コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ments (tics) and high performance (exquisite singing).
2 the lateral septum than females that did not sing.
3 te in female zebra finches, hence only males sing.
4 not in younger males or females, who cannot sing.
5 ent syllable, but also by previous syllables sung.
6 r as very specific but late ultrasonographic sings.
7 essed in specific song nuclei in response to singing.
8 feedback only at subthreshold levels during singing.
9 r repaired neurons that became active during singing.
10 lamocortical circuits but is specialized for singing.
11 k integration for vocal motor control during singing.
12 a X from the ventral striato-pallidum during singing.
13 cortical nucleus that is also necessary for singing.
14 r properties of the upper vocal tract during singing.
15 plore the network architecture of HVC during singing.
16 on of how beak movements are affected during singing.
17 r1 during undirected but not during directed singing.
18 n social contexts of undirected and directed singing.
19 neurons in brain areas that are dedicated to singing.
20 ucleus involved in learning but not in adult singing.
21 llium (RA) carries information about daytime singing.
22 ion, dopamine levels in Area X change during singing.
23 FP synaptic input within RA and destabilizes singing.
24 accumulation of independent variance during singing.
25 ve singing-regulated genes in the absence of singing.
26 higher with directed relative to undirected singing.
27 duction that is not reversed when birds stop singing.
28 he spike amplitude in HVC neurons that drive singing.
29 rontal cortex implicated in human speech and singing.
30 sibly cooled brain areas in songbirds during singing.
31 a finch and successfully reproduces songbird singing.
32 inputs using intracellular recordings during singing.
34 covering the eyes (6 of 64 patients [9.4%]), singing (5 of 64 patients [7.8%]), and yawning (5 of 64
38 volume, consistent with the hypothesis that singing activity induces neuroplasticity in the song con
39 r, these results lead to the hypothesis that sing acts at a step distinct from that of blow, and that
40 uveniles during song learning, in seasonally singing adults during peaks in plasticity that precede t
41 mozygous for ethane methyl sulfonate-induced sing alleles revealed an identical phenotype: replacemen
44 ncreased trial-by-trial variation when birds sing alone, created by highly variable pauses in firing.
45 the best variants of the song learned during singing alone, and suggests that such performance states
46 sions in this region are unable to speak and sing, although their nonverbal vocalizations, such as la
47 ol nuclei in the contexts of hearing song or singing, although these contexts result in marked induct
48 s unusually large, especially in beak width, sang an unusual song, and carried some Geospiza scandens
50 hes is highly sexually dimorphic; only males sing and the brain regions controlling song are far larg
53 We characterize interneuron activity during singing and describe reliable pauses in the firing of th
54 lationship between VSP network structure and singing and identify gene co-expression groups, or modul
55 bilateral electrolytic lesions of the POM on singing and other behaviors in adult male starlings with
58 try is sensitive to auditory feedback during singing and suggest that feedback may contribute in real
59 detect targeted syllables as they were being sung and to disrupt feedback transiently at short and pr
60 ctivity-dependent gene expression when birds sing, and the level of activation is higher and more var
61 esence of a partner on locomotion, grooming, singing, and other behaviors that make up an animal's re
62 genes in the avian genome were regulated by singing, and we found a striking regional diversity of b
65 ations of syllables and silences in juvenile singing are formed by a mixture of two distinct modes of
66 man behavior, such as chanting, dancing, and singing, are cultural universals with functional signifi
67 ) where T acts to regulate the motivation to sing as opposed to other aspects of song has not been de
68 ction of fadrozole reduced the motivation to sing as well as song acoustic stereotypy, a measure of c
70 d courtship song differed in birds naturally singing at low compared to high rates, and mu-opioid rec
72 at both sexes coordinate the timing of their singing based on feedback from the partner and suggest t
73 cific song treatment elicited an increase in singing behavior and an upregulation of genes associated
75 regional neural circuit controlling seasonal singing behavior and identify gene evolution related to
76 DA and molecules that control DA kinetics in singing behavior and social context-dependent brain func
81 h the motor cortex influencing the pacing of singing behavior on a moment-by-moment basis, enabling p
82 finch, a songbird with an extremely precise singing behavior that can nevertheless be reshaped drama
84 tive association between affective state and singing behavior, as revealed using CPP tests of song-as
86 nts to the hormone-sensitivity of the canary singing behavior, we identify seasonal testosterone-sens
90 songbirds implicate opioid neuropeptides in singing behavior; however, past results are contradictor
91 by sleep-dependent circadian fluctuations in singing behaviour, with immediate post-sleep deteriorati
92 in the premotor nucleus HVC (proper name) of singing Bengalese finches in response to feedback pertur
95 rmation from each wren is used to coordinate singing between individuals for the production of this c
102 dataset of PNs and interneurons recorded in singing birds, we test several predictions of these mode
106 urtship phenotypes (and appetitive courtship singing), both in terms of TH-ir cell number, which corr
110 For example, juvenile songbirds learn to sing by comparing their song with the memory of a tutor
111 zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) learns to sing by copying the vocalizations of an older tutor in a
112 ne dynamics in zebra finches, which learn to sing by imitating a tutor song during a juvenile sensiti
114 ty of juvenile zebra finches, which learn to sing by memorizing and vocally copying the song of an ad
115 ermore, we find downregulation in males that sing by themselves (undirected singers) but not in males
116 complex, variable acoustic elements that are sung by male birds in intimate courtship contexts for pe
117 c territoriality favors recognition of songs sung by sympatric heterospecifics, which results in a br
118 ogy of one key identified interneuron of the singing central pattern generator in five cricket specie
120 related to the number of times that the bird sang copies of those songs in juvenile or adult life.
121 ons in both core and shell subregions during singing correlated with acoustic similarity to tutor syl
122 ities steer away from tensions of the day to singing, dancing, religious ceremonies, and enthralling
124 ange rules(1) in which the choice of what to sing depends on the song structure many seconds prior.
126 hat drive courtship song in two species that sing divergent song types and localized relevant evoluti
129 nt breeds (Basenjis, Dingoes, and New Guinea Singing Dogs) come from regions outside the natural rang
130 d HVC microlesions (10% focal ablation) with singing-driven immediate-early gene (IEG) labeling to ex
134 rease to levels similar to that for directed singing, eliminating the social context-dependent differ
137 t song rhythms because (i) our flies did not sing enough and (ii) our segmenter did not identify many
138 We demonstrate that a songbird with prior singing experience can significantly accelerate the re-a
147 egaptera novaeangliae) males in a population sing fundamentally the same version of a complex, progre
150 g the breeding season, males with nest sites sing high levels of sexually motivated song in response
152 zebra finches partway through song learning, singing immature song, are capable of producing song wit
155 in that it regulates both the motivation to sing in a particular social context as well as the quali
156 correct source is a challenge because males sing in aggregations, producing overlapping calls that l
159 (high vocal center), a key premotor area for singing in adult birds, but does require LMAN (lateral m
160 ian song system, we show that short bouts of singing in adult male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata
165 Geospiza magnirostris (large ground finch), singing in the same frequency band (2-4 kHz), colonized
169 tive in response to song playback and during singing, indicating their potential importance to song p
170 of hypoglossal afferents greatly diminished singing-induced Fos expression on the side ipsilateral t
171 triking regional diversity of both basal and singing-induced programs in the four key song nuclei of
172 e-directed) song, which young birds normally sing infrequently, and to compare it with the alone or "
173 der Orthoptera, which includes many familiar singing insects, such as crickets, katydids, and grassho
174 croscopy to monitor ensemble activity during singing, integrating across multiple trials by adopting
176 a step distinct from that of blow, and that sing is required on both founder cell and fusion-compete
178 social cues supports the idea that courtship singing is a state of motor "performance," in which the
179 rodialysis in awake, behaving songbirds that singing is associated with increased dopamine levels in
181 dings of large populations of HVC neurons in singing juvenile birds throughout learning to examine th
182 urons, we recorded from neurons in area X of singing juvenile male zebra finches, and directly compar
183 e male zebra finch songbirds (females cannot sing) learn to sing through coordinated sensory, sensori
185 In the present study, we found that low singing male starlings also had significantly higher enk
190 t female lebinthines, instead of approaching singing males, produce vibrational responses after male
192 end organ for hearing to detect and locate "singing" males that produce multiharmonic advertisement
193 view ostensibly explains why females do not sing-many of the neural populations and pathways that ma
194 e propose that V1aR and OTR distributions in singing mice support an integral role for the AVP/OT sys
195 ts: Scotinomys teguina and S. xerampelinus ("singing mice"), the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus,
196 ceptor (OTR) distributions in two species of singing mice, ecologically specialized Central American
203 Gavialis from the Early Pleistocene of Khok Sung, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, northeastern Thailand.
205 ng-range rules: the choice of what phrase to sing next in a given context depends on the history of t
206 songs, indicating that the choice of what to sing next is determined not only by the current syllable
207 ), infants viewed videos of an adult who was singing nursery rhymes with (i) direct gaze (looking for
209 le was on the display perch, a male bellbird sang only his louder song type, swiveling his body mid-s
222 song learning, raising the possibility that singing-related activity in these cells is compared to a
225 pendence on social context by characterizing singing-related activity of single neurons in the AFP ou
226 we found that stimulation patterns based on singing-related activity were able to drive opposing cha
227 upting auditory feedback does not alter this singing-related activity, indicating it is motor in natu
229 striatal and spiny neurons both show precise singing-related firing across both social settings.
230 DLM, and found that all terminals exhibited singing-related firing patterns indistinguishable from H
235 finches, we found that DAF failed to perturb singing-related synaptic activity of HVCX cells, althoug
236 s higher and more variable during undirected singing relative to directed singing to other birds.
238 ion of embryos injected with double-stranded sing RNA or embryos homozygous for ethane methyl sulfona
239 mically: HVC(X) within juveniles learning to sing show variable properties, whereas the uniformity ra
240 linked to the evolution of species-specific singing.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT A fundamental question in
241 as others such as Portuguese are melodic or "sing-song" wherein identifying a word relies on what com
242 ing courtship, Drosophila melanogaster males sing songs with motifs of varying temporal structure.
243 , HA-only, and CI + HA conditions, using the Sung Speech Corpus, a database of monosyllabic words pro
244 Sentence recognition was measured using sung speech in which pitch was held constant or varied a
245 tour identification (MCI) was measured using sung speech in which the words were held constant or var
246 ed that sentence recognition was poorer with sung speech relative to spoken, with little difference b
247 ve to spoken, with little difference between sung speech with a constant or variable pitch; mean perf
251 ic damage to adult Area X induced changes in singing tempo and global syllable sequencing in all anim
252 ) exhibit sequences of bursts during daytime singing that are characterized by precise timing relativ
255 s are not always specific, there are several sings that are more common in certain types of pneumonia
258 identical patterns of activity when the bird sings the same sequence, and disrupting auditory feedbac
259 attern of the membrane depolarization during singing, the fine dendritic and axonal ramifications, an
260 to two sensorimotor structures implicated in singing, the telencephalic song nucleus interface (NIf)
261 e brain areas and connecting fiber tracts to sing their song, but our knowledge of this circuitry may
262 nch songbirds (females cannot sing) learn to sing through coordinated sensory, sensorimotor, and moto
263 f these species, and as unpaired males often sing throughout the breeding season, local sex ratio bia
271 ing courtship, Drosophila melanogaster males sing to females a song composed of rhythmic pulses and s
273 nct from how tutors changed their songs when singing to females, and that could influence attention a
274 porter caused dopamine levels for undirected singing to increase to levels similar to that for direct
276 These ensembles are then reactivated during singing to train a set of syllable sequences in the moto
277 f A/Singapore/GP1908/2015 H1N1 HA antigen (A-Sing) to the volar forearm (FA); uncoated HD-MAPs; intra
278 Here we addressed these questions using singing-triggered microstimulation and chronic recording
279 uth: Latitudinal variation in timing of dawn singing under natural and artificial light conditions.
280 r(L) and a small fraction of wild-type males sing vigorously, so we limited our reanalyses to these g
281 y key concepts, papers, and contributions by Sung Wan and his colleagues that fall within the four af
285 ected singing emerged concurrently; directed singing was positively correlated with earlier hatching.
286 mity rapidly degrades within hours in adults singing while exposed to abnormal (delayed) auditory fee
288 onth follow-up, we used natural vocal music (sung with lyrics) and instrumental music stimuli to unco
289 irror motor-related activity recorded during singing, with a temporal offset of roughly 40 ms, in agr
291 urons of their patterned burst firing during singing, without changing their spontaneous or singing-r
294 ontinuous vocal patterns, we recorded in the singing zebra finch from populations of neurons in the r
295 ulation and chronic recording methods in the singing zebra finch, a small songbird that relies on aud
297 basal ganglia-projecting dopamine neurons in singing zebra finches as we controlled perceived song qu
298 ion network analysis on microarray data from singing zebra finches to discover gene ensembles regulat