ライフサイエンスコーパス: sound localization

1 pacity for auditory spatial awareness (e.g., sound localization).

2 ation of interaural time differences used in sound localization.

3 ploit interaural time differences (ITDs) for sound localization.

4 l hearing loss is responsible for their poor sound localization.

5 ulus intensity and timing are major cues for sound localization.

6 inputs dictates the resolution of azimuthal sound localization.

7 cessing interaural time disparities used for sound localization.

8 erence encoder that computes information for sound localization.

9 primary auditory cortex (A1) is involved in sound localization.

10 tral cochlear nucleus (VCN) is essential for sound localization.

11 ll mammals use both of the binaural cues for sound localization.

12 mulation and are thought to be important for sound localization.

13 ral intensity differences, which are used in sound localization.

14 tion is crucial for binaural comparisons and sound localization.

15 ner's ears, distorting the binaural cues for sound localization.

16 and level differences that are critical for sound localization.

17 superior olive (LSO), two nuclei involved in sound localization.

18 rebral cortex and how it could contribute to sound localization.

19 ener's ears, distorting the spatial cues for sound localization.

20 many auditory functions, most importantly in sound localization.

21 aminaris and thereby adjust the precision of sound localization.

22 ributes of eye position-dependent effects on sound localization.

23 tes interaural intensity differences used in sound localization.

24 sounds, favoring rate-coding models of human sound localization.

25 ons (HRTFs), spectral cues used for vertical sound localization.

26 ortant component of the circuitry underlying sound localization.

27 n of the MNTB may be rapidly modified during sound localization.

28 n owls, early experience markedly influences sound localization.

29 TD-sensitive neurons contribute to mammalian sound localization.

30 elay neurons following the Jeffress model of sound localization.

31 e differences (ITDs) that underlie azimuthal sound localization.

32 e is most important for pitch perception and sound localization.

33 population code, which can also be used for sound localization.

34 es (ITDs) are an important cue for azimuthal sound localization.

35 auditory functions such as echolocation and sound localization.

36 nce between the brainstem nuclei involved in sound localization.

37 information about auditory space other than sound localization.

38 , and it probably performs a crucial role in sound localization.

39 ural level difference (ILD), a major cue for sound localization.

40 stem circuitry mediating the early stages of sound localization.

41 cludes the use of the auditory forebrain for sound localization.

42 NL) provide a neural substrate for azimuthal sound localization.

43 s signal detection in noisy environments and sound localization.

44 se is pivotal to the circuitry that computes sound localization.

45 lateral superior olive (LSO) are involved in sound localization.

46 g, and supporting a fundamental mechanism in sound localization.

47 rties, implementing probabilistic coding for sound localization.

48 ng downstream neural computations such as of sound localization.

49 ezoid body (MNTB) plays an important role in sound localization.

50 naptic properties to the specific demands of sound localization.

51 system, and auditory cortex is necessary for sound localization.

52 ory brainstem nucleus critically involved in sound localization.

53 de of the midline, enhances the precision of sound localization.

54 APs), which is used for such computations as sound localization.

55 odes of auditory brainstem axons involved in sound localization.

56 The auditory cortex is necessary for sound localization.

57 measured frequency-dependent biases in human sound localization.

58 formation from the two ears, as required for sound localization.

59 s dual-optimality at 8 kHz with unparalleled sound localization.

60 or colliculus (ICC) plays a critical role in sound localization.

61 sential auditory brainstem relay involved in sound localization.

62 naptic targets that use rate information for sound localization.

63 ibitory hub considered critical for binaural sound localization.

64 nt with the long-standing "duplex" theory of sound localization.

65 Sound localization, a fundamental process in hearing, is

66 ding of temporal information is critical for sound localization, a task with direct behavioral releva

67 sentations have perceptual correlates in the sound localization abilities of nonhuman listeners.

68 The sound localization abilities of three rhesus monkeys wer

69 ry auditory cortex neurons at predicting the sound localization ability across different stimulus fre

70 ea contain enough information to account for sound localization ability, but neurons in other tested

71 icient information to account for horizontal sound localization ability.

72 auditory brainstem, which is responsible for sound localization ability.

73 ve and mechanistic explanation for the fly's sound-localization ability from a new perspective, and i

74 required for training-dependent recovery in sound-localization accuracy following monaural deprivati

75 ng corticocollicular neurons, whereas normal sound-localization accuracy was unaffected.

76 We systematically and directly quantified sound localization across a broad spatial range and over

77 uts over frequency, a relevant processing in sound localization across species.

78 To preserve sound localization acuity following changes in the acous

79 n the ICs mediate gain control that enhances sound localization acuity.

80 The passive sound-localization acuity of Egyptian fruit bats (Rouset

81 uired for cholinergic-mediated relearning of sound localization after occlusion of one ear.

82 uired for cholinergic-mediated relearning of sound localization after occlusion of one ear.

83 at found that the capacity to recover normal sound localization after restoration of normal vision wa

84 Sound localization along the azimuth depends on the sens

85 neurons that are essential for low-frequency sound localization and auditory scene segregation, and s

86 MSO neurons perform a critical role in sound localization and binaural hearing.

87 time differences (ITDs) are a major cue for sound localization and change with increasing head size.

88 ermine whether Kv1.1 activity contributes to sound localization and examined anesthetized mice for ab

89 dbrain structure, plays an important role in sound localization and has been shown to have a topograp

90 monstrate independent processing streams for sound localization and identification analogous to the '

91 and whether selective attention facilitates sound localization and identification by modulating thes

92 at the eardrums, generating complex cues for sound localization and identification.

93 (ITD) serves as a primary cue for azimuthal sound localization and is represented topographically in

94 dly assessing cochlear functions involved in sound localization and perception of vocalizations.

95 provide precisely timed spike trains used in sound localization and pitch identification, receive slo

96 d encoding of low frequencies likely affects sound localization and pitch perception in the auditory

97 iscrimination of sounds in background noise, sound localization and protecting the cochleae from acou

98 ral time differences (ITDs), a major cue for sound localization and signal detection in noise, their

99 damental for processing timing cues used for sound localization and signal discrimination in complex

100 hlear implants (CIs) provide improvements in sound localization and speech perception in noise over u

101 lity phase locking exhibited more human-like sound localization and speech perception than models wit

102 restore spatial-hearing abilities, including sound localization and speech understanding in noise.

103 These findings redefine the role of MNTB in sound localization and suggest that the inhibitory netwo

104 ll's in vivo receptor potential, crucial for sound localization and ultimately survival.

105 plays important roles in speech processing, sound localization, and other auditory computations, the

106 ime difference (ITD) is an important cue for sound localization, and the optimal strategies for encod

107 The primary cues for binaural sound localization are comprised of interaural time and

108 hway where the basic computations underlying sound localization are initiated and heightened activity

109 old a key position in the timing pathway for sound localization, are readily identifiable, and exhibi

110 Sound localization as measured by degrees of error from

111 e involved in the early processing stages of sound localization as well as the superior paraolivary n

112 n a rich environment, the capacity to adjust sound localization away from normal extended to later in

113 itory nerve in a pathway that contributes to sound localization based on interaural timing difference

114 l superior olive (MSO) play a unique role in sound localization because of their ability to compare t

115 lopment, adult ferrets show some recovery of sound localization behavior after long-term monaural occ

116 This suggests that both sound localization behavior and ear anatomy are fine-tun

117 Adaptive changes also take place in sound localization behavior, as demonstrated by the fact

118 auditory cortex (A1) is essential for normal sound localization behavior, but previous studies of the

119 s a powerful influence on the calibration of sound localization behavior.

120 ng statistical inference, predicts the owl's sound localization behavior.

121 Sound localization by auditory brainstem nuclei relies o

122 f the medial superior olive analyze cues for sound localization by detecting the coincidence of binau

123 ing acoustics alone, the brain also improves sound localization by incorporating spatially precise vi

124 that can achieve high accuracy in azimuthal sound localization by leveraging binaural and spectral a

125 A major focus of this article is the use of sound localization by normal hearing, hearing impaired,

126 sting that this mechanism may play a role in sound localization, by providing new avenues of communic

127 Specialized sound localization circuit development requires synapse

128 an brain region, the principal nuclei of the sound localization circuit in the auditory brainstem, nu

129 potassium currents in the auditory brainstem sound localization circuit of male mice.

130 ty as well as the immediate response of this sound localization circuit.

131 n for input timing adjustment in a brainstem sound localization circuit.

132 ent as well as in temporal processing in the sound localization circuit.

133 prominent source of inhibition in brainstem sound-localization circuitry.

134 his experience-induced plasticity allows the sound localization circuits to be customized to individu

135 ovel mechanisms by which immature inhibitory sound-localization circuits become optimized.

136 Models of sound localization commonly assume that sound lateraliza

137 Sound localization critically depends on detection of di

138 on of interaural time differences (ITDs) for sound localization critically depends on the similarity

139 tory thalamic neurons to a major category of sound localization cue, interaural time differences (ITD

140 the mechanisms generating the tuning to the sound localization cue.

141 pacity of spike timing over rate codes using sound localization cues as an example.

142 mnidirectional white noise, which suppresses sound localization cues but increases overall activity,

143 ns in the medial superior olive (MSO) encode sound localization cues by detecting microsecond differe

144 The central auditory system translates sound localization cues into a map of space guided, in p

145 medial superior olive (MSO) convey azimuthal sound localization cues through modulation of their rate

146 Finally, our model offers key insights to sound localization cues used by echolocating bats employ

147 y all possible types of binaural response to sound localization cues were represented.

148 ICC neurons to dynamically encode interaural sound localization cues while maintaining an invariant r

149 l specializations that enable them to detect sound localization cues with microsecond precision.

150 measured the tuning of Ipc units to binaural sound localization cues, including interaural timing dif

151 ges into two pathways that process different sound localization cues, interaural time differences (IT

152 with identified roles in processing binaural sound localization cues, the role of the SPON in hearing

153 ion known to be required for transmission of sound localization cues.

154 ) and level differences (ILDs), the dominant sound localization cues.

155 neurons within the N.Ov to tonal stimuli and sound localization cues.

156 fferences is instructed by the experience of sound localization cues.

157 nd abnormal coding of frequency and binaural sound localization cues.

158 Neurons in the medial superior olive process sound-localization cues via binaural coincidence detecti

159 tion for the effects of pinna orientation on sound-localization cues.

160 ech encoding plays a significant role in the sound localization deficits experienced by BiCI users.

161 r processing on NH performance suggests that sound localization deficits may persist even for BiCI pa

162 est measured numerically: speech perception, sound localization, device use, and patient-reported out

163 Thus, in this study, we investigate sound localization directly through WebVR.

164 t a circuit similar to the Jeffress model of sound localization, establishing a place code along an i

165 ere trained to discriminate binaural cues to sound localization, eventually allowing measurement of t

166 Sound localization experiments, so far, have been run on

167 In general, improvements in virtual sound localization following training generalized to a s

168 These data suggest different mechanisms of sound localization for two different behaviors.

169 Traditionally, all models of sound localization have assumed that MSO neurons represe

170 Although the mechanisms of sound localization have been studied extensively, the ne

171 Developmental studies of sound localization have shown that adaptation to asymmet

172 Apart from sound localization, however, much about the role of this

173 me differences (ITDs), which is essential to sound localization in a variety of species and allows re

174 ons in experience-dependent recalibration of sound localization in adult ferrets by selectively killi

175 e this method to probe the representation of sound localization in auditory neurons of chinchillas an

176 approaches can be integrated in the study of sound localization in barn owls.

177 st the model using the system that underlies sound localization in barn owls.

178 Additionally, FF sound localization in BiCI users was measured in the sam

179 st encoder of interaural time difference for sound localization in birds.

180 e further support for the Jeffress model for sound localization in birds.

181 ty of the circuitry underlying low-frequency sound localization in both birds and mammals.

182 ts observed in the vertical plane by testing sound localization in both planes in groups of blind and

183 Sound localization in humans depends largely on interaur

184 ese experiments extend the prior findings on sound localization in mice, and the dependence of PPI on

185 aural time differences (ITDs) is crucial for sound localization in most vertebrates.

186 blind individuals and the special problem of sound localization in people with dual sensory loss.

187 , suggesting a subcortical origin for robust sound localization in reverberant environments.

188 importance of the ILD-processing pathway for sound localization in reverberation.

189 urce of information for sound detection, for sound localization in space, and for environmental aware

190 ncy is thought to be crucial for the task of sound localization in the auditory brainstem.

191 he coding of interaural time differences for sound localization in the avian auditory brainstem.

192 le of incidence, producing cues for monaural sound localization in the spectra of the stimuli at the

193 incidence detectors subserving low-frequency sound localization in which the location of a sound sour

194 ultiple auditory brainstem nuclei, including sound localization information such as interaural level

195 p nucleus laminaris neurons to pass specific sound localization information to higher processing cent

196 ior olive (LSO), a brainstem hub involved in sound localization, integrates excitatory and inhibitory

197 It is known that the two cues for azimuthal sound localization, interaural intensity or level differ

198 Sound localization involves information analysis in the

199 For example, sound localization is a behavior that is partially learn

200 Human sound localization is an important computation performed

201 Sound localization is essential to perceive the surround

202 Sound localization is one of the sensory abilities disru

203 the thalamo-telencephalic auditory pathway, sound localization is subserved by a nontopographic repr

204 with the hypothesis that the role of passive sound localization is to direct the eyes for visual scru

205 Additionally, precise sound localization is vital for technologies such as sma

206 re we observe that two prevalent theories of sound localization make opposing predictions.

207 nisms that enhance frequency sensitivity and sound localization, maturation of the auditory system, a

208 se ratio for speech reception threshold) and sound localization (measured in degree of localization e

209 O and suggest that behavioral degradation of sound localization might originate from changes occurrin

210 In the auditory system, sound localization must account for movements of the hea

211 ts well-timed inhibitory output to principal sound-localization nuclei in the superior olive (SOC) as

212 is finding suggests that the highly accurate sound localization of human observers is consistent with

213 Our findings reveal a novel dependence of sound localization on commissural processing.

214 Although auditory cortex is necessary for sound localization, our understanding of how the cortex

215 used to create stimulus sets varying in two sound-localization parameters each.

216 In the glycinergic sound localization pathway from the medial nucleus of th

217 n between auditory synapses in the mammalian sound localization pathway is described.

218 e prominent in a developing GABA/glycinergic sound-localization pathway.

219 und localization, the present study measured sound localization performance in NH subjects listening

220 y was correlated with accuracy of individual sound localization performance.

221 the effect of active head roll movements on sound localization performance.

222 Sound localization plays a critical role in animal survi

223 e auditory brainstem and participates in the sound localization process with fast and well-timed inhi

224 nterhemispheric communication is involved in sound localization processes underlying spatial hearing.

225 The current dominant model of binaural sound localization proposes that the lateral position of

226 corticocollicular neurons to participate in sound localization relearning, we investigated the effec

227 Sound localization relies on minute differences in the t

228 Sound localization relies on the neural processing of mo

229 information for encoding sound intensity and sound localization.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We report nove

230 The barn owl, a sound localization specialist, exhibits a circuit called

231 known to variably, but inconsistently, shift sound localization, suggesting subtle shortcomings in th

232 rabbits, that prevailing decoding models of sound localization (summed population activity and the p

233 rior olive (LSO), a nucleus in the mammalian sound localization system that receives inhibitory input

234 In this study, we used the barn owl's sound localization system to address this question.

235 olive (LSO), which is part of the mammalian sound localization system.

236 insurmountable size constraint in engineered sound-localization systems.

237 and reaching groups) each while performing a sound localization task in normal and altered listening

238 osterior parietal cortex as mice performed a sound localization task.

239 ecialized auditory tests (dichotic tasks and sound localization tests) for accurate interpretation of

240 ll more demanding by the process of binaural sound localization that utilizes separate computations o

241 ct of CI speech encoding on horizontal-plane sound localization, the present study measured sound loc

242 erior olive (MSO) encode cues for horizontal sound localization through comparisons of the relative t

243 The model predicts that sound localization through the acoustic coupling between

244 ) and the auditory arcopallium (AAr) mediate sound localization through the presence of neurons that

245 icity allows the neural circuitry underlying sound localization to be customized to individual charac

246 barn owl, an auditory specialist relying on sound localization to capture prey, ITDs within the phys

247 p a simple paradigm using visual guidance of sound localization to gain insight into how the brain co

248 In this study, three virtual sound localization training paradigms were evaluated; on

249 ciently informative that we could then model sound localization using speaker position in specific co

250 sults demonstrate the potential of exploring sound localization using WebVR, and our study will suppo

251 l features imposed by the pinna for vertical sound localization was shown by the breakdown in localiz

252 Visually guided biases in sound localization were induced in seven humans and two

253 These animals did, however, show impaired sound localization when inactivating the same auditory c

254 ctions to four key target nuclei involved in sound localization (which is the foundation of auditory

255 One instance of this is sound localization, which improves with increasing bandw