ライフサイエンスコーパス: sexual selection

1 n interaction with the sex-specific costs of sexual selection.

2 fic selective pressures, sexual conflict and sexual selection.

3 beit overlooked-modulator of the strength of sexual selection.

4 romatism is a key proxy for the intensity of sexual selection.

5 size, an indicator of sperm competition and sexual selection.

6 dry more precisely describes the strength of sexual selection.

7 comparison of eight commonly used indexes of sexual selection.

8 d was highly correlated with the strength of sexual selection.

9 for defense, a function presumably not under sexual selection.

10 accounting for such effects when quantifying sexual selection.

11 is central to predicting the consequences of sexual selection.

12 train, are recognized as classic examples of sexual selection.

13 lps to attract females, a classic example of sexual selection.

14 arative analysis to detect parasite-mediated sexual selection.

15 ay be more important than coding sequence in sexual selection.

16 ting the full range of sexual dimorphism and sexual selection.

17 as well as a profoundly important aspect of sexual selection.

18 in plumage, suggesting a prominent role for sexual selection.

19 lation viability could be further reduced by sexual selection.

20 o men's vocal characteristics in contexts of sexual selection.

21 e size between the two mating types underlie sexual selection.

22 ow the female might exercise post-copulatory sexual selection.

23 tal to the formulation of Darwin's theory of sexual selection.

24 xity been embraced by theory and practice in sexual selection.

25 gest important roles for both ecological and sexual selection.

26 ons for cognition, intersexual conflict, and sexual selection.

27 te being linked to inbreeding depression and sexual selection.

28 prime examples of the evolution of color by sexual selection.

29 conjunction with post-zygotic mechanisms of sexual selection.

30 r deflecting predators and to be involved in sexual selection.

31 tical models of mutation-order divergence by sexual selection.

32 vergence often drops with stronger Fisherian sexual selection.

33 ely targets for adaptive evolution driven by sexual selection.

34 d/or random genetic drift, but not universal sexual selection.

35 on offspring can decrease the potential for sexual selection.

36 rom diversifying (allopatric) postcopulatory sexual selection.

37 tive fitness, demonstrating NFDS mediated by sexual selection.

38 ed so many different times in the context of sexual selection.

39 insic influences can limit the potential for sexual selection.

40 pe provides an estimate of the potential for sexual selection.

41 orn length consistently experienced positive sexual selection.

42 d to genetic-driven fitness of males through sexual selection.

43 s, and some aspects of evolution by means of sexual selection.

44 e classic models for studying speciation and sexual selection.

45 responses of animal signalling traits under sexual selection.

46 morphometric traits which may be subject to sexual selection.

47 population-level benefit from pre-copulatory sexual selection.

48 aits, which sets the stage for speciation by sexual selection.

49 es reproductive isolation driven entirely by sexual selection.

50 been difficult to explain in the context of sexual selection.

51 requency of the females is incompatible with sexual selection.

52 central causal process in Darwin's theory of sexual selection.

53 aw material for adaptation by natural and/or sexual selection.

54 entially reflecting diversified intensity of sexual selection.

55 le for ejaculate compositional plasticity in sexual selection.

56 associating parental foraging with offspring sexual selection.

57 n liability and fecundity is consistent with sexual selection.

58 harmful male traits is a central paradox of sexual selection(1-9).

59 Variation in sexual selection across a species range, especially acro

60 roxy measures reliably track the strength of sexual selection across biologically realistic scenarios

61 iably these measures predict the strength of sexual selection across natural systems, and most perfor

62 increase hybridization's benefits and exert sexual selection across species.

63 ascribed to the costs associated with strong sexual selection acting on the population.

64 nt selection (FDS), generated by natural and sexual selection acting on the same trait, maintains mim

65 Strong postcopulatory sexual selection acting within species is the predominan

66 l of individuals and by mate choice, but how sexual selection affects adaptation remains unclear.

67 nces are formed through parental imprinting, sexual selection alone can (1) stabilize a sympatric pol

68 The challenge now is to identify whether sexual selection alone or broader processes, such as soc

69 As sexual selection alters the lysin-VERL interface, FITZAP

70 reveal cryptic mechanisms of postcopulatory sexual selection among diverse animal taxa.

71 Hermaphroditism leads to reduced sexual selection and can result in the retention of dele

72 ndry independently weakened some measures of sexual selection and crucially also impacted sexual sele

73 t the combination of ecological opportunity, sexual selection and exceptional genomic potential is th

74 will help to understand signal evolution by sexual selection and its role in the speciation process.

75 anding life history and body size evolution, sexual selection and many other biological phenomena.

76 This process is thought to be driven by sexual selection and may reinforce species separation.

77 These results together suggest that sexual selection and niche divergence together are impor

78 ications for survival, reproductive success, sexual selection and pathogen transmission of individual

79 nge of taxa, there is no association between sexual selection and rates of coding sequence evolution,

80 dence of adaptation at genes associated with sexual selection and reproduction.

81 use these species to test the links between sexual selection and sex-biased gene expression evolutio

82 catalysis, and suggest an important role for sexual selection and sexual conflict in genome evolution

83 from the genus Drosophila, is evident in the sexual selection and sexual conflict literature over the

84 ffects for evolutionary processes related to sexual selection and sexual conflict, as well as mating

85 rn affect key evolutionary processes such as sexual selection and sexual conflict.

86 read assumption that they are the product of sexual selection and sexual conflict.

87 over of sex bias across this clade driven by sexual selection and show it to be primarily the result

88 However, sexual selection and social competition can also promote

89 es (melanosomes) that play a central role in sexual selection and social competition.

90 Colour polymorphisms play a key role in sexual selection and speciation, yet the mechanisms that

91 clarify longstanding evolutionary puzzles in sexual selection and speciation.

92 text of reproduction, and could be a cue for sexual selection and species recognition.

93 hat initially experience similar natural and sexual selection and that divergent traits and preferenc

94 s is typically the signature of traits under sexual selection and the current evidence suggests the p

95 tes are thought to play an important role in sexual selection and the evolution of mating strategies,

96 ction between female reproductive mode, male sexual selection and the rate of speciation, suggesting

97 lear understanding of the connection between sexual selection and transcriptional dimorphism, often t

98 findings are consistent with region-specific sexual selection and/or random genetic drift, but not un

99 Our findings cast the action of sexual selection (and selection in general) in a novel l

100 I examined how social system (as a proxy for sexual selection) and diet (as a proxy for natural selec

101 ict during pregnancy, drive patterns of male sexual selection, and increase the rate of speciation.

102 e of extrinsic dispersal barriers; partly by sexual selection; and partly by adaptive radiation in th

103 World sand fly species evolve quickly under sexual selection; and therefore, represent an important

104 ovide a more mechanistic explanation for why sexual selection appears to drive early stages of specia

105 Sexual selection appears to have shaped the acoustic sig

106 e results suggest that sexual dimorphism and sexual selection are potent, but largely overlooked comp

107 Besides, quantifications of sexual selection are usually done during a short time wi

108 n amplitude, and thus limits on the reach of sexual selection, are revealed by trade-offs between max

109 the Bateman gradient and the opportunity for sexual selection--are widely used in empirical studies.

110 The role of sexual selection as a driver of speciation remains unres

111 underscore the importance of postcopulatory sexual selection as an agent of diversification.

112 We therefore reveal sexual selection as an important force behind lineages f

113 aintained by a trade-off between natural and sexual selection at a single gene, relaxin-like receptor

114 ion intensity will likely replace the strong sexual selection at the northern range margin.

115 derestimated the intensity and complexity of sexual selection because they used museum specimens alon

116 ltaneously weakened the overall intensity of sexual selection but increased the relative strength of

117 e the relative importance of post-copulatory sexual selection, but experimental tests of this predict

118 Bird song is attributed to sexual selection, but it remains unknown how the expecte

119 We conclude that precopulatory sexual selection by females favored the evolution of sui

120 rmaments might increase extinction risk, but sexual selection can also enhance the spread of benefici

121 Sexual selection can explain the rapid evolution of fert

122 hus, tethered molecular arms races driven by sexual selection can generally explain rapid sperm prote

123 To test the hypothesis that postcopulatory sexual selection can generate reproductive isolation, we

124 t studies in evolutionary genetics show that sexual selection can have a profound influence on the ge

125 hic and evolutionary processes, we find that sexual selection can lead to both increases and decrease

126 , the observed patterns in traits related to sexual selection can lead to predictions regarding how s

127 A new study finds that sexual selection can limit adaptation by causing male-in

128 broadly, our results show that precopulatory sexual selection can play a role in the evolution of gen

129 At macroevolutionary scales, sexual selection can theoretically drive both the rate a

130 chromosomes, sensitivity of spermatogenesis, sexual selection) cannot fully account for these male vi

131 Under sexual selection, competition between (usually) males an

132 ess to females, their role in the process of sexual selection could also be important.

133 Finally, we discuss that sexual selection could promote adaptations in sperm ener

134 f polyandry, with stronger opportunities for sexual selection, declined slowly, with 60% of populatio

135 for sexual selection were poor predictors of sexual selection, despite their continuing popularity.

136 However, in most models of speciation by sexual selection, divergent natural selection is also re

137 show that plumage dichromatism (a proxy for sexual selection) does not predict diversification rates

138 Extensive research indicates that inter-sexual selection drives the evolution of complex vocal c

139 This investigation confirms that sexual selection favours the use of DeltaF as an acousti

140 Sexual selection favours traits that increase reproducti

141 sexes in a species should be similar unless sexual selection, fecundity selection, or resource parti

142 ale genitalia are often under postcopulatory sexual selection for characteristics that increase a mal

143 ion for optimized biomechanics combined with sexual selection for mating adaptations shapes this abil

144 ion between males and females, may be due to sexual selection for ornamentation and mate choice.

145 In high-polyandry groups, sexual selection for status was weakened and largely res

146 The negative effects of sexual selection found in field and other studies are us

147 We find that disruptive sexual selection generates two fitness peaks correspondi

148 are emerging as fundamental contributors to sexual selection given their role in post-mating reprodu

149 Our results show that male sexual selection gradients are consistently positive.

150 AMS to quantify univariate and multivariate sexual selection gradients on male morphological and beh

151 hlights the potential for interactions among sexual selection, habitat heterogeneity, and behavioral

152 n are correlated between the sexes, but that sexual selection has a strong positive effect on male, b

153 Elevated sexual selection has been predicted to increase the numb

154 tcopulatory fertilization success to overall sexual selection has not yet been measured in any specie

155 Sexual selection has resulted in sex-based size dimorphi

156 Sexual selection has resulted in some of the most captiv

157 hypothesis are widely cited as evidence that sexual selection has shaped human mating psychology.

158 intrinsic lineage-specific traits related to sexual selection have strongly influenced the cichlid ra

159 The sexual selection hypothesis proposes that vocal learning

160 about avian SFPs, despite extensive work on sexual selection in birds.

161 Therefore, sexual selection in black grouse operates primarily on m

162 Our results highlight the central role of sexual selection in driving avian colour divergence, and

163 of attractive females and suggest a role for sexual selection in explaining unconditional generosity.

164 range colour, implicated in other studies of sexual selection in guppies, did predict male reproducti

165 Sexual selection in many animal species favors the evolu

166 volving trait that is under both natural and sexual selection in many organisms.

167 d not preclude the potential for natural and sexual selection in our species.

168 How evolution in general and sexual selection in particular shape the somatosensory c

169 ce tests of the relative role of natural and sexual selection in processes such as speciation.

170 ation on offspring reduced the potential for sexual selection in pronghorn.

171 To assess the role of sexual selection in shaping these patterns, we assembled

172 the importance of viewing parasite-mediated sexual selection in the context of coevolution.

173 ve little understanding of parasite-mediated sexual selection in the context of reciprocal parasite e

174 We estimated sexual selection in the wild to determine if the strengt

175 n for elucidating the role of postcopulatory sexual selection in trait diversification and speciation

176 ion of species, supporting theory predicting sexual selection increases rates of speciation at macroe

177 sexual selection and crucially also impacted sexual selection indirectly by constraining mating assor

178 olour evolution are predicted by a proxy for sexual selection intensity (plumage dichromatism) in a l

179 Our results suggest that sexual selection intensity increases toward both edges o

180 shape when considering variables related to sexual selection intensity, such as sexual dimorphism an

181 ructure, and shed new light on mechanisms of sexual selection involving intra- and intersex reproduct

182 Sexual selection is a cornerstone of evolutionary theory

183 Sexual selection is a fundamental evolutionary process b

184 If reproductive success under sexual selection is dependent on individual condition, w

185 Sexual selection is generally predicted to act more stro

186 A classic paradox in sexual selection is how sexual traits under strong direc

187 ecies have led to the common assumption that sexual selection is important in speciation, especially

188 In particular, our results suggest that sexual selection is likely to favour individual differen

189 In Anopheles gambiae, a likely candidate for sexual selection is male 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E).

190 We argue that the potential for sexual selection is not affected by random offspring mor

191 utations more quickly than populations where sexual selection is not operating.

192 Sexual selection is proposed to be a powerful driver of

193 Postcopulatory sexual selection is recognized as a key driver of reprod

194 ker preferences spread in this context until sexual selection is removed.

195 argument against parasites being involved in sexual selection is that they should evolve to become le

196 Despite the general agreement that sexual selection is the main driver of penis evolution,

197 male-male aggression, which is important for sexual selection, is regulated by environment, experienc

198 though plumage coloration is often linked to sexual selection, it may impact a number of physiologica

199 the related ideas of geographic speciation, sexual selection, key innovations, key landscapes and ec

200 morphism, one of the most obvious results of sexual selection, largely requires a positive Bateman re

201 Our results indicate rapid sexual selection leading to reproductive character displ

202 stic selection for colour, we also show that sexual selection leads to greater expansion of the non-r

203 In many cases, our model predicts that sexual selection leads to higher extinction probability

204 Speciation by sexual selection lies at the centre of debates about the

205 itate field studies of natural selection and sexual selection, making it possible for strong selectio

206 llenges theories explaining the intensity of sexual selection, mating-system evolution and the fundam

207 ggest that deeper ecological perspectives on sexual selection may alter some of the fundamental assum

208 Existing work suggests that fluctuations in sexual selection may be extremely common, though work on

209 or stability, providing novel evidence that sexual selection may indirectly influence open- versus c

210 indexes to the actual strength of premating sexual selection, measured as the strength of selection

211 for the quantification and interpretation of sexual selection measures, an insight that applies to an

212 e traits is a fundamental prediction of many sexual selection models, but has largely defied testing

213 e in nature in male swarms likely diminishes sexual selection of post-reproductive traits related to

214 nd other animals, too, could have evolved by sexual selection of the smelliest males through female c

215 Previous theoretical models of the effect of sexual selection on average individual fitness in a popu

216 quality and quantity renders post-copulatory sexual selection on ejaculates unlikely to treat male-ma

217 bilities are likely the result of natural or sexual selection on hybrids, since intrinsic isolation i

218 m after remating can generate postcopulatory sexual selection on male ejaculate traits.

219 lly decreases the intensity of precopulatory sexual selection on male mating success (Bateman gradien

220 y, and - as a result - weaker pre-copulatory sexual selection on male mating success, compared to con

221 creasing polyandry may weaken pre-copulatory sexual selection on males and increase the relative impo

222 Polyandry prolongs sexual selection on males by forcing ejaculates to compe

223 at elevated polyandry weakens pre-copulatory sexual selection on males, shifts selection to post-copu

224 level polyandry to determine the strength of sexual selection on males.

225 are under consistent sexual selection, while sexual selection on morphological traits is stronger in

226 The strength of sexual selection on secondary sexual traits varies depen

227 It remains unknown whether the strength of sexual selection on song characteristics, such as repert

228 The effects of pure Fisherian sexual selection on species maintenance are thus much mo

229 Here we investigate the effect of sexual selection on species persistence in a community o

230 The effect of sexual selection on species persistence remains unclear.

231 suggestion a relaxation of the influences of sexual selection on SSD.

232 Despite strong directional sexual selection on these phenotypes directly and signif

233 reover, we know little about how natural and sexual selection operate on thermal reaction norms, refl

234 ith sex (e.g., a mating system that involves sexual selection, or a sexual diapausing stage that allo

235 tems have tended to find negative effects of sexual selection, or no effect.

236 est in the overlap between kin selection and sexual selection, particularly concerning how kin select

237 ompensation in ZW systems, and suggests that sexual selection plays a major role in shaping sex chrom

238 s to demonstrate that phenotypic measures of sexual selection predict the proportion of male-biased b

239 re likely to reflect the effects of multiple sexual selection pressures.

240 ignal change via changes in both natural and sexual selection pressures.

241 Post-copulatory sexual selection (PSS), fuelled by female promiscuity, i

242 lations with histories of strong versus weak sexual selection purge mutation load and resist extincti

243 ' involve bursts of geographic speciation or sexual selection, rather than adaptive diversification;

244 t with a 'differential fusion' model wherein sexual selection reduces rates of fusion among lineages

245 icant fitness load; our findings reveal that sexual selection reduces this load, improving population

246 viability and the extinction vortex: (a) if sexual selection reinforces natural selection to fix 'go

247 ge, one of the most potent selective forces, sexual selection, remains curiously unexplored.

248 Sexual selection results in sex-specific characters like

249 The maximum intensity of precopulatory sexual selection s'max (the Jones index) outperformed al

250 ich could have a number of causes, including sexual selection, sexual antagonism, and relaxed selecti

251 sperm handling is critical for understanding sexual selection, sexual conflict, and the coevolution o

252 Here, we investigate how natural and sexual selection shape phenotypic plasticity in two cong

253 Just as sexual selection shapes extreme traits that increase mat

254 ection can lead to predictions regarding how sexual selection should change in response to climate ch

255 However, sexual selection should promote adaptive compensation to

256 ations that experienced weak or non-existent sexual selection showed rapid fitness declines under inb

257 backgrounds, with limited opportunities for sexual selection, showed rapid declines in fitness and c

258 xtra-pair paternity are theorized to amplify sexual selection, since some males attract multiple mate

259 ing other males have often been the focus of sexual selection studies, defensive traits (both morphol

260 under selection, or are under mechanisms of sexual selection that we could not test (e.g. balancing

261 udinal data in a lekking species with strong sexual selection - the black grouse Lyrurus tetrix - we

262 Sexual selection, the widespread evolutionary force aris

263 behavior have been successfully explained by sexual selection theory (e.g., mammals [1-5]; birds [6,

264 thesis, founder effects, the island rule nor sexual selection theory alone can provide a compelling e

265 alter some of the fundamental assumptions of sexual selection theory and rapidly lead to new discover

266 As predicted by sexual selection theory, males are larger than females i

267 Based on sexual selection theory, the reproductive potential of m

268 ial DNA uptake and release in the context of sexual selection theory, which has been central to our u

269 the rational choice models currently used in sexual selection theory.

270 ymy sexual conflict if it acts orthogonal to sexual selection, thereby placing limitations on the evo

271 Our results reveal that sexual selection through male competition plays an integ

272 Sexual selection, through intra-male competition or fema

273 We conclude that there is potential for sexual selection to act in bacteria, and that this might

274 together, our results highlight the power of sexual selection to act on gene expression differences a

275 uld represent that available for natural and sexual selection to act upon.

276 ut its complexity has evolved mainly through sexual selection to attract mates and repel sexual rival

277 these costs could be countered if sex allows sexual selection to clear the universal fitness constrai

278 c models to examine the ability of Fisherian sexual selection to contribute to lasting species differ

279 ntrogress faster than trait alleles, causing sexual selection to counter the effects of local adaptat

280 The contribution of sexual selection to diversification remains poorly under

281 as become a textbook example of the power of sexual selection to lead to extreme neurological and beh

282 eproductive success in females, allowing for sexual selection to operate in both sexes.

283 skill in song displays that are involved in sexual selection, toothed whales use learned signals in

284 links between temperature and indicators of sexual selection, using a cold-water pipefish as model.

285 carbon copies of small ones, indicating that sexual selection via male-male competition is an importa

286 ver a mechanism that can lead to directional sexual selection via mate-preference learning: a bias in

287 Moreover, the relative contribution of sexual selection vs. drift in shaping broad patterns of

288 ter a 95-generation history of divergence in sexual selection, we compared fitness and extinction of

289 sen time frame affects estimated measures of sexual selection, we recorded mating success and reprodu

290 ons that differed solely in the strengths of sexual selection, we revealed mutation load using inbree

291 the Bateman gradient and the opportunity for sexual selection were poor predictors of sexual selectio

292 tions that had previously experienced strong sexual selection were resilient to extinction and mainta

293 his difficulty by focusing on postcopulatory sexual selection, where readily quantifiable female repr

294 tems is particularly problematic in studying sexual selection, where variability among taxa is key to

295 e is growing recognition that postcopulatory sexual selection, which can drive rapid diversification

296 n populations will be followed by heightened sexual selection, which may exacerbate the problem of lo

297 ave focused predominantly on the strength of sexual selection, which offers an incomplete view of sel

298 that behavioural traits are under consistent sexual selection, while sexual selection on morphologica

299 predicts that populations undergoing strong sexual selection will more quickly differentiate because

300 resequencing data in the guppy, a model for sexual selection with many Y-linked colour traits.