戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  change drivers such as species invasions on species extinction.
2  conversion, degradation, fragmentation, and species extinction.
3 en neutral genetic diversity and the risk of species extinction.
4 n redundancy, which may confer robustness to species extinction.
5 de of events following perturbations such as species extinction.
6  single threat, but multiple threats lead to species extinction.
7 rsity, including population extirpations and species extinctions.
8 communities and accounts for invasion-driven species extinctions.
9 es-hybrid communities-respond to HL prior to species extinctions.
10 cts and facilitates the estimation of global species extinctions.
11 e than perceived when looking exclusively at species extinctions.
12 singly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions.
13 iding minimum estimates and probabilities of species extinctions.
14 ors are strongly correlated to the timing of species extinctions.
15 in developing a more comprehensive theory of species extinctions.
16 he principle defense against forest loss and species extinctions.
17 global biodiversity loss requires preventing species extinctions.
18  the gradient depended on the order of local species extinctions.
19 eases can cause rapid population declines or species extinctions.
20 plification, loss of ecosystem services, and species extinctions.
21 communities, causing population collapse and species extinctions.
22  counteract the loss of habitats and to slow species extinctions.
23 sequently remained stable until close to the species' extinction.
24 icated in 87 bird, 45 mammal, and 10 reptile species extinctions-58% of these groups' contemporary ex
25 ch to increased breeding management to avoid species extinction and support wild releases.
26 s humanity is facing the double challenge of species extinctions and climate change, designating part
27          Abiotic environmental change, local species extinctions and colonization of new species ofte
28                                              Species extinctions and colonizations in response to lan
29          Global change has accelerated local species extinctions and colonizations, often resulting i
30 ablished predators, even those implicated in species extinctions and declines, can restore complexity
31                        Accelerating rates of species extinctions and disease emergence underscore the
32  is predicted that climate change will cause species extinctions and distributional shifts in coming
33 cies-will only prevent half of the projected species extinctions and functional diversity loss attrib
34   However, our understanding of how waves of species extinctions and introductions influence the stru
35  they provide a complementary perspective to species extinctions and other metrics in tracking the st
36 adation' will prevent the greatest number of species extinctions and proportion of functional diversi
37  us to predict the cascading consequences of species extinctions and the response of ecological netwo
38 missions, reduce land clearing and resultant species extinctions, and help prevent such diet-related
39  resulting in temporal mismatches, nonrandom species extinctions, and loss of spatial co-occurrences
40                                              Species extinctions are accelerating globally, yet the m
41                                              Species extinctions are biased towards higher trophic le
42 ts to reverse biodiversity declines and halt species extinctions are not being met despite decades of
43                  The processes leading up to species extinctions are typically characterized by prolo
44 te the evolutionary dynamics of Anthropocene species extinctions as an alternative model for curative
45 examine the effects of habitat conversion on species extinctions assume that habitat conversion occur
46                                              Species extinction at Seymour Island occurred in two pul
47                        Habitat loss leads to species extinctions, both immediately and over the long
48 (at the species level) resulting from native species extinctions, but also gains of equal numbers of
49  inventories and monitoring in order to halt species extinctions by 2030.
50 hts to the urgent, global problem of halting species extinctions by revealing when, where, how, and w
51 ow methods for estimating the probability of species extinction can be scaled up to harness the massi
52  in host exposure to infection and to reduce species extinction caused by diseases.
53             These changes are underpinned by species extinction, colonisation and shifting relative a
54 uantifying such spatiotemporal dynamics when species extinction-colonization and patch gain and loss
55 -patch links and its components that reflect species extinction-colonization and patch gain and loss.
56                                  The current species extinction crisis is being exacerbated by an inc
57 heory suggests that the best response to the species extinction crisis is to spend money as soon as i
58 versity and reduce the global population and species extinction crisis.
59                               Estimations of species extinction dates are rarely definitive, yet decl
60 lready suffered a disproportionate number of species extinctions due to human activity and introducti
61         Our data indicate that beyond global species extinctions Earth is experiencing a huge episode
62                                              Species extinction following habitat loss is well docume
63 from low-intensity managed areas lowered the species extinction footprint even further.
64                Revealing the consequences of species extinctions for ecosystem function has been a ch
65 sequences on ecosystem function and rates of species extinctions for thousands of years.
66                        Accelerating rates of species extinction have prompted a growing number of res
67  Over the past decade, accelerating rates of species extinction have prompted an increasing number of
68                                              Species extinctions have defined the global biodiversity
69                              Populations and species extinctions have severe implications for society
70  by concern over ecological hazards, such as species extinction if such organisms were to be released
71 t loss and fragmentation, is a key driver of species extinction in spatial extended communities.
72 efensive symbiont on population dynamics and species extinctions in an experimental community compose
73 roevolution may therefore be as important as species extinctions in shaping the response of microbial
74 on of functionally unique species, simulated species extinctions indicate that species losses would r
75 of double jeopardy proposes that the risk of species extinction is elevated if species that are endem
76                                 We show that species extinction is generally expected to reduce biotu
77                                  What causes species extinction is not clear, but either could be sel
78                          The current rate of species extinction is rapidly approaching unprecedented
79                       The ongoing sixth mass species extinction is the result of the destruction of c
80 s of biodiversity, specifically increases in species extinction, is likely to continue without signif
81            There is increasing evidence that species extinctions jeopardize the functioning of ecosys
82 esults wherein the probability of a resident species' extinction just balances the probability of an
83  are discernibly responding to the threat of species extinction, just 10% of network capacity is devo
84    Despite global efforts to combat tropical species extinctions, lack of high-quality, objective inf
85 so coupled with an increasing probability of species extinction, making species immigration critical
86 ns are projected to reach 39% worldwide, and species extinctions may reach 20%.
87 , if anything, underestimated the impacts of species extinction on the productivity of ecosystems.
88 s are responsible for the majority of native species extinctions on islands.
89 reveal likely evidence of two separate multi-species extinctions, one synchronous with bolide impact
90  mechanism altered likelihoods of bumble bee species' extinction or colonization.
91 e some exotic species are implicated in many species extinctions, others can provide benefits to the
92 competition significantly increased rates of species extinction over a broad disturbance gradient, an
93 ity has raised questions about the risk that species extinctions pose for the functioning of natural
94  that it controls both coexistence times and species extinction probabilities.
95                                     Based on species' extinction probabilities, we predict this limit
96                               Projections of species extinction rates are controversial because inver
97                                              Species extinction rates due to human activities are hig
98  least three orders of magnitude higher than species extinction rates, so there is a pressing need to
99 s, or species richness, also alter predicted species extinction rates.
100  To assess the role of human disturbances in species' extinction requires an understanding of the spe
101 as the most comprehensive tool for assessing species extinction risk and has been used at regional, n
102 ct of condition and pressures) on vertebrate species extinction risk and population trends across the
103 s for conservation outcomes that will reduce species extinction risk and promote recolonization of ex
104 eaten global tree diversity, making accurate species extinction risk assessments necessary.
105                    Systematic assessments of species extinction risk at regular intervals are necessa
106 ed to address this shortfall in knowledge of species extinction risk by using the World Checklist of
107        Here, we modeled the potential global species extinction risk from future scenarios of climate
108 evelop a pair approximation model to explore species extinction risk in a lattice-structured landscap
109 pread elevational shifts thought to increase species extinction risk in mountains.
110 g sources of consumption which contribute to species extinction risk, a valuable input to the formula
111 orrelation of disturbance likewise increased species extinction risk, but only for local dispersers.
112 ernationally agreed criteria for classifying species extinction risk, that languages are more threate
113 cessitating robust approaches to quantifying species extinction risk.
114  crisis is how natural hazards contribute to species extinction risk.
115                Climate change could increase species' extinction risk as temperatures and precipitati
116 eveals patterns in the causes and drivers of species' extinction risk that may not be evident solely
117 exposure to climate change in assessments of species' extinction risk.
118 e change, and altered disturbance regimes on species' extinction risk.
119 ecological networks is pivotal to predicting species extinction risks, community stability and ecosys
120                 Comprehensive assessments of species' extinction risks have documented the extinction
121 t regional species loss may result in global species extinctions significantly differs per region and
122 o make ecological communities less robust to species extinctions, stressing the need to assess their
123 rtitioning but can also increase the risk of species extinctions, such that the net effect on species
124 g protected areas (Target 11) and preventing species extinctions (Target 12).
125 tions might become a greater cause of global species extinction than direct habitat destruction.
126 ing and mitigating the ecological impacts of species extinctions that are predicted to occur even und
127 tory environmental feedbacks result in fewer species extinctions, that is, in increased species persi
128 ions abound in nature and society, and, from species extinction to stock market collapse, their predi
129                                 The ratio of species extinctions to introductions has been comparable
130 onship between North American range size and species' extinction-to-colonization ratios.
131  trade globalization can significantly alter species extinction trajectories, exacerbating global ext
132 mazon metacommunity and estimate likely tree-species extinctions under published optimistic and nonop
133                                              Species extinctions undermine ecosystem functioning, wit
134 d the resilience of the system to individual species extinctions using simulations and investigated t
135  environmental stochasticity heightened this species' extinction vulnerability prior to recent anthro
136 I, 616 to 1,503] threatened animal and plant species extinctions were avoided over this period.
137                  Widespread, nonrandom local species extinctions were translated into highly nested n
138                     A considerable number of species extinctions will have taken place.
139                                              Species extinctions will lead to a major loss of avian e
140                       Predicting when future species extinctions will occur is necessary for directin
141 bitat loss and fragmentation generally cause species extinction, with stronger effects occurring at h
142  meta-food web was stable against individual species extinctions, with a higher resilience in food we
143 s provides a broader perspective to observed species extinctions, with ~2% of marine mammal species r
144              However, averting human-induced species extinctions within AZE sites requires enhanced p
145 bitious conservation targets such as halting species extinctions, yet the necessary financial commitm

 
Page Top