コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 with no loss of frequency representation or sound quality.
2 rovided a quantitative assessment of musical sound quality.
3 sual Analogue Scales (VAS) to assess musical sound quality.
7 MUSHRA performance and self-reported musical sound quality, as assessed by more traditional rating sc
9 e of this study was to (a) apply the musical sound quality assessment method, Cochlear Implant-MUltip
10 isfaction, with subjective measures of aided sound quality being the best predictor of performance al
11 y also perceived benefits including improved sound quality, better music enjoyment, and sometimes a p
12 and Anchor (CI-MUSHRA), to quantify musical sound quality deficits in CI (cochlear implant) users wi
16 ual analogue scores used to assess Korotkoff sound quality indicated that systolic blood pressure was
18 sion gave small but significant benefits for sound quality of a percussion instrument (xylophone).
19 ds are helpful to patients but can have poor sound quality or transmission due to insufficient output
20 series of studies on the factors influencing sound quality preferences, mostly for jazz and classical
21 hearing participants, the highest ratings of sound quality were obtained when the reproduction bandwi
22 de, through digital electronic means, better sound quality with visual display and the ability to rep