ライフサイエンスコーパス: serologic test

1 osis remains challenging in the absence of a serologic test.

2 -of-care tests and discuss the basis for new serologic tests.

3 ponses to a questionnaire and the results of serologic tests.

4 We also analyzed the results of serologic tests.

5 course of the disease, diagnosis is based on serologic tests.

6 riteria, despite an increase in requests for serologic tests.

7 mplemented simple acceptability criteria for serologic tests.

8 -infected individuals undetected by standard serologic tests.

9 HIV-1 and HCV in blood earlier than standard serologic tests.

10 dardization of the present generation of IgM serologic tests.

11 l questions related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests.

12 determined by culture or subsequent standard serologic tests.

13 reactive test result by newer enzyme-linked serologic tests.

14 code proteins not included in routinely used serologic tests.

15 l questions related to the use of SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests.

16 related to gluten, but negative results from serologic tests.

17 ed celiac disease, but negative results from serologic tests.

18 0,425 adults with positive results from both serologic tests.

19 f 1.44 to increase in 1.86), or results from serologic tests.

20 mab interference with transfusion laboratory serologic tests.

21 t celiac disease symptoms, risk factors, and serologic testing.

22 ure history and positive results of MERS-CoV serologic testing.

23 ratory diagnosis of Lyme disease relies upon serologic testing.

24 a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR and serologic testing.

25 verall study results for combined RT-PCR and serologic testing.

26 reaction assay (RT-PCR), viral isolation, or serologic testing.

27 t components is an important step in allergy serologic testing.

28 erformed for each patient within 2 months of serologic testing.

29 best practice guidance related to SARS-CoV-2 serologic testing.

30 ted, and their partners were invited for HSV serologic testing.

31 al pertussis infection based upon additional serologic testing.

32 from reflex samples originally submitted for serologic testing.

33 earned that they have genital herpes through serologic testing.

34 egionella pneumophila exposure, according to serologic testing.

35 before infection in children was detected by serologic testing.

36 ed to clinical microbiology laboratories for serologic testing.

37 rase chain reaction and for coronaviruses by serologic testing.

38 complete follow-up, and 23% in each year had serologic testing.

39 595, one third of which was attributable to serologic testing.

40 ts, high-resolution computed tomography, and serologic testing.

41 n efficacy and underwent unnecessary, costly serologic testing.

42 disseminated Lyme disease underwent 2-tiered serologic testing.

43 by the stage of syphilis, for nontreponemal serologic tests?

44 of office visits, 11 and 7; median number of serologic tests, 4 and 4; and median days of antibiotic

45 At the first serologic test, 641 were HBeAg positive and 893 were ant

46 Incidence was determined by applying a serologic testing algorithm for recent HIV seroconversio

47 The serologic testing algorithm for recent human immunodefic

48 the remaining California counties using the Serologic Testing Algorithm for Recent Seroconversion (S

49 Novel serologic tests allowed for the detection of otherwise u

50 Combining the BAT with routine serologic testing allows classification of patients with

51 Serologic testing also revealed possible cases of Lyme b

52 ion in the United States by conducting HHV-8 serologic testing among participants of the Transfusion-

53 proach that involves biliary cytology, FISH, serologic testing and advanced imaging techniques when C

54 these 14, only 5 (35.7%) sought appropriate serologic testing and counseling for active immunization

55 We review aspects of both molecular and serologic testing and discuss the logistical challenges

56 cross-sectional study was undertaken of EBV serologic testing and histories of IM and sexual behavio

57 y limited data on risk in the current era of serologic testing and human leukocytes antigen typing to

58 ocused systemic medical evaluation including serologic testing and imaging studies.

59 plantation have replaced, for the most part, serologic testing and in vitro cultures for the diagnosi

60 Genotyping is a powerful adjunct to serologic testing and is superior for typing transfused

61 s with positive results of M. pneumoniae IgM serologic testing and no alternative diagnosis were cons

62 cellent correlation between contemporary EBV serologic testing and the BioPlex 2200 system.

63 amined rates and factors associated with HBV serologic testing and vaccination rates in adults infect

64 ia should be used to determine when to order serologic testing and when the results of such testing s

65 Eighty-two (51.3%) children underwent either serologic testing and/or esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

66 The children underwent serologic tests and clinical analyses every 6 months and

67 The added value of serologic tests and inflammatory markers in clinical ass

68 New serologic tests and molecular techniques are being added

69 lthough the application of a large number of serologic tests and more stringent donor questioning has

70 ronic relapsing brucellosis as determined by serologic tests and the patient's clinical picture.

71 use in future research or as an antigen for serologic tests and vaccines, the extent of structural c

72 tified 671 MSM with available results of HCV serologic tests and with an HIV genotypic resistance tes

73 iagnostic evaluation (including cultures and serologic tests), and analysis of lymph node tissue.

74 re tested; 100 (20.4%) reacted on at least 1 serologic test, and 65 (13%) were determined to be posit

75 correlated with results from viral culture, serologic testing, and immune markers.

76 Mice were assayed for infection by culture, serologic testing, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) a

77 visits, number of physicians seen, types of serologic tests, and days of antibiotic treatment; 2) oc

78 b. microti polymerase-chain-reaction assays, serologic tests, and questionnaires.

79 of the most sensitive and specific screening serologic tests (anti- tissue transglutaminase antibodie

80 s were systematically collected for culture, serologic testing, antigen detection, and molecular diag

81 A number of serologic tests are available commercially for identifyi

82 BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Serologic tests are essential for an accurate diagnosis

83 Mainstay serologic tests are insensitive during the acute phase o

84 inical performance and utility of SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests are rapidly emerging.

85 gnosis relies on intestinal biopsy findings, serologic tests are useful as screening tools and as an

86 ptional baseline and end-of-study SARS-CoV-2 serologic testing), as well as all household contacts of

87 f class I than single-mutant cells, based on serologic tests, as well as a significantly diminished s

88 Polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) and serologic testing at the Centers for Disease Control and

89 discuss the diagnostic use and potential of serologic tests based on detection of antibodies to MTB

90 Serologic tests based on this antigen will identify peop

91 We propose that serologic tests based on VMPs are of additional value in

92 for Lyme disease with standardized 2-tiered serologic testing between 2005 and 2010 at a single hosp

93 nificant variance in the frequency of celiac serologic testing between providers.

94 e detection of intracellular morulae) and on serologic tests, both of which have recognized limitatio

95 These serologic tests cannot distinguish active infection, pas

96 Serologic testing, contact-tracing, and next-generation

97 2 to 1995, 17 laboratories performed 100,000 serologic tests costing $7.1 million on Maryland residen

98 collected to perform rapid diagnostic tests, serologic tests, culture, and molecular tests for potent

99 hepatitis C, and biochemical blood tests and serologic tests currently have only modest value in pred

100 antibody test-positive histories on approved serologic tests, demonstrating that RT-nPCR was probably

101 Serologic tests developed in the last decade provide a n

102 Serologic tests developed in the past decade provide a n

103 e relatives from Group II that underwent new serologic testing disclosed eight sero-converted subject

104 Although serologic testing does not provide information on the in

105 t on the understanding and interpretation of serologic testing during pregnancy and the perinatal per

106 For surveillance, the need for serologic tests emerged.

107 ructs elicit antibodies detected by standard serologic tests (enzyme immunoassays, rapid tests, and W

108 he sensitivity and specificity of commercial serologic tests (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELIS

109 No validated serologic test exists, and current serologic assays have

110 A serologic test for antibodies to chlamydia may be a usef

111 tart empirical IBS treatment and (2) perform serologic test for CS followed by endoscopic biopsy for

112 mmercially available microimmunofluorescence serologic test for the detection of Chlamydophila pneumo

113 iduals with a negative result from the first serologic test for tTGA had a positive result from the s

114 Although the availability of a commercial serologic test for ZIKV has greatly expanded the nationa

115 There is no evidence to support serologic testing for anti-HBs in this context.

116 Serologic testing for antibodies to H. pylori remains th

117 Serologic testing for B. miyamotoi was performed using a

118 d biopsy results with results for concurrent serologic testing for celiac autoantibodies.

119 t, C-reactive protein or fecal calprotectin, serologic testing for celiac disease, and age-appropriat

120 Serologic testing for chronic parasitic infections is of

121 ithout optic nerve enhancement should prompt serologic testing for CRMP5 IgG to expedite vision-spari

122 their first-degree family members underwent serologic testing for different autoantibodies.

123 re collected through personal interviews and serologic testing for H. pylori antibodies.

124 % took antiretroviral prophylaxis, 23.8% had serologic testing for hepatitis B and 43.1% for hepatiti

125 PSTF previously found adequate evidence that serologic testing for hepatitis B surface antigen accura

126 Recent reports have indicated that serologic testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patient

127 Serologic testing for HEV infection should be performed,

128 years of age were interviewed and underwent serologic testing for HIV and HSV-2.

129 Serious limitations of these data are that serologic testing for HTLV has a high false positive rat

130 The diagnosis was established by serologic testing for IgM and IgG antibodies to La Cross

131 Despite almost universal use in this study, serologic testing for LD did not appear to influence tre

132 Serologic testing for LD was performed for 36 patients (

133 ents seen for tick bites, 95 (67%) underwent serologic testing for LD.

134 Because clinicians routinely order serologic testing for Legionella pneumophila serogroups

135 e attempted to clarify the clinical value of serologic testing for Lyme disease using the results of

136 ether or not they had undergone coccidioidal serologic testing for screening or diagnostic purposes.

137 The role of serologic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome

138 To discuss recent advances in serologic testing for systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associate

139 Newer diagnostic tools, including serologic tests for antibodies against tissue transgluta

140 We describe a recombinant antigen for use in serologic tests for antibodies to Kaposi's sarcoma (KS)-

141 atients did not significantly cross-react in serologic tests for Borrelia burgdorferi.

142 etermined the sensitivity and specificity of serologic tests for CD.

143 ected enteropathy, but negative results from serologic tests for celiac disease (seronegative enterop

144 Only 2 studies of serologic tests for celiac disease involving 62 and 158

145 tein, fecal lactoferrin, fecal calprotectin, serologic tests for celiac disease, tests for bile acid

146 c disease; studies on diagnostic accuracy of serologic tests for celiac disease.

147 S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention serologic tests for detection of anti-MERS-CoV antibodie

148 Here, we evaluated four high-throughput serologic tests for detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG ant

149 precedented influx of commercially available serologic tests for detection of antibodies against SARS

150 Results of serologic tests for heparin-induced antibodies were posi

151 Serologic tests for hepatitis A, B, and C viruses were n

152 There was insufficient evidence to recommend serologic tests for irritable bowel syndrome at this tim

153 The positive predictive value of the serologic tests for Kaposi's sarcoma was 82 percent, and

154 To ascertain use of serologic tests for Lyme disease (LD) in Maryland, all l

155 rols may minimize false-positive results for serologic tests for Lyme disease, and these tests must b

156 chemiluminescence) are probably superior to serologic tests for predicting hemolytic disease of the

157 rlor in Bangkok, Thailand, were interviewed; serologic tests for sexually transmitted infections were

158 High-titer serologic tests for syphilis are uncommon, and prozone r

159 es were low; the use of glycoprotein G-based serologic tests for the measurement of HSV-1 and HSV-2 a

160 utcomes of adults with positive results from serologic tests for tissue transglutaminase antibodies (

161 se is characterized by positive results from serologic tests for tissue transglutaminase antibodies (

162 we present our initial experiences with ZIKV serologic testing from a national reference laboratory p

163 a second stage of the study and undergo new serologic testing (Group II).

164 disease (identified by positive results from serologic tests) had lower mean levels of vitamin B-12 a

165 In addition to suggestive symptoms, serologic testing has high diagnostic reliability and bi

166 Manual treponemal and nontreponemal serologic testing has historically been used for the dia

167 piratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic testing has rapidly increased.

168 Campylobacter jejuni infection, detected by serologic tests, has been implicated in some acute immun

169 Serologic tests have a greater sensitivity, but their re

170 luded nucleic acid detection, viral culture, serologic testing, histopathologic evaluation, and immun

171 straightforward and uses commonly available serologic tests; however, the signs and symptoms of celi

172 ldhood were followed for up to 38 years with serologic testing, imaging, and noninvasive fibrosis mar

173 A total of 146 adult patients with CF had serologic tests (ImmunoCap total IgE, specific Aspergill

174 act identification; pre- and postvaccination serologic testing in contacts and infants, respectively;

175 light and reinforce the known limitations of serologic testing in early LD, with only 29% of individu

176 Lyme disease is diagnosed by 2-tiered serologic testing in patients with a compatible clinical

177 Next, we reviewed the outcome of serologic testing in patients with select clinical syndr

178 -transcription polymerase chain reaction, or serologic testing in the prospective groups, and 61 were

179 Pairing two different serologic tests in a two-test algorithm improves the PPV

180 ons related to the optimal use of SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests in a variety of settings.

181 anti-MERS-CoV antibodies by at least 2 of 3 serologic tests, in addition to 2 fatal cases identified

182 Patients underwent echocardiography and serologic testing including C-reactive protein (CRP).

183 l identified three potential indications for serologic testing including: 1) evaluation of patients w

184 Serologic testing, including examination of serotype-spe

185 Serologic testing, including plaque reduction neutraliza

186 Sensitive and specific serologic tests, including those for anti-transglutamina

187 CD4 percentage between last vaccine dose and serologic testing independently improved the cumulative

188 Serologic testing is essential for the diagnosis of some

189 lichiosis and determination of etiology when serologic testing is inconclusive.

190 sis (HGE) and determination of etiology when serologic testing is inconclusive.

191 In early Lyme disease (LD), serologic testing is insensitive and seroreactivity may

192 Serologic testing is not useful early in the course of L

193 As the landscape of SARS-CoV-2 serologic testing is rapidly changing, this document pro

194 Serologic testing is usually unable to provide evidence

195 The absence of FDA oversight of serologic tests is concerning given that the commerciall

196 Serologic testing may be more useful in later disease, a

197 ble comparing RIPA to commercially available serologic test methods.

198 s, using viral culture, electron microscopy, serologic testing, molecular analysis, and histopatholog

199 amined by testing plasma from 43 horses with serologic test-negative histories and no known contact w

200 inal symptoms did not predict whether celiac serologic testing occurred, though Caucasians (P < 0.01)

201 ies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) are the serologic test of choice for diagnosing celiac disease (

202 Serologic testing of 1863 asymptomatic contacts revealed

203 Serologic testing of all 356 patients found 129 (36.2%)

204 Detection of brucellosis currently relies on serologic testing of an antibody response to Brucella in

205 We report here findings from the serologic testing of blood for EBOV-specific antibodies,

206 Cytomegalovirus serologic testing of enrolled mothers was performed to d

207 ly with distinct clinical phenotypes, making serologic testing of great diagnostic aid.

208 ) with rNS1 as the antigen was evaluated for serologic testing of laboratory rodents.

209 lar testing for EBOV in blood and semen, and serologic testing of peripheral blood mononuclear cells

210 termine the presence of leptospiral DNA; and serologic testing of serum from patients and rats by mic

211 Early serologic testing of the recipient pretransplant and pro

212 we conducted chart reviews, interviews, and serologic testing of thoracic-surgery patients at the tw

213 Based on serologic tests of a community population for celiac dis

214 those screened, 861/925 (93.1%) had negative serologic tests, of which 11/861 (1.3%) subsequently dev

215 To improve vaccine strain selection, human serologic testing on vaccination-induced cross-reactivit

216 ied by metagenomic NGS, 11 were diagnosed by serologic testing only, 7 were diagnosed from tissue sam

217 Syphilis is diagnosed by serologic testing or by identification of the causative

218 chistosomiasis (based on positive results of serologic tests or detection of ova) and 17 healthy cont

219 with results of laboratory testing, such as serologic tests or polymerase chain reaction.

220 tic process must be optimized to ensure that serologic tests perform adequately.

221 infected with T. gondii based on a panel of serologic tests performed at the Palo Alto Medical Found

222 The number of serologic tests performed declined by 25% after implemen

223 A large number of serologic tests, platforms, and methodologies are being

224 06 through 9 February 2007, and we performed serologic tests, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysi

225 The majority of patients had no record of serologic testing prior to biopsy, and evidence of posit

226 HAV and HBV serologic testing prior to referral and at the liver cli

227 The conventional 2-tiered serologic testing protocol for Lyme disease (LD), an enz

228 ilis prevention, as indicated by nonreactive serologic tests (rapid plasma reagin and fluorescent tre

229 studies due to the reported insensitivity of serologic tests relative to antigen detection methods.

230 HBV serologic testing, relevant medical history, and HBV gen

231 of having a normal mucosa but a positive CD serologic test result (OR, 4.57; 95% CI, 1.58-13.22).

232 viduals with normal mucosa but a positive CD serologic test result.

233 ormal mucosa (Marsh stage 0) but positive CD serologic test results (IgA/IgG gliadin, endomysium, or

234 st cases, antibiotics were prescribed before serologic test results became available.

235 Serologic test results for C. trachomatis antibodies in

236 tion (PCR) and immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG serologic test results for confirming BTV cases.

237 The donor had positive serologic test results for E. cuniculi.

238 dividuals with normal mucosa but positive CD serologic test results was 3.09 (95% CI, 1.99-4.80).

239 ASDs) and celiac disease (CD) or positive CD serologic test results, but larger studies are contradic

240 ononuclear cells (PBMCs) to confirm positive serologic test results.

241 greement between the real-time PCR assay and serologic test results: 19.8% (19/96) and 13.7% (29/212)

242 f the genus flavivirus mandates caution when serologic testing results are interpreted.

243 Serologic testing revealed a high prevalence (29 of 81;

244 Serologic testing revealed both ganglionic neuronal acet

245 A tests as well as the introduction of rapid serologic tests (RT) and HIV nucleic acid amplification

246 Serologic testing ruled out toxoplasmosis, rubella, cyto

247 oved by enhancing HCV detection, with annual serologic testing, screening with HCV RNA to detect acut

248 We studied 7046 pregnant women whom serologic tests showed to be at risk for herpes simplex

249 Serologic testing shows that antibodies to this region c

250 The application of imaging techniques and serologic testing such as carbohydrate antigen 19-9 may

251 of US Food and Drug Administration-approved serologic tests, such as an enzyme immunoassay (EIA), fo

252 These serologic tests suggest that Granulibacter immunoreactiv

253 Retrospective serologic tests suggested that HHV-8 was likely transmit

254 Current diagnostic methods rely on serologic testing that are complicated by cross reactivi

255 ld adopt policies on student vaccination and serologic testing that conform to ACIP recommendations a

256 endocrinologist and a standardized panel of serologic testing that included serum insulin-like growt

257 Serologic tests that provide results rapidly could overc

258 induced infections of dogs were confirmed by serologic testing, tissue culture isolation, and PCR amp

259 The role of serologic testing to confirm cure of Helicobacter pylori

260 Serologic testing to detect H. pylori immunoglobulin G (

261 uld be collected and analyzed at the time of serologic testing to determine exposure to gluten and ac

262 We used molecular methods, culturing, and serologic testing to diagnose and ascertain the cause of

263 The use of serologic testing to diagnose Lyme disease (LD) is a sou

264 The utility of serologic testing to evaluate vaccine efficacy of season

265 termined on the basis of testing history and serologic testing to have been recently infected.

266 There are no generally accepted serologic tests to confirm the disease.

267 Accurate serologic tests to detect host antibodies to severe acut

268 syphilis is challenging and often relies on serologic tests to detect treponemal or nontreponemal an

269 er tick bite, were evaluated by the relevant serologic tests to determine if they had been infected w

270 In recent years, serologic tests to identify the less common antisyntheta

271 ted celiac disease but negative results from serologic tests, total IgA level should be measured; pat

272 d recommendation of techniques to be used in serologic testing, training in virus isolation, and proc

273 e a faster and less expensive alternative to serologic tests used in reference laboratories.

274 Results of serologic tests used to diagnose H. pylori should be int

275 lated antigens in addition to gag and env in serologic tests used to identify HTLV-infected individua

276 ness among North Carolina residents and that serologic testing using R. rickettsii antigen may miss c

277 t further standardization, variability among serologic tests using E. equi and HGE agent isolates for

278 Serologic testing, viral culture, and molecular methods,

279 Celiac serologic testing was completed in 63 (39.4%) children.

280 Of 23 people on whom serologic testing was conducted, eight were seroreactive

281 sions, polymerase-chain-reaction testing, or serologic testing was done.

282 Serologic testing was performed 12 and 20 months after s

283 Serologic testing was performed for all 782 children inc

284 HIV serologic testing was performed, and the presence of ris

285 the reliability of the glycoprotein G-based serologic tests, we evaluated HSV-1 and HSV-2 enzyme imm

286 Results of serologic testing were not predictive of relapse.

287 Ophthalmic and systemic evaluations and serologic testing were performed on all infants.

288 Two barriers to serologic testing were significant across the participan

289 o treatment status but counsellors doing the serologic testing were.

290 Biochemical and serologic tests were best at predicting no or minimal fi

291 Alcohol consumption, demographics, and serologic tests were correlated with degrees of steatosi

292 Results of viral serologic tests were negative.

293 Molecular and serologic tests were performed to diagnose CRT infection

294 sis was obtained when culture, skin PCR, and serologic tests were used, although serologic testing wi

295 Serologic testing, when available, requires antigen prep

296 of interlaboratory variability of several LD serologic tests-whole cell sonicate (WCS) enzyme-linked

297 Changes in reimbursement for serologic testing will likely drive future provider orde

298 and provide a number of scenarios for which serologic testing will play a role during our global res

299 PCR, and serologic tests were used, although serologic testing with skin PCR was almost as sensitive

300 of Lyme borreliosis (LB) is commonly made by serologic testing with Western blot (WB) analysis servin