ライフサイエンスコーパス: soft drink

1 d with a distilled beverage and a carbonated soft drink.

2 e and after the ingestion of a candy bar and soft drink.

3 xidant activity and sensory responses in the soft drink.

4 feine/phosphoric acid-containing caramelized soft drink.

5 P) and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) in soft drinks.

6 ation of SY and Tz in commercially available soft drinks.

7 clude lower consumption of high-GI foods and soft drinks.

8 udies in humans have examined the effects of soft drinks.

9 .62) compared with those who rarely consumed soft drinks.

10 (0.77,1.31; P for trend = 0.76) for regular soft drinks.

11 is present in amounts comparable to those in soft drinks.

12 , so has their consumption of fast foods and soft drinks.

13 countries, 80% corresponding to fruit-based soft drinks.

14 le as the main ingredient of citrus-flavored soft drinks.

15 The highest mean size was 783 +/- 715 mum in soft drinks.

16 suitable for quality control of aspartame in soft drinks.

17 ring a healthier alternative to conventional soft drinks.

18 It is also used worldwide to produce soft drinks.

19 , as well as in commercial orange juices and soft drinks.

20 published methods for the analysis of BVO in soft drinks.

21 ivised many manufacturers to reduce sugar in soft drinks.

22 tion, brushing frequency, and consumption of soft drinks.

23 Fruit drinks (all ages) and soft drinks (9-18 y) remained among top added sugars sou

24 sugar-sweetened, and artificially sweetened soft drink and juice and nectar consumption) and pancrea

25 87-112 % for infused beverages, 83-103 % for soft drinks and 94-104 % for energy drinks were obtained

26 g insulin resistance, and dietary intakes of soft drinks and alcohol and was positively associated wi

27 ) for soluble coffee, traditional cola-based soft drinks and central nervous system stimulant capsule

28 affeinated sugar- and artificially sweetened soft drinks and early menarche (defined as menarche age

29 kes in children who consume large amounts of soft drinks and fast foods are not compensated for by in

30 t baseline and defined as the sum of regular soft drinks and fruit drinks (not including fruit juice)

31 hough food and beverage trends were similar, soft drinks and fruit drinks provided the most HFCS (158

32 Sugar-sweetened beverages like soft drinks and fruit punches contain large amounts of r

33 ction and preconcentration of Cd and Pb from soft drinks and further determination by GF AAS was deve

34 ssociation between cumulative consumption of soft drinks and HOMA-IR change after 7 y of follow-up in

35 iation between the cumulative consumption of soft drinks and IR by means of the HOMA-IR in Mexican ad

36 ct was incorporated in non-carbonated orange soft drinks and its antioxidant activity, microbiologica

37 The authors examined the association between soft drinks and juice and the risk of type 2 diabetes am

38 Relatively frequent intake of soft drinks and juice is associated with an increased ri

39 f caffeine and Class IV caramel in cola-type soft drinks and of caffeine, Class III caramel and ribof

40 further applied for analyzing six commercial soft drinks and one was found containing 453.67 ng/mL of

41 Soft drinks and other sweetened beverages may contribute

42 syrup (HFCS) is a commonly used sweetener in soft drinks and processed foods, and HFCS exacerbates in

43 ontrols and were even more likely to consume soft drinks and tea [odds ratio (OR) = 2.01 95% confiden

44 od codes were matched to GI values, of which soft drinks and white bread were top contributors to die

45 procedure for the analysis of energy drink, soft drink, and chocolate milk samples was demonstrated.

46 Consumption of milk, coffee, tea, soft drinks, and alcohol was based on food frequency dat

47 e in foodstuffs such as jellies, condiments, soft drinks, and candies.

48 meat intake, seafood intake, sugar sweetened soft drinks, and consumption of foods high in fructose.

49 tion of sugar-containing drinks (e.g., cola, soft drinks, and energy drinks) and addictive substances

50 e now incorporated into dietary supplements, soft drinks, and energy shakes.

51 and of added P, fish, beef, processed meat, soft drinks, and poultry.

52 centrations were lowest in tea, dairy, light soft drinks, and rice (<10 mg/kg).

53 quate vegetable intake, daily consumption of soft drinks, and weekly fast-food consumption.

54 A two tiered tax levied on manufacturers of soft drinks, announced in March 2016 and implemented in

55 ximately 64%), tea ( approximately 16%), and soft drinks ( approximately 18%) predominant sources; en

56 coffee, instant coffee, tea, and caffeinated soft drinks, as well as caffeine intoxication, tolerance

57 quality control of the synthetic colours in soft drinks, as well as to determine whether the levels

58 programme (NDNS RP) from 2008-12 and British Soft Drinks Association annual reports to calculate suga

59 esence of HA could easily be detected in the soft drink at a spiked concentration of 6.4 ppm where le

60 orld application, identification of enhanced soft drinks based on their Ca(2+), Mg(2+), and Zn(2+) ca

61 ication of brominated vegetable oil (BVO) in soft drinks based upon liquid chromatography-electrospra

62 kcal (from 1.0 to 1.6 oz [28.4 to 45.4 g]), soft drinks by 49 kcal (13.1 to 19.9 fl oz [387.4 to 588

63 l, Cu, Cr, Fe and Ni in Brazilian carbonated soft drinks by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrom

64 suggest that high consumption of carbonated soft drinks by young children is a risk indicator for de

65 ntakes of meat products, refined grains, and soft drinks (caloric and noncaloric) were found to be co

66 ctose intake, primarily from added sugars in soft drinks, can induce fatty liver in animals and is ep

67 bowl of milk or bubbles at the surface of a soft drink, clump together as a result of capillary attr

68 ing those years, and now soft drinks provide soft drink consumers 188 kcal/d beyond the energy intake

69 he explanatory variable was the frequency of soft drink consumption (times per week).

70 a meta-analysis of the relationship between soft drink consumption and cardiometabolic risk, there w

71 estimate the association between changes in soft drink consumption and change in HOMA-IR.

72 To assess the relation between cumulative soft drink consumption and HOMA-IR change, we performed

73 VA) models examining the association between soft drink consumption and MDD diagnosis and symptom sev

74 tudy was to evaluate the association between soft drink consumption and periodontal status in pregnan

75 Recent studies suggest that soft drink consumption could increase IR.

76 gressed each BMD measure on the frequency of soft drink consumption for men and women after adjustmen

77 ng women who increased their sugar-sweetened soft drink consumption from 1 or fewer drinks per week t

78 Children's soft drink consumption has also increased during those y

79 the need for reinforcing policies to reduce soft drink consumption in our population.

80 of metabolic syndrome and its components to soft drink consumption in participants in the Framingham

81 In middle-aged adults, soft drink consumption is associated with a higher preva

82 hypothesis that, in Mexican adults, a higher soft drink consumption is associated with an increase in

83 Soft drink consumption is linked to negative physical an

84 of hyperuricemia in Mexican adults, but diet soft drink consumption is not, which supports the need t

85 In this cohort study, it was found that soft drink consumption may contribute to MDD through gut

86 Soft drink consumption may have adverse effects on bone

87 About 13% of children had a high carbonated soft drink consumption pattern; they also had a signific

88 Soft drink consumption predicted MDD diagnosis (odds rat

89 Mean cumulative soft drink consumption was 0.42 servings/d.

90 High soft drink consumption was associated with the number of

91 Soft drink consumption was estimated by food-frequency q

92 Soft drink consumption was positively associated with HO

93 For each soft drink serving per day, soft drink consumption was significantly associated with

94 t intake, inadequate vegetable intake, daily soft drink consumption, and weekly fast-food consumption

95 We hypothesized that soft drink consumption, which has also been associated w

96 : 1.03; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.07), sugar-sweetened soft-drink consumption (HR per 100 g/d: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.

97 Total soft-drink consumption (HR per 100 g/d: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.

98 CI: 0.97, 1.08), and artificially sweetened soft-drink consumption (HR per 100 g/d: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.

99 -based intervention found significantly less soft-drink consumption and prevalence of obese and overw

100 Low-strength evidence showed that reducing soft-drink consumption decreased recurrent symptomatic s

101 Soft-drink consumption does not seem to be associated wi

102 Associations with total soft-drink consumption were adjusted for juice and necta

103 rospective research on whether the intake of soft drinks containing caffeine, a modulator of the fema

104 pushing away 90% of alcohol cues and 10% of soft drink cues, whereas this ratio was 50/50 in the sha

105 ch increase in the consumption of 2 (355 mL) soft drinks/d, the average change between baseline and f

106 rsons (21.6%) [corrected] consuming > or = 1 soft drink/day [corrected] Consumption of > or = 1 soft

107 The higher tertile of consumption of soft drinks during pregnancy was associated with PD/BOP

108 take was 74 g/d, corresponding to 2.5 sugary soft drinks each day.

109 among overweight than nonoverweight youths; soft drink energy contribution was higher among overweig

110 hard candy, ice cream syrup, sports drinks, soft drinks, energy drinks, artificially colored ready-t

111 ives and profits; posters/advertisements for soft drinks, fast food, or candy; use of food coupons as

112 added-sugars intakes derived from carbonated soft drinks fell 26% between 1997 and 2011 (from 23 to 1

113 ily intake of 330 mL of healthy citrus-maqui soft drinks, for 60 days, by 138 healthy overweight adul

114 cted extracts were tested as colourants in a soft drink formulation and presented suitable sensory pr

115 d were randomised to drink either lager or a soft drink from either a curved or straight-sided glass,

116 specific food items (salty snacks, desserts, soft drinks, fruit drinks, french fries, hamburgers, che

117 Testing with real samples (soft drinks, fruit juices) gave good correlation of the

118 mption of fruits and vegetables, fast foods, soft drinks/fruit juices, and fried/microwaved meat.

119 an experimental design with beverage (lager, soft drink), glass (straight, curved) and quantity (6 fl

120 Consumption of soft drinks has been linked to obesity in children and a

121 on patterns were identified: high carbonated soft drinks, high juice, high milk, and high water.

122 e hypothesis that consumption of caffeinated soft drinks in childhood is associated with higher risk

123 verages and is the sole caloric sweetener in soft drinks in the United States.

124 creased effects of the fast food and bottled soft drink industries on this nutrition shift is availab

125 The soft drinks industry levy (SDIL) in the United Kingdom h

126 The United Kingdom Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL) is a two-tiered tax, an

127 In March 2016, a two-tier soft drinks industry levy (SDIL) on drinks manufacturers

128 The United Kingdom Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL) was announced in March

129 We examined whether the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy (SDIL), announced in March 201

130 tiered structure of the United Kingdom [UK] Soft Drinks Industry Levy [SDIL]).

131 responses by industry to the UK Government's soft drinks industry levy have been seen, but the govern

132 rld, exporting much of its production to the soft drinks industry.

133 igh WC may attenuate the association between soft drink intake and BW gain.

134 Associations between soft drink intake and the annual change (Delta) in body

135 bined may strengthen the association between soft drink intake and WC gain.

136 Our results suggest that soft drink intake may alter the salivary microbiota, wit

137 Public health strategies to reduce soft drink intake may help mitigate depression risk, esp

138 , which suggests that the use of low-calorie soft drinks is a marker for more general dietary behavio

139 reptitiously administered to an alcoholic or soft drink, is associated with "drug-facilitated sexual

140 Intake of cola, but not of other carbonated soft drinks, is associated with low BMD in women.

141 FSS-CSD) or low-calorie sweetened carbonated soft drinks (LCS-CSD) consumed a full sweetness CSD (Con

142 INTERPRETATION: The health impact of the soft drinks levy is dependent on its implementation by i

143 The health impact of the soft drinks levy is dependent on its implementation by i

144 ution but only a single, faster decay in the soft drink matrix.

145 ed beverages (SSBs), particularly carbonated soft drinks, may be a key contributor to the epidemic of

146 that Eggerthella significantly mediated the soft drink-MDD association (diagnosis: P = .011; severit

147 ed whether microbiota abundance mediated the soft drink-MDD link.

148 y pattern score, which consisted of alcohol, soft drinks, meat, coffee, and tea, was positively assoc

149 tion of sweetened beverages, an orange juice soft drink model flavoured with seven characteristic com

150 oped to quantify aspartame in lemon-flavored soft drinks, motivated by classification of aspartame as

151 n of nine elements from Brazilian carbonated soft drinks of several flavors and manufactures using in

152 th those of isocaloric milk and a noncaloric soft drink on changes in total fat mass and ectopic fat

153 the effect of high consumption of carbonated soft drinks on caries in the primary dentition.

154 f the SDIL on price, product size, number of soft drinks on the marketplace, and the proportion of dr

155 tivariable adjustment, children who consumed soft drinks once or more per day had significantly narro

156 (strawberry and custard) powder samples and soft drink (orange) samples with satisfactory results.

157 unflavored milk, and for SoFAS also included soft drinks, other desserts, candy, and snack bars.

158 d data on a total of 209,637 observations of soft drinks over 85 time points between September 2015 a

159 than did those who never or rarely consumed soft drinks (P-trend = 0.03).

160 -sectionally, individuals consuming > or = 1 soft drink per day had a higher prevalence of metabolic

161 rink/day [corrected] Consumption of > or = 1 soft drink per day was associated with increased odds of

162 s, women consuming 1 or more sugar-sweetened soft drinks per day had a relative risk [RR] of type 2 d

163 s modified by 5-year weight gain for > or =2 soft drinks per week among those who gained > or =3 kg (

164 confounders, participants consuming > or =2 soft drinks per week had a relative risk of type 2 diabe

165 OR = 1.19, 1.16-1.22), daily consumption of soft drinks (pooled aOR = 1.14, 1.12-1.17), and weekly c

166 gain, except for consumption of low-calorie soft drinks (positive association, P = 0.002) and white

167 Moreover, beverages of 100% fruit juices and soft drinks prepared with mineral water (free of HAAs) d

168 ed with anticipatory changes in purchases of soft drinks prior to implementation of the SDIL in April

169 ed on commercial carbonated orange and grape soft drinks produced in Ceara State, Brazil.

170 s also increased during those years, and now soft drinks provide soft drink consumers 188 kcal/d beyo

171 ributed 20-24% of energy across all ages and soft drinks provided 8% of energy in adolescents.

172 one year after implementation, the volume of soft drinks purchased did not change.

173 amount of sugar per household per week from soft drinks purchased, 19 months post implementation and

174 d by high intake of sugar-sweetened and diet soft drinks, refined grains, red and processed meat, and

175 subgroups of ultra-processed food, including soft drinks, refined sweetened foods, salty snacks, and

176 real samples study in fruits, vegetables and soft drinks revealed that this sensing platform was repe

177 ings suggest an amplifying mechanism whereby soft drinks rich in glucose and fructose can induce NAFL

178 ion of 0.25% MC was found to yield fermented soft drinks rich in probiotic populations and displaying

179 .25); nor was consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks (RR for 1 serving/d increment: 1.15; 95% CI:

180 rmination of tartrazine and sunset yellow in soft drink samples, producing results comparable to thos

181 cy in recovering cadmium in water, food, and soft drink samples, showing an affordable and fast techn

182 bisphenol A and S (BPA and BPS) in water and soft drink samples.

183 tage for the identification of BB in various soft drink samples.

184 oratory experiments measuring consumption of soft drinks served in different glasses (straight-sided

185 For each soft drink serving per day, soft drink consumption was s

186 nly with the GRSWC (per risk allele for each soft drink serving per day: -0.06 kg/y; 95% CI: -0.10, -

187 MI and GRSComplete [per risk allele for each soft drink serving per day: 0.05 cm/y (95% CI: 0.02, 0.0

188 rometric determination of glucose content in soft drinks showing good repeatability (DPR=1.72%, n=50)

189 exhibits the greatest destabilization in the soft drink solution.

190 ), betanin and carminic acid, in aqueous and soft drink solutions.

191 The consumption of sucrose-sweetened soft drinks (SSSDs) has been associated with obesity, th

192 confirm the composition of food colouring in soft drinks stated on label.

193 candy, soft drink, tap water and drinking water with excellent

194 de residues were detected in citrus-flavored soft drinks, this study reveals that the situation has n

195 oral contraceptive use (IBD), consumption of soft drinks (UC), vitamin D deficiency (IBD), and non-He

196 nd Brilliant Blue (E133) were extracted from soft drinks using C18 SPE and identified by thin layer c

197 The concentration of food colouring in soft drink was determined by ion-pair high performance l

198 Consumption of artificially sweetened soft drinks was also positively associated with risk of

199 nces = 236.6 mL) serving per day increase in soft drinks was associated with a 1.52-kg increase in we

200 body fat, greater consumption of caffeinated soft drinks was associated with a higher risk of early m

201 Greater consumption of carbohydrates and soft drinks was associated with retinal arteriolar narro

202 The positive association with low-calorie soft drinks was no longer present after adjustment for d

203 on of black tea, green tea, fruit juices, or soft drinks was not associated with risk of cirrhosis de

204 Consumption of noncaffeinated soft drinks was not significantly associated with early

205 on of caffeinated and artificially sweetened soft drinks was positively associated with risk of early

206 When all soft drinks were combined, the volume of drinks purchase

207 Diet soft drinks were not associated with hyperuricemia.

208 taining caffeine such as tea and caffeinated soft drinks were not associated with stroke.

209 Diet soft drinks were not associated with the risk of gout (P

210 us aspects of obesity and the consumption of soft drinks, which are a major part of sugar-sweetened b

211 samples of alcoholic beverages (craft beers, soft drinks, wines, and cider).

212 time was equivalent, participants consumed a soft drink with a more 'decelerated' trajectory from out

213 pplied for the determination of Cd and Pb in soft drinks with different brands and flavours.

214 erage samples such as fruit juice, milk, and soft drinks with satisfactory recoveries.

215 ed by determination of the dyes in processed soft drinks with satisfactory results (recovery>95% and

216 lied for estimation of IC in fruit juice and soft drink without the need for exhaustive extraction st

217 ully tested on strawberry jam, low-fat milk, soft drink, yogurt and a commercial mixture of steviol g