ライフサイエンスコーパス: sound pressure

1 eech, we have to make sense of a waveform of sound pressure.

2 ound pressure gradients rather than absolute sound pressure.

3 ollectively encode the wide range of audible sound pressures.

4 acts as an impedance matcher that increases sound pressure and decreases sound vibration velocity be

5 hlighting the importance of considering both sound pressure and particle motion.

6 , are revealed by trade-offs between maximal sound pressure and song duration.

7 num (the ear drum), producing differences in sound pressure and time between the left and right sides

8 i generated by head movements and changes in sound pressure are detected by hair cells with amazing s

9 g the time delay and intensity difference of sound pressure at each ear(1-5).

10 above 5 kilohertz but struggles with reduced sound pressure at lower frequencies.

11 Sound pressure attenuated with distance from the reef at

12 estigate the mechanical processes behind the sound pressure gain in the AT by numerically modeling th

13 Pinnae induced large sound pressure gains (20-30 dB) that enhanced sound dete

14 ounds emitted by small speakers form a sharp sound pressure gradient across the worm body, while soun

15 radients, our results reveal that sensing of sound pressure gradients may represent a common mechanis

16 We suggest that the ability to sense sound pressure gradients provides a potential mechanism

17 speakers do not, suggesting that worms sense sound pressure gradients rather than absolute sound pres

18 cochlea and some insect ears can also detect sound pressure gradients, our results reveal that sensin

19 n the acoustic environment: the variation in sound pressure in each frequency band, relative to the m

20 e basilar membrane and at the stapes, and as sound pressure in the ear canal.

21 ms are characterized by rapid modulations of sound pressure in the so-called roughness range (i.e., 3

22 We measured BC-evoked sound pressures in scala vestibuli (P(SV)) and scala tym

23 ty of mammalian hearing is the conversion of sound pressure into a frequency-specific place of maximu

24 elocity toward scala tympani but at 80-90 dB sound pressure level (in decibels relative to 20 microPa

25 including the measurement of peak equivalent sound pressure level (peSPL) and peak sound pressure lev

26 valent sound pressure level (peSPL) and peak sound pressure level (pSPL).

27 suppresses its spiking response to a 100-dB sound pressure level (SPL) acoustic stimulus and maintai

28 ontractions were studied as functions of the sound pressure level (SPL) and duration of 2-kHz tone bu

29 nducted and airborne sound and estimated the sound pressure level (SPL) at the stapedial footplate ac

30 wild-type (GluA3(WT)) mice reared in ambient sound pressure level (SPL) of 55-75 dB had similar audit

31 o be sensitive to sound levels down to 31 dB sound pressure level (SPL), translating to air particle

32 eater than the acoustic input power at 10 dB sound pressure level (SPL).

33 osition of the spider of approximately 65 dB sound pressure level (SPL).

34 nymphs have auditory thresholds of 70-80 dB sound pressure level (SPL).

35 he PIAT was measured in response to 80-95 dB sound pressure level 1-14 kHz sinusoidal acoustic excita

36 acebo for both clicks (dexamethasone: 6.7-dB sound pressure level [SPL] vs. placebo: 33.4-dB SPL, P=.

37 V and hearing thresholds were elevated 50 dB sound pressure level across the frequency spectrum.

38 f1 ratio of 1.2 and L1/L2 values of 65/55 dB sound pressure level and click-evoked ABR using a slow (

39 al of two acoustic indices, i.e. the average sound pressure level and the acoustic complexity index b

40 the mechanism responsible for this change in sound pressure level and velocity remains elusive.

41 ich presented a significantly higher ambient sound pressure level and were more acoustically complex

42 Increases in sound pressure level appeared to be largely driven by la

43 of the tender corn kernel has the same mean sound pressure level as in hard popcorn.

44 gical traveling waves corresponding to 70 dB sound pressure level at 9 kHz were simulated, advection

45 These cells never fired to tones at 50 dB sound pressure level but fired to frequency-modulated sw

46 -16 kHz octave-band noise exposure at 100 dB sound pressure level caused a threshold shift (~40 dB) a

47 better in Vglut3(WT) Noise exposure at 94 dB sound pressure level caused auditory threshold shifts th

48 d identically (8-16 kHz noise band at 100 dB sound pressure level for 2 h) but at different ages (4-1

49 , and the thermal processes on the change in sound pressure level in the AT.

50 stance of sound propagation is verified, the sound pressure level increases from 32 to 71 decibels at

51 the device's performance and applicability, sound pressure level is characterized in both space and

52 higher predictive power than those based on sound pressure level metrics.

53 In CBA/CaJ mice, a 2-h exposure to 100-dB sound pressure level octave band (8 to 16 kHz) noise res

54 ect operates by continuously integrating the sound pressure level of background noise through tempora

55 were estimated as the A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level over the 24-h period (LAeq24) and d

56 neurons are typically above 100-120 dB SPL (sound pressure level re 20 microPa).

57 lative to 20 microPascals) and at 100-110 dB sound pressure level responses undergo two large phase s

58 rnible auditory brainstem responses (ABR) to sound pressure level stimuli up to 100 dB, indicating a

59 y noise bursts; prepulses for PPI were 70 dB sound pressure level tones of 4, 12, and 20 kHz.

60 Up to 10-dB reduction in energy-averaged sound pressure level was achieved by the active control

61 Each 1 dBA increase in sound pressure level was associated with a 28% increase

62 Sound pressure level was modulated trapezoidally at the

63 10-40%) in emissions from brass instruments; sound pressure level was not associated with woodwind em

64 d areas of Moorea Island (French Polynesia), sound pressure level was positively correlated with the

65 er exposure to a traumatic unilateral 80 dB (sound pressure level) 4 kHz tone.

66 percentile was associated with a 1.6-dB SPL (sound pressure level) decrease in DPOAE amplitude (95% C

67 0-10000 Hz) and input levels (e.g., 50-75 dB sound pressure level).

68 of NH listeners when compared at equal SPL (sound pressure level).

69 the unit over a wide dynamic range (10-90 dB sound pressure level).

70 e youngest embryos (maximum intensity 107 dB sound pressure level).

71 ber auditory nerve responses at 70 and 50 dB sound pressure level, have been quantified, based on KL

72 At an intensity of 60 dB sound pressure level, the bats' hearing extended from 2.

73 sed during passive listening to brief, 95-dB sound pressure level, white noise bursts presented inter

74 with no requirement of knowing the incident sound pressure level.

75 e effects depend nonlinearly on the stimulus sound pressure level.

76 lliculus (IC) change their firing rates with sound pressure level.

77 tic stimulus (a hiss) of approximately equal sound pressure level.

78 ar growth rate of the response to increasing sound pressure level; and the amount of distortion to be

79 detect acoustic stimuli down to a threshold sound-pressure level of 0 dB (decibels) at the entrance

80 ng from 113 Hz to 49 kHz at a level of 60 dB sound-pressure level or less, with their best sensitivit

81 elevation and, correspondingly, on the high sound pressure levels (>100 dB SPL) necessary to produce

82 es in response to white noise stimuli at low sound pressure levels (</=84 dB SPL), revealing a previo

83 uditory system operates over a vast range of sound pressure levels (100-120 dB) with nearly constant

84 re, measured using the time-weighted average sound pressure levels (LAeq,8h), was lower for the Tinni

85 to 120 ms tones at six frequencies and four Sound Pressure Levels (SPL 115-145 dB) were quantified.

86 masker-probe delays, over a range of masker sound pressure levels (SPLs) and frequencies.

87 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80 A-weighted dB sound pressure levels [dBA]) and 6 auditory scene catego

88 h of the wing's membrane, thereby amplifying sound pressure levels and radiating sound at the resonan

89 Both the ambient sound pressure levels and the estimated effective vocali

90 ncluding the visitation frequency, light and sound pressure levels at night were significantly differ

91 hat our design yields a reduction in overall sound pressure levels by up to 5.5 dB and an increase in

92 ented a resolution better than 3 degrees for sound pressure levels of 25 mPa or greater.

93 les thermoacoustic emissions at loud audible sound pressure levels of 90.1 dB, which are inaccessible

94 tion paralleling the loudness function up to sound pressure levels of at least 120 dB.

95 louder, and thus achieve roughly triple the sound pressure levels of pihas.

96 ound-evoked vibrations over a range of input sound pressure levels spanning six orders of magnitude.

97 ces suggest that narwhals react to broadband sound pressure levels well below 120 dB re: 1 uPa and ar

98 s, head pose variation, extremity movements, sound pressure levels, light intensity level, and visita

99 However, we find that frequency and sound pressure levels, not temporal proximity to the US,

100 eocilia in vivo deflect <100 nm even at high sound pressure levels, often it takes >500 nm of stereoc

101 toward source regions associated with higher sound pressure levels.

102 al frequency distribution at low to moderate sound pressure levels: one peak occurred around the prep

103 4, representing lowest to highest A-weighted sound pressure measurements in decibels.

104 l measurements indicate a minimum detectable sound pressure of approximately 20 muPa at 16 kHz.

105 chanically gated ion channel that transduces sound, pressure, or movement into changes in excitabilit

106 given by the interaction with the travelling sound pressure wave.

107 achial cuff device measurements to correlate sound pressure waveform features with left ventricle (LV

108 The extracted sound pressure waveform reveals two prominent oscillator

109 erated by cardiohemic system vibrations, the sound pressure waveform.

110 These findings highlight the value of cuff sound pressure waveforms in providing insights about dyn

111 , it displays either individual, or averaged sound pressure waveforms, and power spectra within each

112 Ramped sound pressure waves (150-250 Hz) evoked electrotonic po

113 aural differences or that fish might compare sound pressure with particle motion signals(7,8).