戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 f audio matched on the age and gender of the speaker.
2 gree of acoustic overlap with the unattended speaker.
3 act on the public's perception of the female speaker.
4 ers but selectively represented the attended speaker.
5 al polypropylene diaphragm found in an audio speaker.
6 ational pitch contour, phonetic content, and speaker.
7 er to a greater extent than from the foreign speaker.
8  in participants listening to and seeing the speaker.
9  perceptions and underlying condition of the speaker.
10  black speakers compared with 0.19 for white speakers.
11 eaningful content from the voices of diverse speakers.
12 r 418 meanings in two natural populations of speakers.
13 onducted with 42 white speakers and 73 black speakers.
14 ising candidate for next-generation acoustic speakers.
15 ing for the gender and rank of the available speakers.
16 late; Bolivian-Spanish speakers; and English speakers.
17  even in the presence of multiple concurrent speakers.
18 d today only among Central American Chibchan-speakers.
19  likelihood of women appearing as colloquium speakers.
20 s in how linguistic forms are copied between speakers.
21 as then analyzed and compared to that of the speakers.
22 he presence of spatially separated competing speakers.
23  infants' demonstrated preference for native speakers.
24 lusivity through selection of annual meeting speakers.
25 ing that are otherwise hidden in monolingual speakers.
26 ntity marker and expressive resource for its speakers.
27 (e.g., a dog bark) in 14 English monolingual speakers.
28 ere sequentially presented from two adjacent speakers.
29 ists that was primarily associated with Khoe speakers.
30 iscounting behaviors selectively in Mandarin speakers.
31  both oral concurrent sessions and symposium speakers.
32  better than state-of-the-art electrodynamic speakers.
33  responses to tone changes in tonal language speakers.
34 i-like nonwords just as well as fluent Maori speakers.
35 h processing in tonal and non-tonal language speakers.
36 on in the majority of the westernmost Uralic speakers [1-5].
37            The conference hosted 35 renowned speakers, 100 posters, 20 short talks, and a preconferen
38 (33.9%) compared with Spanish (29%) or other speakers (20.4%).
39       EEG was recorded while 29 adult native speakers (22 women, 7 men) listened to naturally spoken
40 estigators, including 55 invited world-class speakers, 25 short oral presenters, and 100 poster prese
41                                    Of 14,214 speakers, 30.5% were female, statistically higher than t
42  compared with females when introducing male speakers (53% v 80%; P < .01).
43  their professional title compared with male speakers (62% v 81%; P < .001).
44                                    Of the 86 speakers, 66 (76.7%) included a COI disclosure statement
45       In experiments 1-5, nonsigning English speakers accurately distinguished between telic (e.g., "
46                                   In speech, speakers adjust their articulatory movement magnitude ac
47                                          All speakers agreed that multiple inflammatory measures shou
48 isease duration (45 German-Italian bilingual speakers and 40 monolingual speakers) were included.
49 tructured interviews conducted with 42 white speakers and 73 black speakers.
50 he center of a semicircular arrangement of 7 speakers and are asked to orient their head towards a so
51                                          The speakers and audience discussed the special challenges i
52  with high ecological validity from 160 male speakers and biomarkers of condition, including baseline
53 al Khoesan groups, and highlights that Bantu speakers and Coloured individuals have different mixture
54  research has shown that the degree to which speakers and listeners exhibit similar brain activity pa
55                            All participants (speakers and observers) were monitored via electrocardio
56 Jeanne Nerbonne and Nipavan Chiamvimonvat as speakers and panel discussants.
57 se temporal dependencies arise between adult speakers' and listeners' neural activity.
58 ons across the (right) mid-anterior STG/STS (speakers) and bilateral mid-posterior STG/STS (vowels),
59 retary, Treasurer, CEO and Medical Director, Speaker, and Speaker-Elect and the chairpersons of the A
60 cretary-Treasurer, CEO and Medical Director, Speaker, and Speaker-Elect and the chairpersons of the A
61 s, students, engineers, technicians, invited speakers, and guests from North and South America, Germa
62        Half of the participants were English speakers, and half were not.
63 k, multitalker babble was presented from all speakers, and pairs of speech tokens were sequentially p
64 ese social biases, the preference for native speakers, and propose that this preference may result fr
65 en a subject listens to one of two competing speakers, and show that the brainstem response is consis
66  higher perceived and actual social class of speakers, and that pronunciation cues in speech communic
67 ences are active in the brains of individual speakers, and they are demonstrably distinct from sensor
68 an hunter-gatherer isolate; Bolivian-Spanish speakers; and English speakers.
69                                          Two speakers are easily segregated, even without binaural cu
70 ences in speech understanding when competing speakers are present, as in a crowded restaurant.
71 ears ago, a second expansion of Austronesian-speakers arrived in Near Oceania and the descendants of
72 o-only), and when seeing a silent video of a speaker articulating another story (video-only).
73 e features change constantly (e.g. different speakers, articulation modes etc.), and listeners need t
74                 A top-notch slate of invited speakers, assembled by conference organizers or committe
75 important processes including attending to a speaker at a cocktail party and knowing how (or whether)
76 dy examines gender differences in colloquium speakers at 50 prestigious US colleges and universities
77 ven attention we presented novel sounds from speakers at four different lateral locations while the p
78  The underrepresentation of women as invited speakers at international scientific conferences exempli
79 w respondents to discern the social class of speakers at levels above chance accuracy, that adherence
80  The perceived underrepresentation of female speakers at prominent scientific meetings is currently a
81 emory tasks, LB speakers were better than RB speakers at recalling initial stimuli, but worse at reca
82                         Here, several of the speakers at that conference answer questions posed by Na
83 iews in Nature Reviews Neurology, written by speakers at the congress, highlight the importance of th
84 r, (ii) this variability is attested between speakers but not within a speaker, (iii) this variabilit
85 rimary AC were less discerning of individual speakers but selectively represented the attended speake
86 troducers were more likely to address female speakers by first name only compared with female introdu
87 h inputs.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Watching the speaker can facilitate our understanding of what is bein
88   Musicians can perform at different tempos, speakers can control the cadence of their speech, and ch
89 the acoustic similarity of both phonetic and speaker categories.
90 for Epidemiologic Research hosted 17 invited speakers charged by the Executive Committee with present
91 different word orders are known to influence speakers' choices, but the underlying neural mechanisms
92                  A puzzle of language is how speakers come to use the same words for particular meani
93 -such as the same word produced by different speakers-come to be treated as functionally equivalent.
94 o fully understand the context of the public speakers' comments, including the possible influence of
95 rage word error rate (WER) of 0.35 for black speakers compared with 0.19 for white speakers.
96 professional address when introducing female speakers compared with females when introducing male spe
97 poken object-label mappings across different speaker contexts.
98                                  The keynote speaker, Craig Pikaard, opened the meeting with his pres
99                                      Several speakers demonstrated that multimodal imaging measuremen
100  In every participant, target vowels evoke a speaker-dependent neural response that is consistent wit
101                                     Clinical speakers described their needs for image-based capabilit
102 ir mother tongue better than they do foreign speakers despite their limited speech comprehension abil
103 ech comprehension abilities, suggesting that speaker discrimination may rely on familiarity with the
104                             Finally, several speakers discussed the capabilities of artificial intell
105 quency-dependent selection-a bias that makes speakers disproportionately likely to use the words that
106 inese and English adult participants to rate speaker dissimilarity in pairs of sentences in English o
107     We conclude that signers gesture just as speakers do.
108 ucture of spontaneous connected speech in 52 speakers during the acute stage of a left hemisphere str
109 urer, CEO and Medical Director, Speaker, and Speaker-Elect and the chairpersons of the APA Committee
110 urer, CEO and Medical Director, Speaker, and Speaker-Elect and the chairpersons of the APA Committee
111                        We found that English speakers employed horizontal, linear representations of
112 representations were highly conserved across speakers, enabling a component of the decoder to be tran
113 were more likely than women to be colloquium speakers even after controlling for the gender and rank
114  speech enhances our ability to comprehend a speaker, even in noise-free conditions.
115 ve trends: the overall proportions of female speakers exceed ABO estimates of female ophthalmologists
116                      We show that (i) Korean speakers exhibit substantial variability regarding this
117          Relative to controls, both backward speakers exhibited behavioral advantages for reversing w
118 speech production and speech motor learning, speakers' experience matched auditory and somatosensory
119                                      Invited speakers' expertise covered basic as well as translation
120 ence design refers to the situation in which speakers fashion their utterances so as to cater to the
121                                              Speaker fees (31.7%), consulting fees (21.6%), and resea
122                          Consulting fees and speaker fees were associated with highest payment amount
123                    We found that early Bantu speakers first moved southward, through the equatorial r
124 n the tongue postures recorded from the same speakers for several repetitions of the /e, epsilon, a/
125 ite paper summarizes the topics presented by speakers from academia, industry, and government intende
126 etween Khanty and Bashkir, a group of Turkic speakers from Southern Urals region.
127 tivity to voice cues, such as differences in speakers' gender, develops over time.
128                                       Native speakers had enhanced neural processing of the formant f
129 erent information about phonetic features or speaker identity.
130 s attested between speakers but not within a speaker, (iii) this variability controls interpretation
131 positions for session moderators and invited speakers.IMPORTANCE Politicians and media members have a
132               Humans can easily focus on one speaker in a multi-talker acoustic environment, but how
133 s excel at selectively listening to a target speaker in background noise such as competing voices.
134 k of four acoustic stimuli via an ultrasonic speaker in random order: (1) 50 kHz USVs, (2) 22 kHz USV
135       Moreover, the encoding of the attended speaker in the nonprimary AC was invariant to the degree
136  selectively to one out of several competing speakers in a "cocktail party" situation is a highly dem
137 to one out of several simultaneously talking speakers in a "cocktail party" situation is a highly dem
138     English speakers in the USA and Mandarin speakers in China completed a delay discounting task and
139 nced understanding of the first Sino-Tibetan speakers in relation to the "early farming dispersal" th
140 es in the primary AC responded to individual speakers in the mixture and were relatively unchanged by
141                                      English speakers in the USA and Mandarin speakers in China compl
142 ocieties striving to maximize inclusivity of speakers in their scientific programming.
143  each meeting, information about each public speaker including presence of conflict of interest (COI)
144 ward modeling approach is described, whereby speakers independently generate communicatively relevant
145 xpect to receive information from the native speaker, indicating that infants were preparing to learn
146                 Analysis of the phonetic and speaker information in neural activations revealed that
147 ly, we show a joint encoding of phonetic and speaker information, where the neural representation of
148 nt in processing, including inferences about speaker intentions.
149 ctive, observational study of video-archived speaker introductions at the 2017 and 2018 ASCO Annual M
150                         When women performed speaker introductions, no gender differences in professi
151 ned how professional titles were used during speakers' introductions at the ASCO Annual Meeting.
152 devices that integrate a color module with a speaker is fabricated from a mechanochromic layer that c
153 r is saying, but also, importantly, when the speaker is saying it.
154 l movements relay information about what the speaker is saying, but also, importantly, when the speak
155 s can greatly help in understanding what the speaker is saying.
156 ng of Remote Oceanic islands by Austronesian speakers is a fascinating and yet contentious part of hu
157 ormation, where the neural representation of speakers is dependent on phoneme category.
158  that most of the vocabulary of the Malagasy speakers is derived from the Barito group of the Austron
159  clear proclivity for male-dominated invited speaker lists.
160 tury, ~900,000 Native Americans, mostly Tupi speakers, lived on the Brazilian coast.
161  groups from northern Cameroon and non-Bantu speakers living in present-day Nigeria and Ghana.
162 rs were assessed using a restricted range of speaker locations designed to match those found in clini
163  effects or drift, or do languages with more speakers lose features due to a process of simplificatio
164 he currently attainable marshmallow when the speaker made no such promise.
165 ly, the results show that lips on the Target speaker matched to a secondary (Mask) speaker's audio se
166 ing analyses of the gender parity of invited speakers may allow the ongoing discussions to be informe
167 d voice gender is primarily characterized by speakers' mean fundamental frequency (F0), related to gl
168 ocial settings, speech waveforms from nearby speakers mix together in our ear canals.
169 n English syllable in three groups of native speakers, non-native nonmusicians, and non-native musici
170  functions ranging from threat assessment to speaker normalization.
171  contours directly reflected the encoding of speaker-normalized relative pitch but not absolute pitch
172                                          The speakers not only described how metabolic flux adapts to
173  a professional address compared with female speakers (odds ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.71 to 3.47; P < .0
174                                              Speakers of all human languages regularly use intonation
175 ication: incrementality and efficiency, with speakers of all languages interpreting language incremen
176 using electroencephalography (EEG) in fluent speakers of American Sign Language (ASL) as they watch v
177 lations in western Cameroon today-as well as speakers of Bantu languages from across the continent-ar
178 across vast geographic distances and between speakers of different language families.
179 nterplay between these two forces results in speakers of different languages having different pragmat
180                                       Slavic speakers of Eastern Europe are, in general, very similar
181                                   Non-native speakers of English who hold nursing qualifications from
182 oups, of whom 4 were non-native and 7 native speakers of English.
183  and short-term memory tasks to adult native speakers of four LB and four right-branching (RB) langua
184 ogeneous ceramic-using population related to speakers of languages in the Arawak family from northeas
185 es (e.g., color, material, or size), whereas speakers of languages with a noun-adjective order integr
186 , Hindi, Hungarian, and Wolof), we show that speakers of languages with an adjective-noun order integ
187 erage genomes for 83 Aboriginal Australians (speakers of Pama-Nyungan languages) and 25 Papuans from
188 ists between receipt of industry payments by speakers of the Open Public Hearing (OPH) portion and th
189 etreat of a language is the interaction with speakers of the same language.
190       However, 7-mo-old infants discriminate speakers of their mother tongue better than they do fore
191 uditory speech processing in male and female speakers of tonal and non-tonal languages.
192                                           In speakers of tonal languages, however, processing of pitc
193  varies unpredictably across a population of speakers of what is ostensibly a single language.
194 hat people do not always mean what they say; speakers often use imprecise, exaggerated, or otherwise
195 ing a competing story from the corresponding speaker on the opposite side.
196 orm very rapid personality impressions about speakers on hearing a single word.
197 ons for graphene, such as remote non-contact speakers, optical-switching acoustic devices, etc.
198 standing speech in a background of competing speakers or speech-shaped noise under more realistic con
199 ct with to a much higher degree than English speakers or the global average.
200 s are remarkably skilled at listening to one speaker out of an acoustic mixture of several speech sou
201      We compiled the full rosters of invited speakers over the last 35 years for four prominent inter
202                     Do languages with larger speaker populations change faster due to a greater capac
203 es adult-like levels early in tonal language speakers (possibly before 6 years of age) but continues
204 rm face area (FFA) during eye contact with a speaker predicted the level of autistic traits measured
205 ns ago, among upper castes and Indo-European speakers predominantly.
206 to reviewing existing evidence in the field, speakers presented their own original research to provid
207 mprehension/production explains intra-/inter-speaker priming.
208 eversal of the well-established finding that speakers produce less sophisticated language than they c
209 is the pitch perturbation response, in which speakers respond rapidly to shifts of the pitch in their
210 ory subgroup analyses suggested that Spanish speakers responded more favorably to ConTxt plus health-
211 s and licenses (1 of 13 [7.7%]), and faculty/speaker roles (2 of 48 [4.2%]).
212 s and licenses (1 of 22 [4.6%]), and faculty/speaker roles (21 of 189 [11.1%]) in 2014.
213 al information derived from observation of a speaker's articulatory facial gestures.
214 Target speaker matched to a secondary (Mask) speaker's audio severely increase the participants' comp
215 ated by individuals' looking preferences for speaker's eyes.
216                                     Seeing a speaker's face as he or she talks can greatly help in un
217           The behavioral benefit of seeing a speaker's face during conversation is especially pronoun
218                                     Seeing a speaker's face enhances speech intelligibility in advers
219 e behavioral benefit arising from seeing the speaker's face was not predicted by changes in local enc
220 peech comprehension is improved by viewing a speaker's face, especially in adverse hearing conditions
221 rsation is multisensory: when we can see the speaker's face, visual speech cues improve our comprehen
222                          This is because the speaker's facial movements relay information about what
223 ed as the professional title followed by the speaker's full name or last name.
224 cademic rank, and geographic location of the speaker's institution, male speakers were more likely to
225  of adjective-noun descriptions to infer the speaker's intention when using an adjective (e.g., "the
226 rence between oscillatory brain activity and speaker's lip movements and demonstrated significant ent
227 ce between activity in visual cortex and the speaker's lips.
228 shorter utterances and increased gaze to the speaker's mouth.
229 e of intonation contours independent of each speaker's pitch range.
230 d an agent to defer gratification based on a speaker's promise of the second marshmallow available in
231  and either inferred the authenticity of the speaker's state, or judged how much laughs were contagio
232 s in cardiac activity that were based on the speaker's stress level.
233 en and adults selectively track the attended speaker's voice rather than the global acoustic input at
234 ogether an impressive and diverse line-up of speakers seeking to address the origin and role of mecha
235 alysis of the audio and speech data involved speaker segmentation, automatic speech recognition and m
236 ticipants and the presence of a woman on the speaker selection committee correlated with improved par
237                Here we discuss how inclusive speaker selection fosters better scientific environments
238 a suggest that those who invite and schedule speakers serve as gender gatekeepers with the power to c
239                                  The imaging speakers showcased the state-of-the-art in vivo imaging
240 te, and vocal-tract length (VTL), related to speakers' size.
241 nTxt plus health-coaching calls than English speakers (Spanish contrast: -7.90 [-11.94 to -3.86], p <
242                 We next show that sign-naive speakers spontaneously project these principles to novel
243 luated in three different corpora containing speakers suffering from PD with two main objectives: to
244 quencies did not differ from those of native speakers, suggesting that musical training may compensat
245                Numerous studies with English speakers support this view: there are few terms for odor
246 tion is improved when we are able to see the speaker talking along with hearing their voice, especial
247 oscopy (fNIRS) to record brain activity of 3 speakers telling stories and 15 listeners comprehending
248                  We argue that evidence from speakers' tendency to repeat their own and others' struc
249              Regarding classification of the speakers' testimonies, 70 (81.4%) of 86 were positive, 9
250 ultrathin wood film as a diaphragm in a real speaker that can output music.
251 t what acoustic variables indicate about the speaker-that is, why attention to vocal cues may be favo
252                        In non-tonal language speakers, the effects of disruption of left speech motor
253 eparing to learn information from the native speaker to a greater extent than from the foreign speake
254 e created a "phantom road" using an array of speakers to apply traffic noise to a roadless landscape,
255 ontribution of western central African Bantu speakers to the ancestry of African Americans, whose gen
256 on, here we gauge the sensitivity of English speakers to the putative universal syllable hierarchy (e
257             Proficient language use requires speakers to vary word order and choose between different
258 n of possible instances, or tokens, in which speakers use AAVE rather than SAE speech features.
259 resentations of world events, while Mandarin speakers used more two-dimensional, circular representat
260  speech stream from the chorus of background speakers using a combination of fast temporal processing
261 subjects watched and listened to videos of a speaker uttering consonant vowel (CV) syllables /ba/ and
262 tude growth were calculated for an ear canal speaker versus the intracochlear actuator for tone burst
263 s through observing the mouth movements of a speaker (visual constraints).
264            Children's ability to distinguish speakers' voices continues to develop throughout childho
265 ces in "boot" and "boat") also differentiate speakers' voices.
266                                              Speaker/vowel classification relied on distinct but over
267 ologists that attended the meeting, choosing speakers was a unique challenge.
268  also found that genetic adaptation of Bantu speakers was facilitated by admixture with local populat
269  an Information Masking Task with concurrent speakers, we find significantly more errors in the decis
270 t continues to develop in non-tonal language speakers well into the teenage years.
271 , the number of flyovers and approach to the speaker were higher in Amazonia.
272                                       Female speakers were addressed less often by their professional
273                  In working memory tasks, LB speakers were better than RB speakers at recalling initi
274               When introduced by men, female speakers were less likely to receive a professional addr
275                                       Female speakers were more likely to be introduced by first name
276  location of the speaker's institution, male speakers were more likely to receive a professional addr
277                                        Here, speakers were separated by 15 degrees around the midline
278 talian bilingual speakers and 40 monolingual speakers) were included.
279 ients were excluded if they were not English speakers, were not prescribed treatment for their acne,
280 ponses to tone changes in non-tonal language speakers, whereas disruption of the left speech motor co
281 ous sequence of syllables to native Mandarin speakers while conducting magnetoencephalography (MEG) r
282 en to a short story coming from one of these speakers, while ignoring a competing story from the corr
283 ore likely to give a positive testimony than speakers who did not (P < .001).
284                                              Speakers who disclosed a COI were significantly more lik
285 igmatic isolated population of Indo-European speakers who have been living for centuries in the Hindu
286 tional magnetic resonance imaging in English speakers who underwent a 12 week intensive French immers
287 MRI data acquired before training in English speakers who underwent a 12 week intensive French immers
288 line activity after the earthquake, Japanese speakers, who are assumed to be more directly affected b
289  were preceded by phrases from two different speakers whose voices differed along the same acoustic d
290 he expectation that interactions with native speakers will provide better opportunities for learning.
291                           Each one of the 41 speakers with a COI gave a positive testimony.
292 fferences in brain-language relationships in speakers with acute stroke.
293         POPULATION: Literate, native-English speakers with and without AMD.
294                         Even verbally fluent speakers with ASD display distinctive qualities in sign
295    Recent studies reveal that tonal language speakers with autism have enhanced neural sensitivity to
296 on associations with the content produced by speakers with chronic stroke, where function may have sh
297   Vocal laughter fills conversations between speakers with normal hearing and between deaf users of A
298 n activity was significantly correlated with speakers' with a delay.
299 ides a summary of the data presented by each speaker, with a focus on quantitative techniques and the
300   Therefore, listeners must normalize across speakers without losing linguistic information.
301 essional setting, the introduction of female speakers without their professional title may have an im

 
Page Top