lymph nodes wi
24 rtant role in promoting cancer metastasis to sentinel lymph nodes and beyond and also promotes organ
26 isolated tumor cells and micrometastases) in sentinel lymph nodes and bone marrow micrometastases (BM
27 oma metastases in the hottest and nonhottest sentinel lymph nodes and factors that correlate with dis
28 atric patients more frequently have positive sentinel lymph nodes and increased tumor thickness, yet
29 mors with RhoA knockdown efficiently invaded sentinel lymph nodes and significantly metastasized to l
30 ignalling in the tumour microenvironment and sentinel lymph node, and convert immunosuppressive tumou
32 The primary endpoint, sensitivity of the sentinel-lymph-node-based detection of metastatic diseas
33 h nodes, 11% developed metastases beyond the sentinel lymph node basin and 3.4% recurred in the basin
34 ammation; the results clearly identified the sentinel lymph node basin and delineated the lymphatic d
37 change in approach to patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsies has increased the complexit
39 ial mastectomy (PM), partial mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy (PM SLNB), laparoscopic chole
41 y lymph node assessment (ALNA) consisting of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone if sentinel lymp
42 oups according to axillary surgery approach: sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone, SLNB+RLNR, axil
43 that disconcerting lymphedema rates in both sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph nod
45 oscintigraphy is standardly performed before sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancer.
49 evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) frozen section (FS) ex
51 after identification of nodal metastases by sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been questioned.
52 iate clinical setting for the application of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the management of c
55 ent as clinically localized T1 melanoma, yet sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is controversial in th
58 500, and 800 sec/mm(2)), followed by either sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or axillary lymph node
59 ing regional lymph node evaluation by either sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) or complete lymph node
60 ociated with lower- and higher-than-expected sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) positivity rates and w
62 l recurrence rates of patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using radiocolloid gui
64 surgical axillary evaluation, categorized as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), axillary lymph node d
65 ospective pediatric melanoma database, using sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), from 1992 to 2006, id
66 Several less invasive procedures, such as sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), marking axillary lymp
67 negative biopsy results underwent subsequent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), which yielded negativ
70 neoadjuvant chemotherapy could safely permit sentinel lymph node biopsy alone when the index node has
72 been done to select appropriate patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy based on multiple prognostic
77 of the studies in the past 2 years regarding sentinel lymph node biopsy have been concerned with iden
79 review suggested that these new methods for sentinel lymph node biopsy have clinical potential but g
81 d in the decision about whether to perform a sentinel lymph node biopsy in 16% of patients (67 of 420
82 ce for the efficacy of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in predicting prognosis, redu
88 t findings, it seems reasonable to recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy or at least strict regional l
89 Therefore, it may be reasonable to consider sentinel lymph node biopsy or close nodal surveillance a
90 It may therefore be reasonable to consider a sentinel lymph node biopsy or strict regional lymph node
91 Results Exercise and physical activity and sentinel lymph node biopsy reduce risk, and overweight a
93 ecurrence of melanoma (16%) after a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy result was similar to that in
95 ematic review to assess three techniques for sentinel lymph node biopsy that are not radioisotope dep
103 inically and radiologically normal axilla is sentinel lymph node biopsy with a radioisotope and blue
105 underwent intraoperative lymphatic mapping, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and inguinal femoral lymphad
106 left shoulder underwent wide local excision, sentinel lymph node biopsy, and lymph node dissection.
107 al hernia repair, partial mastectomy without sentinel lymph node biopsy, and partial mastectomy with
108 ry nodal burden, deselection of patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy, and provision of radiotherap
109 ng the appropriate selection of patients for sentinel lymph node biopsy, especially among patients wi
110 ographic characteristics, trends in usage of sentinel lymph node biopsy, rates of local and distant r
119 ngoing clinical trials will evaluate whether sentinel-lymph-node biopsy can be avoided altogether in
120 section for staging has now been replaced by sentinel-lymph-node biopsy for patients with clinically
123 andomly assigned women with breast cancer to sentinel-lymph-node biopsy plus axillary dissection or s
125 not only the indications and techniques for sentinel-lymph-node biopsy, but also lymph-node sampling
127 n was assessed in primary tumors and matched sentinel lymph nodes by a quantitative real-time PCR ass
129 proved survival for patients with a positive sentinel lymph node compared with patients with clinical
131 no palpable axillary adenopathy, and 1 or 2 sentinel lymph nodes containing metastases, 10-year over
133 s with tumor present, but not in the hottest sentinel lymph node, counts ranged from 26% to 97% of th
134 existing nonratiometric protease sensors and sentinel lymph node detection methods, which give no inf
137 s treated with breast-conserving therapy and sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) alone without axil
139 ed axillary dissection (TAD), which includes sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) and selective loca
142 r overall survival for patients treated with sentinel lymph node dissection alone was noninferior to
143 ds from all patients who underwent selective sentinel lymph node dissection at the UCSF Melanoma Cent
145 aining both the ear and upper extremity, and sentinel lymph nodes draining different anatomic locatio
146 pecific fluorescent probe (MFP) to visualize sentinel lymph nodes during surgery, highlighting abnorm
147 duces expansion of lymphatic networks within sentinel lymph nodes, even before the onset of metastasi
149 actice gap exists in the surgical removal of sentinel lymph nodes, from removal of only the most radi
151 patients regarding the appropriate use of a sentinel lymph node identification and sampling procedur
152 hesia, is a safe and effective technique for sentinel lymph node identification in breast cancer pati
157 ence and outcomes of intramammary in-transit sentinel lymph nodes (IMSLN) from primary malignant mela
159 Many of the published controversies about sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer can be resolved by
163 e intraoperative visualization of tumors and sentinel lymph nodes in real-time without disrupting nor
166 d for detection and targeted excision of the sentinel lymph node is preoperative lymphoscintigraphy w
168 number of melanocytes at both the proximal (sentinel) lymph node (LN) and the distal LN from the inj
169 In cancer patients, visual identification of sentinel lymph nodes (LNs) is achieved by the injection
170 In cancer patients, metastasis of tumors to sentinel lymph nodes (LNs) predicts disease progression
171 ver, overexpression of Adm in tumors induced sentinel lymph node lymphangiogenesis and led to an incr
173 examples of their applications ranging from sentinel lymph node mapping and tumor imaging to long-te
175 junct use of NIRF-ICG for (a) intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping for cancer staging, (b) vide
176 se of the GAINS to guide tumor resection and sentinel lymph node mapping promises to improve surgical
177 aspiration from the iliac crests and in vivo sentinel lymph node mapping were performed during open s
179 D conjugates have been used successfully for sentinel lymph node mapping, tumor targeting, tumor angi
180 sensitivity and negative predictive value of sentinel-lymph-node mapping compared with the gold stand
181 cervical injection of indocyanine green and sentinel-lymph-node mapping followed by pelvic lymphaden
183 s with node-positive disease with successful sentinel-lymph-node mapping who had metastatic disease c
185 gate how the presence of neoplastic cells in sentinel lymph nodes may trigger pathways associated wit
186 FAM-labeled UNO (FAM-UNO) homed to tumor and sentinel lymph node MEMs in different cancer models: 4T1
187 he 10-year overall survival of patients with sentinel lymph node metastases treated with breast-conse
188 but enables the direct PET visualization of sentinel lymph node metastases, eliminating the need for
189 sentinel lymph node, presence or absence of sentinel lymph node metastases, primary tumor characteri
193 3, 2.2-cm invasive ductal carcinoma that is sentinel lymph node negative, estrogen receptor positive
195 Nodal metastases were identified in the sentinel lymph nodes of 35 (97%) of these 36 patients, y
199 gh ALND may be safely avoided in a subset of sentinel lymph node positive, Z0011-eligible patients, o
201 I melanoma, either via clinical detection or sentinel lymph node positivity, were eligible for enroll
203 odes removed, technetium-99m counts for each sentinel lymph node, presence or absence of sentinel lym
204 cans decreased by an average of 36%, whereas sentinel lymph-node procedures decreased by 45%, lung sc
205 r lymphatics-mediated melanoma metastasis to sentinel lymph node prompted by tumor-derived epidermal
209 cutive patients with cutaneous melanoma with sentinel lymph nodes resected from January 5, 2004, to J
211 istopathology following surgical excision of sentinel lymph node(s), which is an invasive, time consu
214 include: noninvasive imaging of the breast, sentinel lymph nodes, skin, thyroid, eye, prostate (tran
217 an 20% of patients with melanoma who undergo sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy based on American Socie
222 uideline on the use of lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in staging patients wit
223 To address this potential overtreatment, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is currently being eval
225 e recent advancements and refinements of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy technique in breast can
228 There is no consensus regarding the need for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy when regression is pres
229 utine examination of draining lymph nodes by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy, the most important pre
232 lymphoscintigraphy on overall and bilateral sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in cervical cancer p
233 tivariate analysis, patients with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) had significantly reduced mela
235 ard of care for patients with a positive (+) sentinel lymph node (SLN) is axillary dissection; howeve
236 rovide convenient and accurate targeting for sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping during robotic-assiste
239 outcomes of patients with melanoma who have sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases can be highly varia
242 odds ratios-to calculate the probability of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis for a specific pati
243 nal study to determine factors predictive of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in thin melanoma.
247 of presence or absence of various factors on sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis was assessed using
248 s from 65 patients undergoing resection with sentinel lymph node (SLN) or level I and II ALN dissecti
250 ported a 12.6% false-negative rate (FNR) for sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery after neoadjuvant chem
251 ed a false-negative rate (FNR) of 12.6% with sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery after neoadjuvant chem
253 scopic surgery, the accuracy of the isotopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) technique correlated with hype
259 se of the B-32 trial is to establish whether sentinel-lymph-node (SLN) resection can achieve the same
262 detect the fluorescent signal emanating from sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) approximately 2 d after inje
263 0 or T2N0 breast cancer with 1 or 2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are recommended to undergo a
264 for the selective assessment of nonenlarged sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) for diagnosing metastases in
265 atients with breast cancer metastasis to the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) generally undergo completion
266 h cT1-2N0 breast cancers and 1 to 2 involved sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) having breast-conserving the
267 ratins (CK) is common practice in evaluating sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast carc
268 etastases (clip-containing nodes) as well as sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) may provide more accurate as
269 gional recurrence for patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) randomized either to axillar
270 f sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone if sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were negative, SLNB with axi
271 rall survival between patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) who did and did not undergo
272 with breast cancer with one to two positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) who undergo lumpectomy, radi
274 SLNB correlates with the number of resected sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), our primary end point was t
276 termine whether lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) for sentinel lymph node (SNL) mapping in a woman with a brea
280 , a prospective, multicenter study assessing sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemothera
284 Once the metastatic cells arrived at the sentinel lymph nodes, the extent of lymphangiogenesis at
286 portance, in mice with metastasis-containing sentinel lymph nodes, tumors that expressed VEGF-C were
288 acity to delineate metastases and to map the sentinel lymph nodes via tandem PET-computed tomography
292 Patients who had mapping of at least one sentinel lymph node were included in the primary analysi
294 d from patients with pathologically negative sentinel lymph nodes were centrally evaluated for occult
298 method on an open-source dataset of WSI from sentinel lymph nodes with breast cancer metastases, CAME
299 e operative protocol led to resection of all sentinel lymph nodes with radioactivity greater than 10%