コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 egulation of behavior, with implications for social evolution.
2 g interest in the genetic changes underlying social evolution.
3 role of dispersal, demography and kinship in social evolution.
4 ty is a cause rather than an effect of human social evolution.
5 roup selection as a plausible force in human social evolution.
6 gy on the fixation of neutral innovations in social evolution.
7 omparative data to test hypotheses regarding social evolution.
8 ort proposed links to individual fitness and social evolution.
9 pacts of intergroup conflict and its role in social evolution.
10 tion--a requirement for a complete theory of social evolution.
11 el system of choice for molecular studies of social evolution.
12 llowing us to evaluate alternative models of social evolution.
13 e level of individuals, can be influenced by social evolution.
14 tudy of the genetic mechanisms that underpin social evolution.
15 rces is key to understanding behavioural and social evolution.
16 ader implications of this work for microbial social evolution.
17 r interpreting transitional stages in vespid social evolution.
18 changed perspective for understanding insect social evolution.
19 by which female mate choice could influence social evolution.
20 f the interplay between network dynamics and social evolution.
21 rk for understanding the factors determining social evolution.
22 e it highly attractive as a model system for social evolution.
23 expression of complex behaviors important in social evolution.
24 of population spatial structure in microbial social evolution.
25 ightened our understanding of the process of social evolution.
26 tedness is a central concept in the study of social evolution.
27 made much use of it in attempting to explain social evolution.
28 ples and applied to multivariate problems in social evolution.
29 y has been fashioned by 100 million years of social evolution.
30 ich makes them good models for investigating social evolution.
31 argued to be an important selective force in social evolution.
32 l framework for many problems in biology and social evolution.
33 hin colonies, with profound implications for social evolution.
34 s of health and may act as a hidden force in social evolution.
35 help to reveal the role of these contests in social evolution.
37 em as a reverse auction broadens our view of social evolution and adaptations through the lens of hum
39 Here, we synthesize concepts and theories in social evolution and discuss its underlying ecological c
40 iscoideum is a model system for the study of social evolution and provides insights into the nature o
41 nted insights into the genomic signatures of social evolution and the specific genetic changes that r
44 ps us understand and reconstruct patterns of social evolution as well as fully appreciate the biologi
45 Allee effects underlay early explanations of social evolution but current understanding focusses on k
46 ica provides the opportunity to study recent social evolution by comparing social organization in nat
50 and dynamic relationship between genome and social evolution, demonstrating that sociality can influ
51 are likely to be a fundamental dimension of social evolution, especially when considering age-linked
53 One of the enduring problems in the study of social evolution has been to understand how cooperation
54 size cognitive adaptations, but we show that social evolution has shaped patterns of human phenotypic
55 social foraging could have implications for social evolution if "local" within-roost cooperation and
57 , clonality simplifies efforts to understand social evolution in aphids by obviating issues of intrag
63 raits, highlight recent empirical studies of social evolution in M. xanthus, and consider their impli
66 s, however, and does not accurately describe social evolution in organisms such as microbes where sel
69 ch a framework, thus integrating theories of social evolution into the evolutionary ecology of hetero
70 rge groups played an important role in human social evolution is dependent on how variation, whether
75 ades of research on environmental drivers of social evolution may prove fruitful for predicting shift
78 es of MLS provides a reference point for the social evolution of many taxa, including our own species
79 ness of interactions between the ecology and social evolution of multispecies microbial groups, which
81 es support a key role for infanticide in the social evolution of primates, and potentially, humans.
83 ocial insects, which demonstrates convergent social evolution of these taxa prior to agriculture.
84 within-generation bet-hedging hypothesis for social evolution predicts that (i) variance in reproduct
85 selection is central to the modern study of social evolution, recent studies of social species have
89 Currently, there is no formal framework of social evolution that encompasses genetic polymorphism.
90 confirms a central theoretical prediction of social evolution: that genetic relatedness promotes coop
94 ance on shared EPS may also be a weakness as social evolution theory predicts that inhibiting shared
96 oad agreement of different models shows that social evolution theory, rather than being in turmoil, i
99 e constructed this vertical understanding of social evolution using behavioral and anatomical analyse