ライフサイエンスコーパス: sequence comparison

1 e homologs could not be identified by direct sequence comparison.

2 to be missed or mis-aligned by conventional sequence comparison.

3 ndard algorithmic technique for rapid genome sequence comparison.

4 anoxic core viromes using reciprocal BLASTn sequence comparison.

5 d sequences by an exhaustive all-against-all sequence comparison.

6 orithms for orthology detection are based on sequence comparison.

7 rd 'blast' as a verb referring to biological sequence comparison.

8 ce information contributing to selection for sequence comparison.

9 in ways that can be documented by molecular sequence comparison.

10 n placed into different subfamilies based on sequence comparison.

11 ), for efficient and accurate alignment-free sequence comparison.

12 100 and 87% of the base pairs determined by sequence comparison.

13 of mapping in near isogenic lines (NILs) and sequence comparison.

14 tions to other modeling methods that rely on sequence comparison.

15 r of pattern-based matches in alignment-free sequence comparison.

16 t alternative for measuring approximation in sequence comparison.

17 computational biology require alignment-free sequence comparisons.

18 za strains more accurately than evolutionary sequence comparisons.

19 ification guidelines that incorporate genome sequence comparisons.

20 record of variation and divergence read from sequence comparisons.

21 tallography, NMR, mutational experiments and sequence comparisons.

22 strate-binding surface that we identified by sequence comparisons.

23 elationship that had been predicted based on sequence comparisons.

24 ave functions that can be predicted based on sequence comparisons.

25 e merits of evolutionarily close and distant sequence comparisons.

26 different protein pair than that favored by sequence comparisons.

27 ls and cellular pathways, as well as through sequence comparisons.

28 tency, a novel scoring function for multiple sequence comparisons.

29 ence distance metrics, sequence searches and sequence comparisons across multiple Illumina data sets.

30 Sequence comparisons across phyla and myosin 2 isoforms

31 Sequence comparisons across the angiosperm lineage provi

32 ate newly sequenced organisms, cross-species sequence comparison algorithms can be applied to align g

33 us sequences beyond the accuracy obtained by sequence comparison alone (TurboFold II).

34 of the genome that cannot be discerned from sequence comparisons alone.

35 esented a great challenge to alignment-based sequence comparison among different virus families.

36 s and proteins are largely unavailable, thus sequence comparison among homologous genes in present-da

37 Protein sequence comparison among zebrafish GPR81s, mammalian GP

38 DNA sequence comparisons among closely related species allow

39 In sequence comparisons among more than 580 influenza A str

40 Sequence comparisons among species combined with domain-

41 Our structure along with sequence comparisons among SRA1p orthologs and against a

42 Sequence comparison analysis revealed that the six paral

43 Furthermore, sequence comparison and additional amino acid substituti

44 originate from conventional models of single sequence comparison and captures essential features of p

45 DNA sequence comparison and chemical analysis of the cell wa

46 mes faster than methods based on the popular sequence comparison and database search tools, such as B

47 ics, however, usually only apply to pairwise sequence comparison and do not examine clusters as a who

48 Sequence comparison and phylogenetic analysis between Cy

49 Sequence comparison and phylogenetic analysis showed tha

50 Interestingly, amino acid sequence comparison and phylogenetic tree construction c

51 ethods to map DNA sequence to feature space, sequence comparison and prediction models.

52 er genome, and it is not clear a priori from sequence comparison and similarity which one preserves t

53 Using sequence comparison and site-directed mutagenesis, we pe

54 Sequence comparison and structural homology modeling of

55 Sequence comparison and structural modeling revealed tha

56 Sequence comparison and structure prediction suggest tha

57 Sequence comparison and surface exposure calculations id

58 Through sequence comparison and the analysis of mutants and chim

59 Sequence comparison and widely conserved microsynteny su

60 functional annotation workflow that combines sequence comparisons and conserved domain searching, whi

61 differences between the PFM and traditional sequence comparisons and discuss the informatic basis fo

62 Importantly, our protein sequence comparisons and domain swap experiments support

63 been identified in the rat renin promoter by sequence comparisons and electrophoretic mobility shift

64 xanthus lspA (lspA(Mx)) genes, we conducted sequence comparisons and found that they contained nearl

65 Based on primary sequence comparisons and genomic context, Npun_F4153 (Si

66 Sequence comparisons and homology modeling of the struct

67 Based on structure-sequence comparisons and modeling, a two-stage mechanism

68 Sequence comparisons and molecular modelling studies wer

69 e combined novel coloration analyses, coding sequence comparisons and mRNA expression level studies t

70 Our sequence comparisons and mutational analyses showed that

71 ta, multiple-genome alignments, pre-computed sequence comparisons and other specialized analysis trac

72 Sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analyses were perf

73 Sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analysis suggest t

74 Sequence comparisons and protein modeling suggest that a

75 e resistin family is not observed in primary sequence comparisons and strongly suggests a distant evo

76 can be predicted at some glycosites based on sequence comparisons and three-dimensional structural an

77 Primary sequence comparisons and x-ray structural analyses of tw

78 lts highlight the practical utility of close sequence comparisons, and the loss of sensitivity entail

79 gh-throughput sequencing data and other bulk sequence comparison applications have motivated a search

80 Alignment-free sequence comparison approaches have been garnering incre

81 Classical notions for sequence comparison are increasingly being replaced by o

82 Cross-species sequence comparisons are a prominent method for analyzin

83 Primate genomic sequence comparisons are becoming increasingly useful fo

84 In this paper, pairwise sequence comparisons are shown to be more powerful than

85 GOS reference genomes for Ebola virus target sequence comparison as part of a composite validation st

86 Sequence comparison as well as motif prediction and muta

87 m species have been identified by amino acid sequence comparisons, as well as structural predictions

88 Results of protein sequence comparison at open criterion show a very large

89 DNA sequence comparisons at three loci suggest that this Spi

90 By sequence comparison, bacterial and eukaryotic FMNAT enzy

91 Based on primary sequence comparisons, beta subunits are predicted to be

92 Finally, sequence comparison between an enzyme that catalyzes a r

93 Sequence comparison between human and the cartilaginous

94 T cell receptor sequence comparison between patients identifies clonal c

95 Sequence comparison between resistant and susceptible P.

96 , and so the border can also be located by a sequence comparison between species.

97 This structural similarity is supported by sequence comparison between the schistosome myosin II he

98 Genomic sequence comparisons between individuals are usually res

99 Sequence comparisons between the N- and C-domains of MVL

100 of conservation, an observation supported by sequence comparisons between the St.

101 We also make genome-level and sequence comparisons between these taxa and the horsesho

102 phylogenetic incongruence in protein-coding sequence comparisons between vertebrate taxa.

103 Sequence comparisons, biochemical experiments, and studi

104 of human evolution can be inferred from DNA sequence comparisons, but this requires an accurate esti

105 te the use of a new score for alignment-free sequence comparison, called the score.

106 Our findings suggest that ungapped sequence comparisons can predict regulatory elements gen

107 We have designed a pipeline of sequence comparison, clustering and functional annotatio

108 Analogous to biological sequence comparison, comparing cellular networks is an i

109 Primary amino acid sequence comparisons demonstrate that R. sphaeroides Rpo

110 PFM sequence comparison demonstrates a statistically signifi

111 Sequence comparison demonstrates that this allele is rel

112 ate sequences, making alignment-based genome sequence comparison difficult.

113 High stringency sequence comparison (e < 1 x10(-25)) of 157 group 5L-spe

114 Sequence comparisons, employing structural insights, sug

115 Amino acid sequence comparison exhibited a 24% similarity between t

116 Structural and sequence comparisons, exploiting biological data on rela

117 ations are generated using an integration of sequence comparison, fold recognition, and grid-computin

118 lustered based on an all-versus-all pairwise sequence comparison, followed by the generation of conse

119 Sequence comparisons for this cluster across many genoty

120 Sequence comparisons found that the B2' region exhibits

121 Sequence comparisons further disclosed four Na(+),H(+)-P

122 From structure-guided sequence comparison, Glu-280 was identified as a signatu

123 Sequence comparison has indicated that CTTNBP2 N-termina

124 Alignment-free methods for sequence comparisons have become popular in many bioinfo

125 MCR-1 mechanistic studies were done with sequence comparisons, homology modelling, and electrospr

126 he pathway were identified through in silico sequence comparison, however, a functional homolog of th

127 We also report that the original sequence comparison identified five virus isolates, each

128 Sequence comparisons identified other examples of heptad

129 These studies combined with bioinformatics sequence comparison identify SBPs from five putative tra

130 Sequence comparison in a wide range of species showed th

131 s in the mutational process; however, recent sequence comparisons indicate that mutational input alon

132 Genomic and sequence comparisons indicate that the I-mf and HIC gene

133 Sequence comparisons indicate that these are likely to b

134 etabolic potential of CPR bacteria, although sequence comparisons indicate that these capacities are

135 Sequence comparisons indicate that this type of "bifunct

136 Sequence comparisons indicated that active-site residues

137 Sequence comparisons indicated that only the C-terminal

138 Sequence comparisons indicated that RFHVMn and KSHV deve

139 -CoV and porcine CoV nucleoproteins, because sequence comparisons indicated that SARS-CoV N protein h

140 Sequence comparison indicates that the virus is closely

141 ch NGS data, word-count based alignment-free sequence comparison is a promising approach, but for thi

142 Alignment-free (AF) sequence comparison is attracting persistent interest dr

143 One of the common tasks involving sequence comparison is sequence clustering.

144 Cross-species DNA sequence comparison is the primary method used to identi

145 According to sequence comparison it belongs to the low m.w. glutenin

146 Indeed, based on mitochondrial DNA sequence comparisons it was recently argued that chimpan

147 WSeqKernel, just like any alignment-based sequence comparison method, depends on a substitution ma

148 Therefore, sequence comparison methods remain essential for the det

149 However, production usage of sequence comparison methods that preprocess the database

150 a viruses based on phylogenetic analysis and sequence comparison methods.

151 equence alignments generated by conventional sequence comparison methods.

152 mance when used in the context of evaluating sequence comparison methods.

153 Analogous to sequence comparison, network comparison aims to provide

154 we have used the RNASTRUCTURE algorithm and sequence comparison of 105 enterovirus sequences to prov

155 A sequence comparison of CCR5 and CCR2b identified a diver

156 Sequence comparison of five sea urchin species reveals t

157 Through sequence comparison of hypoxia-responsive genes, COX-2 p

158 Based on the amino acid sequence comparison of mammalian and other lower vertebr

159 f orthologous groups determined by an expert sequence comparison of NAC genes from both monocots and

160 Sequence comparison of natural ACRs and engineered Cl(-)

161 A time-sequence comparison of NHANES data from 1998 through 200

162 e searching, read mapping and alignment-free sequence comparison of nucleic-acid sequences; our imple

163 Sequence comparison of nucleotide (nt) and amino acid (a

164 Sequence comparison of orthologous regions enables estim

165 Functional Domains (FDs), FD1-FD3, based on sequence comparison of PiSLF and PiSLF-like proteins, an

166 nformation, show promising results in genome sequence comparison of prokaryotes.

167 Sequence comparison of Sia-dependent and Sia-independent

168 Sequence comparison of TCRs from conventional memory T h

169 Sequence comparison of the capsular polysaccharide synth

170 A sequence comparison of the DA-C(L) and DA-D(S) genome se

171 Sequence comparison of the juxtamembrane region identifi

172 By using sequence comparison of the transmembrane domains of PAR1

173 ) variant cases were resolved by full genome sequence comparison of the variant viruses to swine infl

174 Sequence comparison of the VP7 gene of G9 strains identi

175 Sequence comparison of these 2 intermediates and iterati

176 Sequence comparison of these diverse myomixer orthologs

177 Finally, a sequence comparison of these epitopes with the hundreds

178 Sequence comparison of these two stealth family proteins

179 Sequence comparison of tumorigenic and tumor-attenuated

180 Structure and sequence comparisons of alpha, beta, and gamma clustered

181 This result, together with sequence comparisons of animal and invertebrate PMKs, su

182 es and synthetic model complexes, along with sequence comparisons of both iron- and cobalt-type NHase

183 The DNA sequence comparisons of mtDNA CR appear to be a valid me

184 To learn how well ungapped sequence comparisons of multiple species can predict cis

185 Finally, sequence comparisons of NL isoforms allow for mapping th

186 Sequence comparisons of pfkB proteins from the model pla

187 late binding in the AtIPMDH2 active site and sequence comparisons of prokaryotic and eukaryotic IPMDH

188 Sequence comparisons of segments Seg-1 to Seg-10 show th

189 d for expression was identified in silico by sequence comparisons of seven nematode species, demonstr

190 DNA sequence comparisons of the 21 H. influenzae sodC genes

191 Amino acid sequence comparisons of the CPBs made by 8 randomly sele

192 DNA sequence comparisons of the ends of CTnBST, the joined e

193 Sequence comparisons of the promoters identified a 57-ba

194 Amino acid sequence comparisons of the rice and Arabidopsis superfa

195 Structural and sequence comparisons of the two enzyme families revealed

196 unction, we performed nucleotide and protein sequence comparisons of Vps33 homologues in different sp

197 In this study we have used sequenced comparisons of the Hoxa2 locus from 12 vertebr

198 RNA sequencing comparison of VEC-null and VEC-positive cells

199 RNA sequencing comparisons of co-housed GFP-positive and GFP

200 sed and alignment-free) have been applied to sequence comparison-one of the most fundamental issues i

201 ious approaches, which are based on pairwise sequence comparisons, our method explores the correlatio

202 our Spaced Words approach to alignment-free sequence comparison, pattern sets calculated with rasbha

203 Sequence comparison predicted conserved extracellular DR

204 Such annotations are valuable for antibody sequence comparison, protein structure modelling and eng

205 rototype for a new class of inteins based on sequence comparisons, reactivity, and mechanism.

206 rgent homologous sequences for cross-species sequence comparison remains a challenge.

207 The current K-string-based protein sequence comparisons require large amounts of computer m

208 Although sequence comparisons reveal many differences between the

209 Amino acid sequence comparisons reveal that BsrDI and BtsI belong t

210 Sequence comparisons reveal that the other members of th

211 Sequence comparisons reveal that the SARAF-fold is highl

212 Sequence comparisons reveal that Vibrionaceae species po

213 tests with insertion mutants, combined with sequence comparisons, reveal functions for the products

214 Sequence comparison revealed a 2-bp insertion in the cod

215 A sequence comparison revealed an extra proline in the TM2

216 Multilocus sequence typing and whole-genome sequence comparison revealed that M16917 is a member of

217 Sequence comparison revealed that the Bph32 gene shares

218 Sequence comparison revealed the miR167 target site on I

219 In addition, structural and sequence comparisons revealed large similarity with MPs

220 Multi-species sequence comparisons revealed only a single conserved no

221 Sequence comparisons revealed that all but the mandarin

222 Sequence comparisons revealed that TE-derived human miRN

223 Sequence comparisons revealed that the analogous interfa

224 Sequence comparisons revealed the MKS1 catalytic triad,

225 Finally, sequence comparison reveals that only primate species ca

226 Gene sequence comparisons reveals very strong purifying selec

227 Based on sequence comparisons, SA12 is most closely related to BK

228 A sequence comparison search of GenBank using BLASTP revea

229 er of bacterial taxa, based on 16S rRNA-gene sequence comparison, shared between humans and dogs, two

230 However, amino acid sequence comparisons show pervasive genomic mosaicism, a

231 Sequence comparisons show that it has shed a large porti

232 Genomic and IRT sequence comparisons show that other introns have been p

233 Sequence comparisons show that proline content for bacte

234 Sequence comparison showed that both CLR proteins share

235 Sequence comparison showed that the extracellular domain

236 A subsequent sequence comparison showed that these nonhomologous alle

237 Sequence comparisons showed that 168, its siblings (122,

238 Sequence comparisons showed that aside from one clade sh

239 Sequence comparisons showed that nine of the genome segm

240 Sequence comparisons showed that some Vbetas from distan

241 Homology sequence comparisons showed the presence of the LDEVFL a

242 lographic analysis complemented by sensitive sequence comparisons shows that PriX is a diverged homol

243 The BLAST software package for sequence comparison speeds up homology search by preproc

244 Second, sequence comparisons suggest that Fv1 has been involved

245 Sequence comparisons suggest that LpxL shares distant ho

246 Sequence comparisons suggest that reappearance of HCV RN

247 Structural and sequence comparisons suggest that some eukaryotic and ba

248 Sequence comparisons suggest that the current distributi

249 Genome sequence comparisons suggest that the yydFGHIJ operon ma

250 Sequence comparisons suggested that analogous peptide se

251 Sequence comparisons suggested that the catalytic mechan

252 Sequence comparisons suggested that the protein may bind

253 Sequence comparison suggests that BluB is a member of th

254 Sequence comparison suggests that Xenopus Wnt11-R, not W

255 We also showed using whole-genome sequence comparison that C. albicans strains can persist

256 dynamic programming approach for model-free sequence comparison that incorporates high-throughput ch

257 We present a tool for DNA/DNA sequence comparison that is built on the HMMER framework

258 ined by reverse Southern analysis and direct sequence comparisons that most of the dumpy gene has evo

259 Despite sequence comparisons that predict that SET1 family enzym

260 ly introduced a physically based approach to sequence comparison, the property factor method (PFM).

261 Although eluding simple sequence comparisons, the DDBH2 domains share the only s

262 There is undeniable value in using sequence comparison to identify putative regulatory sequ

263 aditional approaches have relied on pairwise sequence comparisons to construct graphs, which were the

264 Sequence comparisons to human Kaposi's sarcoma-associate

265 Here, we use multispecies sequence comparisons to identify a common SNP (rs642961,

266 itions of recently determined structures and sequence comparisons to infer that both bacterial and sp

267 r magnetic resonance (NMR), and evolutionary sequence comparisons to map where and how the PHTH domai

268 earches were combined with iterative protein sequence comparisons to obtain a current picture of the

269 tering out redundancy and putative paralogs, sequence comparisons to orthologous groups, instead of t

270 Structural and sequence comparisons to other fungal family GH26 endoman

271 with the variation in residue type from the sequence comparison, to generate 3D templates of the cat

272 son and classification, given the arsenal of sequence comparison tools developed by computational bio

273 or poorly conserved ncRNAs than conventional sequence comparison tools.

274 framework that is complementary to existing sequence comparison tools.

275 DNA-sequence comparisons used single nucleotide variants (SN

276 ving the structure of the virus, and through sequence comparison, we clear up this taxonomic ambiguit

277 Based on an expert NAC sequence comparison, we propose forty orthologous groups

278 By inter-species sequence comparisons, we detected 27 highly conserved no

279 ghbour-joining phylogenetic trees and direct sequence comparison were used to detect the presence of

280 of sequence similarities seen by amino acid sequence comparison, which is surely an underestimate of

281 d potency trends are compatible with protein sequence comparisons, while modeled kinase binding site

282 Sequence comparison with orthologs in other plant specie

283 Furthermore, using sequence comparison with strictly coupled XylEEc and sim

284 se superfamily by a comprehensive amino acid sequence comparison with structurally authenticated memb

285 gion-encoding genes were determined by using sequence comparison with the ImMunoGeneTics database, an

286 in the RVRp22 genome based on a full-length sequence comparison with the RVRp13, VR2332, and MLV gen

287 mutants were rationally engineered based on sequence comparison with the three other P450 2B enzymes

288 Based on a sequence comparison with the wild relative Fragaria vesc

289 Sequence comparison with two enzymes of known structure

290 interactions, derived by isostericity-based sequence comparisons with 3D RNA motifs from the RNA x-r

291 proach that integrated multispecies (n = 11) sequence comparisons with algorithm-based transcription

292 Sequence comparisons with another family in the FLSF tha

293 Structure-based sequence comparisons with other AB5 toxin family members

294 Sequence comparisons with other Tec-family kinases sugge

295 This, in addition to structural and sequence comparisons with putative MenD orthologues, pro

296 annotated by identifying their homologs via sequence comparisons with reference or curated proteins.

297 Sequence comparisons with related Erynnis suggest that p

298 6 in the RVRp22 genome based on full-length sequence comparisons with RVRp13, VR2332 (the parental v

299 ur method is the MLBP feature vectors permit sequence comparisons without the need for explicit pairw

300 Structural considerations and sequence comparisons would suggest that IGFL proteins ar