戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 fter simultaneous peptide administration and skin grafting.
2 lass I-disparate bm1 mice 7 d prior to donor skin grafting.
3       Donor-specific tolerance was tested by skin grafting.
4 afts, although incomplete tolerance to donor skin grafting.
5 sured by mixed lymphocyte reaction assay and skin grafting.
6 er DST, and 7, 14, 21, 28, and 75 days after skin grafting.
7 s confirmed by mixed lymphocyte reaction and skin grafting.
8 by the use of CSS together with conventional skin grafting.
9  assisted by tissue-expansion techniques and skin grafting.
10 lysis of graft-infiltrating lymphocytes, and skin grafting.
11  (mHA) of the recipient by means of repeated skin grafting.
12 burn excision and autologous split-thickness skin grafting.
13 eceived a WKY lung transplant 35 days before skin grafting.
14 oantigens after second donor and third-party skin grafting.
15 YAC-1 target cells on day 14 or day 15 after skin grafting.
16           We have tested T-cell tolerance by skin grafting.
17  well as secondary wound closure by means of skin grafting.
18 s, and then repair with advancement flaps or skin grafting.
19           Injection of each cell type before skin grafting abolished hemopoietic cell engraftment and
20 lowed until rejection with donor/third-party skin grafting, adoptive transfer, and interleukin 2 infu
21               Tolerance was confirmed by AKR skin grafting after antibody clearance.
22     Swine donors were presensitized by mouse skin grafting and boosted by the injection of mouse cell
23                              This neglect of skin grafting and nutritional support resulted in critic
24 arrival, all patients underwent excision and skin grafting and received similar clinical care.
25 h broad clinical implications for allogeneic skin grafting and sepsis.
26 ACS) analysis, and tolerance was assessed by skin grafting, and also by mixed lymphocyte reaction (ML
27 se, could convey many benefits of autologous skin grafting, and avoids the major drawback of donor si
28  Histology, mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR), skin grafting, and flow cytometry assessed functional to
29 stemic or topical antibiotic administration, skin grafting, and nutritional formulations also impact
30 of cirrhotic rats was assessed by allogeneic skin grafting, and the immune response to transplanted p
31  were collected at various times after mouse skin grafting, and their potential to induce GVHD and to
32 fts from both groups was seen on day 1 after skin grafting, and thereafter the number remained stable
33                             A full-thickness skin grafting approach was used to investigate the postn
34 etal muscle transplant (VASM) and autologous skin grafting as rescue therapy for refractory squamous
35          Mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and skin grafting assessed donor-specific tolerance in vitro
36  we describe bone marrow transplantation and skin grafting between WT and KO mice to assess the contr
37 rier, measured by the stringent criterion of skin grafting, can be achieved using a noncytoablative t
38 ance, measured by the stringent criterion of skin grafting, can be induced across a widely disparate
39                                      MLR and skin grafting confirmed donor-specific tolerance in euth
40   This rejection after repeat donor-specific skin grafting correlated with a decline in the percentag
41                                              Skin grafting experiments between Snd/Snd and control mi
42                                              Skin grafting experiments confirmed the stratum corneum
43                        Adoptive transfer and skin grafting experiments were conducted to assess wheth
44 ific immune suppression, as indicated by the skin-grafting experiments.
45                                     Standard skin grafting, flow cytometry (FC), and mixed lymphocyte
46 vivors were tested for tolerance by standard skin grafting from the recipient (LEW), the donor (LBN),
47                      A streamlined method of skin grafting in mice is described.
48 onfirmed in all limb-allograft recipients by skin grafting in vivo and by MLR in vitro.
49 immunocompetence were determined by standard skin grafting in vivo and mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR
50 tantially improve healing quality and reduce skin grafting incidents and thus pave the way for clinic
51 ical to wound healing and procedures such as skin grafting, increases with mechanical stimulus for ce
52  in the antidonor CTLp frequency after donor skin grafting, indicating that a specific defect in the
53                                   Autologous skin grafting is a standard treatment for skin defects s
54 ecific pigmentation in reconstructs used for skin grafting is incompletely understood.
55                                              Skin grafting, MLR, and flow cytometry revealed that tol
56 cells into malignancy in a regenerated human skin grafting model.
57                                      Using a skin-grafting model, we demonstrated that IL-17 in HPV16
58 eointegrated dental implant installation and skin grafting of the fibular bone 3 to 6 months before j
59 2(b/d)) BMCs on day 7 relative to DBA/2 (D2) skin grafting on day 0.
60 -1, +2, and +5 relative to B10.A (H2k) donor skin grafting on day 0.
61  major histocompatibility complex-mismatched skin grafting on day 0.
62 h lesions > 1.5-mm thick frequently required skin grafting or amputation.
63 participants whose treatment had failed, had skin grafting, or were coinfected with human immunodefic
64 s a day by mouth until 7 days after the last skin grafting procedure, discharge from the acute care u
65 irect implications for improving outcomes in skin grafting procedures.
66 ense medical challenge, and while autologous skin grafting remains the "gold-standard" therapeutic op
67 al and socioeconomic burdens, and autologous skin grafting remains the gold standard for wound repair
68 lity of delivering secreted proteins through skin grafting rests upon (i) the strength of the promote
69 arginal zone B cells before sensitization or skin grafting resulted in a significant diminution of an
70       Injection of presensitized cells after skin grafting resulted in different outcomes depending o
71                                    Following skin grafting, splenic chimerism was reduced with differ
72                              We report a new skin-grafting strategy that stabilizes the Li metal-liqu
73  deep injuries is autologous split-thickness skin grafting (STSG), which frequently results in contra
74 on for flap reconstruction, debridement, and skin-grafting techniques in one study, dehiscence in a s
75 ytes form squamous cell carcinomas following skin grafting, these results suggest that in mouse kerat
76 in penile reconstruction are glansectomy and skin grafting to fashion a neoglans in penile cancer and
77 ization to donor can, however, be induced by skin grafting two weeks prior to liver transplantation,
78                                              Skin grafting unveiled additional defects in GATA-3-null
79 nged compared to normal recipients even when skin grafting was delayed until after rejection of the H
80                                       B10.D2 skin grafting was performed on day 14.
81           In murine models of MHC mismatched skin grafting, we investigated whether it is feasible to
82 crochimerism and was confirmed by second-set skin grafting with donor skin 100 days after the first g