戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1    The outcome measure was the electrodermal skin conductance response.
2 on through pupil size change, heart rate and skin conductance response.
3 ing in the MR-available groups as indexed by skin conductance responses.
4 vior, questionnaires, subjective report, and skin conductance responses.
5  group had significantly smaller conditional skin conductance responses.
6 s are associated with changes in nonspecific skin conductance response, a sensitive psychophysiologic
7 opposing asymmetric gradients of conditioned skin conductance responses across training groups that s
8  specificity in the recovery of extinguished skin conductance responses after presentations of an aud
9      The fear conditioning outcome measures, skin conductance response amplitudes and anxiety ratings
10 igated the relationship between non-specific skin conductance response, an objective index of sympath
11 itioning of physiological startle responses (skin conductance response and heart rate).
12  learning task modelled computationally with skin conductance response and pupillometry.
13 ented extinction across exposure sessions on skin conductance response and skin conductance level.
14 es was associated with transiently increased skin conductance responses and bilateral amygdala activa
15                                              Skin conductance responses and blood oxygenation level-d
16 salient cues (indexed by subjective ratings, skin conductance responses and EEG event-related potenti
17 flected in the patients' subjective ratings, skin conductance responses and facial expression behavio
18 They also showed weaker correlations between skin conductance responses and frontal brain regions, in
19   The saliency manipulation was confirmed by skin conductance responses and subjective ratings of the
20                                              Skin conductance responses and verbal self-reports of ar
21 ponse as measured by self-reported fear, the skin conductance response, and right anterior insula act
22 o losses relative to gains, as measured with skin conductance response, and the difference in arousal
23  during the dental cleaning (eg, nonspecific skin conductance responses associated with the Frankl Sc
24                                        Lower skin conductance response at context renewal in scopolam
25                     Scopolamine led to lower skin conductance response at long-term extinction retest
26 roups did not differ in conditioned arousal (skin conductance responses) at any stage.
27                                              Skin conductance responses, blood oxygenation level-depe
28          Subjective pleasantness ratings and skin conductance responses did not differ between behavi
29  (CRF-R1) antagonist, GW876008, on brain and skin conductance responses during acquisition and extinc
30                         Controls had greater skin conductance responses during acquisition than extin
31                                              Skin conductance responses during extinction recall did
32 ex predicted fear expression (as measured by skin conductance response) during extinction recall.
33 h PTSD and combat controls were conditioned (skin conductance response), extinguished, and tested for
34                                  Analyses of skin conductance responses, fear ratings and blood oxyge
35                                   Despite no skin conductance response group differences during extin
36  recovery (freezing in rats and anticipatory skin conductance responses in humans) when tested 24 hou
37                                              Skin conductance responses in OCD patients (n = 43) fail
38                                              Skin conductance response indexed psychophysiological re
39                         Youth behavioral and skin conductance response markers suggest successful thr
40 ethodology-electrodermal activity recording (skin conductance responses)-may be influenced not only b
41 ficant differences were found in nonspecific skin conductance responses (mean difference, -0.30 [95%
42 oral (self-reported anxiety), physiological (skin conductance response), neuronal (task-based and res
43                                          The skin conductance responses of 15 patients with chronic d
44 s-outcome) reversal learning assessed by the skin conductance response: one innately threatening stim
45 re-exposure did not affect generalization of skin conductance response or fear potentiated startle.
46                               In contrast to skin conductance responses or pupil dilation, modulation
47 ls with autism spectrum disorder showed less skin conductance responses overall.
48 sal (threat ratings), physiological arousal (skin conductance response), perceptual learning [discrim
49 ctive condition displayed lower increases in skin conductance responses relative to baseline and repo
50 f pavlovian threat conditioning by assessing skin conductance response (SCR) and declarative memory o
51  paradigm with 24 h delayed extinction while skin conductance response (SCR) and fear ratings were re
52                        In the present study, skin conductance response (SCR) and unconditioned stimul
53 groups showed a reduced differential CS+/CS- skin conductance response (SCR) compared to placebo (b =
54 ural basis for individual differences in the skin conductance response (SCR) during discriminative fe
55                              The sympathetic skin conductance response (SCR) is one index of autonomi
56                                              Skin conductance response (SCR) was the behavioral index
57 ctions in the magnitude of the unconditioned skin conductance response (SCR).
58 rning was quantified by shock expectancy and skin conductance response (SCR).
59                                              Skin conductance responses (SCR) and self-reported fear
60  change in skin conductance levels (SCL) and skin conductance responses (SCR) between outdoor-complex
61 to all cues (no shocks were delivered) while skin conductance responses (SCR) were recorded.
62 ction learning with no significant impact on skin conductance responses (SCR).
63 king performance and electrodermal activity (skin conductance responses, SCR) as an index of somatic
64 n training, generalization), while acquiring skin conductance responses (SCRs) and ratings (arousal,
65                              We measured the skin conductance responses (SCRs) of subjects after they
66                                              Skin conductance responses (SCRs) to stimuli that were p
67 ages while heart rate deceleration (HRD) and skin conductance responses (SCRs) were monitored.
68                                Additionally, skin conductance responses (SCRs) were weakly correlated
69 over, normals began to generate anticipatory skin conductance responses (SCRs) whenever they pondered
70 esonance imaging and concurrent recording of skin conductance responses (SCRs).
71      Anticipatory sympathetic arousal [i.e., skin conductance responses (SCRs)] and explicit measures
72 uring extinction, women with IBS had greater skin conductance responses than controls-an effect norma
73 the inflation group exhibited larger learned skin conductance responses than the control group.
74                             The magnitude of skin conductance response to both conditioned stimulus t
75 enewal; in the danger context, they had less skin conductance response to CS+E and lower activity in
76                             The authors used skin conductance response to index conditioned respondin
77 ng, pathological anxiety involves heightened skin conductance response to potential but not immediate
78  individuals who failed to show a suppressed skin conductance response to the extinguished versus non
79                                    Change in skin conductance response to the neutral stimulus was us
80                                          The skin conductance response to unpleasant pictures was sig
81 e manifest in higher pain ratings and larger skin conductance responses to directly experienced cues.
82    In contrast, FTLD patients showed reduced skin conductance responses to the aversive stimulus, whi
83 vary FGF2 exhibited significantly heightened skin conductance responses to the CS without shock durin
84 n tuning: Both conditioned visuocortical and skin conductance responses to the CS+ were strongly redu
85 y psychological (ratings) and physiological (skin conductance) responses to both humans and avatars.
86                   Similarly, threat-elicited skin conductance responses varied positively with violen
87 nificant differences in conditionability for skin conductance responses, verbal reports, or activatio
88                       The mean unconditioned skin conductance response was greater in the DMD group t
89                                              Skin conductance response was measured throughout the ex
90 ., increased heart rate, frequency of phasic skin conductance response) was associated with time pass
91 ce noted in our psychophysiological measure (skin conductance responses) was during extinction recall
92                                Additionally, skin conductance responses were found to have less contr
93  cocaine users, but not in control subjects, skin conductance responses were positively correlated wi
94                                              Skin conductance responses were used as an index of cond
95 ile viewing fearful faces and showed reduced skin conductance response when greeting an unfamiliar ex
96 ersive than did controls and displayed lower skin conductance responses when anticipating an upcoming
97 TMS to target 1 showed significantly reduced skin conductance responses, whereas TMS to target 2 had