戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 bright light, direct social interaction, and social dominance.
2 rone promotes behaviours intended to enhance social dominance.
3 perceptions of attractiveness, strength, and social dominance.
4 context specific and can be dissociated with social dominance.
5 rting success, signalling and enhancing male social dominance.
6 ted the format of infants' representation of social dominance.
7  and 2 targeted expectations of stability of social dominance.
8 cks, and migration, and at varying levels of social dominance.
9  and cooperation in predicting 2 measures of social dominance.
10 ntrolled, wins alone predicted teacher-rated social dominance.
11 rative behaviors and their associations with social dominance.
12 ey were thus lower ranking on all indices of social dominance.
13  screening reveals deficits in olfaction and social dominance.
14 cial patterns strongly predict body size and social dominance.
15 ents to interrogate the mechanistic basis of social dominance.
16 t's rank in object dominance and its rank in social dominance.
17 ression proactively, motivated by pursuit of social dominance.
18 ding social interactions, social memory, and social dominance.
19 which the mPFC exerts top-down modulation of social dominance.
20  examined whether a domain of social context-social dominance-accounted for more phenotypic variation
21  we test the hypothesis that an individual's social dominance affects nighttime rest in a troop of wi
22 s higher in sex-changing females that attain social dominance and display dominant male behavior than
23 e establishment of relationships of coercive social dominance and exploitation.
24  GH axis and central DA neurotransmission in social dominance and fitness is clearly appreciated, the
25 niature GPS tracking to study, respectively, social dominance and in-flight leader-follower relations
26 st that preverbal infants mentally represent social dominance and use a cue that covaries with it phy
27 tream signals that are critical for fitness, social dominance, and competition between adult males.
28 epression, fear-related learning and memory, social dominance, and low locomotor activity.
29 ere rated separately for physical dominance, social dominance, and masculinity, and was seen for two
30  including increased allogrooming, increased social dominance, and reduced pup USV.
31 lity originates from their representation of social dominance as a relationship between two agents ra
32  by studying human infants' understanding of social dominance as a stable relation.
33 However, the regulatory mechanisms governing social dominance, as well as the crucial regulators and
34 tinuity in the neuroanatomical substrates of social dominance back to at least 35 million years.
35 ubordinate mice when they initiate effortful social dominance behavior during encounters with a domin
36 nd synaptic defects in prefrontal cortex and social dominance behavior.
37 he balance of neuronal activities underlying social dominance behaviors-a phenomenon suggestive of a
38 lin in the medial prefrontal cortex reverses social dominance deficits in Grn+/- mice, an animal mode
39 uronal progranulin-deficient lines developed social dominance deficits similar to those in global Grn
40                        Using mouse models of social dominance (Dom) and submissiveness (Sub), which p
41                                              Social dominance encompasses winning dyadic contests and
42 ed to object dominance (food competition) or social dominance (freedom of movement in social encounte
43                                       Female social dominance (FSD) over males is unusual in mammals,
44 etration and victimization, we highlight the social dominance function of bullying, the inflated self
45                                              Social dominance hierarchies enable efficient resource a
46        The natural alignment of animals into social dominance hierarchies produces adaptive, and pote
47 f humans, bonobos, and chimpanzees, lived in social dominance hierarchies that created conflict throu
48 mation about the ranks of individuals within social dominance hierarchies.
49  social species and can function to maintain social dominance hierarchies.
50 ations that occur through the development of social dominance hierarchies.
51 e nonhuman primate, the authors examined the social dominance hierarchy of juvenile macaque monkeys (
52    Here, we examined the association between social dominance hierarchy status established within cag
53 eptor-expressing neurons in the PFC regulate social dominance hierarchy.
54 sured some phenotypic traits, and found that social dominance (i.e. dominance hierarchy type and degr
55  study the anatomy of connections underlying social dominance in a colony of 15 female squirrel monke
56  show that trait anxiety directly influences social dominance in male outbred rats and identify an im
57 dial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is involved in social dominance in rodents(7,8) and humans(10,11).
58 mated behavioral monitoring system to assess social dominance in same-sex, group-living mice.
59 ering biologically relevant factors, such as social dominance, in experimental designs and statistica
60 omarorum, display territorial aggression and social dominance independent of reproductive state.
61                                 The study of social dominance interactions between animals offers a w
62                                              Social dominance is essential for maintaining a stable s
63               Despite widespread interest in social dominance, little is known of its neural correlat
64 tegrity of the right uncinate fasciculus and social dominance measures, including normalized David's
65 ts a model of the evolution of interspecific social dominance mimicry (ISDM), that does not rely on t
66  as female perinea and faces, as well as the social dominance of those faces.
67 oundwork for understanding the mechanisms of social dominance, offering potential insights for managi
68                    Individual differences in social dominance orientation (SDO) interact with the soc
69  a dominant racial identity, we hypothesized social dominance orientation (SDO) would relate to force
70                                              Social dominance orientation (SDO), an influential index
71 ltruism, interpersonal trust, agreeableness, Social Dominance Orientation and opposition to immigrati
72 aled that Black conservatives (determined by social dominance orientation) referenced high status mor
73 suggest that Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation, indicators of support for
74 .5 caused adult females to display increased social dominance over control females, consistent with a
75                                         This social dominance paradigm may mimic human relational str
76       Subjects were exposed to a widely used social dominance paradigm that elicits behavioral and ph
77                          Here, we present a "social dominance paradox": using self-report scales and
78  minority (38 groups, 22%) show more complex social dominance patterns (close competitors or bullying
79                                              Social dominance, personality ratings, and frequency, du
80                              The dynamics of social dominance play a significant role in regulating a
81 one of the operated groups showed changes in social dominance postsurgery, although changes in other
82                        Hamsters that achieve social dominance prior to social defeat exhibit greater
83 hat behaviors, such as those associated with social dominance, produce fitness effects that are subje
84    We also examined the relationship between social dominance rank and blood corticosterone (CORT) le
85 ms that are predominant in animals of lowest social dominance rank, and implicate PACAP in brain adap
86       Infants' demonstrated understanding of social dominance reflects the cognitive underpinning of
87 s demonstrate that infants' understanding of social dominance relations may be based on evolutionaril
88 s 6-9 mo of age are capable of understanding social dominance relations.
89 ct a transcriptomic analysis of non-breeding social dominance relationships.
90 asexual competition to establish significant social dominance relationships.
91 uctive and health benefits, but the costs of social dominance remain a topic of debate.
92 hanisms underlining the caste transition and social dominance remain unclear.
93 ation of this expression engenders increased social dominance specifically among other aspects of soc
94  we investigate how body mass interacts with social (dominance status and number of helpers) and envi
95                    Here, we examined how the social dominance status of adult male Sprague-Dawley rat
96 determined the relatively stable within-cage social dominance status of animals, half were subjected
97 xic amygdala lesions displayed lower rank in social dominance status, reduced aggressive gestures, an
98 adolescent monkeys did not alter presurgical social dominance status.
99 imal distinctiveness, uncertainty reduction, social dominance, terror management); (c) key moderators
100 age sleeping, and subordinate responses in a social dominance test.
101 hannel 2 (ASIC2) exhibit persistently higher social dominance than their wild-type cagemates.
102 eveals three main patterns of rank-dependent social dominance: the downward heuristic (aggress unifor
103                      Three studies translate social dominance theory to policing, testing the relatio
104 edial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) orchestrates social dominance through subcortical pathways to the amy
105 everal aspects of their foraging ecology and social dominance, which could require differential seaso

 
Page Top