ライフサイエンスコーパス: sound pressure level

1 0-10000 Hz) and input levels (e.g., 50-75 dB sound pressure level).

2 of NH listeners when compared at equal SPL (sound pressure level).

3 the unit over a wide dynamic range (10-90 dB sound pressure level).

4 e youngest embryos (maximum intensity 107 dB sound pressure level).

5 with no requirement of knowing the incident sound pressure level.

6 e effects depend nonlinearly on the stimulus sound pressure level.

7 lliculus (IC) change their firing rates with sound pressure level.

8 tic stimulus (a hiss) of approximately equal sound pressure level.

9 toward source regions associated with higher sound pressure levels.

10 he PIAT was measured in response to 80-95 dB sound pressure level 1-14 kHz sinusoidal acoustic excita

11 uditory system operates over a vast range of sound pressure levels (100-120 dB) with nearly constant

12 er exposure to a traumatic unilateral 80 dB (sound pressure level) 4 kHz tone.

13 V and hearing thresholds were elevated 50 dB sound pressure level across the frequency spectrum.

14 f1 ratio of 1.2 and L1/L2 values of 65/55 dB sound pressure level and click-evoked ABR using a slow (

15 al of two acoustic indices, i.e. the average sound pressure level and the acoustic complexity index b

16 the mechanism responsible for this change in sound pressure level and velocity remains elusive.

17 ich presented a significantly higher ambient sound pressure level and were more acoustically complex

18 h of the wing's membrane, thereby amplifying sound pressure levels and radiating sound at the resonan

19 Both the ambient sound pressure levels and the estimated effective vocali

20 ar growth rate of the response to increasing sound pressure level; and the amount of distortion to be

21 Increases in sound pressure level appeared to be largely driven by la

22 of the tender corn kernel has the same mean sound pressure level as in hard popcorn.

23 gical traveling waves corresponding to 70 dB sound pressure level at 9 kHz were simulated, advection

24 ncluding the visitation frequency, light and sound pressure levels at night were significantly differ

25 These cells never fired to tones at 50 dB sound pressure level but fired to frequency-modulated sw

26 hat our design yields a reduction in overall sound pressure levels by up to 5.5 dB and an increase in

27 -16 kHz octave-band noise exposure at 100 dB sound pressure level caused a threshold shift (~40 dB) a

28 better in Vglut3(WT) Noise exposure at 94 dB sound pressure level caused auditory threshold shifts th

29 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80 A-weighted dB sound pressure levels [dBA]) and 6 auditory scene catego

30 percentile was associated with a 1.6-dB SPL (sound pressure level) decrease in DPOAE amplitude (95% C

31 d identically (8-16 kHz noise band at 100 dB sound pressure level for 2 h) but at different ages (4-1

32 elevation and, correspondingly, on the high sound pressure levels (>100 dB SPL) necessary to produce

33 ber auditory nerve responses at 70 and 50 dB sound pressure level, have been quantified, based on KL

34 , and the thermal processes on the change in sound pressure level in the AT.

35 elocity toward scala tympani but at 80-90 dB sound pressure level (in decibels relative to 20 microPa

36 stance of sound propagation is verified, the sound pressure level increases from 32 to 71 decibels at

37 the device's performance and applicability, sound pressure level is characterized in both space and

38 re, measured using the time-weighted average sound pressure levels (LAeq,8h), was lower for the Tinni

39 s, head pose variation, extremity movements, sound pressure levels, light intensity level, and visita

40 es in response to white noise stimuli at low sound pressure levels (</=84 dB SPL), revealing a previo

41 higher predictive power than those based on sound pressure level metrics.

42 However, we find that frequency and sound pressure levels, not temporal proximity to the US,

43 In CBA/CaJ mice, a 2-h exposure to 100-dB sound pressure level octave band (8 to 16 kHz) noise res

44 ect operates by continuously integrating the sound pressure level of background noise through tempora

45 ented a resolution better than 3 degrees for sound pressure levels of 25 mPa or greater.

46 les thermoacoustic emissions at loud audible sound pressure levels of 90.1 dB, which are inaccessible

47 tion paralleling the loudness function up to sound pressure levels of at least 120 dB.

48 louder, and thus achieve roughly triple the sound pressure levels of pihas.

49 detect acoustic stimuli down to a threshold sound-pressure level of 0 dB (decibels) at the entrance

50 eocilia in vivo deflect <100 nm even at high sound pressure levels, often it takes >500 nm of stereoc

51 al frequency distribution at low to moderate sound pressure levels: one peak occurred around the prep

52 ng from 113 Hz to 49 kHz at a level of 60 dB sound-pressure level or less, with their best sensitivit

53 were estimated as the A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level over the 24-h period (LAeq24) and d

54 including the measurement of peak equivalent sound pressure level (peSPL) and peak sound pressure lev

55 valent sound pressure level (peSPL) and peak sound pressure level (pSPL).

56 neurons are typically above 100-120 dB SPL (sound pressure level re 20 microPa).

57 lative to 20 microPascals) and at 100-110 dB sound pressure level responses undergo two large phase s

58 ound-evoked vibrations over a range of input sound pressure levels spanning six orders of magnitude.

59 suppresses its spiking response to a 100-dB sound pressure level (SPL) acoustic stimulus and maintai

60 ontractions were studied as functions of the sound pressure level (SPL) and duration of 2-kHz tone bu

61 nducted and airborne sound and estimated the sound pressure level (SPL) at the stapedial footplate ac

62 wild-type (GluA3(WT)) mice reared in ambient sound pressure level (SPL) of 55-75 dB had similar audit

63 o be sensitive to sound levels down to 31 dB sound pressure level (SPL), translating to air particle

64 eater than the acoustic input power at 10 dB sound pressure level (SPL).

65 osition of the spider of approximately 65 dB sound pressure level (SPL).

66 nymphs have auditory thresholds of 70-80 dB sound pressure level (SPL).

67 to 120 ms tones at six frequencies and four Sound Pressure Levels (SPL 115-145 dB) were quantified.

68 acebo for both clicks (dexamethasone: 6.7-dB sound pressure level [SPL] vs. placebo: 33.4-dB SPL, P=.

69 masker-probe delays, over a range of masker sound pressure levels (SPLs) and frequencies.

70 rnible auditory brainstem responses (ABR) to sound pressure level stimuli up to 100 dB, indicating a

71 At an intensity of 60 dB sound pressure level, the bats' hearing extended from 2.

72 y noise bursts; prepulses for PPI were 70 dB sound pressure level tones of 4, 12, and 20 kHz.

73 Up to 10-dB reduction in energy-averaged sound pressure level was achieved by the active control

74 Each 1 dBA increase in sound pressure level was associated with a 28% increase

75 Sound pressure level was modulated trapezoidally at the

76 10-40%) in emissions from brass instruments; sound pressure level was not associated with woodwind em

77 d areas of Moorea Island (French Polynesia), sound pressure level was positively correlated with the

78 ces suggest that narwhals react to broadband sound pressure levels well below 120 dB re: 1 uPa and ar

79 sed during passive listening to brief, 95-dB sound pressure level, white noise bursts presented inter