ライフサイエンスコーパス: social support

1 y, pre-existing psychiatric conditions, poor social support).

2 nces; (5) glaucoma-related distress; and (6) social support.

3 experienced anaphylaxis and will have lower social support.

4 se-prevention planning, self-monitoring, and social support.

5 lowed by trait anxiety, age, anaphylaxis and social support.

6 stress response and higher receptiveness for social support.

7 ess perception, self-efficacy, and perceived social support.

8 demographic or environmental influences, and social support.

9 not confounded by socioeconomic variables or social support.

10 comorbidities, and polypharmacy, as well as social support.

11 ts with higher insurance coverage levels and social support.

12 ors as competing responsibilities or loss of social support.

13 ide opportunities for group intervention and social support.

14 s were stress symptoms, quality of life, and social support.

15 h measures of HF-specific quality of life or social support.

16 sociated with treatment include drug use and social support.

17 enabling factors (MEF), stress, coping, and social support.

18 nancy events, positive affect, and perceived social support.

19 site, event-related loss of spouse, and low social support.

20 e RPS group reported improvement in diabetes social support.

21 r age at LT, allograft longevity, and strong social support.

22 ession, optimism, multiple life changes, and social support.

23 ession given high hurricane exposure and low social support.

24 ronary risk factors but not by job strain or social support.

25 ed app (MatchFIT) encouraged between-session social support.

26 ental stage with respect to the aetiology of social support.

27 challenges because of poverty and inadequate social supports.

28 ce awareness, self-efficacy, and referral to social supports.

29 ted to traumatic events, and the presence of social support (-0.28 < rg < 0.20; p < 0.008).

30 f they had one of the following: (1) limited social support; (2) limited cognition; (3) substance abu

31 spaces (21%); support of community-initiated social support (21%); and basic counselling for groups a

32 nces with healthcare professionals and other social support; 4) adaptive and maladaptive coping strat

33 Needs were mainly social support (53%) and establishing goals of care (28%

34 itive work-life balance (69.2%), presence of social support (89.3%), and career satisfaction (73.2%);

35 o different indicators of social capital and social support across countries.

36 been reduced, psychosocial factors (lack of social support, adverse life events, loneliness, depress

37 ioural coping mechanisms-physical avoidance, social support, affiliative, aggressive and displacement

38 onditions of high hurricane exposure and low social support after adjustment for sex, ancestry (as de

39 Greater perceived social support, also potentially modifiable, was associa

40 ocial transmission process, and, conversely, social support ameliorates stress responses, a phenomeno

41 so had measures of stressful life events and social support and a depression symptom score, as well a

42 Associations between social support and age-related cognitive decline vary ac

43 N), 2279 (97.8%) completed surveys to assess social support and barriers to exercise, resulting in th

44 We aimed to describe the association between social support and barriers to participation with exerci

45 Evidence regarding social support and birth weight is also reviewed with at

46 s for CVD, a patient's readiness for change, social support and community resources that support beha

47 mined black immigrants, who may benefit from social support and country-of-origin foods in black immi

48 o discuss current views on the function that social support and demands, as well as role expectations

49 comes and can affect patients' perception of social support and depressive affect.

50 home, yet she is bedbound and lacks adequate social support and financial resources to manage safely.

51 teria for review and investigated aspects of social support and heart failure self-care behaviors.

52 Poor social support and high barriers to exercise were associ

53 ed an explosion of epidemiologic research on social support and human health.

54 positively associated with greater perceived social support and less severe illness-related grief.

55 iovascular risk in their owners by providing social support and motivation for physical activity.

56 rences and within-person changes in positive social support and negative social support were independ

57 Nonfunctional social support and noninclusion of the liver in the visc

58 e domains (Moods and emotions, Autonomy, and Social support and peers); average differences in QoL be

59 n the general population in only one domain (Social support and peers; mean difference -2.7 [0.25 SD]

60 ected publications focusing on links between social support and physical health are summarized.

61 Moreover, these innovations require social support and political will in order to be success

62 This research clearly demonstrates that social support and positive coping skills can mediate th

63 We assessed the mediating roles of social support and positive coping skills in the relatio

64 Social support and positive coping skills partially medi

65 Social support and positive coping skills predicted high

66 Social support and positive effects of the donation on r

67 ocial stressors - life events that challenge social support and relationships - represent powerful ri

68 iew the literature on interpersonal traumas, social support and risk for PTSD and integrate findings

69 Patients shared similar thoughts about social support and self-care ability by race, whereas AA

70 iterature regarding the relationship between social support and self-care behaviors in individuals wi

71 ES may influence levels of resources such as social support and SOC, which mediate stress and in turn

72 ure symptomatology, and the subcomponents of social support and social problem-solving increase the l

73 symptomatology and coping resources, such as social support and social problem-solving, on depression

74 Social support and social relationships have been repeat

75 t association was found between instrumental social support and survival, even after adjustment for c

76 probability of waitlisting while having more social support and transplant knowledge increased the pr

77 robability of wait-listing while having more social support and transplant knowledge increased the pr

78 th-care providers identified many sources of social support and used self-management strategies to co

79 t group (ISG) members benefit from receiving social support and, according to the helper therapy prin

80 sment of symptoms, psychological status, and social supports and should receive palliative care early

81 ternal psychosocial factors (stress, coping, social support) and adolescent dental behavior/access.

82 in psychosocial factors (e.g., hopelessness, social support) and cancer progression.

83 nges (diet, activity, stress management, and social support), and the men in the control group underw

84 ster damages but had also given and received social support, and 1.70 (95% CI: 1.03-2.76) among those

85 life events, 2) parenting stress, 3) lack of social support, and 4) parental worries.

86 ty that involves impaired cognition, lack of social support, and an inability to function independent

87 RQOL (SF-36; Liver Disease Quality of Life), social support, and cognition (Neuropsychological Impair

88 rotein, obesity, alcohol use, sleep quality, social support, and depression), adjusted odds ratio (OR

89 vascular risk factors, socioeconomic status, social support, and depressive symptoms (0.83; 95% CI, 0

90 were adjusted for age, sex, education, pain, social support, and depressive symptoms and were compare

91 o predict adherence, such as depressed mood, social support, and disease severity level.

92 d tobacco use, baseline WHO stage 4 disease, social support, and duration of ART.

93 It was hypothesized that race or ethnicity, social support, and functional status are independently

94 ce of patient age, gender, insurance status, social support, and functional status on decisions to op

95 ning physical and mental health status, less social support, and greater depressive symptomology were

96 ance abuse problems and mental illness, lack social support, and have no medical insurance.

97 Lymphoma symptom burden, less social support, and having received a transplantation we

98 troviral drugs, acceptance of HIV diagnosis, social support, and increased confidence in their abilit

99 quality of patient care, caregiving quality, social support, and level of unmet caregiving assistance

100 omen: parental warmth, neuroticism, divorce, social support, and marital satisfaction.

101 ty, cognitive function, psychological state, social support, and nutritional status.

102 Demographics, social support, and perceived health showed little corre

103 elationships between childhood maltreatment, social support, and positive coping skills and their dir

104 who had better physical function, emotional social support, and positive ratings regarding the quali

105 he 2004 hurricanes about hurricane exposure, social support, and posthurricane PTSD and major depress

106 ter control is made for depressive symptoms, social support, and psychiatric conditions and medicatio

107 drugs combined with psychological therapies, social support, and rehabilitation, but a pressing need

108 s on improving knowledge, coping, self-care, social support, and self-management strategies.

109 iting knowledge about menstruation, limiting social support, and shaping internalised and externally

110 olving, behavioral activation, strengthening social support, and stress management.

111 ing self-esteem and self-efficacy, promoting social support, and ultimately motivating positive chang

112 social outcomes (HRQoL, anxiety, depression, social support, and work performance).

113 ffects include minority race/ethnicity, poor social supports, and poor perceived health.

114 nutritional status, psychological state, and social support; and a review of the patient's medication

115 nor KT), psychosocial characteristics (e.g., social support, anxiety, depression), or transplant know

116 Social support appears to have a positive relationship o

117 Social support appears to influence both heart failure s

118 ly basic research on the positive effects of social support are also widespread.

119 High levels of social trust and social support are associated with life satisfaction aro

120 immediately after discharge, and longer-term social support are indicated.

121 Social support at baseline and at one year was predicted

122 Greater social support at child's age 3 was directly associated

123 tor symptoms, stressful life events, and low social support at each visit were each independently ass

124 zed shame and self-blame and lower levels of social support availability, which subsequently increase

125 a cancer disclosure, internalized shame, and social support availability.

126 osure, internalized reactions to stigma, and social support availability.

127 eassurance, and religious approval), needing social support (avoiding family conflict, unrelenting in

128 stressor-3 h of acute immobilization-impacts social-support behaviors differently when experienced in

129 es also consistently identify perceptions of social support both before and after a traumatic event a

130 eased physical activity levels and increased social support, both of which could improve the outcome

131 ghts the potentially significant impact that social support can have on cancer detection, treatment,

132 are experiencing many major life changes and social support can help them adjust to the associated en

133 In times of stress, social support can serve as a potent buffering mechanism

134 udy investigates how college students can be social support catalysts for organ donation and how soci

135 , organ function, comorbidity, polypharmacy, social support, cognitive and/or psychosocial factors, o

136 Perceived social support, cognitive functioning, and posttraumatic

137 red with the control group (P = .005) and in social support compared with the SET group (P = .012).

138 AG genotypes reported seeking more emotional social support, compared with those with the AA genotype

139 jective health status, and poorer subjective social support confer a higher risk for poor outcome.

140 onditions of high hurricane exposure and low social support, confirming and extending previous resear

141 improving stress levels, quality of life and social support [CORRECTED] for distressed survivors of b

142 Improved social support could indicate greater reliance on social

143 Social support criteria should be reconsidered in light

144 lf-reports of 7 life events and 3 sources of social support during the periconceptional period among

145 ST by examining its direct and indirect (eg, social support) effects compared with a nondirective sup

146 and intimate partner abuse) and needed more social support (eg, long-term welfare receipt and unempl

147 loss of a child and whether professional or social support facilitate the long-term grief process.

148 e reviews the influences of psychopathology, social support, family issues, dialysis unit culture, an

149 ing depression trajectory were low perceived social support, followed by high neuroticism, low treatm

150 in, and still existed when there was greater social support for breastfeeding.

151 social approaches are effective, introducing social support for physical activity within communities

152 Adherence interventions and increased social support for those most at risk should be consider

153 of intervention by maintaining or enhancing social support for women soon after their breast cancer

154 including emotion regulation, parenting, and social support, for children who are exposed to war.

155 Among men, higher-than-average positive social support from a spouse/partner was associated with

156 95% CI: 0.000, 0.012); whereas high negative social support from all relationship types was associate

157 For women, higher-than-average positive social support from children (beta = 0.037, 95% CI: 0.01

158 ender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, social support, functional status, and insurance, respon

159 We examined whether pre-disaster social support functions as a disaster preparedness reso

160 So social support generates a form of learning that differs

161 included a total of 2,293 participants, and social support (giving and receiving emotional & instrum

162 epressive affect and decreased perception of social support have been linked with mortality in severa

163 is worse), as were responses to questions on social support (higher is better).

164 ically, how do traditional mechanisms (e.g., social support) hold up as explanations for religion-hea

165 failure symptomatology, and subcomponents of social support (i.e., belonging, tangible, and appraisal

166 All four types of social support (i.e., emotional support, instrumental/ta

167 Social support improved over time but the duration of un

168 d brain structures involved on the effect of social support in changing behavior and fear extinction

169 Significantly more providers used social support in listing decisions than believed it oug

170 9.2% supported revised guidelines for use of social support in listing decisions.

171 Nearly 25% believed that using social support in listing determinations was unfair or w

172 o identify potential stressors and available social support in order to promote psychological adaptat

173 ducation, verbal intelligence, stresses, and social support in parenting) and the home environment [H

174 hat differs from extinction acquired without social support in terms of the brain structures involved

175 y risk factor, whereas stable settlement and social support in the host country have a positive effec

176 l buffering is one mechanism by which strong social support increases resilience to mental illness.

177 physical and mental health status, and less social support independently predicted higher risk of no

178 dical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, and Duke Social Support Index.

179 there was no consistent association between social support indicators and mortality.

180 sed on the important roles played by stress, social support, individual differences, and broader soci

181 l factors, such as coping style and level of social support influence how people deal with stressful

182 ithout access to emotional support (Enriched Social Support Instrument score of <19 vs. > or = 19) ha

183 ssing moral injury; 6) the need for peer and social support interventions; and 7) normalization and p

184 iatric conditions, the extent and quality of social support is a strong determinant of outcome such t

185 Extinction with social support is blocked by the protein synthesis inhib

186 ormation of supportive social ties, and weak social support is itself often linked to dysregulated st

187 Likewise, social support is processed by some of the same neural r

188 Social support is used to determine transplant eligibili

189 behavioral/psychological (illness behavior, social support, learned helplessness, smoking, drinking)

190 ct of patient care on other activities, less social support, less sense of control over life, and les

191 ggest that a variety of stressors can induce social support-like behaviors.

192 severity, socioeconomic factors, education, social support, literacy, and trust reduced these racial

193 emale sex, greater age, being employed, less social support, longer drive time to CR, lower neighborh

194 th high TA were also associated with reduced social support, lower optimism, higher hostility, and gr

195 e threat, and posttrauma factors such as low social support, maladaptive coping strategies, and paren

196 performance status, cognitive function, and social support may affect decision making and complicate

197 ease ability to self-manage care and enhance social support may increase retention in care and improv

198 However, social support may positively influence an individual's

199 ated to recovery time, financial issues, and social support, may result in greater SWL after donation

200 bution of potential explanatory variables to social support measured.

201 further improve long-term survival including social support measures, visceral transplantation has ac

202 ve status, health literacy, psychopathology, social support, medical adherence, and substance abuse,

203 .e., depressive symptoms, perceived control, social support, medication adherence, sodium intake, and

204 mortality, as well as how SES differences in social support might account for SES differences in mort

205 nality (BFI-10), religious beliefs (SBI-15), social support (MOS), the mental and physical components

206 Social support most strongly differentiated the HG, PSYG

207 ion: (1) Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), (2) The Depression Anxiety Stres

208 ons per year on diet, physical activity, and social support (n=2262).

209 drug use; sleep quality; physical activity; social support; natural killer (NK) cell number and cyto

210 to better understand the specific health and social support needs of postpartum patients living in ur

211 in multiple linear regression included less social support, negative appraisals of life threat and t

212 on recent (past 6 months) sex, drug-use, and social-support network members (n = 897 ties).

213 increase network resilience in, for example, social support networks and logistics networks.

214 The aim of this study was to describe social support, networks and perceived satisfaction, exp

215 5) but not early life stress, social status, social support, neuroticism, or sleep disturbance.

216 .g., demographic variables, trauma exposure, social support), not taking the geographic nature of the

217 ife-years, and functional status; receipt of social support, nutritional, rehabilitative, and fertili

218 The social support of group hunting and territory defence ar

219 ding of the brain mechanisms involved in the social support of memories and in therapies for disorder

220 of life (HRQoL), mental health and perceived social support) of HCV patients receiving DAAs therapy p

221 nding our understanding of the influences of social support on health.

222 urrent knowledge related to the influence of social support on heart failure self-care behaviors.

223 l designs, to determine the effectiveness of social support on self-care behaviors in individuals wit

224 l support could indicate greater reliance on social support or becoming more adept at mobilising reso

225 Some interventions, such as increases in social support or the education of mothers about respons

226 l status (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.82), poor social support (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30-0.47), self-pay (

227 Moderate to severe symptom burden, limited social support, or having received a transplantation sho

228 aphics, disease severity, education, income, social support, or trust.

229 Partners reported less social support (P < .001), dyadic satisfaction (P < .05)

230 Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and social support (p = 0.013, Hospital Anxiety and Depressi

231 ere queried on 5 domains: home independence, social support, pain control, immediate, and overall sur

232 hold heads with greater reputations had more social support partners (measured as network indegree ce

233 ures that elicited demographics, sleepiness, social support, perceptions about prior training, relati

234 t was found to be negatively associated with social support, positive coping skills, and positive men

235 on loss and use of instrumental coping, good social support, positivity, and use of assistive aids.

236 strong determinant of outcome such that high social support predicts symptom improvement and remissio

237 lth measures, substance use history, current social support, recent stressor exposures, and, from the

238 port: social attachment, a type of emotional social support reflecting connections with others, and i

239 ng connections with others, and instrumental social support reflecting the availability of tangible a

240 ging support was the most beneficial type of social support related to depression.

241 This prospective study examined how social support relates to long-term survival among conse

242 d without coronary artery disease, including social support, relaxation therapy, yoga, meditation, co

243 the consolidation of extinction memory with social support relies on vmPFC rather than hippocampus g

244 nt hospice and have neither the home nor the social support required for home hospice.

245 iers to exercise, resulting in the perceived social support score (PSSS) and barriers to exercise sco

246 cifically cultural norms regarding emotional social support seeking.

247 We found that moderate stress increased social support-seeking behavior in rat cagemates and fac

248 d frequently are unable to access health and social support services.

249 ept for tangible support, all other forms of social support showed a small to moderate correlation wi

250 We focused on two types of social support: social attachment, a type of emotional s

251 zation were transportation, life disruption, social support, socioeconomic resources, poor health, an

252 oL and individual (sense of coherence [SOC], social support, stress, oral health beliefs, dental beha

253 esence of a familiar nonfearful conspecific (social support), such as that of others tasks, can occur

254 alth Index (MHI5) and Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS).

255 ss associated with HCT, patients need a good social support system and a secure financial net.

256 are, economic considerations, and family and social support systems also play a key role in the inten

257 the possible relationships between religious social support systems and other dimensions of congregat

258 se owing to differences in sexual practices, social support systems and relationships with the medica

259 This suggests that social support systems are potentially at the core of re

260 These data suggest that cultural and social support systems can lead to divergent real-world

261 terosexual men, and tend to have less robust social support systems, experience increased psychologic

262 n that aims to treat depression by enhancing social support, teaching coping skills, and income-gener

263 trade-off between academic success and peer social support that creates a dilemma not typically enco

264 tegration of increased physical activity and social support to alter modern diets and lifestyles hold

265 of coping such as optimism, resilience, and social support to be associated with less psychological

266 only somewhat or not at all confident using social support to determine transplant suitability.

267 enotype interacts with disaster exposure and social support to moderate risk of these phenotypes.

268 potentially important benefits of providing social support to others.

269 concentrated on further linking measures of social support to physical health outcomes.

270 uire optimized educational, psychologic, and social support to reach the educational level of their p

271 use both markets and bans on markets require social support to work well, this sheds light on the pro

272 , and traits related to traumatic events and social support using genetic association data from the P

273 ncy by Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale, and social support using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measu

274 (versus low, ORs, 2.44 and 1.64), having low social support (versus high, ORs=2.78 and 1.40), and hav

275 model subjective well-being as a function of social support, volunteering and social trust, controlli

276 Higher perceived emotional social support was also associated with retention.

277 Social support was assessed 3 times in the 24.4-year per

278 ed the HG, PSYG, and PHSG groups, and higher social support was associated with increased odds of mal

279 Perceived social support was significantly higher during the treat

280 Greater social support was significantly inversely associated wi

281 Received social support was unrelated to mortality across all gro

282 (e.g., life satisfaction), and social (e.g., social support) well-being decline substantially.

283 ences and within-person changes in levels of social support were associated with age-related cognitiv

284 Parity, diabetes, fibroids, and poor social support were associated with prevalent incontinen

285 nges in positive social support and negative social support were independently associated with cognit

286 Hypothetical patient age, BMI, and social support were most influential.

287 Measures of social support were not associated with cancer mortality

288 al burden, self-rated health, and subjective social support were significant independent predictors o

289 re, the low-expression 5-HTTLPR variant, low social support) were at 4.5 times the risk of developing

290 Higher PSSS indicated higher levels of social support, whereas higher BTES indicated more barri

291 individuals use their smartphones to access social support, which may help guard against negative ef

292 usting included improved physical health and social support, which was especially important within th

293 Regular social support with bond partners could lead to better h

294 s research has demonstrated relationships of social support with disease-related biomarkers in patien

295 iation of maternal stressful life events and social support with risks of gastroschisis and hypospadi

296 The authors examined the associations of social support with socioeconomic status (SES) and with

297 he association of stress-related factors and social support with the presence of comorbidities.

298 lth insurance coverage, and a lower level of social support, with consistent findings across countrie

299 f quality of patient care, opportunities for social support, with reports of pacing work to preserve

300 es included African American ethnicity, less social support, worse functional status, and a greater b