1 in pediatric SBTx against LTx patients at a
single center.
2 6 libraries in six separate experiments in a
single center.
3 eglumine in liver transplant recipients at a
single center.
4 of incompatible donor/recipient pairs, at a
single center.
5 e care intervention (UC + PAL) (n = 75) at a
single center.
6 t Database and a nested cohort analysis of a
single center.
7 maintained kidney transplant database from a
single center.
8 , the studies have been small and often only
single-center.
9 initions of RVF, and are mostly derived from
single centers.
10 nfluenza Control Strategies (TROPICS1) was a
single-center,
1:1 randomized, observer-blinded, active-
11 ry 2009 to December 2018 were recruited in a
single-center,
2-year prospective, longitudinal cohort s
12 From a
single center,
741 young adults (19-30 years of age, 49%
13 In this
single-center analysis, AEM was helpful in expeditious i
14 ic de novo respiratory failure admitted to a
single center and candidates for a 24-hour NIV trial wer
15 Here we describe a
single-center approach to creating a generalizable, comp
16 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:
Single-center,
assessor-blinded, randomized clinical tri
17 Prospective
single-center before and after study.
18 multiple strains and species collected at a
single center between 2008 and 2016.
19 ncer who received checkpoint inhibitors at a
single center between April 2015 and May 2018.
20 s who underwent first deceased donor LT at a
single center between August 2008 and October 2017.
21 c anal sphincter augmentation procedure at a
single center between December 2008 and January 2016, we
22 een in consultation for PROSE treatment at a
single center between January 1992 and December 2016 wit
23 In this
single-center Brazilian cohort, ZIKV infection was assoc
24 ive patients implanted with Intacs ICRS at a
single center by 1 of the authors between October 2006 a
25 A
single-center case series (January 2014-December 2018) c
26 The study design is a
single-center case-control study.
27 In a
single-center cohort of 51,457 surgical patients undergo
28 Here, we assessed a
single-center cohort of 64 orthotopic heart transplant r
29 erived a group-based trajectory model from a
single-center cohort of 837 patients with ALS who presen
30 A
single-center cohort of patients undergoing coronary or
31 A
single-center cohort of patients with cirrhosis, who wer
32 Among a
single-center cohort of SPK transplants overrepresented
33 s for brain abscess is limited and relies on
single-center cohort studies.
34 This retrospective
single-center cohort study analysed outcome in patients
35 We performed a retrospective
single-center cohort study assessing all individuals wit
36 We performed a
single-center cohort study in 1000 renal allograft recip
37 within the allograft.Methods: We performed a
single-center cohort study of lung transplantation patie
38 We performed a retrospective
single-center cohort study utilizing an electronic medic
39 The aim of this
single-center cohort study was to compare direct oral fe
40 We conducted a prospective,
single-center cohort study, including 907 patients with
41 This was a retrospective,
single-center cohort study.
42 In a
single-center cohort, fecal samples from preterm infants
43 This was a prospective,
single center,
cohort study.
44 A retrospective,
single-center,
cohort study evaluating surgical performa
45 viewed data from a prospective database in a
single center concerning patients transplanted between J
46 METHODS AND A
single-center continuous flow-LVAD database (n=354) was
47 Materials and Methods In this prospective
single-center cross-sectional study, participants with t
48 Methods: For this
single-center,
cross-sectional study, 22 patients with 2
49 Methods: For this
single-center,
cross-sectional study, 22 patients with 2
50 We used granular,
single-center data on 109 cPRA 100% deceased donor kidne
51 ncy department sedation are limited by their
single-center design and are underpowered to identify ri
52 of clinician symptom or wellness metrics; a
single-center design.
53 Data were generated in a large
single-center diagnostic study using central adjudicatio
54 This was a
single-center double-blind, placebo-controlled prospecti
55 In a
single-center,
double-blind, noninferiority trial involv
56 We conducted a
single-center,
double-blind, randomized, parallel-group
57 This was a
single-center,
double-blind, randomized, placebo-control
58 with metabolic syndrome studied by MRI in a
single center during a 2-year period, 154 were excluded
59 and prognostic implications of VE/VCO2 in a
single-center dyspneic referral cohort (MGH-ExS [Massach
60 We report the largest
single-center experience to date on VA use, at a high-vo
61 dy included its retrospective nature and the
single-center experience.
62 esearch to date is limited to case series or
single-center experiences, and there are no well-establi
63 Methods: A
single-center feasibility study included 10 patients wit
64 patients (1646 black and 2400 white) from a
single center from 2007 to 2015.
65 s with lung cancer or lymphoma referred to a
single center from August 2011 to August 2013.
66 Patients with VRL at a
single center from January 1, 1984, through July 30, 201
67 ve adult kidney recipients transplanted at a
single center from March 2004 to February 2013.
68 nal cross-sectional study was conducted at a
single center HTx outpatient clinic.
69 nd, randomized clinical trial conducted in a
single center in Calgary, Canada, from August 2013 to De
70 (median age at diagnosis, 11.96 years) at a
single center in Canada and their family members (2305 s
71 Centralization of care at a
single center in developing countries can achieve patien
72 he patients underwent bariatric surgery at a
single center in France and were followed for 5 years.
73 and Omega-3 Trial (VITAL), coordinated by a
single center in Massachusetts.
74 aft kidneys from patients with COVID-19 at a
single center in New York City between March and June of
75 eonates were enrolled in a cohort study at a
single center in rural Gambia (N = 120).
76 g elective laparoscopic general surgery at a
single center in the Netherlands from May to November, 2
77 oria, Australia, and in patient cohorts from
single centers in Queensland, Scotland, and England.
78 c units (n = 4) from across the network to a
single center,
in order to create space to accommodate t
79 Setting:
Single-center institutional study.
80 This study was a
single-center,
interventional study comparing rates of f
81 A
single center IRB approved study included 874 patients.
82 A retrospective review of a
single-center ITx database was performed.
83 lementation resulted in the nation's longest
single-center kidney chain, and likelihood of LDKT incre
84 program, and the resulting nation's longest
single-center kidney chain, mitigated disparities in acc
85 donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) within a
single-center kidney transplant waitlist, by race and se
86 t Recipients (SRTR) database (1998-2016) (2)
Single center liver transplant database (Mayo Clinic Roc
87 This was a
single-center medical record review of previously untrea
88 Reviewing
single-center medical records, we identified all patient
89 Our
single-center model of interventions may serve as a prac
90 In this first-in-human,
single-center,
multioperator trial, VALUE trial (VytronU
91 ds This study was conducted as a prospective
single-center nonblinded randomized controlled trial (Ne
92 In this small,
single-center,
nonblinded trial involving patients with
93 Prospective,
single-center,
nonblinded, randomized controlled trial.
94 This was a
single-center observational cohort study.
95 Prospective
single-center observational cohort study.
96 In this prospective
single-center observational study, surgical patients wer
97 This was a
single-center,
observational cohort study of patients wi
98 Material and Methods: In this prospective,
single-center,
observational study 1003 oncological exam
99 This was a
single-center,
observational study of 115 consecutive pa
100 llergy aged 7 to 13 years were enrolled in a
single-center,
open-label peanut OIT trial.
101 nt metastases were enrolled in a prospective
single-center,
open-label pilot study.
102 olled patients with sickle cell disease in a
single-center,
open-label pilot study.
103 This univariate retrospective analysis of a
single center/
organ procurement organization use of HbA1
104 (n = 245) and DDLT (n = 592) performed at a
single center over 10 years (2009-2019), comparing survi
105 outpatients were recruited for this 12-week,
single-center,
parallel-group, double-blind RCT and rand
106 In this academic,
single-center,
parallel-group, prospective, randomized,
107 es of EoE in male and female subjects from a
single-center pediatric cohort.
108 A double blind, randomized,
single center phase II clinical trial was conducted comp
109 In our
single-center phase 2 randomized controlled trial, 57 pa
110 In this
single-center,
phase 1, open-label, parallel-group study
111 We performed a
single-center,
phase 1b/2a, randomized controlled trial
112 In this
single-center,
phase 2 study, 48 patients with relapsed/
113 This
single-center,
phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placeb
114 howed efficacy against B-cell lymphomas in a
single-center,
phase 2a study.
115 s nonrandomized, retrospective, comparative,
single-center pilot study, 105 consecutive eyes of 75 pa
116 We externally validated the final model in a
single-center population (n = 10,259 ICU days).
117 This
single-center,
population-based, retrospective study ide
118 This
single-center,
pre-post, quasiexperimental study evaluat
119 In this
single-center preliminary study of patients undergoing e
120 A
single-center propensity-score matched cohort study, inc
121 This was a
single-center prospective clinical study including healt
122 study included patients recruited via (1) a
single-center prospective cohort and (2) a national phar
123 We studied a
single-center prospective cohort of 1258 kidney transpla
124 This is a
single-center prospective cohort study conducted from Ju
125 Patients in this
single-center prospective cohort study received either D
126 Single-center prospective cohort study.
127 In a
single-center prospective cohort, we assessed disability
128 S was conducted among children enrolled in a
single-center prospective consecutive cohort at The Chil
129 The purpose of this
single-center prospective interventional case series was
130 ry, and total knee and hip arthroplasty in a
single-center prospective observational cohort study.
131 This was a
single-center prospective observational study that compa
132 Retrospective analyses and
single-center prospective studies identify chronic metab
133 ds A HIPAA-compliant secondary analysis of a
single-center prospective study was performed for adult
134 Based on this
single-center prospective study, both of these therapies
135 Single-center,
prospective cohort, as well as secondary
136 This
single-center,
prospective cohort, feasibility study, en
137 First, in a
single-center,
prospective observational study of ARDS,
138 This
single-center,
prospective study from a regional public
139 This is a
single-center,
prospective study including 107 patients
140 In our pilot,
single-center,
prospective study, 11 patients with ESKD
141 A
single-center,
prospective, nonrandomized trial enrolled
142 was an institutional review board-approved,
single-center,
prospective, randomized, parallel-group,
143 M between 1992 and 2012 were included from a
single-center prospectively maintained database.
144 Retrospective,
single-center quasi-experimental study of hospitalized p
145 A
single-center,
quasi-experimental study of adult bactere
146 We conducted a
single-center,
randomised controlled trial involving 130
147 A
single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted,
148 RATIONALE:
Single-center randomized controlled trials of the Zephyr
149 DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:
Single-center randomized trial conducted among women wit
150 We performed a
single-center randomized trial to compare the effects of
151 Three
single-center randomized trials reported no significantl
152 We conducted a
single-center randomized, controlled trial evaluating su
153 In this
single-center,
randomized clinical trial, patients under
154 We conducted a
single-center,
randomized controlled trial involving 130
155 e banded versus nonbanded sleeve gastrectomy
single-center,
randomized controlled trial was conducted
156 neous Coronary Procedures) is a prospective,
single-center,
randomized study.
157 We performed a
single-center,
randomized trial of 66 patients with conf
158 In this
single-center,
randomized, controlled trial, 35 consecut
159 Methods: This
single-center,
randomized, double-blind, placebo-control
160 In this
single-center,
randomized, nonblinded trial, we assigned
161 Individual patient data were obtained from 3
single-center,
randomized, parallel-group, open-label tr
162 A
single-center register-based cohort study with inclusion
163 terdam Cardiology Hospital) is a prospective
single-center registry in which post-percutaneous corona
164 Montreal Heart Institute hospital cohort, a
single-center registry of participants.
165 mains to be established, a growing number of
single-center reports indicate their presence and potent
166 We performed a
single center retrospective case control study of patien
167 Materials and methods This
single-center retrospective analysis included radiomic f
168 The method used in this study was
single-center retrospective analysis of 207 liver transp
169 A
single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively co
170 This
single-center retrospective cohort analysis suggests tha
171 A
single-center retrospective cohort design study was perf
172 This is a
single-center retrospective cohort of 897 liver transpla
173 We constructed a
single-center retrospective cohort of adult patients dia
174 This
single-center retrospective cohort study compared donor
175 A
single-center retrospective cohort study examined adult
176 This
single-center retrospective cohort study included patien
177 We conducted a
single-center retrospective cohort study of primary lung
178 In this
single-center retrospective observational study, we exam
179 This
single-center retrospective proof-of-concept study inclu
180 A
single-center retrospective review of 196 nodules in 184
181 We performed a
single-center retrospective review of SOTR diagnosed wit
182 This is a
single-center retrospective review that includes 279 con
183 A
single-center retrospective review was performed on 2963
184 Materials and Methods This
single-center retrospective study evaluated consecutive
185 This
single-center retrospective study included all consecuti
186 This
single-center retrospective study included all consecuti
187 We performed a
single-center retrospective study of stem cell and organ
188 I, 1.02-1.40]).Conclusions: Publication of a
single-center retrospective study was associated with si
189 A large observational
single-center retrospective study was conducted.
190 We performed a
single center,
retrospective case series study of lung t
191 A
single center,
retrospective chart review of patients wi
192 IASCC) in persons with HIV-1, we performed a
single-center,
retrospective analysis of a prospective c
193 This was a
single-center,
retrospective analysis of electronic heal
194 We present a
single-center,
retrospective cohort of patients with ant
195 We conducted a
single-center,
retrospective cohort study including 1115
196 This
single-center,
retrospective cohort study was conducted
197 This
single-center,
retrospective cohort study was conducted
198 Single-center,
retrospective cohort study.
199 Single-center,
retrospective review of 157 patients with
200 We performed a
single-center,
retrospective review of children with BSI
201 This was a
single-center,
retrospective review of children with DCM
202 This was a
single-center,
retrospective review of patients undergoi
203 Materials and Methods This
single-center,
retrospective study was approved by the i
204 Materials and Methods In this
single-center,
retrospective study, 370 patients underwe
205 In this
single-center,
retrospective study, we describe the freq
206 We conducted a
single-center,
retrospective study.
207 This investigation comprised a
single-center,
retrospective study.
208 In this
single-center,
retrospective, longitudinal study, diseas
209 A
single-center,
retrospective, observational cohort study
210 In this
single-center,
retrospective, observational study, we ex
211 This was a retrospective
single-center review of 100 KP recipients transplanted b
212 A retrospective
single-center review of Employee Health and Wellness Ser
213 Retrospective,
single-center review of patients with BA requiring LT >
214 Whereas
single-center safety data for diagnostic use have been p
215 The study was an open-label, single-arm,
single-center secukinumab treatment study that included
216 In a large,
single-center series, no differences in clinical or proc
217 date, the majority of outcome data are from
single-center series.
218 Conclusion This post hoc analysis of the
single-center SIESTA trial revealed that time from groin
219 e RECIPE trial was an investigator initiated
single-center,
single-blind prospective, randomized cont
220 From a
single-center,
single-surgeon series of 189 consecutive
221 ng the study period, 80 351 were listed in a
single center (
SL group), and 3584 were listed in >1 cen
222 Single-center studies have demonstrated that resection o
223 Single-center studies suggest that neonatal acute kidney
224 has not been conducted, results from small,
single-center studies support this notion.
225 surgery literature consists mostly of small,
single-center studies, and the epidemiology of frailty r
226 ing is a unique tissue-based marker that, in
single-center studies, suggests strong prognostic value.
227 Current evidence for RAMIE originates from
single-center studies, which may not be generalizable to
228 excellent diagnostic and prognostic value in
single-center studies.
229 Evidence has been limited to short,
single-center studies.
230 escriptions of outcomes are limited to small
single-center studies.
231 ry cardiac malignancies are limited to small
single-center studies.
232 A retrospective,
single center study carried out between 01.2005 and 06.2
233 This was a prospective,
single center study comparing levels of bronchioalveolar
234 disease were included in this retrospective
single center study.
235 ly), and 1 US-based prospective longitudinal
single-center study (MGH; both anticoagulation- and nona
236 This phase 1b/2, observer-blind,
single-center study (NCT01193920) enrolled infants born
237 articipating centers, one German prospective
single-center study (UKER-ICH; nonanticoagulation-associ
238 Setting:
Single-center study at an academic referral center.
239 This
single-center study compared CRT patients (implant date,
240 This was a cross-sectional,
single-center study comprising 32 ESRD patients and 38 c
241 Rationale: In December 2016, a
single-center study describing significant improvements
242 A retrospective,
single-center study evaluated 62 patients who tested pos
243 This was a
single-center study in a patient simulation population.
244 A 5-year retrospective
single-center study in all adult patients with SD admitt
245 This
single-center study included 14 of 93 patients with ESCS
246 This retrospective,
single-center study included kidney transplant recipient
247 Materials and Methods This
single-center study involved retrospective analysis of 1
248 PARTICIPANTS: We conducted an observational
single-center study of 13,877 adults with suspected infe
249 Single-center study of 94 patients with type 2 diabetes
250 Retrospective
single-center study of all LT since the start of DCD pro
251 This was a
single-center study of clinical practice that included s
252 We conducted a cross-sectional
single-center study of platelet donors undergoing platel
253 We report on a
single-center study of tocilizumab in hospitalized patie
254 In this
single-center study of women with HIV infection and CIN
255 y unresectable pancreatic cancer-the largest
single-center study reported.
256 Our
single-center study shows genetic sensory polyneuropathi
257 Our
single-center study suggests access to oral antibiotic t
258 Emerging data from a
single-center study suggests that a 30% relative reducti
259 Single-center study that included all cirrhotic patients
260 This is a retrospective,
single-center study that included consecutive LT recipie
261 and nutritional status was investigated in a
single-center study under tightly controlled conditions
262 Materials and Methods This retrospective
single-center study was conducted from June 2008 to June
263 Retrospective,
single-center study with 54 patients (mean 67.0 +/- 13.1
264 Randomized, assessor-blinded,
single-center study within Region Zealand and the Capita
265 Methods: In this observational
single-center study, 1,003 oncologic examinations (918 p
266 In this
single-center study, 52 consecutive eyes with vasculariz
267 In this prospective,
single-center study, 76 patients with preoperatively non
268 Materials and Methods In this retrospective
single-center study, patients (age >=16 years) were incl
269 In this retrospective,
single-center study, T1 mapping data were collected from
270 In this retrospective
single-center study, three different DLMs were trained o
271 In this
single-center study, we included 153 consecutive eyes th
272 In this
single-center study, we reviewed 136 children (199 eyes)
273 e prospectively included in an observational
single-center study.
274 een healthy subjects were recruited for this
single-center study.
275 Single-center,
tertiary eye care referral center.
276 e study was retrospective and performed at a
single center;
the sample was small; follow-up was limit
277 onal, observational study was conducted in a
single center to analyze aqueous samples from highly myo
278 deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) at a
single center to demonstrate the advantages of LDLT and
279 231 patients with glomerular disorders at a
single center to develop a computerized algorithm compri
280 ere retrospectively screened and tested on a
single center training cohort and subsequently tested on
281 oma biopsy samples, constituting the largest
single center translationally analyzed osteosarcoma coho
282 A randomized, double-blind,
single-center trial (NCT01820208) was conducted between
283 This phase I/II,
single-center trial enrolled patients with metastatic HP
284 sults of a phase II, randomized, open-label,
single-center trial in adults aged 18 to 45 years in the
285 In this
single-center trial involving patients with sciatica las
286 efit to ibrutinib, we conducted a randomized
single-center trial of ibrutinib vs ibrutinib plus ritux
287 protocol sequence randomized noninferiority
single-center trial performed at Turku University Hospit
288 In this
single-center trial, children and adolescents with drug-
289 In a
single-center trial, we randomly assigned patients with
290 Prospective randomized
single-center trial.
291 ven that the individual trials examined were
single-center trials and disability was the primary outc
292 Single-center trials and retrospective case series have
293 lecular imaging in oncology have been small,
single-center trials.
294 dependent multicenter discovery (CTOT14) and
single-center validation (BUMC) cohorts, we analyzed kid
295 This phase 2a,
single-center,
vehicle-controlled, intrapatient study wa
296 Initially validated, in a
single-center Veteran hospital, we sought to improve mod
297 This
single-center (
VISSUM Innovation, Alicante, Spain) study
298 ses of more than 1000 children with IBD at a
single center,
we found that 3% had rare variants in gen
299 ection of the sciatic or femoral nerves at a
single center were included.
300 dobronchial ultrasound-guided staging from a
single center were included.