ライフサイエンスコーパス: sexual partner

1 partners; 2.44, 1.45-4.08, for >=4 lifetime sexual partners).

2 th disclosed their HIV status to their first sexual partner.

3 to greatly reduced transmission of HIV to a sexual partner.

4 ed HBV infection from a chronically infected sexual partner.

5 reams, alcohol drinking, and condom use by a sexual partner.

6 tential sexual exposure to an HSV-2-infected sexual partner.

7 t they were infected by their spouse/regular sexual partner.

8 to susceptible individuals with an infected sexual partner.

9 another case patient as a syringe-sharing or sexual partner.

10 tient who was treated with telaprevir to his sexual partner.

11 inversely associated with lifetime number of sexual partners.

12 li that predict the availability of food and sexual partners.

13 matched by age group and number of lifetime sexual partners.

14 or age, race, education, and total number of sexual partners.

15 as 72% were attributed to 5 or more lifetime sexual partners.

16 linked isolates such as those collected from sexual partners.

17 y of HIV testing among Chinese MSM and their sexual partners.

18 pose continued risk of HSV-2 transmission to sexual partners.

19 (index participants) to their HIV-uninfected sexual partners.

20 ies of males versus females to seek multiple sexual partners.

21 d those with an increased number of lifetime sexual partners.

22 urers were also more likely to have had many sexual partners.

23 602 MSM aged 16-27 years with </= 5 lifetime sexual partners.

24 d reduce transmission of the virus to female sexual partners.

25 strated transmission of the pathogen between sexual partners.

26 ive treatment for infected persons and their sexual partners.

27 not transmit HIV (nontransmitters) to their sexual partners.

28 with mild symptoms, shed HSV, and can infect sexual partners.

29 mption, and having a male partner with other sexual partners.

30 nitis, exposure to T. vaginalis, or multiple sexual partners.

31 an 39 years and having had more than 20 male sexual partners.

32 s condom usage, and those with more lifetime sexual partners.

33 gressive behaviors and dictate the choice of sexual partners.

34 , alcohol, and other drug use; and number of sexual partners.

35 rograms which encourage people to have fewer sexual partners.

36 on of gonorrhea from infected males to their sexual partners.

37 an be transmitted in semen from a man to his sexual partners.

38 n of syphilis in persons exposed to infected sexual partners.

39 ogy has been observed in viral isolates from sexual partners.

40 ocaine use, and a greater lifetime number of sexual partners.

41 s occur, even in persons with relatively few sexual partners.

42 eferral slips to distribute to their primary sexual partners.

43 iving with HIV and with increasing number of sexual partners.

44 matched by age group and number of lifetime sexual partners.

45 (95% CI, 8.8%-15.4%) among those with no new sexual partners.

46 evelop alternative interventions for one-off sexual partners.

47 transmitted infections (STIs), and number of sexual partners.

48 owingly spread the infection to their female sexual partners.

49 aged secondary distribution of self-tests to sexual partners.

50 curable STIs to prevent transmission between sexual partners.

51 t transmit HIV ('non-transmitters') to their sexual partners.

52 ections but may be depositions from infected sexual partners.

53 dults are favored because they are preferred sexual partners.

54 experiences of unprotected sex and multiple sexual partners.

55 encouraged to distribute HIVST kits to their sexual partners.

56 d take appropriate measures to protect their sexual partners.

57 se in genetically linked HIV-1 infections in sexual partners.

58 mavirus (HPV) infection from female and male sexual partners.

59 ut underlies selective tuning to appropriate sexual partners.

60 , 6.0-22.5), and having two or more lifetime sexual partners (1.84, 1.21-2.78, for 2-3 lifetime sexua

61 Of the 1,329 men with a regular sexual partner, 173 were current smokers, 836 had previo

62 e than one partner), and number of male anal-sexual partners (2.57, 1.46-4.49, for at least three mal

63 partners (1.84, 1.21-2.78, for 2-3 lifetime sexual partners; 2.44, 1.45-4.08, for >=4 lifetime sexua

64 81 to 8.63, p < 0.001), and more than 10 new sexual partners (21/471, HRs 11 to 49, 50 to 99, and >10

65 n-commercial heterosexual (60.5%) or regular sexual partner (31.4%) transmission, suggesting that the

66 Median numbers of sexual partners 6 months and 1 month before acquisition

67 that among those infected by extra-household sexual partners, 62% (95% CI: 55%-70%) are infected by s

68 sexual activity since treatment denied a new sexual partner; 62% of these subjects reported that thei

69 Of the 400 people who had a new sexual partner abroad, 300 (75%) used condoms on all occ

70 not least because young people who meet new sexual partners abroad may be a convenient proxy group f

71 were used to develop mathematical models of sexual partner acquisition and antibody dynamics.

72 ent BV was associated with exposure to a new sexual partner (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 2.51; 95% C

73 ated with having the same pre-/posttreatment sexual partner (adjusted HR [AHR] = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.0

74 s risk increases among persons with multiple sexual partners (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.2-2.9), but

75 Data on self-reported sexual partner age distributions are available from a va

76 Patterns of age differences between sexual partners - "age-mixing" - may partially explain t

77 ession, stratifying by study, age, number of sexual partners, age at first intercourse, parity, smoki

78 ce linking HHV8 infection with the number of sexual partners among homosexual men, the challenge now

79 he proportion of same-sex to total number of sexual partners among nonheterosexuals suggests that the

80 CI, 0.76-1.03; P = .11] for having an older sexual partner and an odds ratio of 0.91 [95% CI, 0.60-1

81 s increased with the same pre-/posttreatment sexual partner and inconsistent condom use, and halved w

82 A higher lifetime number of sexual partners and a younger age at sexual debut was al

83 s (IDUs) and secondary transmission to their sexual partners and children.

84 exual behavior by increasing their number of sexual partners and consequently their number of offspri

85 indicate the presence of predators, food, or sexual partners and consequently, induce migratory, repr

86 nfection were identified based on numbers of sexual partners and eventual seroconversion.

87 cessful in promoting HIV testing among their sexual partners and in facilitating safer sexual decisio

88 le mice and increased aggression toward both sexual partners and male intruders in a seminatural envi

89 lts in frequent transmission of infection to sexual partners and neonates.

90 nd current disease state to both prospective sexual partners and potential rivals.

91 M) in the USA have reported similar or fewer sexual partners and reduced HIV testing and care access

92 associated with increasing number of recent sexual partners and smoking, whereas clade 2 was associa

93 rises in part from higher number of lifetime sexual partners and stronger associations with sexual be

94 s such as exposure to an increased number of sexual partners and to certain medications.

95 among men who reported having >/=16 lifetime sexual partners and using condoms intermittently.

96 ntrols, all of whom reported having only one sexual partner, and from interviews with their husbands.

97 nfection from a cohabiting or non-cohabiting sexual partner, and then the proportion of total heteros

98 of infection, prevention of transmission to sexual partners, and appropriate counseling.

99 Associations with age, sex, number of sexual partners, and current number of cigarettes smoked

100 te analysis, age, greater number of lifetime sexual partners, and history of other sexually transmitt

101 dal anti-inflammatory drugs, total number of sexual partners, and lifetime marijuana use, whereas an

102 behavioral contexts, such as locating food, sexual partners, and oviposition sites.

103 ntions include screening, contact tracing of sexual partners, and promoting effective barrier contrac

104 egarding sexual concerns, relationships with sexual partners, and reproductive issues with women suff

105 HIV infection among thousands of IDUs, their sexual partners, and their children.

106 a managerial occupation, had fewer lifetime sexual partners, and were more likely to have a history

107 dom receptive anal intercourse, who had more sexual partners, and who had a history of syphilis or he

108 fined as using a condom with the most recent sexual partner; and (c) itchy vaginal discharge in the p

109 vs married/living-as-married); and number of sexual partners (aOR 3.6 [95% CI, 1.9-7.0] >/=6 vs 1).

110 red to married/living as married), number of sexual partners (AOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.0-6.1 for >/=4 part

111 th of BV-associated microorganisms and a new sexual partner appeared to be at particularly high risk

112 chains of transmission is difficult, because sexual partners are commonly difficult or impossible to

113 their undersampling and very high numbers of sexual partners are factored in, the discrepancy disappe

114 hemes emerged: young people assess potential sexual partners as "clean" or "unclean"; sexual partners

115 n drug use, and a greater number of lifetime sexual partners as independent risk factors for HBV-HCV

116 n the control phase had at least one treated sexual partner at 2-4 weeks after contact tracing consul

117 HIV was 0.5% and the patient did not have a sexual partner at risk.

118 were also likely to report large numbers of sexual partners at home.

119 t minority of the population who report most sexual partners at home.

120 ith HIV (PWH) whose epidemiologically-linked sexual partners became HIV infected or did not acquire H

121 INTERPRETATION: Sexual partnering between young women and older men, who

122 Sexual partnering between young women and older men, who

123 Participants referred sexual partners by passive referral.

124 ng an initial mating and that selection of a sexual partner can be determined by olfactory stimuli as

125 Adolescents who had more than one sexual partner [Coef: 0.04; p < 0.001], exposed to early

126 han twice as likely to have 2 or more recent sexual partners compared with oral contraceptive users (

127 Having multiple sexual partners concurrently increases the risk of trans

128 suggest that KIR/HLA incompatibility between sexual partners confers protection against HIV-1 transmi

129 those with a higher number of lifetime oral sexual partners, current tobacco use and immunosuppressi

130 HPV exposure, HPV DNA positivity, number of sexual partners, cytology findings, and age.

131 Additionally, the mean number of sexual partners decreased over the study.

132 Most participants with primary sexual partners distributed self-tests to partners: 53 (

133 n of 3.26% adolescent boys had more than one sexual partner during wave 1 whereas in wave 2, it rose

134 e was the number of HIV tests taken by their sexual partners during 12 months of follow-up.

135 and those who did not transmit HIV to their sexual partners (E = 19.77; P < .01).

136 and those who did not transmit HIV to their sexual partners (E=19.77, p<0.01).

137 ople with HIV whose epidemiologically linked sexual partners either did or did not acquire HIV.

138 black MSM that facilitate communication with sexual partners especially about risk reduction strategi

139 s of age, same-sex experience, more lifetime sexual partners, ever being diagnosed with a sexually tr

140 A slow turnover of sexual partners favors HR HPV, whereas high frequency of

141 ctices that lead to mucosal trauma (multiple sexual partners, fisting, use of sex toys) and the prese

142 A 25% reduction in sexual partners for 6 months among MSM in Baltimore, wit

143 age, current smoking, and lifetime number of sexual partners for both genders (adjusted Ptrend < 0.02

144 VS activation predicted greater increases in sexual partners for both men and women, the effect in me

145 en's infidelity, and with number of lifetime sexual partners for men and women.

146 ), and have had a greater lifetime number of sexual partners (for > or =14 partners vs < or =4 partne

147 llowed prospectively with their 19 long-term sexual partners from 1986 to 1993 in California, Florida

148 rotect themselves, their families, and their sexual partners from HIV.

149 tners, 62% (95% CI: 55%-70%) are infected by sexual partners from outside their community.

150 g women coenrolled with their regular female sexual partner (FSP), to investigate the BV incidence ra

151 vaginal microbiota of women and their female sexual partners (FSPs), as measured by Nugent score (NS)

152 phosphoryl lipid A in subjects whose regular sexual partners had a history of genital herpes.

153 r, recipients who transmitted HIV-1 to their sexual partners had higher mean viral RNA levels than di

154 but the effect of KIR/HLA mismatches between sexual partners has never been investigated.

155 ial sexual partners as "clean" or "unclean"; sexual partners have an important influence on behaviour

156 with having a high number of lifetime female sexual partners (hazard ratio 2.40, 1.38-4.18, for at le

157 was positively associated with reporting >1 sexual partner, hazardous alcohol use, homelessness, hav

158 Current smoking, >10 lifetime sexual partners, history of genital warts, and among men

159 ith previous syphilis infection, an infected sexual partner, HIV infection, or more than 4 sex partne

160 HSV-2 seropositivity included more lifetime sexual partners, HIV positive status, and lower educatio

161 M. genitalium infections in women and their sexual partners improve reproductive health in women and

162 e resident in these boroughs, had at least 1 sexual partner in the last 12 months, stated willingness

163 and proportion reporting at least one female sexual partner in the past 5 years (2.00, 1.59-2.51) inc

164 restricted to persons who did not have a new sexual partner in the past year (ie, removing those at h

165 Participants reporting one or more sexual partner in the past year were given a score on th

166 ally active individuals (those reporting any sexual partner in the past year).

167 ence (odds ratio, 3.9 [CI. 2.6 to 5.9]), new sexual partner in the previous year (odds ratio, 2.2 [CI

168 ho have sex with men to report having only 1 sexual partner in the previous year.

169 experienced individuals (those reporting any sexual partner in their lifetime) and sexually active in

170 mpleted by transients and men with exclusive sexual partners in a city-level analysis, in the interve

171 ntial age difference between female and male sexual partners in Manicaland is the major behavioural d

172 ed with age <25 years (P < .03) and with >=2 sexual partners in the last 12 months (P < .003).

173 ed in consistent condom use or the number of sexual partners in the last 7 days, with high levels of

174 ples were collected from PBD, IDU, and their sexual partners in the most severely affected provinces,

175 ts provided contact information for all male sexual partners in the past 3 years.

176 A higher number of sexual partners in the past 6 months was associated with

177 ttern everywhere, but having had two or more sexual partners in the past year is more common in men t

178 reporting partner concurrency or two or more sexual partners in the past year were independently asso

179 ncy of sexual contact and overall numbers of sexual partners in this group of homosexual men who acqu

180 The majority of male sexual partners in this study were infected, emphasizing

181 role of C. trachomatis and number of recent sexual partners in type-specific HPV redetection.

182 [1.46-4.71]), and higher numbers of lifetime sexual partners (in women only; 2.12 [1.68-2.67] for ten

183 nnaire including reported methods of meeting sexual partners, including OPS, in the prior 3 months, a

184 Importantly, the per-sexual partner increase in prevalence was significantly

185 of first intercourse, reduction in number of sexual partners, increases in condom use, etc) that are

186 R, 2.3 [CI, 1.7 to 3.0]), more than 1 recent sexual partner (IRR, 3.1 [CI, 2.3 to 4.2]), and HIV infe

187 clude interventions to address age-disparate sexual partnering is crucial to reducing HIV incidence a

188 fection were estimated by number of lifetime sexual partners (LTSPs) using logistic regression.

189 HSV-2) was conducted to assess whether their sexual partners may be at an increased risk of HSV-2 fro

190 s in the mother plus child program had fewer sexual partners (mean [SE], 0.68 [0.16]) compared with a

191 or 42% of named partners; the mean number of sexual partners medically evaluated per index case was 5

192 tivariable regression suggest that number of sexual partners met from online social networking techno

193 lities of HIV transmission, and the rates of sexual partner mixing.

194 use of other services (PWID), more lifetime sexual partners (MSM), and needle sharing (PWID).

195 e UK Biobank, here, we show that having more sexual partners no longer predicts more offspring since

196 measured by EEG which in turn predicted male sexual partner number.

197 h 30.4% of men tested self-reporting reduced sexual partner numbers and 12.8% reporting increased con

198 (76.7-78.7%) of women reported at least one sexual partner of the opposite sex in the past year.

199 C. albicans was isolated from both the male sexual partner of the patient with a recurrent infection

200 ST) may improve uptake of HIV services among sexual partners of antiretroviral therapy (ART) clients,

201 es, along with provision of treatment to all sexual partners of chiamydia-infected individuals.

202 The average frequency of HIV tests among sexual partners of each participant was higher in interv

203 Nine of 85 sexual partners of HCV-positive donors were anti-HCV-pos

204 HIV testing among the sexual partners of HIV-positive clients is critical for

205 or exposure notification and HIV testing for sexual partners of individuals diagnosed with HIV (index

206 alyses of follow-up samples and samples from sexual partners of infected donors.

207 onors (PBD), injection drug users (IDU), and sexual partners of infected individuals.

208 High rates of T. vaginalis among sexual partners of infected persons suggest a role for e

209 n the control arm tested HIV positive, and 8 sexual partners of intervention arm participants also te

210 elf-tests distributed to and used by primary sexual partners of participants, couples testing occurre

211 We investigated whether serotesting sexual partners of pregnant women for herpes simplex vir

212 e of these recommendations in protocols puts sexual partners of study participants at serious risk.

213 concerns about risks of HIV transmission to sexual partners of study participants.

214 s is greater exposure to previously infected sexual partners of the opposite sex.

215 h his HIV-1-infected partner (P63) and other sexual partners of unknown HIV-1 serostatus.

216 and semen for T. vaginalis detection in male sexual partners of women with trichomoniasis identified

217 ltaneously infected with HIV-1 from the same sexual partner--one individual progressed to AIDS in les

218 t progressing to AIDS or transmitting HIV to sexual partners or infants.

219 t progressing to AIDS or transmitting HIV to sexual partners or infants.

220 more likely to have a higher number of oral sexual partners (OR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.23, 3.57).

221 more likely to have higher number of vaginal sexual partners (OR = 3.38; 95% CI: 1.81, 6.31) and earl

222 95% CI, 1.52-4.32), greater than 15 lifetime sexual partners (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.94-2.76) and sexual

223 eferral slips to distribute to their primary sexual partners; or (2) index HIVST whereby ART clients

224 s aged 16-44 years who reported at least one sexual partner over the lifetime was tested for the pres

225 However, in women, the number of male sexual partners over the lifetime (age-adjusted odds rat

226 individuals vary greatly in their number of sexual partners over time, but it has proved difficult t

227 d gender predicting changes in the number of sexual partners over time.

228 I, 3.91-19.31]) and increased with number of sexual partners (P < .001 for trend) and cigarettes smok

229 der symptoms (P < 0.001), number of lifetime sexual partners (P = 0.035), legal troubles (P = 0.002),

230 Number of sexual partners, partner characteristics, condom use, an

231 oeconomic status, greater lifetime number of sexual partners, past use of hormones, and condom use.

232 t the personalities of individuals and their sexual partners play a role in different episodes of sex

233 mission of HIV-1 from bisexual men to female sexual partners plays a greater role in heterosexual tra

234 Sexual partner preference in female rats has been diffic

235 , we focused on four regions associated with sexual partner preferences.

236 Targeting MSM with sexual partners ranging between >10 to >50 partners with

237 percent) assigned to expedited treatment of sexual partners (relative risk, 0.76; 95 percent confide

238 Among persons whose sexual partners reportedly took antiretroviral medicatio

239 lder female people through spouse or regular sexual partner route.

240 Effective treatment of men and their sexual partner(s) is complicated as macrolide antimicrob

241 g, while living/continued communication with sexual partner(s) was associated with lower odds of SDCS

242 symptoms of NGU as well as in their current sexual partner(s).

243 use, sharing of shaving equipment, multiple sexual partners should be discouraged.

244 nt criteria, and having had two or more male sexual partners since the last visit.

245 with unknown HIV status, number of lifetime sexual partners, syphilis, bacterial vaginosis (BV), and

246 rtners reported significantly fewer external sexual partners than did the other groups.

247 havior is that men report substantially more sexual partners than women do.

248 mely low estimated risk for HCV infection in sexual partners, the lack of association with specific s

249 ases of apparent sexual transmission between sexual partners; the prevalence of HCV infection in high

250 s and privacy concerns precluded identifying sexual partners through the Internet service provider.

251 In this study, meeting sexual partners through the Internet was associated with

252 more likely than controls to have met their sexual partners through use of the Internet (67% vs 19%;

253 An increase in unsafe sex or sexual partners to 50% or more could substantially reduc

254 rt procuring condoms and ability to convince sexual partners to use condoms were significantly higher

255 nvertors with those from their corresponding sexual partners (transmitters).

256 directly with the lifetime number of female sexual partners (trend p < 0.001) but not with male part

257 ng tests received by primary and non-primary sexual partners, two (4%) of 53 tests from participants

258 ndoms and were instructed to have their male sexual partners use them.

259 contraceptives and increased with number of sexual partners, use of hormonal creams, alcohol drinkin

260 ipants, the proportion of participants whose sexual partners used a self-test, couples testing, and s

261 2002 to estimate the prevalence of physical/sexual partner violence (55.5%), adult sexual assault by

262 iated with increased risk of physical and/or sexual partner violence (risk ratio = 2.43, 95% confiden

263 iated with increased risk of physical and/or sexual partner violence (risk ratio = 2.64, 95% confiden

264 ct the population prevalence of physical and sexual partner violence within the past 12 months.

265 Older age of sexual partner was associated with increased risk of HIV

266 men (RR, 8.71; 95% CI, 6.19-12.24) when the sexual partner was infected with the same HPV type.

267 A new sexual partner was reported more often in subjects with

268 The median lifetime number of male sexual partners was 17 (IQR: 6, 50) and 246 (19%) were H

269 In addition, having multiple lifetime sexual partners was a significant risk for oral-genital

270 Tobacco use and greater number of lifetime sexual partners was associated with higher HPV infection

271 load, place of residence, and the number of sexual partners was found to be major significant factor

272 ty education because locating information on sexual partners was limited to screen names and privacy

273 An increased number of sexual partners was significantly associated with infect

274 Having lots of sexual partners was the least important goal across all

275 Lifetime number of sexual partners was the most important modifiable risk f

276 Using the locations of self-reported sexual partners, we estimate that 39% (95% CI: 34%-42%)

277 HIVST distribution by sexual partners, web-based distribution, as well as heal

278 .10; 95% CI 1.75-2.53, P < 0.001), and their sexual partners were 1.55 times more likely to take HIV

279 ing a primary HSV-2 infection and from their sexual partners were analyzed by RFLP and heteroduplex m

280 Recent and lifetime numbers of sexual partners were both strongly associated with incid

281 tive voluntary blood donors and their female sexual partners were either HIV infected (n=246) or HIV

282 ges in the rates of condom use and number of sexual partners were evaluated among 140 female sex work

283 d 15-25 years with no more than six lifetime sexual partners were included in PATRICIA irrespective o

284 Sexual partners were more likely to both be RT-PCR posit

285 ence, shaving equipment sharing and multiple sexual partners were not risk factor for distribution of

286 opsy results, and no more than four lifetime sexual partners were randomly assigned (1:1) by central

287 tion, baseline viral load, and the number of sexual partners were significantly associated with the p

288 Patients assigned to expedited treatment of sexual partners were significantly more likely than thos

289 characteristics of cohabitating mothers and sexual partners, when available) and prevalence and inci

290 f incident detections were attributed to new sexual partners, whereas 72% were attributed to 5 or mor

291 need for condoms even if they have multiple sexual partners, which places them at risk for sexually

292 egatively associated with lifetime number of sexual partners, while twelve months persistence was onl

293 29-3.63) and having a spouse or other steady sexual partner who earned a high income (OR, 2.85; 95% C

294 articipants at the 4 sites reported having a sexual partner who had developed AIDS.

295 known about their clients and noncommercial sexual partners who may heavily influence their behavior

296 ted sexual intercourse with 235 (62%) of 380 sexual partners who tested HIV-negative, compared with e

297 e gay men assessed via ACASI reported having sexual partners who were HIV antibody positive (odds rat

298 with a urogenital chlamydial diagnosis or a sexual partner with chlamydia were eligible.

299 gibility was expanded to pregnant women with sexual partners with similar travel histories.

300 icipants were HIV-negative and had 2 or more sexual partners within the past month.