ライフサイエンスコーパス: spatial attention

1 rate endogenous expectation-driven shifts of spatial attention.

2 ell as healthy variability in the control of spatial attention.

3 d in human subjects during the allocation of spatial attention.

4 erventions for right hemisphere disorders of spatial attention.

5 ve as an index for the covert orientation of spatial attention.

6 tems during target detection under sustained spatial attention.

7 rformed a stimulus discrimination task under spatial attention.

8 when the task required rapid reallocation of spatial attention.

9 mulation, demonstrating exogenous capture of spatial attention.

10 ric dynamics that underlie the allocation of spatial attention.

11 ltifarious mechanisms that accomplish visual spatial attention.

12 d propagation of attended information during spatial attention.

13 rosaccades is inherently linked to shifts in spatial attention.

14 ard associations of visual stimuli modulated spatial attention.

15 idence that microsaccades index the locus of spatial attention.

16 t BF, tracked trial-to-trial fluctuations in spatial attention.

17 spontaneous microsaccades reflect shifts in spatial attention.

18 of these structures have a possible role in spatial attention.

19 sual stimuli associated with rewards attract spatial attention.

20 delayed saccade task that required sustained spatial attention.

21 neural activity also predicts variability in spatial attention.

22 mation and that relates to the engagement of spatial attention.

23 amygdala neurons predicts the allocation of spatial attention.

24 cessing, and others which seem important for spatial attention.

25 nkeys and assessed how these cues influenced spatial attention.

26 tasks are thought to invoke a redirection of spatial attention.

27 heric language dominance are RH dominant for spatial attention.

28 ght to be involved in stimulus selection and spatial attention.

29 orrelated with trial-to-trial variability in spatial attention.

30 sal frontoparietal cortex for the control of spatial attention.

31 derstanding the brain mechanisms that enable spatial attention.

32 ye fields) that are commonly associated with spatial attention.

33 n visual areas as a function of anticipatory spatial attention.

34 at alpha is a neural signature of supramodal spatial attention.

35 ate during anticipatory deployment of visual spatial attention.

36 pecific control systems during deployment of spatial attention.

37 dorsal frontoparietal network that controls spatial attention.

38 licit awareness but which nonetheless guides spatial attention.

39 on asymmetrically activated during shifts of spatial attention.

40 ttentional modulation during rapid shifts of spatial attention.

41 tion, thus suggesting that it interacts with spatial attention.

42 by visual cues that modulated alertness and spatial attention.

43 several components, including alertness and spatial attention.

44 idence that parietal alpha controls auditory spatial attention.

45 across the large-scale network that directs spatial attention.

46 ritical cortical region for overt and covert spatial attention.

47 egion for the deployment of overt and covert spatial attention.

48 hemisphere contralateral to the direction of spatial attention.

49 gnitive modulations by changing the focus of spatial attention.

50 stimulation on top-down control of auditory spatial attention.

51 ha asymmetry and causally impact measures of spatial attention.

52 n and forebrain networks interact to control spatial attention.

53 brain and the midbrain coordinate to control spatial attention.

54 dulation of visual representations by visual spatial attention.

55 gaze are also recruited for covert shifts of spatial attention(1-9).

56 be distinguished from the effects of covert spatial attention [11-13].

57 [11, 12], and a limited resolution of visual spatial attention [13].

58 e superior parietal lobule (SPL) in shifting spatial attention, a finding not predicted by human lesi

59 ge network predicted language, but not visuo-spatial attention abilities, while VWFA connectivity wit

60 ortex are known to control the allocation of spatial attention across the visual field.

61 onhuman species, we tested whether shifts in spatial attention activated the monkey DMN.

62 Feature and spatial attention affect the activity of local populatio

63 howed a rightward shift in the allocation of spatial attention after rTMS over the right intraparieta

64 o spot and quantify acquired disturbances of spatial attention after unilateral brain injuries?

65 rd-predictive stimuli, and to correlate with spatial attention allocation.

66 ygdala neurons may be present independent of spatial attention allocation.

67 es of reinforcement, and responses reflected spatial attention allocation.

68 Spatial attention allows us to make more accurate decisi

69 Our results indicate that sustained spatial attention alone reliably produces the microsacca

70 all, our findings demonstrate that sustained spatial attention alone, even in the absence of saccade

71 In the awake state, shifts of spatial attention alternate with periods of sustained at

72 rsion results from discharge fluctuations as spatial attention alternates between distal cues and loc

73 rmation or higher-level information, such as spatial attention, an understanding of how these cortica

74 rn analysis to explore how spatial position, spatial attention and color information are differential

75 ten requires stronger engagement of auditory spatial attention and context-dependent semantic predict

76 ected to language areas but peripheral V1 to spatial attention and control networks.

77 While both spatial attention and decision confidence have been subj

78 rrelated with brain networks associated with spatial attention and executive control.

79 Our results demonstrate that spatial attention and expectation engage partly overlapp

80 Thus, spatial attention and expectation engage partly overlapp

81 novel multisensory paradigm, we manipulated spatial attention and expectation selectively in auditio

82 al spatial selection and is thought to guide spatial attention and eye movements.

83 udes of neuronal response modulations due to spatial attention and feature attention are correlated;

84 highlight processes that occur during visual spatial attention and feature-based attention in cortica

85 a core component in computational models for spatial attention and gaze control.

86 mechanism of the corpus callosum function in spatial attention and have broader implications for the

87 ng of how distracters are suppressed, and of spatial attention and its dysfunction.

88 Spatial attention and its neural correlates in the human

89 -band oscillations have been tightly tied to spatial attention and may not reflect location-independe

90 left hemisphere injury, includes deficits of spatial attention and motor actions contralateral to the

91 ty-dependent effects dissociated between the spatial attention and motor intention task, with the rig

92 inct predictability-dependent activation for spatial attention and motor intention, but also common c

93 ha-band activity is commonly associated with spatial attention and multisensory prioritization.

94 The results highlight the critical role of spatial attention and object identification but also pre

95 a central role in spatial functions, such as spatial attention and saccadic eye movements.

96 Spatial attention and saccadic processing therefore co-o

97 f the pulvinar nucleus as a critical hub for spatial attention and selection of visually guided actio

98 etal cortex is traditionally associated with spatial attention and sensorimotor integration, recent e

99 e dominance during stimulus-driven shifts of spatial attention and target detection reflects asymmetr

100 stimulus-evoked BOLD modulations related to spatial attention and that incoming sensory signals add

101 temporoparietal cortex being involved during spatial attention and the left angular gyrus and anterio

102 Both perceptual sensitivity during covert spatial attention and the probability of overt explorato

103 PPC is used to study cognitive mechanisms of spatial attention and to examine the potential of this t

104 mory retinotopic effects complement previous spatial attention and working memory findings (and sugge

105 ported in frontal and parietal cortex during spatial attention and working memory.

106 ity to cognitive effort (number of shifts of spatial attention) and to effort risks.

107 ominance have left-hemispheric dominance for spatial attention, and all but one of 16 participants wi

108 to isolate the effects of feature attention, spatial attention, and normalization on the responses of

109 cits involve mechanisms for saliency coding, spatial attention, and short-term memory and occur in co

110 improvements consistent with the effects of spatial attention, and simultaneously measure network, c

111 bility unrelated to threat-related biases in spatial attention, and support a disruption in more gene

112 dulated by feature attention, independent of spatial attention, and the magnitude of response enhance

113 However, whereas spatial attention appears to act on local populations, f

114 related; however, whereas modulations due to spatial attention are correlated with normalization stre

115 here suppressive and facilitatory effects of spatial attention are expressed.

116 enges: First, effects associated with visual spatial attention are hard to distinguish from those tha

117 Such acquired biases of spatial attention are persistent, are nonstrategic in na

118 arietal sulcus (IPS), modulations related to spatial attention are relatively small, are confined pri

119 Language production and spatial attention are the most salient lateralized cereb

120 rent behavioral contexts), while focusing on spatial attention as a dynamic process that unfolds over

121 Experiment 2, we mapped the distribution of spatial attention as a function of WMC and WML, by recor

122 logical link between the control of gaze and spatial attention, as information sampled at covertly at

123 ctive behavioral preferences when allocating spatial attention, as measured by a landmark task.

124 ing rates was correlated with variability in spatial attention, as measured by reaction time.

125 Currently, the precise time at which spatial attention becomes fully allocated to the task-re

126 ights of individual subjects, and thus their spatial attention behavior, could be predictably shifted

127 Given that spatial attention both facilitates learning of image sta

128 to play important roles in the regulation of spatial attention but have limited selectivity of nonspa

129 negativity) is not related to the control of spatial attention but is instead an N2pc in disguise, re

130 o-parietal attention network predicted visuo-spatial attention, but not language abilities.

131 rt of the network of brain areas involved in spatial attention, but recent findings have dramatically

132 The question of whether spatial attention can be directed independently to diffe

133 While spatial attention can be divided effectively between sep

134 ortex is retinotopically organized, however, spatial attention can comodulate local neuronal populati

135 Although it has been suggested that visual spatial attention can only be affected by consciously pe

136 The lateral PPC contributes to spatial attention constituting a basic function of the h

137 focused on soccer goalkeepers' Covert Visual Spatial Attention (CVSA) abilities, which are essential

138 ention battery assessed both spatial and non-spatial attention deficits.

139 entified by fMRI caused similar neglect-like spatial attention deficits.

140 Cued spatial attention differentially modulates alpha power i

141 time differences, whereas directing auditory spatial attention does not.

142 tic tool for acquired pathological biases of spatial attention due to unilateral brain damage.SIGNIFI

143 n and is necessary for the normal control of spatial attention during perceptual judgments.

144 ion and exhibited decreased ability to shift spatial attention during the frustration condition relat

145 These include signals for spatial attention, early target selection, evidence accu

146 They also imply that spatial attention effects can be found both in early and

147 In addition, it is not clear to what extent spatial attention effects extend from early to high-orde

148 dence for attention gradients is provided by spatial attention effects on event-related potentials (E

149 This cholinergic agonist enhanced spatial attention effects on low-frequency alpha/beta os

150 dies have demonstrated that the magnitude of spatial attention effects on neuronal responses covaries

151 lts show that for top-down processes such as spatial attention, elevated top-down beta-band influence

152 We infer that such redirection of spatial attention engages multisensory vestibular cortic

153 on shifts are a principal mechanism by which spatial attention enhances population codes for relevant

154 In the visual system, spatial attention enhances sensory responses to stimuli

155 ield (FEF) participates in the deployment of spatial attention, even in the absence of saccadic eye m

156 t do objects leave some trace that can guide spatial attention, even without participants intentional

157 ure hemispheric asymmetries during shifts of spatial attention evoked by a peripheral cue stimulus an

158 hese studies suggests that the correlates of spatial attention exhibited by neurons within the visual

159 There are two forms of covert spatial attention: exogenous attention is automatic, sti

160 We present two spatial attention experiments in humans, where we first

161 axis lateralizing to the left hemisphere and spatial attention, face recognition, and emotional proso

162 We show that a purely spatial attention field propagating downward in the neur

163 Although the locus of spatial attention has been hypothesized to be represente

164 Spatial attention has been postulated to facilitate perc

165 In the intact brain, the control of spatial attention has been related to a distributed fron

166 Over the last several decades, spatial attention has been shown to influence the activi

167 Visual spatial attention has been studied in humans with both e

168 Covert spatial attention has long been thought to speed visual

169 spatial information, and its relationship to spatial attention, has not been explored.

170 Spatial attention (i.e., task-relevance) and expectation

171 By measuring the rapid reallocation of spatial attention immediately after the onset of distrac

172 epresentations.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Covert spatial attention improves processing at attended locati

173 Much evidence indicates that spatial attention improves starting from the immediate p

174 ently), we determined the lateralization for spatial attention in a group of individuals with known a

175 n, but the stimulus drew a similar amount of spatial attention in both conditions.

176 Stimulus-driven shifts of spatial attention in both visual fields evoked right-hem

177 ciple in cortical implementation of auditory spatial attention in challenging listening situations.

178 were eliminated while leaving the effects of spatial attention in FEF intact.

179 eye field (FEF), an area assumed to control spatial attention in human and nonhuman primates, firing

180 milar processes operate during deployment of spatial attention in other sensory modalities.

181 s that have been used to characterize visual spatial attention in primates.

182 ion, which posits that even covert shifts of spatial attention in the absence of eye movements are el

183 valuable insights into the representation of spatial attention in the human brain.

184 C hypometabolism is associated with impaired spatial attention in very early AD and 2) that impaired

185 h a rightward attentional bias that reflects spatial attention in vision.

186 There is clear evidence that spatial attention increases neural responses to attended

187 In the magnetoencephalogram, spatial attention induced lateralization of alpha power

188 Spatial attention induces increasing and decreasing powe

189 Shifting spatial attention into the receptive field of visual neu

190 Stimulus selection for gaze and spatial attention involves competition among stimuli acr

191 visual regions reflect feedback control when spatial attention is allocated and this control is exerc

192 Spatial attention is comprised of neural mechanisms that

193 ifferences, provide compelling evidence that spatial attention is controlled through competitive inte

194 Furthermore, when spatial attention is deployed within vision, processing

195 We tested the hypothesis that when spatial attention is directed to a stimulus, this causes

196 ect-based attention have suggested that when spatial attention is directed to part of an object, atte

197 When spatial attention is directed toward a particular stimul

198 Spatial attention is discontinuous, sampling behaviorall

199 rformance in an attention task, we show that spatial attention is fully available at the task-relevan

200 Spatial attention is known to gate entry into visual sho

201 Spatial attention is most often investigated in the visu

202 This demonstrates that spatial attention is not coupled to the executed oculomo

203 Spatial attention led to a multiplicative increase in th

204 Early in training, spatial attention led to an increase in the gain of stim

205 nvolved in anticipatory deployment of visual spatial attention, less is known about the electrophysio

206 ition to skills with language sounds, visual-spatial attention may be an important predictor of readi

207 e opposite but parallel effects suggest that spatial attention may bias the neural processing of dyna

208 The neuronal circuits that link the SC to spatial attention may include attention-related areas of

209 memory is accomplished by modality-specific spatial attention mechanisms.

210 findings demonstrate that both alertness and spatial attention modulate neural variability and highli

211 Cued spatial attention modulates functionally relevant alpha

212 latively simple visual discrimination tasks, spatial attention modulates perceptual sensitivity prima

213 It is known that the allocation of spatial attention modulates the amplitude of LFPs in vis

214 New work shows that spatial attention modulates visual responses of single n

215 Additionally, spatial attention modulations are stronger with multiple

216 us for several critical functions, including spatial attention, multisensory integration, and behavio

217 ening stimulus elicits amygdala input to the spatial attention network and inferotemporal visual area

218 The midbrain spatial attention network in birds generates high-amplit

219 ctional logic in a critical component of the spatial attention network, the optic tectum (OT, superio

220 predicting threatening events can prime the spatial attention network.

221 his relationship by comparing the effects of spatial attention on anticipatory and stimulus-evoked si

222 The effect of spatial attention on brain rhythms in the alpha band (8-

223 tigated the effects of two distinct forms of spatial attention on decision confidence; endogenous att

224 rease in power when participants focus their spatial attention on laterally presented stimuli, in lin

225 We compared the effects of feature and spatial attention on local and spatially separated popul

226 Here we investigated the influence of visual spatial attention on LTP-like and LTD-like plasticity in

227 mited spatial selectivity, (ii) no effect of spatial attention on mean response amplitudes, and (iii)

228 isual cortex (V1), resembling the effects of spatial attention on primate visual cortical activity.

229 greatly reduced while leaving the effects of spatial attention on responses intact.

230 The benefits of spatial attention on stimulus processing are thought to

231 Here we determined the effects of spatial attention on the set of visual field locations (

232 It is unknown, however, whether selective spatial attention operates where the observer is already

233 lained as an effector-nonspecific deficit in spatial attention or awareness, since the temporary "les

234 Directing spatial attention or manual response selection by means

235 anges in known oscillatory EEG signatures of spatial attention orienting and motor preparation in the

236 No effects were found on EEG signatures of spatial attention orienting over occipitoparietal sites.

237 alertness in humans interact with those for spatial attention orienting.

238 In a sustained spatial attention paradigm, human participants detected

239 Using the same reward-related spatial attention paradigm, we show that the volumetric

240 n be an overt correlate of the allocation of spatial attention, precisely timed gaze stabilization ca

241 uman subjects and showed that highly focused spatial attention primarily enhanced neural responses to

242 Spatial attention prioritizes processing of information

243 ortical and subcortical processes underlying spatial attention, providing important insight not reali

244 The results show that chickens shift spatial attention rapidly and dynamically, following pri

245 onents of attention, including alertness and spatial attention, reduces neural variability in humans.

246 e the notion that the perceptual benefits of spatial attention rely on increased signal-to-noise in V

247 ior colliculus (SC) in the control of visual spatial attention remains poorly understood.

248 ance (stay cues) or shifting (shift cues) of spatial attention, respectively, caused a delay of alpha

249 ained within the attended stimulus, or might spatial attention selectively enhance the features relev

250 se time (RT) after a shift or hold of covert spatial attention served as a behavioral index of fluctu

251 These findings are the first to characterize spatial attention signals in topographic frontal and par

252 ctional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of spatial attention signals, behavioral measures of spatia

253 ior parietal lobule (SPL1)] to examine their spatial attention signals.

254 ion in only right, but not left SPL1 carried spatial attention signals.

255 e aid differential diagnoses in disorders of spatial attention.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The significanc

256 n information, consistent with their link to spatial attention.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Working memory

257 ice display fundamental signatures of visual spatial attention spanning behavioral, network, cellular

258 ight visual, left and right motor, language, spatial attention, spatial and verbal memory) with the p

259 in visual evoked potentials, associated with spatial attention starting with V1/V2 and continuing thr

260 the dorsal striatum of mice during a visual spatial attention task [6], taking advantage of the abil

261 data from human subjects performing a visual spatial attention task and correlating Granger causal in

262 ently recorded EEG and fMRI in a cued visual spatial attention task in humans, which allowed delineat

263 ects performing a trial-by-trial cued visual spatial attention task in which the subject had to respo

264 an subjects while they performed a selective spatial attention task over the course of 1 month.

265 ns in alpha power during a delay period in a spatial attention task preceded subsequent stimulus-driv

266 ling to psychophysical data (obtained from a spatial attention task) under a psychopharmacological ch

267 onal neuroimaging data obtained during a non-spatial attention task, we examined the locus, time-cour

268 In alert monkeys performing a visual spatial attention task, we probed thalamocortical commun

269 correlations during stimulus selection in a spatial attention task.

270 e and during unilateral SC inactivation in a spatial attention task.

271 f salience (i.e., monetary reward/loss) in a spatial attention task.

272 mispheric modulation of alpha power during a spatial attention task.

273 using subdural electrocorticography during a spatial-attention task to study network dynamics.

274 en the pulvinar, area V4, and IT cortex in a spatial-attention task.

275 me visuospatial tasks, behavioral studies of spatial attention tasks have mostly yielded negative res

276 In neglect patients, performance on spatial attention tasks improves after rightward-deviati

277 visual attention, as measured with standard spatial attention tasks, and visual awareness, as measur

278 ction, acting much like spatial cues used in spatial attention tasks.

279 ntegration of reward, executive control, and spatial attention that occurs during spatial reinforceme

280 on is applicable to the allocation of visual spatial attention, then the involvement of basal ganglia

281 ed factors that may interfere with deploying spatial attention to a target talker masked by another t

282 endent and hemisphere-specific modulation of spatial attention to facial expressions.

283 escribe a method for simultaneously tracking spatial attention to fixated and nonfixated locations du

284 In human electroencephalographic recordings, spatial attention to peripheral locations robustly modul

285 The amygdala therefore may act to enhance spatial attention to sensory stimuli associated with rew

286 rained monkeys to perform tasks that engaged spatial attention to varying degrees to understand the g

287 These results suggest that, during visual spatial attention, top-down signals from TCN to DMN regu

288 re therefore obtained while monkeys directed spatial attention towards stimuli promising reward or th

289 Results suggest that auditory spatial attention under low cognitive loads modulates or

290 Modification of spatial attention via reinforcement learning requires th

291 osterior alpha power is influenced by visual spatial attention via top-down control from higher order

292 depending on the sensory system within which spatial attention was deployed.

293 al judgment on the probe shape, their covert spatial attention was drawn to the original location of

294 hand, demonstrating that a precise focus of spatial attention was established during the selective m

295 Greater overall BOLD activation with spatial attention was observed in visual cortical areas

296 As a behavioral measure of spatial attention, we recorded fixation time during visu

297 es that indicate to either shift or maintain spatial attention, we tested whether this functional ana

298 Our results show that shifts of spatial attention when monitoring rapidly presented visu

299 he visual scene, including the deployment of spatial attention, whereas motor responses do not.

300 Whether the same neuronal mechanisms mediate spatial attention, which improves perception of attended